Form: Mini Essay

  • Dr Seuss? He was one of Them. He worked to circumvent our children’s stories. Wh

    Dr Seuss? He was one of Them. He worked to circumvent our children’s stories. Why? We are all kings, queens, princes, and princesses, regardless of our rank or we are serfs and slaves.

    —“I think he’s saying that traditional children’s stories focused on the archetypical prince and princess because under the European tribal system, every family was sovereign. Therefore the average person could relate to the tales and recognize the message within.

    Dr Seuss’s stories are nonsense, there is no underlying moral or archetype and therefore the reader does not have a goal or example to follow”—by Steven Jackson

    CD: Worse, like critique, they are meant to destroy our civilization and it’s mythos and its ethics.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-24 16:51:00 UTC

  • (MY POSITION ON RELIGION) The Oath Of Transcendent Man A Pagan, A Christian, An

    (MY POSITION ON RELIGION)

    The Oath Of Transcendent Man A Pagan, A Christian, An Aryan, A Warrior, A Man Transcendent

    (repost from Nov 2017)

    I am a pagan if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends.

    As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Pagan.

    I am a christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian.

    I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan.

    I am a warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior.

    As far as I know, if I succeed as a Pagan, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man.

    And that is the objective of heroes. We leave the rest for ordinary men.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Cult of Sovereignty

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity

    The Propertarian Institute,

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-24 16:46:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE PAGAN, CHRISTIAN, AND FUTURE SACRED I am,

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE PAGAN, CHRISTIAN, AND FUTURE SACRED

    I am, at this stage of my life, extremely conscious of the Germanic and Scandinavian pagan side of my upbringing – possibly because of the influence of my paternal grandfather and his father’s educations. Possibly because I lived in a very germanic town as a child. Possibly because of the remnants of prewar education. Possibly because that category of knowledge has been actively (((suppressed))) by the left in the postwar period.

    I have more in common with, and experience with, Shakespeare’s work as a ‘bible’ than the semitic one. And far more exposure to folklore than Biblical stories.

    This is despite the fact that my mother is a die hard french catholic in the ancient tradition – and I completed the catholic teachings, schooling, and sacrements.

    My own reading formed more of my ‘religion’ than did all the teachings.

    I am fairly sure that when I was in church, I ignored the speeches of the priests and that my concept of god, the saints and the heroes is a pagan one.

    Not by choice but by circumstance.

    This is one of the reasons I understand that if we all went to church and heard it in latin, without understanding a word that was spoken, we would get the benefits of religion simply by the ritual and the sacredness of the circumstance.

    If we instead of listening to latin we did not understand (which I recall, since I am old enough to remember the latin mass) heard the pagan stories and lessons of history, and gave the oath of allegiance (lord’s prayer) to one another, the same result would manifest in the population.

    All the good of religion comes from mindfulness, and mindfulness from training the mind and emotions to intuit (habituate) using beneficial norms rather than animal impulses, and to feel good about it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-24 12:31:22 UTC

  • THE PAGAN, CHRISTIAN, AND FUTURE SACRED I am, at this stage of my life, extremel

    THE PAGAN, CHRISTIAN, AND FUTURE SACRED

    I am, at this stage of my life, extremely conscious of the Germanic and Scandinavian pagan side of my upbringing – possibly because of the influence of my paternal grandfather and his father’s educations. Possibly because I lived in a very germanic town as a child. Possibly because of the remnants of prewar education. Possibly because that category of knowledge has been actively (((suppressed))) by the left in the postwar period.

    I have more in common with, and experience with, Shakespeare’s work as a ‘bible’ than the semitic one. And far more exposure to folklore than Biblical stories.

    This is despite the fact that my mother is a die hard french catholic in the ancient tradition – and I completed the catholic teachings, schooling, and sacrements.

    My own reading formed more of my ‘religion’ than did all the teachings.

    I am fairly sure that when I was in church, I ignored the speeches of the priests and that my concept of god, the saints and the heroes is a pagan one.

    Not by choice but by circumstance.

    This is one of the reasons I understand that if we all went to church and heard it in latin, without understanding a word that was spoken, we would get the benefits of religion simply by the ritual and the sacredness of the circumstance.

    If we instead of listening to latin we did not understand (which I recall, since I am old enough to remember the latin mass) heard the pagan stories and lessons of history, and gave the oath of allegiance (lord’s prayer) to one another, the same result would manifest in the population.

    All the good of religion comes from mindfulness, and mindfulness from training the mind and emotions to intuit (habituate) using beneficial norms rather than animal impulses, and to feel good about it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-24 08:31:00 UTC

  • The Purpose of The Religious Right in Propertarian Prose

    The purpose of the religious right is captured in: (a) Resist the destruction of the intergenerational family as the purpose of government, policy, law and norm. (b) Resist the destruction of civic (voluntary market) society with civil (involuntary monopoly) society. (c) Resist the replacement with the accumulative with the consumptive. (d) Resist the export of charity onto other (virtue signaling) (e) Resist the replacement of humility with arrogance. (f) Resist the replacement of self discipline with self indiscipline. (g) Resist the replacement of the sacred (non-consumption) with the profane (consumption) (g) Resist the replacement of natural law (reciprocity and meritocracy) with arbitrary rule (democracy and equality). (h) Resist the replacement of eugenics (meritocracy) with dysgenics (equality). I am an anti-abrahamist, but that includes the ancient generation (judaism, christianity, Islam), and the modern generation (postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism, marxism, and neo-conservatism). The Germanics (europeans) managed to Germanicize Christianity, into the masculine, hierarchical, and meritocratic (markets), in all but prose. The Germans managed to secularize it in prose (Kant, Hegel). The English managed to restore science (Hobbes, Locke, Smith, Hume, Darwin, Maxwell). The french (Latins) (Rousseau, Derrida, Foucault) and the Ashkenazi (Mendelsohn, Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Adorno, Chomsky) have sought to restore the feminine, equalitarian, and authoritarian (monopoly). But both Protestant and Catholic religion resists de-germanization (violating natural law), and rationalism resists supernaturalism but not pseudoscience (marxism), and science resists pseudoscience( marxism, feminism), pseudo-rationalism (postmodernism), supernaturalism (abrahamism in all its forms), and violation of natural law (arbitrary rule, and equality). There is only one problem remaining of substance for man: one child for those that cannot compete at current levels of development. In four generations, the dysgenia of the industrial revolution would be reversed, and the 3500 year program in market eugenics that we call western civilization will be restored. That is truth. All else is falsehood.

  • The Purpose of The Religious Right in Propertarian Prose

    The purpose of the religious right is captured in: (a) Resist the destruction of the intergenerational family as the purpose of government, policy, law and norm. (b) Resist the destruction of civic (voluntary market) society with civil (involuntary monopoly) society. (c) Resist the replacement with the accumulative with the consumptive. (d) Resist the export of charity onto other (virtue signaling) (e) Resist the replacement of humility with arrogance. (f) Resist the replacement of self discipline with self indiscipline. (g) Resist the replacement of the sacred (non-consumption) with the profane (consumption) (g) Resist the replacement of natural law (reciprocity and meritocracy) with arbitrary rule (democracy and equality). (h) Resist the replacement of eugenics (meritocracy) with dysgenics (equality). I am an anti-abrahamist, but that includes the ancient generation (judaism, christianity, Islam), and the modern generation (postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism, marxism, and neo-conservatism). The Germanics (europeans) managed to Germanicize Christianity, into the masculine, hierarchical, and meritocratic (markets), in all but prose. The Germans managed to secularize it in prose (Kant, Hegel). The English managed to restore science (Hobbes, Locke, Smith, Hume, Darwin, Maxwell). The french (Latins) (Rousseau, Derrida, Foucault) and the Ashkenazi (Mendelsohn, Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Adorno, Chomsky) have sought to restore the feminine, equalitarian, and authoritarian (monopoly). But both Protestant and Catholic religion resists de-germanization (violating natural law), and rationalism resists supernaturalism but not pseudoscience (marxism), and science resists pseudoscience( marxism, feminism), pseudo-rationalism (postmodernism), supernaturalism (abrahamism in all its forms), and violation of natural law (arbitrary rule, and equality). There is only one problem remaining of substance for man: one child for those that cannot compete at current levels of development. In four generations, the dysgenia of the industrial revolution would be reversed, and the 3500 year program in market eugenics that we call western civilization will be restored. That is truth. All else is falsehood.

  • Capitalism vs Socialism and Public Private Partnership

    Capitalism is impossible since no group can survive competition with other groups as other than parasites without producing commons open to free riding or defection. The question is only the method for producing those commons while suppressing free riding and defection. Communism is impossible since no group can survive competition with other groups as other than predators and parasites, by producing commons to the exclusion of private property, because all are incentivized only to free ride (do as little as possible) and defect (engage in black markets and corruption). State (corporation) private (shareholder) partnerships have the best record in history, when the state provides roles of insurer and banker in exchange for returns to the commons. At present the only reason the USA is not competing successfully in the world market is a failure to produce public-private partnerships. The reason we cannot do so is because the left can seek rents on these public private partnerships both politically, economically, and socially by the use of syndicalism (unions etc). Unions are only necessary because the courts do not provide universal standing in matters of the commons – ever since the british began violating the ancestral common law of reciprocity and universal standing.

  • Capitalism vs Socialism and Public Private Partnership

    Capitalism is impossible since no group can survive competition with other groups as other than parasites without producing commons open to free riding or defection. The question is only the method for producing those commons while suppressing free riding and defection. Communism is impossible since no group can survive competition with other groups as other than predators and parasites, by producing commons to the exclusion of private property, because all are incentivized only to free ride (do as little as possible) and defect (engage in black markets and corruption). State (corporation) private (shareholder) partnerships have the best record in history, when the state provides roles of insurer and banker in exchange for returns to the commons. At present the only reason the USA is not competing successfully in the world market is a failure to produce public-private partnerships. The reason we cannot do so is because the left can seek rents on these public private partnerships both politically, economically, and socially by the use of syndicalism (unions etc). Unions are only necessary because the courts do not provide universal standing in matters of the commons – ever since the british began violating the ancestral common law of reciprocity and universal standing.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. CAPITALISM VS SOCIALISM AND PUBLIC PRIVATE PA

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    CAPITALISM VS SOCIALISM AND PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP

    Capitalism is impossible since no group can survive competition with other groups as other than parasites without producing commons open to free riding or defection. The question is only the method for producing those commons while suppressing free riding and defection.

    Communism is impossible since no group can survive competition with other groups as other than predators and parasites, by producing commons to the exclusion of private property, because all are incentivized only to free ride (do as little as possible) and defect (engage in black markets and corruption).

    State (corporation) private (shareholder) partnerships have the best record in history, when the state provides roles of insurer and banker in exchange for returns to the commons.

    At present the only reason the USA is not competing successfully in the world market is a failure to produce public-private partnerships.

    The reason we cannot do so is because the left can seek rents on these public private partnerships both politically, economically, and socially by the use of syndicalism (unions etc). Unions are only necessary because the courts do not provide universal standing in matters of the commons – ever since the british began violating the ancestral common law of reciprocity and universal standing.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 20:42:36 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Centralization is achieved by suppression of

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Centralization is achieved by suppression of local parasitism and rents, and levying taxation instead, that is used for that suppression. This drastically reduces transaction costs and associated risks, which in turn produces volume and velocity. The problem of taxation arises when it is not used for the purpose of suppressing local parasitism and rents and instead simply centralizes parasitism and rents.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 20:05:27 UTC