Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THE ONLY CYCLE OF HISTORY THAT MATTERS It’s pretty simple. Abrahamism is an unde

    THE ONLY CYCLE OF HISTORY THAT MATTERS

    It’s pretty simple. Abrahamism is an underclass rebellion against the aristocracies of the ancient world, all of whom are western (brown haired) white, or eastern (black haired) white.

    Just as the lies of the enlightenment philosophers (anglo, french, german, jewish, russian) are a middle class rebellion against the aristocracies of post ancient world.

    Just as the lies of the cosmopolitan jews, and french postmodernists are a working class rebellion against the enlightenment aristocracy.

    The cycle of history: Truth produces eugenic aristocracy, and lies produce dysgenic pretense of equality.

    We empower the animals and they defeat us in times of weakness.

    We recover and domesticate the animals.

    We empower the animals and they defeat us in times of weakness.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-25 16:07:00 UTC

  • CAN WE SUPPRESS FALSEHOODS IN RELIGION? It may be true that our women and our un

    CAN WE SUPPRESS FALSEHOODS IN RELIGION?

    It may be true that our women and our underclasses do not like aristocracy unless it is visible to them that their kin-aristocracy carries them better than the alternatives.

    Our women and our underclasses cannot really be seduced by hinduism without vast importing of their numbers.

    Our women and our underclasses have little reason and little interest be seduction of confucianism or the rituals of japan – although it would be good if they did. It’s not seductive. It’s merely true. But it is rational and political, leaving open sinic society’s underclasses and women for the personal comforts of buddhism.

    Our women and our underclasses can be seduced by Buddhism without much harm as long our aristocracy is not. Buddhism is androgynous in its emphasis on the self, and abandonment of the political.

    Our women and our underclasses however have profound reason to be seduced by Abrahamism: the feminine surrender to un-reason in jewish, christian, islamic, marxist, and postmodern versions.

    Why? Because unlike judaism, christianity, and islam, (anglo) egalitarian liberalism, (jewish) marxism, and (french) postmodernism, all tell comforting lies that have adapted to modernity by wishful thinking and pseudoscience, the same way that judaism, christianity, and islam, adapted to the ancient empires by wishful thinking using pseudo-reason of literary mysticism.

    So the question is, if we can prevent fraud in goods, service, and court, then why not in the commons?

    There is no reason, except for the same anger of criminals who we suppressed fraud in goods, services, and court. And the same criminals we suppressed in the church with their lies. And the same criminals we suppressed in our governments because of their lies – particularly ‘divine right’.

    No more lies.

    It’s not complicated.

    No lies. No excuses. The commons must be protected.

    Those that cannot tolerate full reciprocity must be denied full liberty.

    Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, Serfdom, Slavery, and the caging or killing of beasts.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-25 13:54:00 UTC

  • Understanding Ourselves by Comparing Jewish and Aristocratic Philosophy

    TURNING JEWISH PHILOSOPHY ON ITS HEAD, AND THEREBY UNDERSTANDING OUR OWN ARISTOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY It’s not hard. You can turn all jewish philosophy on its head: A poor, migratory, pastoral people, with high inbreeding, high clannishness, reverse sexual dimorphism, and who experienced their age of transformation as slaves, never adapted to land-holding, or developed land holding virtues, norms, institutions, laws and traditions, nor through selection developed a masculine aristocracy, or permanent warrior class, then industrialized the lying and wishful thinking of slaves, and upon obtaining literacy, selected for amplifying all their reverse sexual dimorphism (female reproductive strategy), and supporting values, and through their males, weaponized the reproductive strategy of women: wishful thinking, gossip, and deceit, by which to bring about a restored primitive matrilineal order. In other words, just as women evolved gossip to rally males against alphas, jews continued this strategy of gossiping Just as women make their men weak if give the opportunity, jews make their hosts weak if given the opportunity. Just as women ridicule, shame, gossip, and rally, jews do so but on an industrial scale with great deal of sophistication. Just as women are superior at speech and men at action, jews are superior at speech, and aristocracy superior in action. Just as women are petty and treat each other horribly if empowered, jews are petty and treat others horribly if empowered. We have already had one jewish empire: the soviet union. And we must never have that happen to mankind again. So no more Abrahamism: judaism, christianity, islam. So no more Cosmopolitanism: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Rothbard, Rand, of the millions of jewish propagandists. No more postmodernism: Foucault, Derrida, and all. No more feminism and its history of lies. Reciprocity and Meritocracy are as they are, without the wishful thinking and parasitism of women. We know the name of pandora: Abrahamism of the Jews, and its cancerous impact on the christians and muslims and by consequence, the rest of the world. How do we stop abrahamism, cosmopolitanism, and the ridicule, shaming, rallying, and gossip of women? Reciprocity, Truth. Testimonialism. Natural Law. Punishment. Zero Tolerance. The via positiva law of Reciprocity (natural law): The via negativa law is non imposition of costs The via positiva of words is truth, of actions is exchange, The via negativa is zero tolerance And that is the aristocratic (white) version of Sharia. Meaning that zero tolerance, requires mastery of violence. Mastery of violence is expensive. Therefore it must be profitable. Aristocracy’s first industry is violence for the purpose of conducting zero tolerance of impositions of costs, by words or deeds, directly or indirectly, The common people need only rule of law to protect them – when empowered they are parasites. all else can be produced by voluntary rather than coercive organizations. The people who demonstrate productivity through reciprocity of production need means of developing commons by which to create multipliers of their productivity. They require a market for the production of commons: houses of the commons. The people who demonstrate productivity through defense of reciprocity: militia and army, sheriff and judiciary, regional nobility and the monarchy, require a house of government to limit the houses of the commons. With courts of reciprocity under universal standing and universal application a market for reciprocity can form without the monopoly rule of government to fabricate it. Then government can be used for its only moral purpose: the creation of contracts for the production and maintenance of commons – where these contracts must survive the market for reciprocity we call the courts. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Understanding Ourselves by Comparing Jewish and Aristocratic Philosophy

    TURNING JEWISH PHILOSOPHY ON ITS HEAD, AND THEREBY UNDERSTANDING OUR OWN ARISTOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY It’s not hard. You can turn all jewish philosophy on its head: A poor, migratory, pastoral people, with high inbreeding, high clannishness, reverse sexual dimorphism, and who experienced their age of transformation as slaves, never adapted to land-holding, or developed land holding virtues, norms, institutions, laws and traditions, nor through selection developed a masculine aristocracy, or permanent warrior class, then industrialized the lying and wishful thinking of slaves, and upon obtaining literacy, selected for amplifying all their reverse sexual dimorphism (female reproductive strategy), and supporting values, and through their males, weaponized the reproductive strategy of women: wishful thinking, gossip, and deceit, by which to bring about a restored primitive matrilineal order. In other words, just as women evolved gossip to rally males against alphas, jews continued this strategy of gossiping Just as women make their men weak if give the opportunity, jews make their hosts weak if given the opportunity. Just as women ridicule, shame, gossip, and rally, jews do so but on an industrial scale with great deal of sophistication. Just as women are superior at speech and men at action, jews are superior at speech, and aristocracy superior in action. Just as women are petty and treat each other horribly if empowered, jews are petty and treat others horribly if empowered. We have already had one jewish empire: the soviet union. And we must never have that happen to mankind again. So no more Abrahamism: judaism, christianity, islam. So no more Cosmopolitanism: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Rothbard, Rand, of the millions of jewish propagandists. No more postmodernism: Foucault, Derrida, and all. No more feminism and its history of lies. Reciprocity and Meritocracy are as they are, without the wishful thinking and parasitism of women. We know the name of pandora: Abrahamism of the Jews, and its cancerous impact on the christians and muslims and by consequence, the rest of the world. How do we stop abrahamism, cosmopolitanism, and the ridicule, shaming, rallying, and gossip of women? Reciprocity, Truth. Testimonialism. Natural Law. Punishment. Zero Tolerance. The via positiva law of Reciprocity (natural law): The via negativa law is non imposition of costs The via positiva of words is truth, of actions is exchange, The via negativa is zero tolerance And that is the aristocratic (white) version of Sharia. Meaning that zero tolerance, requires mastery of violence. Mastery of violence is expensive. Therefore it must be profitable. Aristocracy’s first industry is violence for the purpose of conducting zero tolerance of impositions of costs, by words or deeds, directly or indirectly, The common people need only rule of law to protect them – when empowered they are parasites. all else can be produced by voluntary rather than coercive organizations. The people who demonstrate productivity through reciprocity of production need means of developing commons by which to create multipliers of their productivity. They require a market for the production of commons: houses of the commons. The people who demonstrate productivity through defense of reciprocity: militia and army, sheriff and judiciary, regional nobility and the monarchy, require a house of government to limit the houses of the commons. With courts of reciprocity under universal standing and universal application a market for reciprocity can form without the monopoly rule of government to fabricate it. Then government can be used for its only moral purpose: the creation of contracts for the production and maintenance of commons – where these contracts must survive the market for reciprocity we call the courts. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • THE VERY SIMPLE SOURCE OF HAPPINESS AND NOT, HAPPY MARRIAGE AND NOT, HAPPY POLIT

    THE VERY SIMPLE SOURCE OF HAPPINESS AND NOT, HAPPY MARRIAGE AND NOT, HAPPY POLITIES AND NOT.

    The smaller the household, the greater distance from kin, the greater the diversity the neighborhood or village, the more dependent we are on the perfection of our mates, and the less durable are our relationships and families – and the demonstrably unhappier we are. The larger the household, the shorter distance from our kin, the lower the diversity of our neighborhood or village the less dependent we are on the perfection of our mates, and the more durable are our relationships and families – and the demonstrably happier we are.

    WHO CAUSED THIS?

    (a) economists

    (b) socialists.

    (c) women

    (d) the politicians who enabled them.

    Bring capital to people not people to capital.

    Zero immigration. Limited migration.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-25 11:14:00 UTC

  • COMPARING ABRAHAMIC PHILOSOPHY AND ARISTOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY BY OUR EVOLUTIONARY P

    COMPARING ABRAHAMIC PHILOSOPHY AND ARISTOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY BY OUR EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES – CONTRASTS IMPROVE COMPREHENSION

    Europeans combined testimony (truthful, empirical, military reporting), horse, wheel, and bronze, took control of their destiny, and invented paternalistic sky gods and heroes, and conquered from spain to china, and arctic circle to north africa.

    The research has not settled the argument yet, but Europeans either wholly replaced, or conquered these peoples and profited from ruling them. It looks increasingly like it was a process of horizontal (european plain) replacement, and vertical (north-south) rule.

    But the central observation we can take away from the european expansion, is the domestication of man for profit. First displace, then enslave, then serfdom, then freedom, then liberty (property), then enfranchisement. They did it by militia. And this is their secret and the secret of the west. The militia, and the indoctrination of the ordinary man into martial epistemology (objective truthfulness upon pain of death). So truthfulness was the means of status signaling despite its disruption just as military tactics and scientific advantage are beneficial to the group despite their political distributions. when you build a hierarchy of truth it can reorganize easily because it need not expose lies.

    Western man competes by deflationary (scientific) truth. And this is unique among civilizations. And truth like heroism, is rewarded, regardless of the cost to the reorganization of the status (dominance) hierarchy.

    This rapid adaptability is the secret to why western civlization evolved faster than the rest in the ancient and modern worlds: lower friction of reorganization of strategy and tactics because strategy and tactics were empirical rather than authoritarian, literary, or fictitious. More rapid suppression of parasitism through the natural, common law, and independent judges. More risk taking and innovation in commerce. The continuous indoctrination of males into truth telling as a means of climbing the status hierarchy (a form of conspicuous consumption signal actually – by showing you could bear the cost of truthfulness.)

    We took the strategy of outmaneuver by horse and chariot to outmaneuver across our entire civilization by increasingly rapid means of adaptation, by using truth as the central organizing principle, that allowed reorganization without threatening the overall hierarchy. The strategy of heroism, heroic truth, and jury, turns out to simply produce the least cost and least time means of adaptation humans have invented or CAN invent.

    It’s not hard. You can turn all christian philosophy’s claims (submission), jewish philosophy’s claims of creating peace (safety for jews), or the musllms claims of creating peace (aggression) on its head by studying the history of the jews:

    A poor, migratory, pastoral people, with high inbreeding, high clannishness, reverse sexual dimorphism, and who experienced their age of transformation as slaves, never adapted to land-holding, or developed land holding virtues, norms, institutions, laws and traditions, nor through selection developed a masculine aristocracy, or permanent warrior class, then industrialized the lying and wishful thinking of slaves, and upon obtaining literacy, selected for amplifying all their reverse sexual dimorphism (female reproductive strategy), and supporting values, and through their males, weaponized the reproductive strategy of women: wishful thinking, gossip, and deceit, by which to bring about a restored primitive matrilineal order. In other words, just as women evolved gossip to rally males against alphas, jews continued this strategy of gossiping

    Just as women make their men weak if given the opportunity, jews make their hosts weak if given the opportunity.

    Just as women ridicule, shame, gossip, and rally, jews do so but on an industrial scale with great deal of sophistication.

    Just as women are superior at speech and men at action, jews are superior at speech, and aristocracy superior in action.

    Just as women are petty and treat each other horribly if empowered, jews are petty and treat others horribly if empowered.

    We have already had one jewish empire: the soviet union. And we must never have that happen to mankind again.

    So, for the good of our people, if not for the good of mankind, no more Abrahamism: judaism, christianity, islam.

    So no more Cosmopolitanism: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Rothbard, Rand, of the millions of jewish propagandists.

    So no more postmodernism: Foucault, Derrida, and all.

    So no more feminism and its history of pseudoscience. Reciprocity and Meritocracy are as they are, without the wishful thinking and parasitism of women.

    We know the name of pandora: Abrahamism of the Jews, and its cancerous by the christians and muslims and by consequence, the rest of the world.

    How do we stop abrahamism, cosmopolitanism, and the ridicule, shaming, rallying, and gossip of women?

    Reciprocity, Truth. Testimonialism. Natural Law. Punishment. Zero Tolerance.

    The via positiva law of Reciprocity (natural law):

    The via negativa law is non imposition of costs

    The via positiva of words is truth, of actions is exchange,

    The via negativa is zero tolerance

    And that is the aristocratic (white) version of Sharia.

    Meaning that zero tolerance, requires mastery of violence.

    Mastery of violence is expensive.

    Therefore it must be profitable.

    Aristocracy’s first industry is violence for the purpose of conducting zero tolerance of impositions of costs, by words or deeds, directly or indirectly,

    The common people need only rule of law to protect them – when empowered they are parasites. all else can be produced by voluntary rather than coercive organizations.

    The people who demonstrate productivity through reciprocity of production need means of developing commons by which to create multipliers of their productivity. They require a market for the production of commons: houses of the commons.

    The people who demonstrate productivity through defense of reciprocity: militia and army, sheriff and judiciary, regional nobility and the monarchy, require a house of government to limit the houses of the commons.

    With courts of reciprocity under universal standing and universal application a market for reciprocity can form without the monopoly rule of government to fabricate it. Then government can be used for its only moral purpose: the creation of contracts for the production and maintenance of commons – where these contracts must survive the market for reciprocity we call the courts.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-25 09:34:00 UTC

  • Why And How Do Free Markets Work?

    People come into proximity with one another to decrease opportunity costs (concentrate opportunities and decrease the cost of each opportunity). This is the reason productivity increases with population density: we save time and expense, increase the division of knowledge and labor, and increase the velocity of trades, so we make the cost of pursuing opportunities cheaper.

    But when we come into proximity and decrease the costs of opportunities, we also increase the number of competitors both for consumption of goods, services, and information, and for the production of goods, services, and information.

    So the only means of pursuing those opportunities is to reduce the cost or improve the product, service, or information. Innovators force all other producers to improve the cost and quality and diversity of their products. Unfortunately it is usually much harder to improve the quality of labor, than it is to improve goods, services, and information.

    This cycle of competition and innovation keeps prices down and quality up, at the cost of forcing everyone to work harder, think harder, and spend more time working, leaving some people by the wayside because they cannot adapt themselves or their goods, services, or information fast enough to serve the interests of buyers given the available competition.

    A free market refers to the territorial, political, and juridical conditions under which anyone can engage in the negotiation and voluntary trade of attention, effort, labor, goods, services, information, promises and obligations, assuming that which he trades was obtained by him by the same means.

    Where one of the following sets of conditions applies:

    The government does not interfere with prices or conditions of the transaction and only enforces common laws of contract and tort. (this is an ok thing)

    or

    The government does not interfere with prices conditions of the transactions, but forces all parties to warranty for performance, and against fraud. (This is better thing)

    or

    The government does not interfere with prices conditions of the transactions, but forces all parties to warranty for performance, for fully informed consent, and against fraud, and that the exchange is reciprocally productive (This is an even better thing)

    or

    The government does not interfere with prices, conditions of the transactions, forces involuntary warranties for performance and fully informed consent, and against fraud, and that the exchange is reciprocally productive, but prevents externalization of costs to the commons by the socialization of losses, the privatization of commons, or the consumption of a common resource without compensation to the polity. (an even better thing.)

    or

    The government does not interfere with prices, conditions of the transactions, forces involuntary warranties for performance and fully informed consent, and against fraud, and that the exchange is reciprocally productive, but prevents externalization of costs to the commons by the socialization of losses, the privatization of commons, or the consumption of a common resource without compensation to the polity, and that no conspiracy exists to create an artificial shortage in order to increase prices without increasing the content of the product, service, or good (an even better thing.)

    A free market, may describe any of those different conditions. But only the last of those, I have listed is in fact a MORAL free market.

    Free markets are too often used as an excuse to conduct parasitism rather than productivity, under the ruse of moral pretense.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine

    https://www.quora.com/Why-and-how-do-free-markets-work

  • THERE IS NO EXPLOITATION – JUST FARMING It is simply more profitable to construc

    THERE IS NO EXPLOITATION – JUST FARMING

    It is simply more profitable to construct markets than it is serfdom and slavery.

    But make no mistake about it.

    You are ruled for profit.

    The lies of Religion.

    The forces of Law.

    The hazard of Credit.

    I choose to RULE.

    I choose to RULE by denying rule to others.

    If possible I desire to rule by denying rule to all.

    And by denying rule to all we are left with markets.

    Markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons and polities.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-24 14:16:00 UTC

  • MORALS MAY BE RELATIVE BUT MORALITY IS ABSOLUTE. (really) Reciprocity is an evol

    MORALS MAY BE RELATIVE BUT MORALITY IS ABSOLUTE.

    (really)

    Reciprocity is an evolutionary necessity for a cooperative species of marginal differences in capabilities. And this sensitivity must evolve in parallel to cooperation.

    We universally sense reciprocity and reward it, and sense irreciprocity and punish it – so it must have genetic origins.

    Moral senses vary by gender, and within males, reflecting our different reproductive strategies. This variation is consistent so it must have genetic origins.

    Moral sensitivity applies only to kin and in-group members, or potential outgroup members, and effectively dissipates with kin-distance. This again is an evolutionary necessity.

    However, given that property allocations (of all kinds) vary from group to group, and therefore the set of changes that cause us to sense reciprocity and irreciprocity, vary from group to group.

    And we can be fooled (as we have been) by complexity of information that overloads our genetic ability to sense changes in state and therefore reciprocity.

    For these reasons it is not correct to say that morality is relative, but instead, that it is ALWAYS decidable if we must decide matters of conflict either within group or without group by pure reciprocity.

    Instead, moral decidability always exists regardless of gender, kin-distance, and culture. But we must choose to decide by local group moral norms, or objective moral norms depending upon whether the question we are deciding is between in group and out-group members.

    There is only one possible law for sentient beings in general, one possible for humans in general, and one possible for each in-group.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-23 19:26:00 UTC

  • YES. I BAIT YOU INTO LEARNING OR TEACHING… I say something controversial, some

    YES. I BAIT YOU INTO LEARNING OR TEACHING…

    I say something controversial, something offensive, or something that’s a half truth.

    The purpose of doing so is to attract ‘those who understand a half truth’, then bait people into correcting me (or using suggestion to correct them by inserting doubt), so that I can make a point:

    that the (a) abrahamic tradition is predatory, and

    (b) that intellectuals who lack power, attempt to seize it (obtain status signals) by deception, using this technique REGARDLESS OF THEIR GENETIC ORIGINS.

    Men seek to advance status (climb a dominance hierarchy) by any RATIONAL MEANS AVAILABLE TO THEM, and lying (abrahamism) is an exceptional technique for that deception, just as western truth telling is its opposite.

    If I wrote about propertarianism the way *I* think, no one would know about it at all. The price of getting criticism is that I’m entertaining by advancing my work from the position of an extremist.

    Long time followers know I use these techniques. I attack things or promote things in order to create conflict and interest in order to provide solutions that if stated simply would be overlooked, because the knowledge required to comprehend them requires an essay, whereas in this technique it requires an argument that people can get involved in.

    Create controversy to draw interest, then solve the controversy by leading the horse to water.) Exactly what every talking head show on television does all day long…..

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-23 11:45:00 UTC