(FB 1549820681 Timestamp) MORALITY AMORALITY CONFLICT DESPOTISM AND THE SOCIOPATHIC MIND. MORALITY Some basis of morality either exists or it does not. The science, law, and logic say that such a thing is called reciprocity, and reciprocity within the bounds of proportionality, and outside of the bounds of proportionality exit is necessary for any disadvantaged party. And that prohibition on or unbearable cost of exit is the origin of conflict, fighting, and war. AMORALITY If no basis for morality exists, then all that is required is power to force whatever order upon people that is useful. This is a license for any and all for corruption at every level. In other worse, one has rule of law and decidability, or one has rule by man and authority. CONFLICT The evolution of the law has been a battle between corruption (rule by man) and morality (rule of law). Even socialism (rule by man) and capitalism (rule of law), and globalism (rule by men) and nationalism (rule of law), and representative democracy (rule by men), and direct democracy (rule of law) are simply various examples of a long standing battle between the moral men who produce and the immoral men to live by parasitism. DESPOTISM The despot’s argument: empower elites further in order to garner favor (suck up to more successful people). Seize power and opportunity at every opportunity. Incrementally exercise pent up envy, anger, hatred, in order to gain pleasure and relief. SOCIOPATHY Sociopaths use a well documented set of tactics. They are natural liars. They will choose to lie even if the truth is just as advantageous. And once you know how lies are constructed, by using suggestion to force appeal to intuition, then you are no longer vulnerable to liars. The Sociopath’s Mind: “I must dominate, rule, punish, harm” “I have had no achievements” “I have no resources” “I am not likable or desirable” “I cannot build a following nor participate in one” “I cannot build an organization nor participate in one” “I can only use deceit and cunning because of this” “I will use deceit and cunning to self promote at all times” “I will shift locations, alliances, positions, tactics, claims, anything, and deny anything else, in order to exercise my sociopathy and related rewards” This person will always favor despotism because it is in his interests. Because there is no other means by which those without merit can exercise any agency over those others they envy, despise, and hate. THAT IS A CHAIN OF REASONING.
Form: Mini Essay
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549820681 Timestamp) MORALITY AMORALITY CONFLICT DESPOTISM AND THE SOCIOPATHIC MIND. MORALITY Some basis of morality either exists or it does not. The science, law, and logic say that such a thing is called reciprocity, and reciprocity within the bounds of proportionality, and outside of the bounds of proportionality exit is necessary for any disadvantaged party. And that prohibition on or unbearable cost of exit is the origin of conflict, fighting, and war. AMORALITY If no basis for morality exists, then all that is required is power to force whatever order upon people that is useful. This is a license for any and all for corruption at every level. In other worse, one has rule of law and decidability, or one has rule by man and authority. CONFLICT The evolution of the law has been a battle between corruption (rule by man) and morality (rule of law). Even socialism (rule by man) and capitalism (rule of law), and globalism (rule by men) and nationalism (rule of law), and representative democracy (rule by men), and direct democracy (rule of law) are simply various examples of a long standing battle between the moral men who produce and the immoral men to live by parasitism. DESPOTISM The despot’s argument: empower elites further in order to garner favor (suck up to more successful people). Seize power and opportunity at every opportunity. Incrementally exercise pent up envy, anger, hatred, in order to gain pleasure and relief. SOCIOPATHY Sociopaths use a well documented set of tactics. They are natural liars. They will choose to lie even if the truth is just as advantageous. And once you know how lies are constructed, by using suggestion to force appeal to intuition, then you are no longer vulnerable to liars. The Sociopath’s Mind: “I must dominate, rule, punish, harm” “I have had no achievements” “I have no resources” “I am not likable or desirable” “I cannot build a following nor participate in one” “I cannot build an organization nor participate in one” “I can only use deceit and cunning because of this” “I will use deceit and cunning to self promote at all times” “I will shift locations, alliances, positions, tactics, claims, anything, and deny anything else, in order to exercise my sociopathy and related rewards” This person will always favor despotism because it is in his interests. Because there is no other means by which those without merit can exercise any agency over those others they envy, despise, and hate. THAT IS A CHAIN OF REASONING.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549908672 Timestamp) THE MARKET FOR DECIDABILITY When the ordinary person fails he appeals to associates. When associates fail he appeals to superiors When superiors fail he appeals to professionals When professionals fail the appeals to thought leaders. When instincts fail we appeal to familial ethics. When familial ethics fail we appeal to virtue ethics. When virtue ethics fail we appeal to rule ethics When rule ethics fail we appeal to outcome ethics. When intuition fails one must appeal to logic. When logic fails, one must appeal to empiricism. When empiricism fails one must appeal to operationalism. When operationalism fails one must appeal to limits scope and parsimony. When religion fails, one appeals to reason When reason fails one appeals to philosophy When philosophy fails, on appeals to science When science fails, one appeals to testimony. And the opposite is true. Why? We only have so much knowledge, and so much time, to satisfy the market for decidability in time for taking action.
- Curt Doolittle
- The Propertarian Institute.
PS by Bill Joslin Incremental Disambiguation in one direction (from low to high investment)- Graceful failure in the other (from high to low cost) which explains why the later presents stronger incentives than the former.z
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549847452 Timestamp) GETTING IT DONE My understanding of the current situation is that the previous generation of the alt right is dead, and that certain people need to disappear for progress to be made without them boat-anchoring everyone. There are, as always, three different clans that reflect the possible means of exercising power… authoritarian <–> market <-> religious … with overlap, and as in all things, that these clans have common genetic interests, but uncommon methods of achieving them. My preference is that this is the standard we all approach the clans with, and that we agree to fight the status quo from three angles. But that we do not try to determine which order is best, since all orders are necessary, to serve the three power structures, and the elites in each of the three power structures. The reality is that there are limited options available to us. And that those options will favor a legalistic solution as the lowest cost price of entry. That religion has zero hope of anything other than obtaining exclusivity, and that authority requires individuals to emerge capable of that roles – and we have none outside of the military. We have anglos (north and west) the anglo scots irish (the south), and the germans and the scandinavians (the center). The evidence is that of them, the only ones who fight and have military experience are the southerners. The germans never fight. The scandinavians are still cucks, and the anglos are too privileged to do much. We have a potential of going mainstream, while the religious can follow us if we gain momentum, they can do nothing on their own. All the authoritarians can do is form special forces (prosecutors of enemies) so to speak. That is all that can happen. Our (and my) position is that we are better off ‘leaving the alt right behind’ as a failed movement, and will gain normie cred if we either do so, distance ourselves from, or are ‘enemies’ of the hard right. This election is basically our last demographic and political chance so I am not terribly interested in pragmatisms. This sh-t has to get done.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549919526 Timestamp) OUR TRIBES AND PACKS MUST WORK TOGETHER TOWARD A SHARED END: OUR SURVIVAL Look. It’s just reciprocity. Don’t swing at me and mine. It’s not complicated. I don’t swing at others unless they swing first …. or say something so stupid it’s incomprehensible to me (Peterson on “Darwinian Truth” or Taleb on “IQ”… omfg., or basically whenever (((anyone))) in the libertine movement makes and excuse for high fraud.). I stated my vision again yesterday. And I’ll state it more clearly here: Men form packs, and packs unite in tribes. They form tribes to concentrate forces behind leaders. Yet, there are only three means of coercion: 1 – force vs defense, 2 – payment vs missed payment, 3 – and inclusion vs ostracization. So we form groups of: 1 – Force (authoritarian, force), 2 – Operation (rule of law and commerce, science), and 3 – Morality (religion, moralism). These constitute the three political archetype of aggression, exchange, and boycott. We also seem to have adopted the GSRRM of the left (women’s strategy) which is undermining, and technically speaking that is an extension of boycott, moralizing, religion. And because of these three cognitive frameworks, we need leaders of each personality group, cognitive fram, leadership, and strategy. Because together we form a division of knowledge perception comprehension and labor. But here is what it will boil down to. The religious provide human shields (defense), the libertarians provide the communication, propaganda and supply, and the fascists fight. And as far as I know this is the history of how people work albeit with significant overlap. Something of this nature will evolve. The only thing that matters is that: A) we will restore some sort of authority rather than the chaos of the parasites against our people. B) we will restore a constitution and an political and bureaucratic system of policy by which our people are no longer preyed upon by. C) we will restore our religion to the status of a conditional monopoly since all religions contain morals, ethics, laws which are incompatible and lead only to middle eastern chaos and despotism. This is how it will be. Because this is how it must be. Nothing else is possible. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549908672 Timestamp) THE MARKET FOR DECIDABILITY When the ordinary person fails he appeals to associates. When associates fail he appeals to superiors When superiors fail he appeals to professionals When professionals fail the appeals to thought leaders. When instincts fail we appeal to familial ethics. When familial ethics fail we appeal to virtue ethics. When virtue ethics fail we appeal to rule ethics When rule ethics fail we appeal to outcome ethics. When intuition fails one must appeal to logic. When logic fails, one must appeal to empiricism. When empiricism fails one must appeal to operationalism. When operationalism fails one must appeal to limits scope and parsimony. When religion fails, one appeals to reason When reason fails one appeals to philosophy When philosophy fails, on appeals to science When science fails, one appeals to testimony. And the opposite is true. Why? We only have so much knowledge, and so much time, to satisfy the market for decidability in time for taking action.
- Curt Doolittle
- The Propertarian Institute.
PS by Bill Joslin Incremental Disambiguation in one direction (from low to high investment)- Graceful failure in the other (from high to low cost) which explains why the later presents stronger incentives than the former.z
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549847452 Timestamp) GETTING IT DONE My understanding of the current situation is that the previous generation of the alt right is dead, and that certain people need to disappear for progress to be made without them boat-anchoring everyone. There are, as always, three different clans that reflect the possible means of exercising power… authoritarian <–> market <-> religious … with overlap, and as in all things, that these clans have common genetic interests, but uncommon methods of achieving them. My preference is that this is the standard we all approach the clans with, and that we agree to fight the status quo from three angles. But that we do not try to determine which order is best, since all orders are necessary, to serve the three power structures, and the elites in each of the three power structures. The reality is that there are limited options available to us. And that those options will favor a legalistic solution as the lowest cost price of entry. That religion has zero hope of anything other than obtaining exclusivity, and that authority requires individuals to emerge capable of that roles – and we have none outside of the military. We have anglos (north and west) the anglo scots irish (the south), and the germans and the scandinavians (the center). The evidence is that of them, the only ones who fight and have military experience are the southerners. The germans never fight. The scandinavians are still cucks, and the anglos are too privileged to do much. We have a potential of going mainstream, while the religious can follow us if we gain momentum, they can do nothing on their own. All the authoritarians can do is form special forces (prosecutors of enemies) so to speak. That is all that can happen. Our (and my) position is that we are better off ‘leaving the alt right behind’ as a failed movement, and will gain normie cred if we either do so, distance ourselves from, or are ‘enemies’ of the hard right. This election is basically our last demographic and political chance so I am not terribly interested in pragmatisms. This sh-t has to get done.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549919526 Timestamp) OUR TRIBES AND PACKS MUST WORK TOGETHER TOWARD A SHARED END: OUR SURVIVAL Look. It’s just reciprocity. Don’t swing at me and mine. It’s not complicated. I don’t swing at others unless they swing first …. or say something so stupid it’s incomprehensible to me (Peterson on “Darwinian Truth” or Taleb on “IQ”… omfg., or basically whenever (((anyone))) in the libertine movement makes and excuse for high fraud.). I stated my vision again yesterday. And I’ll state it more clearly here: Men form packs, and packs unite in tribes. They form tribes to concentrate forces behind leaders. Yet, there are only three means of coercion: 1 – force vs defense, 2 – payment vs missed payment, 3 – and inclusion vs ostracization. So we form groups of: 1 – Force (authoritarian, force), 2 – Operation (rule of law and commerce, science), and 3 – Morality (religion, moralism). These constitute the three political archetype of aggression, exchange, and boycott. We also seem to have adopted the GSRRM of the left (women’s strategy) which is undermining, and technically speaking that is an extension of boycott, moralizing, religion. And because of these three cognitive frameworks, we need leaders of each personality group, cognitive fram, leadership, and strategy. Because together we form a division of knowledge perception comprehension and labor. But here is what it will boil down to. The religious provide human shields (defense), the libertarians provide the communication, propaganda and supply, and the fascists fight. And as far as I know this is the history of how people work albeit with significant overlap. Something of this nature will evolve. The only thing that matters is that: A) we will restore some sort of authority rather than the chaos of the parasites against our people. B) we will restore a constitution and an political and bureaucratic system of policy by which our people are no longer preyed upon by. C) we will restore our religion to the status of a conditional monopoly since all religions contain morals, ethics, laws which are incompatible and lead only to middle eastern chaos and despotism. This is how it will be. Because this is how it must be. Nothing else is possible. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549990301 Timestamp) VISIONS OF THE FUTURE I don’t have anything against other groups because I understand men speak by and act by different grammars and that those grammars reflect their genes, class, and region – so they have little choice. But reciprocity rules. There is no value in trying to get despotic absolutists, the religious absolutists, the legal absolutists, the classical liberals, the libertarians, and the anarcho capitalists to unite behind a single message or goal other than survival as a group. The reality is that we need authority, religion, law, government, entrepreneurs, investors, and artists. And these demands are supplied by each of the right’s groups. With shared sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, and markets for voluntary organization in all walks of life – and prohibition on all actions against our people. My simple point is that law is and forever will be the means of organizing a population into whatever polity possible, and the left will always be better able to use the semitic techniques of false promise, baiting into moral hazard, fictionalisms, to lie, cheat, and steal from our people, and subject them once again to defeat. As far as I know this argument is unassailable other than to make the claim that the right and libertarians are better liars, whose message sells better than the false promises of the left, when what separates us largely from the left is that we speak the truth whether in scientific, legal, rationalist, or allegorical form, and that our message does not sell, but must be enforced, for the good of those who would hyper-consume the institutions that make our quality of life possible. There is only one way of imposing order at any scale – and that is law: the market for punishment. What order you build upon that law, must today consist of force, finance, commons production, insurance, administration, and education. You cannot avoid producing all of those functions and survive competition in the world. It cannot be done. And these are the roles of the various wings of the right and near right. And if you understand my policy recommendations you will understand also that I’ve solved most of the means of preying upon our people You must only decide: (a) How you want to obtain power, (b) What degree of separation to choose (conquest, secession, big sort. (c) How you want to operate whatever government or governments result. (d) What policies to enact if obtaining power and operating government, while still defending against enemies foreign and domestic. (e) Whether you want to even attempt to impose dictatorship, or a state version of christianity. Because both will fail. My preference is to defederalize, to redistribute centralized federal weath to many regions, eliminate discretionary rule in the federal government – leaving only watchman duties: military, treasury, insurer of last resort, judiciary limited to conflicts between the states. My preference is to impose voluntary disassociation and let the ‘market’ do its job. (this will drive (((enemy))) and occupier into urban centers.(ghettos). My preference is to issue warnings to all other states that if their people come here for our rule, then we will come there to rule their people out of self defense. My preference is forcible repatriation and revocation of passports of the enemies in exchange for not engaging in war upon them mostly south america. My preference is to make european religions of all forms the law of the land, and to prohibit all others, and to restore the churches to control of education, under threat of decomposition if they violate any of the laws. My preference is to immediately export the revolution and restoration to the rest of our peoples – in cooperation with those outside of western europe -all of whom will help us. But the truth is – we will ALWAYS AND EVERYWHERE gravitate to a government of rule of law if we want to survive competition on the world stage with our own people. Because we can outcompete others only by this means. Everything else is not ‘my problem’ so to speak: it is yours. Because I don’t need to involve myself in anything other than bringing about change, and providing the means of transition, and a means of operating such a government if we win. If you want to fight over control of it that’s your game. But you will, I promise, end up with what I propose simply because of the numbers, power, and knowledge of the different factions. You can have wishes and fantasies. But the only reality that can exist is revolt is necessary and very soon. That it will be somewhere between uncomfortable and horrific. That we will choose PRAGMATICALLY whatever means of ‘divorce’ is most easily available (mine is easiest), and what rules to impose on people in order to complete the victory, while not being conquered by external forces. Anything else you believe is nonsense. If you are too frightened to fight for these conditions then just shut up, cower, and stay out of the way of those who are not. There are men among us. And we are many. And we are enough. Anyone i find deluding our people to any other set of options is an ally of our enemy, and I will, and we will, do everything possible to punish you and silence you for your actions. Curt Doolittle.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549990301 Timestamp) VISIONS OF THE FUTURE I don’t have anything against other groups because I understand men speak by and act by different grammars and that those grammars reflect their genes, class, and region – so they have little choice. But reciprocity rules. There is no value in trying to get despotic absolutists, the religious absolutists, the legal absolutists, the classical liberals, the libertarians, and the anarcho capitalists to unite behind a single message or goal other than survival as a group. The reality is that we need authority, religion, law, government, entrepreneurs, investors, and artists. And these demands are supplied by each of the right’s groups. With shared sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, and markets for voluntary organization in all walks of life – and prohibition on all actions against our people. My simple point is that law is and forever will be the means of organizing a population into whatever polity possible, and the left will always be better able to use the semitic techniques of false promise, baiting into moral hazard, fictionalisms, to lie, cheat, and steal from our people, and subject them once again to defeat. As far as I know this argument is unassailable other than to make the claim that the right and libertarians are better liars, whose message sells better than the false promises of the left, when what separates us largely from the left is that we speak the truth whether in scientific, legal, rationalist, or allegorical form, and that our message does not sell, but must be enforced, for the good of those who would hyper-consume the institutions that make our quality of life possible. There is only one way of imposing order at any scale – and that is law: the market for punishment. What order you build upon that law, must today consist of force, finance, commons production, insurance, administration, and education. You cannot avoid producing all of those functions and survive competition in the world. It cannot be done. And these are the roles of the various wings of the right and near right. And if you understand my policy recommendations you will understand also that I’ve solved most of the means of preying upon our people You must only decide: (a) How you want to obtain power, (b) What degree of separation to choose (conquest, secession, big sort. (c) How you want to operate whatever government or governments result. (d) What policies to enact if obtaining power and operating government, while still defending against enemies foreign and domestic. (e) Whether you want to even attempt to impose dictatorship, or a state version of christianity. Because both will fail. My preference is to defederalize, to redistribute centralized federal weath to many regions, eliminate discretionary rule in the federal government – leaving only watchman duties: military, treasury, insurer of last resort, judiciary limited to conflicts between the states. My preference is to impose voluntary disassociation and let the ‘market’ do its job. (this will drive (((enemy))) and occupier into urban centers.(ghettos). My preference is to issue warnings to all other states that if their people come here for our rule, then we will come there to rule their people out of self defense. My preference is forcible repatriation and revocation of passports of the enemies in exchange for not engaging in war upon them mostly south america. My preference is to make european religions of all forms the law of the land, and to prohibit all others, and to restore the churches to control of education, under threat of decomposition if they violate any of the laws. My preference is to immediately export the revolution and restoration to the rest of our peoples – in cooperation with those outside of western europe -all of whom will help us. But the truth is – we will ALWAYS AND EVERYWHERE gravitate to a government of rule of law if we want to survive competition on the world stage with our own people. Because we can outcompete others only by this means. Everything else is not ‘my problem’ so to speak: it is yours. Because I don’t need to involve myself in anything other than bringing about change, and providing the means of transition, and a means of operating such a government if we win. If you want to fight over control of it that’s your game. But you will, I promise, end up with what I propose simply because of the numbers, power, and knowledge of the different factions. You can have wishes and fantasies. But the only reality that can exist is revolt is necessary and very soon. That it will be somewhere between uncomfortable and horrific. That we will choose PRAGMATICALLY whatever means of ‘divorce’ is most easily available (mine is easiest), and what rules to impose on people in order to complete the victory, while not being conquered by external forces. Anything else you believe is nonsense. If you are too frightened to fight for these conditions then just shut up, cower, and stay out of the way of those who are not. There are men among us. And we are many. And we are enough. Anyone i find deluding our people to any other set of options is an ally of our enemy, and I will, and we will, do everything possible to punish you and silence you for your actions. Curt Doolittle.