Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • BTW: I love women. Which is why this whole catastrophy of feminism to woke is so

    BTW: I love women. Which is why this whole catastrophy of feminism to woke is so frustrating.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 02:56:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706140579606692349

    Reply addressees: @schizarella

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706039167145123939

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    “MEN SHOULD BE PROTECTING WOMEN – BUT FOR SOME REASON THEY”VE GIVEN UP”

    Women are irrational actors, live in imaginary and often magical world, but men are rational actors. We live in the real world, and the world we struggle to make real by our efforts.

    You tell men you hate them 24 hours a day, in every single way possible, and you wonder why entire generations are giving up on you en masse? You (collectively), are out of control, hyper-privileged, hyperconsumtive, irresponsible, selfish, neurotic, magical thinking, attention addicts with only about one percent of women tolerable enough for marriage and long term trust and investment, in a legal political and court system that is entirely for the benefit of women, and entirely at the expense of men, despite that women spend seventy percent of the money, incurr most of the debt, do so for selfish reasons, and consume seventy percdent of government services.

    So what is it precisely that the anti-enfranchisement men and women had wrong about women in commerc and government?

    It took a while. But it turns out – they had nothing wrong. And that surprised even those of us who were optimists.

    So now that you’ve destroyed dating, mating, relationships, the family, replacement reproduction, the education system, the legal system, and the government, and you’ve driven us to the bring of civil war between irresponsible urban and responsible rural, what do you think is going to happen? It’s happening. And if you are under 25 today there aren’t going to be children to pay for your health care, your social security, or to producde enough workers with enough global competitive advantage to ensure that you are other than living your life on the edge of poverty even more so than people are now.

    Youi’ve destroyed the very concept that democdracy is possible. And you’ve reversed the two thousand years we’ve spent, particularly the chivalric and victorian efforts to reframe women as virtous in stead of selfish trivial shallow vain harlots underminers gossips and shrills. Which is precisely why women were contained to the home and second class citizens or les until the industrial revolution gave teh promise of freedom to participate with equal responsibility to the private and common.

    Only to realize that the primary difference between the sexes is male proucition of and responsibilty for common comons and female selfish hyperconsumption and irresponsibility for commons. That’s what feels vs reals means.

    I”m out of the game at my age, but what’s occurring is obvoius cause and consequencde. All life equilibrates to satisfy the needs of sexes and ages and abilities, and the family was the first institution that produced a compromise exchange between the sexes, the ages, and the abilities.

    Women killed the family. Worse. THat was the INTENTION of the feminist movement. To destroy the family. Just as the leftist movement’s ambition is to destroy the family, the classes, the nobility and aristocracy, and reduce us all to children and peasantry.

    Cheers.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1706039167145123939

  • “can we really have opposite-sex friends?”– Short answer: Yes, as long as you a

    –“can we really have opposite-sex friends?”–
    Short answer: Yes, as long as you are both in secure relationships or you’ve been friends for a very long time.

    I’m a Man not a Guy. And I’m career Tech CEO and very minor public intellectual.
    I talk to all sorts of women I’m not at all attracted to or interested in, and would never be. (Although young women today are obviously almost univerally broken – so I avoid them.)
    I do spend business time in public with women. It’s a necessity. Especially employees, salespeople, vendors, customers, activists and almost anyone who wants to speak with me.
    I have generally had executive assistants I spend a lot of time with and value deeply. (Work WIfe).
    I do not spend ‘friendship’ time with women unless in public, and only for coffee, lunch, or dinner.
    I have generally had female friends who provide good advice. Women have a different perspective and I value them.
    I prefer to spend time with a woman I am friends with along with her significant other – and mine. I would never make any man uncomfortable in any way – it would be ‘wrong’.
    I suspect this is because I am gregarious and confident and am totally uninterested in any woman other than the one I’m married or almost married to. 😉
    I used to make use of the girl-gossip network in my companies because the admins know everything and a good relationship with them means they alert you to potential problems. And that provoked some odd suspicion I had more than professional interests.
    Every time its been suggested that I have an interest in a woman in the workplace (or out of it for that matter) it’s been false. And I’ve even taken the heat for a business partner that was ‘enjoying’ one of my assistants.
    It’s very very common for younger women to pursue older successful male execs, and while it’s sometiems flattering it’s largely annoying. 😉 I can’t believe some of the things women have said to me despite knowing I have a long term girlfriend, or am married. Not all women are timid.

    Reply addressees: @datepsych

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 02:55:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706140288639496192

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706132235156418784

  • A COUNTER TO INDIAN ARROGANCE (HARSH RANT) –“India breaking with the West would

    A COUNTER TO INDIAN ARROGANCE (HARSH RANT)
    –“India breaking with the West would be a wondrous event, preventing the spread of liberal democracy – we must ensure India remains separate from NATO”–

    Totally agree. Especially if you’re assasinating people on allied territories, receeding into religiosity, allying with Russians in their genocide, when bordered with an unstable and hostile nuclear Pakistan; suffering internal conflict from Muslims; holding disptuted territories that demand independencde; in a territorial war with a vastly superior force in China who is entirely capable of cutting your water supplies; and failing to perform in the labor market despite our efforts to move chinese industry to india where neither showing up for work, being competent for the work, or doing much work is common among your people; and your primary export to the west is cheap tech labor, and telephone scams from call centers; and you’re hobbled by low level corruption as debilitating and endemic as the ignorance, filth, disease, unemployment and birth defects that plague the country despite the few shiny tech centers that are but islands in sea of cultural sewage due to the charity of western labor arbitrage.

    I agree to severing ties. I think we should just skip ahead, embrace the future, totally sever strategic and economic ties and communiation, repatriate your expats, and leave you to your affairs alone – as you continue to blame others for your long history of being conquered and your stagnation dating back to the first century, and your demographics which challenge subsaharan africa in their inability to modernize.

    Clean your civilization first. You haven’t been very good at it. You haven’t been able to govern. To unify. To resist invaders. If you hadn’t british institutions you’d still be a peer of west africa. And then we wouldn’t have to listen to your infantile posturing as if you had some vague moral standing in the world as other than evading responsibility for the world sistem the europeans built that dragged you out of poverty disease suffering and ignorance.

    In our culture false pride of the unworthy is a sin. We admit ours and try to change. You never do. Never have.

    We will defeat the present woke-marxist crisis that you call liberalism. And return to classical liberalism, rule of law, and a democracy limited to those demonstrating responsibilty for private and common. It might take us a bit, and it might take an uprising, and it might take a civil war. But it will happen. And it will happen bfore the 2030-2035 world crisis hits as the anglosphere abandons it’s interests, returns to its bases, russian and chinese populations collapse, cause upheavals, cause massive staration in africa, and as India most likely continues to struggle to escape her handicaps, becuse demographics is destiny.

    No man is a hero to his debtors. And frankly the Anglosphere is going to prosper in comfort, even if the european doesn’t, while the anglo american creation of the rules based order, continues to withdraw, we continue to repatriate our industries, and we let the world island of eurasia, india, and it’s cousin africa, descend into war, chaos, poverty, starvation, and the return of the age of empires and monopolization of trade routes, restoration of imperial possessions and colonies.

    We are not heroes to our debtors – but then we will still enjoy the spectacle as the world of the arrogant and ungrateful burns, while we sip our lattes, eat our steaks, and wash them down with fine wines, concerned more about the choice of dessert than the justice nature visits on the unworthy.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @empireenjoyer10 @2020Blackstone

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 23:23:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706087078767783936

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706075690074837093

  • YES, JEWS DID IT ON PURPOSE, AND SO DID EUROPEANS – AND EVERYONE ELSE FOR THAT M

    YES, JEWS DID IT ON PURPOSE, AND SO DID EUROPEANS – AND EVERYONE ELSE FOR THAT MATTER
    We had our period of supremacy, and they, especially since their enfranchisement, are having theirs.

    You know I had a great conversation about this with Rabbi Daneil Lapin, who I personally love very much as a human being as well as a Rabbi and moral man. He said “There are good jews and bad jews, good christians and bad christians, good muslims and bad muslims.” We must work with the good and constrain the bad. And this is my position as well.

    I want to fix the problem for us and for them. I can’t fix their past. I can’t fix our colonial past. I can’t fix the horrors that are endless in the muslim and chinese past, or the africans occurring today.. And I can’t even fix the relative absence of badness in indian civilization’s past so that they didn’t stagnate, and weren’t at this moment trending toward recidivism into their over the top mystical religion.

    So while you and many like you seem to need your anger and retribution, I’ve had it, and given it up, so that I focus on fixing the problem forever. And I think I have.

    Now, the evidence is that the feminine cognition, brain organization, and incentives of the ashkenazi remains consistent, even despite outbreeding, and that like women they will always pursue their instincts unless we encode the problem with their instincts for seduction (responsibility evasion, baiting into hazard, undermining and sedition) – like our instincts for conquest and domestication for profit – in the foundations of our laws, so that neither the male nor the female can pursue it’s extreme intuitions, and then perhaps we can avoid this problem and domesticate the jews as we have ourselves over time – and in doing so take advantage of their verbal acutiy by putting it to less harmful use.

    What I’ll say that’s disturbing, is that we could have stopped this behavior if it weren’t for women’s enfranchisement and vulnerability to it. And if not for the greed of our people going along with it when it suited them. There are moral men among us, particularly among the english tradition who understood, and documented these issues thoroughly, but control of the purse buys the juriy no matter how large or small. The only cure is the intolerance of the law, the citizenry, the sheriffs, and the courts for the behavior.

    And we must admit that we have allowed the legal positivists to deprive us of those protections of the common law, that ensureed those people an institutions were available to use for the suppression of this criminality. We have been disintermediated from our court of common law by design, and by the greed of the state for taxes, and the elites for rent seeking, and profits from abuse of our people.

    I’ve done the work to fix the problem peacefully, if not happily for all, by ending financialization and financial manipulation, limiting us all to open reciprocal exchanges that are transparent. This ends the ability to bait into hazard favored as occupations in the jewish culture, and hopefully redirects them to more productive ends. But it ends the ability of our women, and the men who happily defect and manipulate those women, as well.

    I should note that ashkenazi amorality (or immorality if you choose) in such matters, is as advantagous as western man’s advantage for our benevolet sociopathy in such matters: business, finance, and government. Because what is counter intuitive to many, (not me), is that when you work at very large scale, there is a tendency of minor goods and bads to average out as overall goods. And this often takes a more pragmatic mind, with more empirical judgement. And this is why askenazi jews that do not share our morals of the commons in finance and european “benevolent” sociopaths in business and industry are often successful at their duties. IN many cases the externalities are good.

    So while you may want me to share in your emotions (which I consider an immature and feminine demand by the way), I don’t. I merely want to solve the problem, worked to solve the problem, and we are switching from research and development to activism so that we do solve the problem.

    Doing is more important than feeling. 😉

    -Hugs brother.

    Reply addressees: @teodoriancu14 @BasedLawyer

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 20:59:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706050780409503744

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706042601449603239

  • “MEN SHOULD BE PROTECTING WOMEN – BUT FOR SOME REASON THEY”VE GIVEN UP” Women ar

    “MEN SHOULD BE PROTECTING WOMEN – BUT FOR SOME REASON THEY”VE GIVEN UP”

    Women are irrational actors, live in imaginary and often magical world, but men are rational actors. We live in the real world, and the world we struggle to make real by our efforts.

    You tell men you hate them 24 hours a day, in every single way possible, and you wonder why entire generations are giving up on you en masse? You (collectively), are out of control, hyper-privileged, hyperconsumtive, irresponsible, selfish, neurotic, magical thinking, attention addicts with only about one percent of women tolerable enough for marriage and long term trust and investment, in a legal political and court system that is entirely for the benefit of women, and entirely at the expense of men, despite that women spend seventy percent of the money, incurr most of the debt, do so for selfish reasons, and consume seventy percdent of government services.

    So what is it precisely that the anti-enfranchisement men and women had wrong about women in commerc and government?

    It took a while. But it turns out – they had nothing wrong. And that surprised even those of us who were optimists.

    So now that you’ve destroyed dating, mating, relationships, the family, replacement reproduction, the education system, the legal system, and the government, and you’ve driven us to the bring of civil war between irresponsible urban and responsible rural, what do you think is going to happen? It’s happening. And if you are under 25 today there aren’t going to be children to pay for your health care, your social security, or to producde enough workers with enough global competitive advantage to ensure that you are other than living your life on the edge of poverty even more so than people are now.

    Youi’ve destroyed the very concept that democdracy is possible. And you’ve reversed the two thousand years we’ve spent, particularly the chivalric and victorian efforts to reframe women as virtous in stead of selfish trivial shallow vain harlots underminers gossips and shrills. Which is precisely why women were contained to the home and second class citizens or les until the industrial revolution gave teh promise of freedom to participate with equal responsibility to the private and common.

    Only to realize that the primary difference between the sexes is male proucition of and responsibilty for common comons and female selfish hyperconsumption and irresponsibility for commons. That’s what feels vs reals means.

    I”m out of the game at my age, but what’s occurring is obvoius cause and consequencde. All life equilibrates to satisfy the needs of sexes and ages and abilities, and the family was the first institution that produced a compromise exchange between the sexes, the ages, and the abilities.

    Women killed the family. Worse. THat was the INTENTION of the feminist movement. To destroy the family. Just as the leftist movement’s ambition is to destroy the family, the classes, the nobility and aristocracy, and reduce us all to children and peasantry.

    Cheers.

    Reply addressees: @schizarella

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 20:13:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706039166843158528

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705702085931786440

  • ZOOM’s NEW ZOOM-IQ FEATURE (text summary) #Zoom’s new AI that records summaries

    ZOOM’s NEW ZOOM-IQ FEATURE
    (text summary)

    #Zoom’s new AI that records summaries of your meetings is ‘ok’. It’s not as good as the third party products whatsoever, but given that zoom is worried about Google’s introgression in the space, ZoomIQ is just a first step that needs work but that will improve.

    I’ve asked ChatGPT to summarize the ZoomIQ summary in under 5000 words (our meetings are content heavy), and the result is at least a fair list of the topics covered, even if the detail is overly general and not insightful.

    So for the time being we’ll stick with adding these summaries to our videos on YT.

    Note that our work is quite academic and dense, and impenetrable to the average audience, despite our use of humor and frequent failed attempts at humor, so we have dedicated but small audience of students who follow the work.

    I’m reluctant to share this Video content directly on XTwitter because while we hear placating words, the actions of the new CEO mimic the actions of the previous. And her most recent publications that suggest a return to previous suppression of uncomfortable truths, even when in neutral academic prose, and free of hostile intent.

    Those things that cause us conflict need the light of day so that we can resolve the conflicts and move on. I know Elon knows this but without legal protection from interference in marriage, employment, business, or services, it appears that the ‘suppression of resolution of conflicts by the suppression of discussion’ is very hard to reverse. Even though it’s prohibited under common law, until the age of social media, we didn’t have the legal need to restore that common law, to contemporary legislative code. (This is something our organization intends to pursue by class action and restore from common law to legislative code)

    So while we prefer the Twitter platform, now that we have long-form text, we are staying with Youtube and Odysee for videos where, as we are not seeking monetization, and only seeking to reach a dedicated adult, informed, and usually male audience, our work on the law and the so many taboos that need addressing in the law, that are otherwise impossible to discuss in social media without mouth-breathers seeking attention by offense seeking, find offense in even the science of the causes of our contemporary conflicts, and the mutually beneficial curese for those conflicts we have sought to produce for all. 😉

    Sorry. Had to stick that bit of truthful scarcastic wit in there for theraputic reasons. 😉

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 19:43:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706031628420521984

  • RE: JEWS (MULSIMS TOO): OVERCOMING RAGE AND PRODUCING REFORMS THAT FOREVER FIX T

    RE: JEWS (MULSIMS TOO): OVERCOMING RAGE AND PRODUCING REFORMS THAT FOREVER FIX THE PROBLEM.
    Well you know, you can remain angry and want to punish these people, or you can simply seek to solve the problem that like most problems caused us conflict over the milennia.

    Like most people I was angry at first. Despite the efforts, the harm the christians, and the jews, and now the muslims have done to the west is far far worse and more seditous than we’d imagined – even among those of us who understood the christian destruction of the ancient world, and worse, the islamic destruction of the seven great civilizations of the ancient world, leaving only China and the subsaharan untouched by the abrahamic cognitive disease.

    But, once I realized we’re all bots, then I understood it’s the responsibility of those of us who grasp these things enact laws and policies and institutions to bring about the rules and incdentives that prohibit bad behavior. We focus (rightly) on the jews precisely because we are particularly and uniquely vulnerable to the feminine method of undermining and warfare, and even more so the weaponization of finance and debt, because we prohibit ourselves those forms of coercion and deception and baiting into hazard becuase they violate our first principles of sovereignty, freedom of choice, duty to the commons, truth, and reciprocity.

    It’s a fixable problem and we have or at least I have done the work to prohibit the behavior forever, and oncde I understood the problem I understood also it was a relatively easy fix. The hard part was the testable criteria for truth and reciprocity in court that would make it impossible to circumvent again in the future by anyother means.

    Do we blame women for their immorality? It’s hard to think of women as more immoral than men, because we had done so well at limiting their immorality worldwide. But while men are bad, women are evil. While men are criminal women are treasonous. It’s in their selfish nature. Similarly, do we blame the jews and the muslims for their immorality? The jews in particular since their strategy is entirely to replicate the female? The muslims becasue of their absurd devotion to what has been a failed strategy since the end of the islamic expansion – reducing their people to ignorance superstition and worst of all, dysgenia in a spectrum of gene pools already limited to a full standard deviation or more below the european, and demographic distribution that all but ensures they will forever be backward, unproductive, and poor in a world no longer purely of agrarian peasants?

    I prefer to fix the problem so we don’t have a 110th time so to speak. And fixing that problem first by law, second by explanation and education, will have to work it’s way into jewish and muslim culture for a few generations. And it will ‘hurt’ them a greate deal in their cultural memory, self image and self worth to understand that they are organized crime organizations on one end, and disorganized raiders, hiding under pretense of religion and culture, becuse they cannot form loyalty, responsibilty, or states necessary to do otherwise but parasitically depend upon the institutions produced by others.

    But we have learned and adapted ourelves after learning that our direct colonial efforts failed. And that in the postwar period our indirect attempts to domesticate and modernize less developed civilizations has faiked – most importantly russian, chinese, arab, and maybe now african (I hold out hope for subsaharan africa if it remains evangelical christian). And we are just now learning that our hope of equality of ability and reason among sexes, classe, cultures and races is also a failed project.

    So we must like the chinese in their prevoius iterations, learn that the best we can do is wall ourselves off, focus on ourselves, and trade and cooperate with those who wish to do the same. And restore the world to historical trend as a conflict of civilizations where each civilization is the group evolutionary strategy of the racde it formed in, and each race in its geography, genetics, distribution, culture, and history, must evolve on its own terms, while not imposing costs on others to compensate for their own failures.

    It’s not so much about forgivness. I don’t think in those terms. It’s merely solving theproblem so it no longer exists, and continuing to drage mprimitive mankind out of ignorance, superstition, parasitism, predation, criminality, iresponsibilty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffereing, child mortality, early death, despotic government, and the vicisitudes of a nature all but constantly trying to exterminate us. And an uncaring god, gods, or universe, that permits it all to happen. So that by the crucible of hardship we evolved into the gods we imagine and correct those gods we presumed – but did not exist.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation
    😉

    Reply addressees: @BasedLawyer

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 19:17:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706025097591500800

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706009258850996230

  • (NLI Community Love) Why Our Organization Succeeds One of the reasons our organi

    (NLI Community Love)
    Why Our Organization Succeeds

    One of the reasons our organization is so successful at producing work, and working together to produce it – and now, striving at putting it to practice, is that we are all on the hyper-moral end of the spectrum, and we love and respect eachother.

    In fact, I would venture that the people who stay in the organization vs those that move on, all do so partly because of the brotherhood (and sisters) that we’ve developed because we are full of love and moral conviction. Even when the truths we discover are uncomfortable for us (and certainly for others.)

    While we believe we are working to fix the problems facing the broken people, ‘the left and right extremes’, that’s why we don’t really have room in NLI for those broken people, all too often full of justifiable anxiety, frustration, anger and rage, because they can’t get past those feelings enough to abandon retribution instesad of seeking to do the right and moral thing for everyone – including the ‘evil’ folk who in our judgement need parenting and governing, and sometimes court, prosecution and punishment, until they are calm conscious, and moral too.

    Though you know, it’s rather apparent if you do this work for a while, that people often confuse what they percieve as good as moral, when it is very often not. I would say, that’s a normal human universal cognitive bias. It’s part of the normalcy bias.

    But the universe is evolutionary and merciless. The universe, solar system, the planet, and nature are not fair but brutal. And in that universe, life is not fair. But we can, at least try to make make it moral. Meaning we cannot accomplish all wanted goods, but we can with incremental effort, suppress all unwanted bads.

    Despite that many if not most people in pursuit of their presumed good ( really their personal advantage at the lowest cost and risk) will always and eerywhere act immorally at every opportunity that they can get away with.

    So it’s our job to finish the five thousand year work of western civilization in producing ascience of cooperation that we call the law, a constitution embodying it, and economy operating under it, and a society that is as moral as possible, given human abilities and frailties.

    We’ve actually done it. (No Really). And in restrospect, our founders, and their english predecessors, and their germanic predecessors, and their roman and greek predecessors, and thir corded ware predecessors, and thei indo european apreecessors had it far more right than you’d think. And far far more right than all other civilizations combined.

    It’s just coutner intutive.

    It means we all must bear the maximum responsibility for private and common, and create an perpetuate institutions that persist that responsibility – and this what ‘whiteness’ means: individual responsibility. Not individualism. But Individual responsibilty the product of which is the high trust society wa call ‘commons-osm’ instead.

    The natural common concurrent law of cooperation between the sexes classes and nations.

    Hugs

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 18:52:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706018805707632640

  • SORCERERS VS SCIENTISTS 😉 Critics who know the story can sound crazy, and playe

    SORCERERS VS SCIENTISTS 😉
    Critics who know the story can sound crazy, and played off as if they are nuts, necessarily employ inflated language, if they have not been trained in the science (our work), so that they can speak unassailably and unambiguously.

    Now, thats another way of saying my origina mission was the production of a value neutral (scientific) paradigm,vocabulary and logic of ethics and politics.

    And so it’s possible to ‘counter the spell’ of the feminine seduction by storytelling and undermining by ridicule if you have ‘superior magic’ so to speak, in the form of the language of science(testimony) instad of the language of myth(lying).

    They’re sorcerers. But they never call us liars. They will attack our character. But they cannot attack the truth.

    Again this is the female technique of warfare.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 15:43:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705971236453404672

  • IS FEMALE MANIPULATION A CLASS THING? (Mostly) Hmm…. It’s very hard to be a man

    IS FEMALE MANIPULATION A CLASS THING? (Mostly)

    Hmm…. It’s very hard to be a man in the upper half a percent if you are swayed by the manipulations of women. In fact that’s what both sexes appreciate in male executives, is our insensitivity to that nonsense.

    I can tell you that in my career I valued women highly because my aspieness requires their assistance in judging people – and preparing me to meet with them. So I have worshipped the women around me in business my entire career. Because I NEED them.

    That said, I’ve had quite a few ‘feminist’ employees literally hate me because I’m absolutely f——g immune to that nonsense.

    Gimme a mom who says she needs to put family and kids first and if she does her job I’m all in for her, and every extra bit I can help with.

    But, give me one of these self righteous feminists who think they’re not making the upper level because of male oppression and I’m a master at explaining how they are selfish, manipulative and untrustworthy and won’t put loyalty to the rest of the management team ahead of their self interest – which is required for the peerage of shared ownership of a company. So I’ll keep paying them more than anyone else will but I’m not putting the company at risk by having one of them on the management team. (Best woman I’ve ever had in management is a gay women who I love to this very day as one of the best people I”ve ever worked with.)

    Women have a very hard time comprehending absolute loyalty The one’s that do are priceless. And they’re married. And they stay married. I was married to one but cancer changed me so much I had to wipe the slate clean and start over with simplicity and that just wasn’t in her plans. 😉

    So yes, it’s mostly a class thing. I’m having a bit of trouble with the dating issue because it LOOKS like a class thing. But the upper class is notoriously out of sight, and wouldn’t disgrace itself with this kind of nonsense. So until I see some data I just have to reserve judgement.

    It also might be that with the end of my people (anglos) as an elite, and replacement with credentialists, and our displacement by the undermining of women, that there are no true upper class any longer that hasn’t defected to the financial games like the rest.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Obediencio1

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 21:01:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705688973853511680

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705680920009740609