Jan 30, 2017 10:32pm NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT. An animal has no agency, only impulse; can enter no contracts, only seize conveniences; can resolve no disputes truthfully, only imagine excuses. It cannot be reasoned with, only bribed or punished. But with bribes and punishments it can be trained. And if training fails, abandoned to the wild, enslaved, imprisoned, or killed. We train the animal with property in toto, manners, ethics, morals, and law. We use peers, parents, teachers, sheriffs, police, judges, juries, soldiers, generals and kings. The animal can be trained from beast to slave, to serf, to dependent, to freeman, to civilian, to soldier, to aristocracy: human. The training requires sentience, awareness, consciousness, reason, knowledge, and agency. But each degree of training demands more of the animal, and many – most – cannot complete it, and transcend the animal. As such the world is full of a few humans and many domesticated animals of varying degree, and many, many beasts. Thankfully, like many domesticatable animals, these animals, once domesticated, can often be put to good use. And as such, the beast man, like all other domesticatable beasts, can be domesticated for profit. The domestication of man – that occupation we call rule – is the most profitable occupation of all, except for one: The success in breeding, and training humans. Because while animals are a commodity, producing the rare human is the most profitable industry of all. And if it fails, hunting the beast man that remain, is the greatest joy of all. The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
Form: Mini Essay
-
Natural Law of Sovereign Men: Domesticating Animal Man for Peers and Profit.
Jan 30, 2017 10:32pm NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT. An animal has no agency, only impulse; can enter no contracts, only seize conveniences; can resolve no disputes truthfully, only imagine excuses. It cannot be reasoned with, only bribed or punished. But with bribes and punishments it can be trained. And if training fails, abandoned to the wild, enslaved, imprisoned, or killed. We train the animal with property in toto, manners, ethics, morals, and law. We use peers, parents, teachers, sheriffs, police, judges, juries, soldiers, generals and kings. The animal can be trained from beast to slave, to serf, to dependent, to freeman, to civilian, to soldier, to aristocracy: human. The training requires sentience, awareness, consciousness, reason, knowledge, and agency. But each degree of training demands more of the animal, and many – most – cannot complete it, and transcend the animal. As such the world is full of a few humans and many domesticated animals of varying degree, and many, many beasts. Thankfully, like many domesticatable animals, these animals, once domesticated, can often be put to good use. And as such, the beast man, like all other domesticatable beasts, can be domesticated for profit. The domestication of man – that occupation we call rule – is the most profitable occupation of all, except for one: The success in breeding, and training humans. Because while animals are a commodity, producing the rare human is the most profitable industry of all. And if it fails, hunting the beast man that remain, is the greatest joy of all. The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
-
AMERICAN POLICY IS NOT MORALLY GOOD – JUST PRAGMATIC PURSUIT OF MARKET PROSPERIT
AMERICAN POLICY IS NOT MORALLY GOOD – JUST PRAGMATIC PURSUIT OF MARKET PROSPERITY
Let me put something into perspective. America advocates markets and meritocracy and fixed borders. This sounds very ‘moral’ but it is just profitable for an advanced country to advocate meritocracy. For the same reason it is sensible for a less advanced country to advocate authoritarianism.
We all pursue self intersets. It is just that sometimes, self interest is in everyone’s interest. And America’s self interest is most often in everyone’s interest.
It’s not because americans are good or smart.
it’s because it is more profitable.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 21:12:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. Curt Doolittle updated his status. Jan 30, 20
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Jan 30, 2017 10:32pm
NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT.
An animal has no agency, only impulse; can enter no contracts, only seize conveniences; can resolve no disputes truthfully, only imagine excuses. It cannot be reasoned with, only bribed or punished. But with bribes and punishments it can be trained. And if training fails, abandoned to the wild, enslaved, imprisoned, or killed.
We train the animal with property in toto, manners, ethics, morals, and law. We use peers, parents, teachers, sheriffs, police, judges, juries, soldiers, generals and kings.
The animal can be trained from beast to slave, to serf, to dependent, to freeman, to civilian, to soldier, to aristocracy: human.
The training requires sentience, awareness, consciousness, reason, knowledge, and agency.
But each degree of training demands more of the animal, and many – most – cannot complete it, and transcend the animal.
As such the world is full of a few humans and many domesticated animals of varying degree, and many, many beasts.
Thankfully, like many domesticatable animals, these animals, once domesticated, can often be put to good use.
And as such, the beast man, like all other domesticatable beasts, can be domesticated for profit.
The domestication of man – that occupation we call rule – is the most profitable occupation of all, except for one:
The success in breeding, and training humans.
Because while animals are a commodity, producing the rare human is the most profitable industry of all.
And if it fails, hunting the beast man that remain, is the greatest joy of all.
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 14:21:24 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. Jan 30, 2017 10:32pm NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Jan 30, 2017 10:32pm
NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT.
An animal has no agency, only impulse; can enter no contracts, only seize conveniences; can resolve no disputes truthfully, only imagine excuses. It cannot be reasoned with, only bribed or punished. But with bribes and punishments it can be trained. And if training fails, abandoned to the wild, enslaved, imprisoned, or killed.
We train the animal with property in toto, manners, ethics, morals, and law. We use peers, parents, teachers, sheriffs, police, judges, juries, soldiers, generals and kings.
The animal can be trained from beast to slave, to serf, to dependent, to freeman, to civilian, to soldier, to aristocracy: human.
The training requires sentience, awareness, consciousness, reason, knowledge, and agency.
But each degree of training demands more of the animal, and many – most – cannot complete it, and transcend the animal.
As such the world is full of a few humans and many domesticated animals of varying degree, and many, many beasts.
Thankfully, like many domesticatable animals, these animals, once domesticated, can often be put to good use.
And as such, the beast man, like all other domesticatable beasts, can be domesticated for profit.
The domestication of man – that occupation we call rule – is the most profitable occupation of all, except for one:
The success in breeding, and training humans.
Because while animals are a commodity, producing the rare human is the most profitable industry of all.
And if it fails, hunting the beast man that remain, is the greatest joy of all.
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 10:21:00 UTC
-
The Chinese Created Their Cultural Revolution with Violence and Political Intent
THE CHINESE CREATED THEIR CULTURAL REVOLUTION WITH VIOLENCE AND POLITICAL INTENT. WE DID IT WITH A SELF ORGANIZING MARKET – WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THAT DIFFERENCE? Their ‘Cultural Revolution’ involved granting liberal tolerance to defectors, then rounding them up and brutally killing them in the streets. A uniquely Chinese degree of practical political violence. Their difference in value of individual human life, and intra-cultural trust is evident. A difference we have only attributed to competitive outsiders and religious defectors. Our ‘Cultural Revolution’ (means of identifying defectors, and those with in-group defects) is a free market where the defectors and defective are self-identifying by self-organizing. Where the Chinese exterminated to maintain homogeneity, we can merely politically separate. *Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate.* Look at the current crisis – genocide against our people – as an opportunity to voluntarily exit from the gene pool those costly genes that impede our transcendence into Overmen (gods). Where we could struggle for another thousand years or more to produce a eugenic meritocratic, aristocratic, high trust, high commons, order – we can instead, radically separate not only others, but our own, and make a rapid leap in evolutionary progress. Revel in our time. Few men have the opportunity to leave a mark not only on history – but on the transcendence of mankind. This is the greatest opportunity since the failed construction of Roman Walls. Again – the Chinese succeeded where we have failed; for the simple reason that they use extraordinary violence to produce a hierarchical monopoly, where we use the violence necessary to produce a market of voluntary cooperation. This insight helps us understand not just the Chinese method, but how our method differs, and where it is stronger (innovation and velocity) and where it is weaker (markets make one vulnerable to greed that consumes genetic, cultural, institutional, behavioral, and knowledge capital.)
-
The Chinese Created Their Cultural Revolution with Violence and Political Intent
THE CHINESE CREATED THEIR CULTURAL REVOLUTION WITH VIOLENCE AND POLITICAL INTENT. WE DID IT WITH A SELF ORGANIZING MARKET – WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THAT DIFFERENCE? Their ‘Cultural Revolution’ involved granting liberal tolerance to defectors, then rounding them up and brutally killing them in the streets. A uniquely Chinese degree of practical political violence. Their difference in value of individual human life, and intra-cultural trust is evident. A difference we have only attributed to competitive outsiders and religious defectors. Our ‘Cultural Revolution’ (means of identifying defectors, and those with in-group defects) is a free market where the defectors and defective are self-identifying by self-organizing. Where the Chinese exterminated to maintain homogeneity, we can merely politically separate. *Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate.* Look at the current crisis – genocide against our people – as an opportunity to voluntarily exit from the gene pool those costly genes that impede our transcendence into Overmen (gods). Where we could struggle for another thousand years or more to produce a eugenic meritocratic, aristocratic, high trust, high commons, order – we can instead, radically separate not only others, but our own, and make a rapid leap in evolutionary progress. Revel in our time. Few men have the opportunity to leave a mark not only on history – but on the transcendence of mankind. This is the greatest opportunity since the failed construction of Roman Walls. Again – the Chinese succeeded where we have failed; for the simple reason that they use extraordinary violence to produce a hierarchical monopoly, where we use the violence necessary to produce a market of voluntary cooperation. This insight helps us understand not just the Chinese method, but how our method differs, and where it is stronger (innovation and velocity) and where it is weaker (markets make one vulnerable to greed that consumes genetic, cultural, institutional, behavioral, and knowledge capital.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE CHINESE CREATED THEIR CULTURAL REVOLUTION
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
THE CHINESE CREATED THEIR CULTURAL REVOLUTION WITH VIOLENCE AND POLITICAL INTENT. WE DID IT WITH A SELF ORGANIZING MARKET – WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THAT DIFFERENCE?
Their ‘Cultural Revolution’ involved granting liberal tolerance to defectors, then rounding them up and brutally killing them in the streets. A uniquely Chinese degree of practical political violence. Their difference in value of individual human life, and intra-cultural trust is evident. A difference we have only attributed to competitive outsiders and religious defectors.
Our ‘Cultural Revolution’ (means of identifying defectors, and those with in-group defects) is a free market where the defectors and defective are self-identifying by self-organizing.
Where the Chinese exterminated to maintain homogeneity, we can merely politically separate.
*Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate.*
Look at the current crisis – genocide against our people – as an opportunity to voluntarily exit from the gene pool those costly genes that impede our transcendence into Overmen (gods).
Where we could struggle for another thousand years or more to produce a eugenic meritocratic, aristocratic, high trust, high commons, order – we can instead, radically separate not only others, but our own, and make a rapid leap in evolutionary progress.
Revel in our time. Few men have the opportunity to leave a mark not only on history – but on the transcendence of mankind.
This is the greatest opportunity since the failed construction of Roman Walls. Again – the Chinese succeeded where we have failed; for the simple reason that they use extraordinary violence to produce a hierarchical monopoly, where we use the violence necessary to produce a market of voluntary cooperation.
This insight helps us understand not just the Chinese method, but how our method differs, and where it is stronger (innovation and velocity) and where it is weaker (markets make one vulnerable to greed that consumes genetic, cultural, institutional, behavioral, and knowledge capital.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-26 11:34:01 UTC
-
THE CHINESE CREATED THEIR CULTURAL REVOLUTION WITH VIOLENCE AND POLITICAL INTENT
THE CHINESE CREATED THEIR CULTURAL REVOLUTION WITH VIOLENCE AND POLITICAL INTENT. WE DID IT WITH A SELF ORGANIZING MARKET – WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THAT DIFFERENCE?
Their ‘Cultural Revolution’ involved granting liberal tolerance to defectors, then rounding them up and brutally killing them in the streets. A uniquely Chinese degree of practical political violence. Their difference in value of individual human life, and intra-cultural trust is evident. A difference we have only attributed to competitive outsiders and religious defectors.
Our ‘Cultural Revolution’ (means of identifying defectors, and those with in-group defects) is a free market where the defectors and defective are self-identifying by self-organizing.
Where the Chinese exterminated to maintain homogeneity, we can merely politically separate.
*Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate.*
Look at the current crisis – genocide against our people – as an opportunity to voluntarily exit from the gene pool those costly genes that impede our transcendence into Overmen (gods).
Where we could struggle for another thousand years or more to produce a eugenic meritocratic, aristocratic, high trust, high commons, order – we can instead, radically separate not only others, but our own, and make a rapid leap in evolutionary progress.
Revel in our time. Few men have the opportunity to leave a mark not only on history – but on the transcendence of mankind.
This is the greatest opportunity since the failed construction of Roman Walls. Again – the Chinese succeeded where we have failed; for the simple reason that they use extraordinary violence to produce a hierarchical monopoly, where we use the violence necessary to produce a market of voluntary cooperation.
This insight helps us understand not just the Chinese method, but how our method differs, and where it is stronger (innovation and velocity) and where it is weaker (markets make one vulnerable to greed that consumes genetic, cultural, institutional, behavioral, and knowledge capital.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-26 07:34:00 UTC
-
Copernicus’ Children and Galileo’s Children
Copernicus’ Children Copernicus never married and is not known to have had children, but from at least 1531 until 1539 his relations with Anna Schilling, a live-in housekeeper, were seen as scandalous by two bishops of Warmia who urged him over the years to break off relations with his “mistress”. His sister Katharina married the businessman and Toruń city councilor Barthel Gertner and left five children, whom Copernicus looked after to the end of his life.
Galileo’s Children Despite being a genuinely pious Roman Catholic, Galileo fathered three children out of wedlock with Marina Gamba. They had two daughters, Virginia (born in 1600) and Livia (born in 1601), and a son, Vincenzo (born in 1606). Because of their illegitimate birth, their father considered the girls unmarriageable, if not posing problems of prohibitively expensive support or dowries, which would have been similar to Galileo’s previous extensive financial problems with two of his sisters. Their only worthy alternative was the religious life. Both girls were accepted by the convent of San Matteo in Arcetri and remained there for the rest of their lives. Virginia took the name Maria Celeste upon entering the convent. She died on 2 April 1634, and is buried with Galileo at the Basilica of Santa Croce, Florence. Livia took the name Sister Arcangela and was ill for most of her life. Vincenzo was later legitimised as the legal heir of Galileo and married Sestilia Bocchineri.