Form: Mini Essay

  • THE FORMULA FOR RECIPROCITY BETWEEN THE SEXES: RELATIONSHIPS Men should be domin

    THE FORMULA FOR RECIPROCITY BETWEEN THE SEXES: RELATIONSHIPS

    Men should be dominant (responsible) regardless of context and seek recovery in the affection of women’s respect and ‘care’.

    Women should be dominant (responsible) only when and where they wish to and seek recovery in the dominance (responsibility) of men’s respect and ‘care’.

    A relationship consists of the echange of putting the other person’s interests at peer or above your own, whenever and wherever it is possible to do so, and the exchange of that priority for mutual gain. By combining the best of each sex, by the only criteria for which we have reason to place one person above the other: care, mating, and reproduction.

    You will notice that our organization focuses our attention on first principles, and responsibility is the first principle that most separates the sexes. Why? Male predator bias to control territory and resources with other men, and female prey bias to protect offspring in the sharing of caretaking with other women. It’s baked into our genes.

    We are happiest when we figure out how to make the other person feel ‘safe’ (secure, loved), and we each fulfill those responsibilities we can because we can fulfill them most successfully and with the least stress.

    Respect and responsibility are two terms that have gone out of tradition and fashion because the left promises self-indulgence and irresponsibility, meaning evasion of conformity to Western high investment commons, and high trust manners, ethics, and morals.

    What I notice most in the sequence of generations is the decline in responsibility, respect, reciprocity, suppression of attention seeking, and self-indulgence, in favor of creating a high trust commons whose purpose is creating an environment optimized for the raising of children – instead of the indulgence of consumption by irresponsible hyperconsumptive adults.

    I don’t make the rules – Nature does. Evolution did. I just explain the consequences of violating those rules and the tragic cumulative cost of doing so.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-19 18:52:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670867208283488280

  • RACE IS A POLITICAL, AND AS SUCH SOCIAL, ISSUE I dated an african american woman

    RACE IS A POLITICAL, AND AS SUCH SOCIAL, ISSUE
    I dated an african american woman albiet for a short time and I dated, proposed to, and almost married a woman of indian-european admixture with relatively dark skin, along with her decidecly african admixture children from a previous marriage – only to break it off because of another serious illness, and the need to return to the USA for treatment, after which I was a very different person with diminished life ambitions. So my opinions are not idle talk.

    As far as I know the Race issue is a political and as a consequence, social, issue, especially among whites who are the least racist people on earth. In separate polities we are all cousins, the way we are in separate households, and the family and it’s scale into the polity produce the only common intersest we have.

    Why? (a) reproductive, social, economic status differences between the races that are involable, (b) needs for different commons given our rates and depths of sexual development and subsequent demand for different norms traditions values and institutions that would alleviate status differences. (c) the resulting conflict between incompatible groups – largely due to vast differences in class size (ability) between groups.

    As different groups, in the same polity we are always and everywher in conflict. As different groups in MARKETS whether families in the economy, or ethnicities in nation states, we are always incentivized to cooperate for mutual benefit because all internaltional Market interactions are VOLUNTARY.

    Whereas in politics and society, we produce the INVOLUNTARY: legislation, laws, norms, traditions, values, institutions, and most importantly status.

    Our motto is “Let A Thousand Nations Bloom”
    We do not need an ethnically heterogeneious polity.
    We need ethnically homogenous nation states in federations under the natural law of cooperation, so that all peoples can transcend on their terms, at their rates, for the benefit of all, in a condition that is to the satisfaction of all.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-19 14:51:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670806422181781509

  • ON RACE: CONTRA FALSE PROPHET SAM HARRIS AND HIS SUPERNATURAL CLAIMS (RE: Skin c

    ON RACE: CONTRA FALSE PROPHET SAM HARRIS AND HIS SUPERNATURAL CLAIMS
    (RE: https://t.co/GJSLZ2Xx87)

    Skin color will only not matter when skin color no longer matters. Skin color will no longer matter when race and ethnic differences no longer matter. We will only get to when race and ethnic differences no longer matter when kin preference no longer matters or exists. We will only get to a place where kin preference no longer matters when we are no longer marginally different in group properties affinities and utility. We will only get to the the place where group properties affinities and utility are no longer marginally different when we groups are marginally indiffierent in evolutionary neoteny, resulting domesticatin syndrome, in resulting rate and depth of maturity, and as such mirror one another’s personality and IQ distributions. That will only occur if we are all indistinguishably an admixture of white and east asian, with south eurasian (MENA+Central Asia+India) and african gene pools have been diluted out of gene expression.

    Is that even desirable? (no)

    Otherwise racially netural behavior except in cooperation between the upper classes is irrational and disadvantageous and devolutionary both politically and genetically.

    The alternative is of course diversity in the gradual evolution of all of our races into whatever is the optimum they can become.

    Interpersonal racisim is irrational (stupid really). But so is political anti-racism. Because we are always and everywhere dependent upon the ingroup because kin and ingroup provide the greatest discount on cooperation, and cooperation is the most scarce good, because of the scarcity of time, in the defeat of entropy in time.

    We can be anti-racist in markets. We can be anti-racist in personal interactions. We cannot be anti-racist in politics. And we never will be. Ever. And it’s a supernatural religous fraud to claim so.

    There is no difference between this law of the universe and any other. If you don’t believe so you don’t grasp the first principle of the universe, and it’s expression at the physical, biological, social, and individual levels as the defeat of entropy by evolutionary computation of the greatest capture and transfer of entropy into order, and that order among humans is scale of cooperation, and that scale of cooperation among humans is dependent upon neotenic evolution, which produces agency over impulse, and that as a consequence the four generations (races, species) of man, are incremental leaps in neotenic evolution. African(70s) > South Eurasians(low 80s) > Hybrids(90s) > Europeans(100) > East Asian(105). And this neotenic evolution is measurable by group differences in measurable neurological adaptability in time (IQ).
    Period.
    End of story.
    That’s the Science
    No more lies.

    Here is the behavioral science behind it: Sam, like most of feminine cognition, semitic genetics and religion, and leftist political ambition, are attempting to avoid conflict and responsibility while claiming virtue, by avoiding responsibility, that requires paying the costs of conflict, for the continuation of the western foundational demand for maximization of individual responsibility for both private and common, by defense of sovereignty in demonstrated interests, reciprocity in display, word, and deed, and truth before face regardless of cost – including the genetic ability of peoples to learn to and assume responsbility for private and common – despite the resulting conflict, and to pay that high cost to both create and maitain our high trust truth-before-face western civ (vs the semitic low trust “facelessness” where deceiving, lying and cheating and bargaining are admirable), and to *reduce the harm including reproduction of those unfit for that responsibility*. In other words, western man continuously domesticates western man by the exchange of impulse and aggression for self regulation patience and long(low) time preference, thus facilitating the production of trust and the resulting velocity of cooperation and scales of voluntary organization, that no other civilization can manage or even approximate.

    No more lies. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam were and are as great an innovation in suggestion, deceit, fraud, and warfare as the indo european invention of horse, bronze, wheel and democracic rule of law, as the greek invention of reason empiricism politics, and phalanx.

    No More Supernatural Semitic Lies. We must end the greatest risk to mankind in the jewish, christian, and islamic false promise that if we reduce outselves to semitic tribalism and superstition that we can resolve conflict rather than devolve civilizations in to dark ages of ignorance, dysgenia, and decline.

    Love one another.
    But do not lie to one another.
    Diversity is exceptional in creating markets between polities, and continuing cooperative competition producing parallel evolution towards the transcendence of man.
    But polities are as important as households.
    And the left is trying to destroy both just as the abrahamic religions tried to destroy politics, reason, and empiricism, and the western tradition of truth-before-face.

    The semitic systemization of and institutionalization of deceit, lying, fraud, and sedition destroyed not only ancient mediterranean european civilization, but North african, egyptian, levantine, mesopotamian, persian, central asian, anatolian, and byzantine civilizations – and reduced them to ignorance superstition and irredeemable dysgenia that cannot today more so than it could in the ancient iron world, or the age before the bronze age collapse. And india was saved only by her vast numbers, and china by her comprehension of the severity of the threat, combined with her geography and vast numbers.

    No More Lies.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-19 14:26:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670800281930543104

  • DEMONSTRATED INTELLIGENCE The brain is relatively simple operationally. Neurons

    DEMONSTRATED INTELLIGENCE
    The brain is relatively simple operationally. Neurons are quite individually simple, but can produce profound complexity in combination, in layers that peform different functinos, in microcolumns that are the primary processing unit, and and nerual colums tha combine them, and brain regions that connect to one another.
    Neural performance follows the same formula as undersea cables (and all cables for that matter) so the combination of neural organization, neural development, balance between white and grey matter, resulting resistance, and available resources (chemical balance, or health) determine how successful are ‘computations’, connections, durability, and therefore pattern development and memory.
    So IQ is a measure of generalized neural response time by testing a series of faculties divided by age to compensate for the fact that we tend to learn more with age. These tests include subtests for pattern recogition and learned knowlege and the intersection of both.
    There is a slight difference in the organization (development and interconnections) in male and female brains. First, bilateral creatures with bilaterial brains must find a means of decision making (priority) in order to time actions. Second the means of doing so has evolved largely to reflect male predator over time and bias to the empirical prediction of environmental state, vs female prey in time (empathizing) and bias to interpersonal prediction of emotional state.
    This results in the feminine empathizing/verbal vs the masculine systematizing/spatial, and the female hyperconsumptive in time and male hypercapitalizing over time – both of which reflect needs of the reproductive strategy of each (female her offspring) male (brothers and cousins and their territorial resources and collection of females and their offspring).
    And it also results in masculine pursuit of responsibility for commons in order to obtain status despite risks, and female pursuit of hyperconsumption and irresponisiblity for commons by creating demands from men, as a means of evading risk.
    The result is that men invent everything of consequence other than children, and women in politics has been a catastrophe, even if women in the economy has been beneficial.
    Now all of us get better at what challenges and fulfills us without causing us to fail. Ergo despite IQ improving learning times, people with different IQ’s pursue interests that vary so that they satisfy challenge and fulfillment to the best of theire ability and opportunity.
    And so the guy with a 105 IQ that fixes cars is going to be better at it over time than the guy who fixes or advances complex mathematical formulae. Because both would fail at one another’s jobs. The lower IQ at the ability, and the higher IQ at interst.
    Ergo DEMONSTRATED INTELLIGENCE is like applied science: it’s how you apply the resources of your intelligence and knowledge successfully or not.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Barbarian_Brain @dosontheshinshi @MudKevin


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 19:40:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670154542493605890

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670148964333617153

  • Q: “DO YOU EVER FIND IT WEIRD BEING A YANK AND A MONARCHIST?” I was surprised, y

    Q: “DO YOU EVER FIND IT WEIRD BEING A YANK AND A MONARCHIST?”

    I was surprised, yes. But I’ve come to undrestand it’s just the result of doing the science.

    I just follow the evidence. It was rather late in life that I understood that the english completed the restoration of greek reason and politics and roman legislation and administration in the british invention of the modern empirical (scientific) dutiful rule of law state.

    And that the USA as a british colony, had created a constitution that codified that invention, completing Aristotle’s project of a scientific (natural) government, but failed to include the presumptions inherent in that innovation: the rule of law by the natural law by commonality and concurrency as the science of cooperation, and the government as a hierarchy of courts to limit us to the science of cooperation by that law, commonality, and concurrency, and the reason being to prohibit authority by the maximization of individual responsibility, with participation in self determination by evidence of taking and demonstrating that responsibility.

    They had only an intuition of the existence of evolution but for all intents and purposes our ancient ancestors created the most evolutionary society and government with the least resistance to discoverty, innovation, application, adaptation, and evolution in human history, or that is humanly possible.

    As such the west evolved faster than the rest combined in the bronze, iron, and steel ages.

    However, we failed to learn that we cannot domesticate rule, or cooperate with peoples who are inferior in institutions and development becuse of their demographics and tradition.

    So there is a conflict between the ancestral desire to create empires to profit from trade, and the natural tendency of man to desire federations of states that all profit from trade but distribute the cost of government and war and in doing so resists empires -as we are having to resist three imperial civilizations today.

    They can only do so if they all adhere to natural law.

    The Natural Government consists of a hierarchy of Juries (courts):
    The Four Sets of the Laws of Nature (Logical, Physical, Behavioral, Evolutionary)
    … < The Natural Law of Cooperation
    … … < A Constitution Producing that Hierarchy of Courts under that natural law
    … … … < A Monarchy as judge of Last Resort , above the law in the restoration of the law.
    … … … … < A Cabinet for the Administation of the Commons
    … … … … … < A Parliament of houses or Regions and Class as a Political Court (Negativa) and Market between the Regions and Classes (Positiva)
    … … … … … … < The Courts for the Resolution of Substantive Harms
    … … … … … … … < A Nobility for the resolution of common conflicts
    … … … … … … … … < A Church for the restolution of moral disputes
    … … … … … … … … … < Every man as his own legislature for himself and his family in federation with all other men in the polity.
    … … … … … … … … … … < Every woman as the legislature for herself and her childen.

    This is a hierarchy of responsibility given domains of DEMONSTRATED (empirical) interest and comptency

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 17:47:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670126036057571329

  • THE AMERICAN SPIRIT IN ECONOMIC (SCIENTIFIC) TERMS The pursuit of status and sel

    THE AMERICAN SPIRIT IN ECONOMIC (SCIENTIFIC) TERMS
    The pursuit of status and self image through responsibility demonstrated by heroism (risk) and responsibility (risk) demonstrated through heroism as a contribution of responsibility to the commons, and contribution of responsibility to the commons creates the high trust society that reduces all transaction (cooperation), capital, and maintenance costs for all – as such exhaustive responsibility for private and common produces cooperative (economic) velocity and reduces political friction, allowing cooperative participatory government, limited to the need for rule by natural, common, concurrent law.

    It’s just science. It’s also the most intellectually, psychologically, emotionally, and demanding civilization to live in, and it’s why the feminine left rebels against that responsibiliy: the purpose of the female instinct is to maximize hyperconsumption at minimum responsibility for commons, because responsibility for commons presents an opportunity for conflict, and conflict for harm, and this is contrary to feminine instinct whoch evolved for no other purpose than to extend her nervous system over a passle of children and ensure her ability to protect their fragile lives and survive into self determinant adulthood.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @digitildream @realdanstilwell


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 14:27:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670075785267367936

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670071683716198400

  • Nature, of which man is a member, judges everything – over some period of time.

    Nature, of which man is a member, judges everything – over some period of time. And it is not merciful.

    The USA cannot maintain democracy or rule of law or relative wealth with an IQ under 97, and certainly not under 95, because the minimum optimum IQ is 105 and the maximum is closer to 115. And there is a relationship between the needs of the economy and the possibility of a majority middle class. When it is the middle class and only the middle class that has moral ambitions (treating everyone as a customer).

    We are just about to tip into 97IQ and will hit 95 within two decades. That means the gains of western civ in the USA are lost, and an authoritarian government will be required and the middle class will continue to evaporate, and wealth will decline to second world levels.

    Reply addressees: @digitildream @realdanstilwell


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 13:27:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670060635491631104

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670058014747901954

  • THE HIERARCHY OF LIMITS FOR PUBLIC INTELLECTUALS Dr Peterson achieves success by

    THE HIERARCHY OF LIMITS FOR PUBLIC INTELLECTUALS
    Dr Peterson achieves success by satisfying an unsatisfied audience.
    All public intellectuals are eventually subject to audience capture, in a hierarchy of most true and smallest audience to the most desired and the broadest audience – not the other way around.
    I have greater freedom than Dr Peterson to address the hard problems than those like him who are subject to audience capture.
    While we work with overlapping scientific reserach, Dr Peterson works from the premise of theraputic utility in matters of counsel, I work from the premise of judicial decidabilty in matters of conflict.
    My audience is small and selects for truth at all costs, because I (we) select for decidability regardless of preference or desirability.
    The people most dedicated to truth over face or preference eventually end up in my camp.
    Decidable Truth is a filter for character and adulthood, both of which are but tests of responsibility.
    -Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Buck3DX @jordanbpeterson


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 10:11:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670011199340019712

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669996488099758081

  • REASONS FOR MALE DEMAND FOR LOWER BODY COUNT (Biases are distributed in both sex

    REASONS FOR MALE DEMAND FOR LOWER BODY COUNT
    (Biases are distributed in both sexes, so we are merely talking about those men who possess this bias)

    Given marriage and divorce are the highest lifetime risk a man experiences:
    1. Differences in the population distribution of the disgust response (disgust, purity, loyalty): STDs but disgust purity and loyalty are all the same emotional foundation, so high body counts violate all three.
    2. Tendency of Male loyalty over time vs Female devotion in time. (Women seek to consume now, men to capitalize over time).
    3. Female status and quality (reputation) are indicative of man’s status and quality, and high body count women are of lower status and value – status and income risk.
    4. Female need for attention(consumption) as cheap stimulation by others, vs productive occupation, socialization, and hobbies, means higher relationship risk.
    5. Accumulated Trauma and, therefore, relationship risk.
    6. Bonding capacity and, therefore, relationship risk.

    Simple version: risk mitigation.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-16 18:44:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669777945999671307

  • Once someone has established they engage in magical and justificationary thinkin

    Once someone has established they engage in magical and justificationary thinking, the practice of pilpul and critique, respond with intellectual dishonesty, and worse, demonstrated that they can’t identify, dismiss, or deliberately ignore the pattern between their words and others’ criticism of it, that individual is irredeemable, and all investment is sunk cost. Because instinc-bots, addicts, and criminals do not reform until they have no other choice.

    Simple questions from existing exchanges:
    (a) Are you denying the existence of your recent article (post) on conservatism?
    (b) Are you able to reduce your own bias to first cuases such that you can compare your presumptions with the opposition’s presumptions?
    (c) Are you ignoring the criticism of your use of the feminine > abrahamic > leftist method of undermining and virtue signaling in lieu of argument, or are you just unaware of the differences between the systematic and empirical method of masculine and european criticism and the empathic and social method of feminine and abrahamic criticism?
    (d) Why did you evade the sex differences in cognition as the origin of interpersonal, moral, and political bias? And claim I had no specific criticism?
    (e) If you are so unaware of the scientific and logical foundations of your own and others bias and understanding, then why are you even vaguely fit to comment on it as other than gossip? (You are, because that’s what you’re doing. Using feminine GSRRM – gossip.

    Because that’s all you are capable of.

    1. If you were intellectualy capable you would recognize the patterns betwen the arguments I’m making and your writing.
    2. If you were intellectually informed you would respond with specific questions that illustrated your understanding (you haven’t).
    3. If you were intellectually honest as well, then you would seek to understand rather than object.

    So you have failed all three tests of capacity, knowledge, and honesty. Why should I or anyone else take you as anything other than seeking attention to confirm your bias, create a false self image, and a pretense of ability and status, by your act of calling the science you are ignorant of ‘esoteric’ rather than your own work as consisting of nothing more than atention seeking conformity and populist drivel?

    Adulthood is seeking to do precisely the opposite of every behavior you are demonstrating. The purpose of governing by demonstrated competency instead of credentialism is precisely to prevent your kind of folly from being politically imposed upon others who are, quite opposite from you, competent and moral.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @jcallahanbryant @Thaeus4


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-16 16:32:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669744846351872005

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669737433888591872