Form: Mini Essay

  • “Why Communism is Seductive” THE FEMININE INSTINCT AND COMMUNISM I’ll add that t

    “Why Communism is Seductive” https://t.co/tTGF5YygYB

    THE FEMININE INSTINCT AND COMMUNISM
    I’ll add that the entirety of the left has but one strategy – the female strategy – of seduction into authoritarianism and the promise of irresponsibility, non-competition, non-conflict by the false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: the formal (truth), the physical (scarcity), the behavioral (self interest), and the evolutionary (mutation, load, classes, natural selection). The female and feminine and effeminate intuition is that of a child: the search for parental provision on one hand, or the search by a mother for authoritarian control over her children.
    One does not need to be female, feminine, or effeminate to be attracted to the female means of seduction. One needs to be seeking irresponsibility in a world of low trust people doing the same.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-23 10:54:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672196517891801092

  • COUNTRY IQ DIFFERENCES ARE HUGE WHEN WE STUDY THE SMART FRACTIONS. (Indian Perfo

    COUNTRY IQ DIFFERENCES ARE HUGE WHEN WE STUDY THE SMART FRACTIONS.
    (Indian Performance in the USA)

    India’s population has an average IQ of 77 to 83 depending upon whos numbers you believe – though as a continent not just a country, it is not evenly distributed (as isn’t africa). And it’s odd but it’s higher in the south.

    But India has a population of 1.4billion. So India has a 1,000,000 to 3,500,000 potential smart fraction >125

    America has a population of 320 Million. So America has a 10,000,000 potential smart fraction (because USA IQ has dropped to 97, leaving a 3% smart fraction.)

    The entire European Ethnicity has a population of 770 Million And the european ethnicity only has a smart fraction > 125 of 36,000,000

    That said, Indian education is pretty impressive especially in mathematics – and so is student motivation. This produces a smart fraction that punches above their weight.

    (It’s not clear the Chinese do because the cheating factor is endemic and so until we have a handle on that I can’t make any assessment.)

    What I can say is that Indian elites achieve lifetime performance better than chinese elite students. But again, I can’t determine the cause of that. Only make an observation that it’s possibly quite different who migrates and works where. And chinese deferential culture combined with the langauge difference is probably enough to compensate, despite being the ‘ideal minority’.

    As for China’s numbers, I just don’t know. I have only been seriously wrong in one prediction, and it’s the survivability of China’s economy over time, which by my 2004-6 estimates should have entered a contraction by 2010 – but nope… 😉

    We can however compare with Japan who europeans see as peers or better. At 104, with 125M population that’s a 10,000,000 smart fraction over 125IQ, meaning with 40% of our population they produce the same number of the smart fraction.

    The postwar pseudoscientific assault by the left on IQ is a tragedy becuse it is the most important number that explains every single factor in a society, across the entire planet.

    Hope this helps
    Curt

    Reply addressees: @JaredAberach


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-23 01:19:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672051689136836608

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672033427955273728

  • MORE ON INDIA VS FUTURE US RELATIONS He’s stating that india was never a friend

    MORE ON INDIA VS FUTURE US RELATIONS

    He’s stating that india was never a friend or ally, it was just in her interest at the moment when we were facilitating free trade and the transcendence of lesser developed peoples into industrial technological and rule of law societies ending the age of empires.

    So given india will not assist us geostrategically in preserving that order, and given that india is capable of domestic production and consumption for relative independence from that order, the only alliance or assistance we should expect from india is with china, who is perpetual threat to india right next door. even then, India will only allow us to assist them, they won’t assist us.

    Ergo india will drop off the favored nation status because (like france) she is self interested to the point of harming alliances, and like france is sufficiently autarkic not to need them.

    And Modi is a populist but a grifter with a long history of corruption, playing the religous identity card, so he is assisting in driving this process.

    In general, the world we spent blood and treasure to build is coming apart because we were not brutal enough in completing the second world war by eradicating communism in russia and china, and by ending colonialism we caused the europeans to create states from their empires that did not reflect the requirements to facilitate the formation of enthostates with less internal conflict,and more prone to federations.

    And war with Mexico is going to happen. 😉 Possibly because their president is agitating in favor of it, while the american people are increasingly demanding it, in part because china is facilitating it.

    Reply addressees: @Will_Benge


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-22 13:47:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671877657292570624

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671870999825108993

  • ENDING THE CONFLICT OF THE MODERN AGE I love everyone. I hate conflict – even if

    ENDING THE CONFLICT OF THE MODERN AGE

    I love everyone. I hate conflict – even if I’m good at it, and I’m probably good at it precisely because I hate it.

    I’m trying to end lying, fraud, and baiting into hazard in public speech. Particularly academic, media, and political speech.

    The sex, class, and race problems were solved by maximization of cooperation through minimization of conflict, using natural law, rule of law under it, and the scientific and resulting economic revolutions.

    But people were impatient and sought to accelerate social economic and political evolution faster than was possible – doing harm – by ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, fictionalisms, deceits, frauds, and underminings.

    The multicultural multi-ethnic experiment has failed as thoroughly as the marxist universalist underclass experiment has failed, the noMarxist cultural marxism has failed, the feminist marxist experiment has failed, and the islamic universalist experiment has failed.

    The europeans long ago, despite the criminal imperial ambitions of the french under napoleon, discovered that the small, homogenous, ethnostate is the optimum political order with the least conflcit and competition, greastest contribution to the commons, greatest willingless for redistribution, and greatest adaptability.

    The British invented the modern state using it. The Americans tried to codify it in their constitution as the natural common concurrent law of self determination. But the greed and strategic opportunity of the westward expansion combined with the conflict of the tax paying agrarian south and the tax consuming industrial north, led to the conversion of the federation into a domestic empire – one that must be reversed if we are to live in peace to gether at all.

    There is a difference between defection and alliance with foreign powers against the interests of others in the federation, and choosing your preferrable society and economy within a federation under rule of law.

    That’s all that’s necessary.

    Masculine love comes from Noblesse oblige, at the top even if from feminine Christian care at the bottom.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-21 16:06:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671550081172926467

  • I love everyone. I’m trying to end lying, fraud, and baiting into hazard in publ

    I love everyone.
    I’m trying to end lying, fraud, and baiting into hazard in public speech. Particularly academic, media, and political speech.

    The sex, class, and race problems were solved by natural law rule of law under it, and the scientific and resulting economic revolutions.

    But people were impatient and sought to accelerate social economic and political evolution faster than was possible – doing harm – by ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, fictionalisms, deceits, frauds, and underminings.

    The multicultural multi-ethnic experiment has failed as thoroughly as the marxist universalist underclass experiment has failed, the noMarxist cultural marxism has failed, the feminist marxist experiment has failed, and the islamic universalist experiment has failed.

    The europeans long ago, despite the criminal imperial ambitions of the french under napoleon, discovered that the small, homogenous, ethnostate is the optimum political order with the least conflcit and competition, greastest contribution to the commons, greatest willingless for redistribution, and greatest adaptability.

    The British invented the modern state using it. The Americans tried to codify it in their constitution as the natural common concurrent law of self determination. But the greed and strategic opportunity of the westward expansion combined with the conflict of the tax paying agrarian south and the tax consuming industrial north, led to the conversion of the federation into a domestic empire – one that must be reversed if we are to live in peace to gether at all.

    There is a difference between defection and alliance with foreign powers, and choosing your preferrable society and economy within a federation under rule of law.

    That’s all that’s necessary.

    Masculine love comes from Noblesse oblige, at the top even if from feminine christian care at the bottom.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-21 16:06:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671541791558860800

  • RACIAL DIFFERENCES ARE REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL (Our Experiment, Like the Marxist Ex

    RACIAL DIFFERENCES ARE REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL
    (Our Experiment, Like the Marxist Experiment, Has Failed.)

    Sorry, but racial differences are real because people act as if they are real, and by doing so, make them demonstrably real even though they always have been genetically, biologically, and behaviorally real – and they do so for inescapable reasons: because neoteny is the direction of evolution and sexual selection, and because kin preference is universal and assists in natural selection, if for no other reason than discounts on ingroup cooperation vs outgroup.

    1. Neoteny is the direction of human evolution by the domestication of aggression and impulse into self-regulation and cooperation.

    2. The four primary races and the hybrids (averages) of them, differ in degree of neotenic evolution by natural selection. Those four primary races and their proposed speciation events are African(East African Event), South Eurasian (Dry Persian Gulf Event), European (European Event), East Asian (Tibetan Event).

    3. The four primary races and their hybrids also retain vast differences in class sizes because with each neotenic leap, the lower classes shrink – And Class is a property of an individual and group’s capacity for responsibility and agency over time, caused by the suppression of impulse and the increase in intelligence to further that suppression of impulse by toleration for the spectrum of frustrations including that of offense and intellectual work.

    4. This difference in class sizes generates demand for different habits, manners, ethics, morals, norms, laws, and formal and informal institutions, to compensate for or tolerate differences in impulsivity, self-regulation, and intelligence. This, in turn, produces a reproductive selection, and, therefore status hierarchy by neoteny both within and between races. This generates conflict between races when in proximity because status is the instinct we use to measure our self-worth vs our competitors. As such, even if cultural norms to institutions are homogenized, through forcible integration, which will produce a race hierarchy of status (it does, everywhere), or unless groups separate territorially and by government (ethnic nation-states) to eliminate that pressure and restore ingroup status and cooperation signals, then conflict will occur. At least whenever the minority finds any advantage in group preference that seeks political, social, or economic advantage that is ‘unnatural’ creating that conflict.

    4. In theory, the application of the reproductive pressure of cold climates in favor of prosocial (neotenic) behavior by suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses until the average IQ (a measure of neoteny+genetic fitness), surpassed today’s 95 should reduce race differences, even though IQ is only a compensation for aggression and impulse. That said, minor increases in group neoteny, conscientiousness, and IQ produce increasing gains, because the ‘smart fraction’ above 130 produces such a disproportionate competitive advantage.

    You would know this if you studied the subject matter.

    This is why our mission is ‘let a thousand nations bloom’.

    Because as cooperators between nations we are cousins, friends, and allies. But as competitors within states we are forever in natural conflict that evolution forces upon us and cannot ever cease.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-21 14:46:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671530043602878467

  • RACIAL DIFFERENCES ARE REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL (Our Experiment, Like the Marxist Ex

    RACIAL DIFFERENCES ARE REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL
    (Our Experiment, Like the Marxist Experiment, Has Failed.)

    Sorry, but racial differences are real because people act as if they are real, and by doing so, make them real – and they do so for inescapable reasons: because neoteny is the direction of evolution and sexual selection, and because kin preference is universal and assists in natural selection, if for no other reason than discounts on ingroup cooperation vs outgroup.

    1. Neoteny is the direction of human evolution by the domestication of aggression and impulse into self-regulation and cooperation.

    2. The four primary races and the hybrids (averages) of them, differ in degree of neotenic evolution by natural selection. Those four primary races and their proposed speciation events are African(East African Event), South Eurasian (Dry Persian Gulf Event), European (European Event), East Asian (Tibetan Event).

    3. The four primary races and their hybrids also retain vast differences in class sizes because with each neotenic leap, the lower classes shrink – And Class is a property of an individual and group’s capacity for responsibility and agency over time, caused by the suppression of impulse and the increase in intelligence to further that suppression of impulse by toleration for the spectrum of frustrations including that of offense and intellectual work.

    4. This difference in class sizes generates demand for different habits, manners, ethics, morals, norms, laws, and formal and informal institutions, to compensate for or tolerate differences in impulsivity, self-regulation, and intelligence. This, in turn, produces a reproductive selection, and, therefore status hierarchy by neoteny both within and between races. This generates conflict between races when in proximity because status is the instinct we use to measure our self-worth vs our competitors. As such, even if cultural norms to institutions are homogenized, through forcible integration, which will produce a race hierarchy of status (it does, everywhere), or unless groups separate territorially and by government (ethnic nation-states) to eliminate that pressure and restore ingroup status and cooperation signals, then conflict will occur. At least whenever the minority finds any advantage in group preference that seeks political, social, or economic advantage that is ‘unnatural’ creating that conflict.

    4. In theory, the application of the reproductive pressure of cold climates in favor of prosocial (neotenic) behavior by suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses until the average IQ (a measure of neoteny+genetic fitness), surpassed today’s 95 should reduce race differences, even though IQ is only a compensation for aggression and impulse. That said, minor increases in group neoteny, conscientiousness, and IQ produce increasing gains, because the ‘smart fraction’ above 130 produces such a disproportionate competitive advantage.

    You would know this if you studied the subject matter.

    This is why our mission is ‘let a thousand nations bloom’.

    Because as cooperators between nations we are cousins, friends, and allies. But as competitors within states we are forever in natural conflict that evolution forces upon us and cannot ever cease.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-21 14:46:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671528688553189390

  • Fewer Coders or More Code? 😉 AI code generation is the obvious mainstream direc

    Fewer Coders or More Code? 😉
    AI code generation is the obvious mainstream direction in the industry, and it’s so obvious because so much code is boilerplate transformation of data from one source to another with minor application of rules and manipulations. I mean, there are only so many language models, only so many data sources, only so many design patterns, and only so many code problems. And that’s why coding gets boring over the lifetime of your career. You rewrite the same nonsense with differen syntax over and over.
    Seriously. I just can’t figure out if half the coders are going to disappear or the volume of software is going to double. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 21:29:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671269164609069059

  • “IM NOT AN EQUALITARIAN. CLASSES MATTER. THIS IS WHY:” I am an Anglo (English) A

    “IM NOT AN EQUALITARIAN. CLASSES MATTER. THIS IS WHY:”
    I am an Anglo (English) American, of the upper middle classes, of New England Puritain descent, and before that the upper middle class of educated property owning classes in Central Western England, and before that of the same class in Avranches Normandy which is our oldest recorded history in the early part of the eleventh century (1000ad).

    As such, I am also a product of that legalistic, and as such empirical, scientific, and logical tradition. In other words I’m a scientist. In that sense my ‘religion’ is truth. I am a product of the empirical restoration of pre-christian reason, and not of the continental (french) optimism of the ‘enlightenment’.

    That is why my work seeks to save our people from another dark age of religious superstition whether another supernatural or the present pseudoscientific, by the use of truth to prevent and reverse the present ‘acts of conquest by conversion’ that repeat the destruction of the west by the jews and christians, and the present attempt by jews and muslims.

    Though I do observe loyalty and respect for the lower classes who of necessity need less demanding means of comprehension of life and the world around them, and the mindfulness that results from the sensation of comprehension no matter how much it diverges from consistency and correspondencde with the laws of nature.

    I’m loyal to you ‘folks’ because I was brought up in the culture of noblesse oblige: the obligations of the natural aristocracy to care for the common people.

    That does not mean I must hold to the comforting superstitions and falsehoods that commoners find necessary and with which you identify potential allies in class cooperation – an act which I would find vulgar in the traditional meaning of the term: beneath me, and a property of the comon classes.

    Ergo european culture is not homogenous but includes class differences, as much or perhaps more so than even the Hindu – though we open that aristocracy, middle class, working class to the lower classes for rotation by mertitocracy whenever it’s possible.

    In anglo civilization, of west germanic civilization, of germanic civilization, in the long history of european civilization, we practice aristocratic egalitarianism not equality, and any and all demonstrations and expressions of equality are only expressions of loyalty between the classes out of Noblesse Oblige: respect and care for doing your duty to the best of your ability for the benefit of all of us.

    Get over it.

    Classes matter as much as races and sexes. Ignoring classes is what causes the friction between the classes because we are not and cannot be equal in other than duty to one another in production and defense of private and common, within the limits of our abilities and competencies. We can neither demand the lower classes express the agency of the upper, nor demand the upper diminish themselves to the behavior and intersts of the lower.

    “ita finitur lectio.”
    Thus ends the lesson

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @Hrafnskall @alsey_miller @PaulGottfried6 @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 19:59:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671246497436909571

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671237937210556417

  • WAS THE CHURCH ANTI-SCIENCE? YES BUT ONLY SELECTIVELY: THEY WERE AGAINST LITERAC

    WAS THE CHURCH ANTI-SCIENCE? YES BUT ONLY SELECTIVELY: THEY WERE AGAINST LITERACY AND INDEPENDENT THOUGHT IN THE LAITY.
    It was all well and good if science (natural philosophy as they understood it) was produced and captured by the church whose members feared for their livelihood and often their lives if they contradicted the faith. And outside of the church’s political influence, the europen home was still a religion of the hearth(pagan) – the church participants then were similar in status to the woke bureaucracy today – in fact almost identical. So the state wias still military, technological, and legalistic in operation with the church responsible for ‘the little people’ – more so in western europe and less so in eastern.

    So:
    (a) A common mistake: the Church was captured by the aristocracy (second and third sons under primogeniture) as a land-holding corporation for each local manor – and the church, as an extension of the manor, desired an ignorant, pliable, and cheaply governable labor force (peasantry).
    One of the reasons the Byzantines organzied and forced christianity on the west, and prevented the restoration of the aristocracy and destroyed the arts, letters, institutions, schools, and killed or outcast the philosophers, was because Rome and Constantinople had lacked the population to administer and enforce rule of law (truth) and had learned from the middle east that while the aristocracy could rely on reason and empiricism, the dumb ignorant underclasses of the middle east were (are) intellectually incompetent for anything OTHER than superstition and mythology (lies). (European IQ ~100, and Semitic IQ ~84, meaning more than half of the middle eastern population the byzantines were governing, and only about 15% of europeans were that dumb).

    (b) Ergo the church’s ambition was rule and control by maintaining popular ignorance. So the only anti-science they demonstrated was whenever it challenged church dogma or authority sufficiently to threaten to disempower them.
    This is why religion rapidly collapsed among the literate after the invention of the printing press, and why luther was so determined to give people a bible in their own language and to spread literacy – to end the corruption of the church that held the people in virtual serfdom (half of the land in europe was under the church).
    We can’t often imagine that Rome had faced a labor shortage, ad upon the fall of the roman state, and the loss of the legions, that meant feudalism(self-defense by alliances of warrior landlords) was the only possible means of maintaining any economic survival.

    Economics = Incentives. Writen prose is just the excuses we tell to justify what we’re doing about it. That’s history. And that’s why historical explanation was difficult before we began to understand economics. It’s obvious why empiricism, enlightenment, economic productivity, legal precision and testimony, resulted in histories we now understand were fairly accurate representations in at least the pre-war period. And slightly better now, with Yuval harari and Howard Zin the laggarts. 😉

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @CrastoMervin @OtonielFilho5


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 17:59:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671216142424080399

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671210152933081088