Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549746742 Timestamp) THE GREAT LIE OF THE 20TH CENTURY IT’S NOT CAPITALISM VS SOCIALISM but RULE OF LAW, MARKETS FOR CLASSES, and NATIONALISM of EUROPEANS VS RULE BY AUTHORITARIAN DISCRETION, MONOPOLY, and INTERNATIONALISM of MIDDLE EASTERNERS. (Simple rules for moral people, and simple rule for immoral people.) —“I think the issue could largely be the hierarchy of what we value. Rather than seeing capitalism as the best way to improve the material well-being of people, it became the goal itself. So, whereas before, the focus of life was family, faith, and folk (and the method by which you took care of your family was economic system), capitalism became the goal (“greed is good” rather than the more neutral “everyone operates in their self-interest” of Locke and Smith), and family, faith, and folk became secondary, tertiary, or a non factor. Communism is an evil, possibly the greatest evil to ever gain traction, but it’s not an evil because of the market conditions.”—Ethan Trice Yeah. well who invented the term ‘capitalism’ and who advances it rather than rule of law?

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549735909 Timestamp) OUR LANGUAGES DETERMINE OUR ORGANIZATIONS OF RESISTANCE AND REBELLION Western people have always been tripartite: Fight (rule), Pray (administer), Work (produce), and never developed semitic monopoly (submission to an abstraction). In our past we had celtic, anglo-saxon, and anglo-saxon-nordic of the common people, anglo-saxon (norman) french of the political class, and the latin and greek of the educated classes. We had the hearth religion of the common people, the christianity, aryanism and law of the political class, and the law, christianity and philosophy of the educated classes. When we developed the middle classes, we had the hearth religion of the common people, upward migration of participation into christianity and the law, upward participation participation of the middle and upper classes into law and philosophy, and the gradual exit of classes from christianity, leaving the academy as the survivor of the church, and the church a social group for the lower classes. This is because law is and philosophy are rational, and therefore problems calculable, and as division of labor increases, complexity arises, wealth is created, demand for consistent rules that limit bad behavior (risk) is amended by greater demand for adaptation, and needs to reason and calculate the continuous unknown in a world of continuous risk offset by continuously improving returns. All language consists of measurements(nouns, names) and operations(verbs, actions) resulting in calculations (statements, promises) which accumulate into transactions (sentences, paragraphs, arguments), that produce a contract for reciprocal consistency (meaning). Today we have islam and judaism for the enemy, christianity for those indoctrinated, a range of subjective moralizing for those not so (Gossiping, Shaming, Ridicule, Rallying), the combination of sophism, pseudoscience, and deceit in marxism,socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and anarchic denialism, for those indoctrinated by the academy, the allegorical use of literature by the academy, the archaic remnants of philosophical rationalism (the academic version of religion), the law in natural(right), limited(classical), and unlimited(left) forms, the pseudosciences (social) and sciences (physical.) We have many grammatical paradigms (vocabulary, rules of disambiguation into transactions that I call the ‘grammars’) for use across and within our classes, and with greater or less frequency in different regions, because of origins of regional peoples, and consequent internal migrations. THE HERD ALL SPEAKS THE SAME LANGUAGE. THE PACKS DON’T. JULY 22, 2018 The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack. Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary. And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass. And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism. So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight. So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all. The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549742098 Timestamp) THE IRRELEVANCE OF THE DESPERATE FOR RELEVANCE I’m not listed anywhere by anyone in any canon, registry, article, or map as ‘alt right’. I didn’t want to be associated with the alt right. I tried the moniker New Right but Paul Joseph Watson started using it, and I hadn’t TM’d it so I lost that one. I can sympathize with the alt right as a movement of justifiably dissatisfied young men, copying Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals and making use of new technology to achieve against the left with the interet what the left achieved with media against the rest of us. And I’m “On The Right” in the sense that I’m a conservative libertarian (sovereignty, and private property) – which makes me a rule-of-law rightist rather than an authoritarian or religious rightist. In my ideal world we have a rule of law by natural law, an independent judiciary, an hereditary monarchy, professional ministers, some set of class based houses of veto allocated by random selection, and something that would look very much like intolerant nationalism in the interwar french and german model. If that sounds like fascism, it’s simply extremely intolerant anglo monarchy under rule of law. John Mark has made us very popular very fast. Faster than we had ever imagined. Because his message sells, and he’s a hell of a smart guy, with media ready personality, and quality writer and producer. People of good character sell by their nature. People of poor character do not sell because of their nature. John is a man of good character and his message sells accordingly. ATTENTION DEFICIT DESPERATION DISORDER The current round of criticism is driven by Josh Jeppeson (Imperius) > Dylan Thomas (TruDilTom) and Dylan’s cohost (I won’t name) > Richard (Dicky) Spencer. Josh recruited Moritz Bierling, [name removed] and Joel Davis from my followers. Young smart guys with great promise but lacking skin in the game (family, career, biz) a need for aesthetics – which means “secular religious zeal”. And some of these folks attempted to stir conflict with me and those people who work with me. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ABOUT YOUNG SMART MEN Those without agency or responsibility in a sphere of influence(family, social, economic, political, military) generate demand for authority whether intelligent or dim, knowledgeable or ignorant. And they do so by means that they can participate in: sophism, supernatural sophism, economic sophism and pseudoscience and political pseudoscience and sophism. Because passion (emotion), persuasion(sophism), and pretense of knowledge, is all that they have to work with. And as with any market product ‘there is a sucker born every minute’ for every grammar of advocacy and persuasion. Each of us demonstrates a moral intuition a grammar of advocacy, argument, and resistance, and these demonstrations reflect our sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value. In other words, our moral intuitions reflect our reproductive strategies; our method of argument reflect those reproductive strategies. Each of us demonstrates at every single moment our sexual social economic, political, and military value with every expression gesture, display, dress, word, and deed – with humans working very hard to signal falsehoods: children their value in association, and women notoriously their youth, and men notoriously their future potential to the pack. So as a result we see the dim pursue religion, the less dim secular spiritualism or the occult, the less dim framing and sophism, the less dim pseudoscience. But those with agency, in a sphere of influence, with assets, relations, knowledge, and experience, simply use truth and utility, and rather than inspire, or persuade, they provide rational incentives for possible practical means of operating the familial, social, economic, political, and military order. Everything you want to know about an individual can be determined by his means of advocacy, argument, and resistance. Grammars of argument, just like vocabulary, are insights into the operations of the human mind. And there exist a limited number of NON CORRESPONDENT grammars to work with just as there are a limited number of personality traits. Megan Usui was an insider advising and promoting me. Unfortunately she was backchannel working with Jeppeson – I love her but good intentioned people are easily fooled. I think they concocted some idea of uniting the hard right. Of “bringing us all together”. Something ‘undesirable’. But Jeppeson is a sociopath and coat-tail rider. He tried to do something himself and couldn’t’. Tried to ride my coattails. And yes, I’m too tolerant of human pound puppies, but you know, after the tenth rage-quit and death threat, even the most tolerant of people disconnect and keep you at arm’s length. Megan worked up the meeting in NY with me Duchesne and Macdonald. Jeppeson spent the entire summer trying to convince megan that I couldn’t do it for some reason and that he should instead. (laughable.) Then another death threat, this time in public, on voice chat. I threatened to turn him into cops. It worked and he got quiet for a bit. Spencer is desperate for relevance, and the rest of the ‘leadership’ so to speak has simply ignored him. However, we are the rising stars and will be able to reach far larger numbers than the ‘alt right’, because we are selling a portfolio of solutions that will produce right, libertarian, and centrist ends, at the sole expense of the very bottom and very top – and natural incentives and pressures will do the rest. The secret to collapsing a dam or a fortress wall, is to weaken it and let the natural gravity of the environment do the work for you as a consequence. A good way of capturing attention is to undermine the competition. This is the strategy of female proxy for violence: undermining. Women gossip, shame, ridicule, rally,moralize (“GSRRM”), and they do so to hold back competitors rather than to to provide opportunities superior to those of competitors. Evidence suggests that the origin of language has as much to do with GSSRM to control alphas and redistribute control of reproduction as it does for hunters to communicate – when hunting is an almost entirely silent occupation. (The counter is that whenever GSSRM is used against you, retaliate with it, then repeat the central point. Use each volley GSSRM as a means of promoting your central point and thesis, and simply wear out the other party’s reliance on GSSRM. Over time people learn that GSSRM “hats are empty” so to speak. This takes patience but it always succeeds.) Dylan seemed interested in P, but I’m guessing was pursued Jeppson, who then rode Dylan’s coattails and rage crashed their group at some point but I don’t know if he still does. He’s riding Richards coattails now, and Jeppeson’s a lot smarter than Spencer. (God knows Spencer’s not smart enough to comprehend my work. What did he accomplish other than being the poster child for what NOT to do?) So Richard makes a good sock puppet for Jeppeson who is hoping to make Spencer relevant again. Despite the fact that Richard is selling inspiration to empty halls and was only relevant as a whipping boy for the press. Jeppeson and Dylan were pitching a somewhat novel version authoritarian postmodernism by combining a bit of pseudoscience and sophism. (Like Derrida, social construction, and therefore authoritarianism.) And it’s going nowhere for obvious reasons. But there are suckers born every minute and suckers for sophism are everywhere, just as suckers for passion, supernaturalism and pseudoscience are everywhere. So these guys, who have never accomplished anything in life – not even so much as a family, career, or small business but have grandiose visions of themselves and their understanding of the world (despite lack of evidence) are merely pursuing self interest – not our group interests. In this sense, in hindsight I almost wish the deplatforming was more successful so that bad I deas could not be funded so easily by donations from those susceptible to each non-correspondent grammar of persuasion. And so between two sock puppets and a sociopath we undrestand the scramble for relevance – the desperate cries for attention. GOING MAINSTREAM We (our folks) have tried the direct message (constitutional change desirable by the majority of our people) with the only method anyone thinks will work (mass resistance, uprising, or conflict) and given that the people are frustrated, they are buying the message because of it. They’re buying it because It isn’t a message about ‘follow me’. Or a message of handwaving. It’s a message that we have the power to alter the course of events if we choose, and we have an actionable plan of change that will restore our laboring working and middle classes at the expense of the financial, media, and political classes, and end the redistribution of our reproduction to invaders. Now this might not work. But it is the only deal on the table at the moment that isn’t evangelism, hand waving, woo, or unmarketable – and it’s certainly open to improvement and revision. LEAVE THEM BEHIND The irrelevant get left behind, because they deserve to be. But we should not expect the irrelevant to continue to disappear without desperately trying to preserve the attention they garner. One bad apple spoils the whole movement. Richard is irrelevant and poisonous to our success, and Jeppeson is just sociopath and cancer and always has been. The rest are probably well intentioned cerebral young men without any agency or experience seeking ideals as substitute for sphere of influence (family, business etc). “CLEAN OUR HOUSE FIRST” (so to speak) -Curt Doolittle

    -The Propertarian Institute

    People Mentioned in this post: – Richard Spencer – Josh Jeppeson (alias Josh Jeppson, “imperius”) – Dylan Thomas (TruDilTom) – Joel Davis ( Joel Davis )

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549735909 Timestamp) OUR LANGUAGES DETERMINE OUR ORGANIZATIONS OF RESISTANCE AND REBELLION Western people have always been tripartite: Fight (rule), Pray (administer), Work (produce), and never developed semitic monopoly (submission to an abstraction). In our past we had celtic, anglo-saxon, and anglo-saxon-nordic of the common people, anglo-saxon (norman) french of the political class, and the latin and greek of the educated classes. We had the hearth religion of the common people, the christianity, aryanism and law of the political class, and the law, christianity and philosophy of the educated classes. When we developed the middle classes, we had the hearth religion of the common people, upward migration of participation into christianity and the law, upward participation participation of the middle and upper classes into law and philosophy, and the gradual exit of classes from christianity, leaving the academy as the survivor of the church, and the church a social group for the lower classes. This is because law is and philosophy are rational, and therefore problems calculable, and as division of labor increases, complexity arises, wealth is created, demand for consistent rules that limit bad behavior (risk) is amended by greater demand for adaptation, and needs to reason and calculate the continuous unknown in a world of continuous risk offset by continuously improving returns. All language consists of measurements(nouns, names) and operations(verbs, actions) resulting in calculations (statements, promises) which accumulate into transactions (sentences, paragraphs, arguments), that produce a contract for reciprocal consistency (meaning). Today we have islam and judaism for the enemy, christianity for those indoctrinated, a range of subjective moralizing for those not so (Gossiping, Shaming, Ridicule, Rallying), the combination of sophism, pseudoscience, and deceit in marxism,socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and anarchic denialism, for those indoctrinated by the academy, the allegorical use of literature by the academy, the archaic remnants of philosophical rationalism (the academic version of religion), the law in natural(right), limited(classical), and unlimited(left) forms, the pseudosciences (social) and sciences (physical.) We have many grammatical paradigms (vocabulary, rules of disambiguation into transactions that I call the ‘grammars’) for use across and within our classes, and with greater or less frequency in different regions, because of origins of regional peoples, and consequent internal migrations. THE HERD ALL SPEAKS THE SAME LANGUAGE. THE PACKS DON’T. JULY 22, 2018 The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack. Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary. And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass. And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism. So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight. So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all. The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549746742 Timestamp) THE GREAT LIE OF THE 20TH CENTURY IT’S NOT CAPITALISM VS SOCIALISM but RULE OF LAW, MARKETS FOR CLASSES, and NATIONALISM of EUROPEANS VS RULE BY AUTHORITARIAN DISCRETION, MONOPOLY, and INTERNATIONALISM of MIDDLE EASTERNERS. (Simple rules for moral people, and simple rule for immoral people.) —“I think the issue could largely be the hierarchy of what we value. Rather than seeing capitalism as the best way to improve the material well-being of people, it became the goal itself. So, whereas before, the focus of life was family, faith, and folk (and the method by which you took care of your family was economic system), capitalism became the goal (“greed is good” rather than the more neutral “everyone operates in their self-interest” of Locke and Smith), and family, faith, and folk became secondary, tertiary, or a non factor. Communism is an evil, possibly the greatest evil to ever gain traction, but it’s not an evil because of the market conditions.”—Ethan Trice Yeah. well who invented the term ‘capitalism’ and who advances it rather than rule of law?

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549742098 Timestamp) THE IRRELEVANCE OF THE DESPERATE FOR RELEVANCE I’m not listed anywhere by anyone in any canon, registry, article, or map as ‘alt right’. I didn’t want to be associated with the alt right. I tried the moniker New Right but Paul Joseph Watson started using it, and I hadn’t TM’d it so I lost that one. I can sympathize with the alt right as a movement of justifiably dissatisfied young men, copying Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals and making use of new technology to achieve against the left with the interet what the left achieved with media against the rest of us. And I’m “On The Right” in the sense that I’m a conservative libertarian (sovereignty, and private property) – which makes me a rule-of-law rightist rather than an authoritarian or religious rightist. In my ideal world we have a rule of law by natural law, an independent judiciary, an hereditary monarchy, professional ministers, some set of class based houses of veto allocated by random selection, and something that would look very much like intolerant nationalism in the interwar french and german model. If that sounds like fascism, it’s simply extremely intolerant anglo monarchy under rule of law. John Mark has made us very popular very fast. Faster than we had ever imagined. Because his message sells, and he’s a hell of a smart guy, with media ready personality, and quality writer and producer. People of good character sell by their nature. People of poor character do not sell because of their nature. John is a man of good character and his message sells accordingly. ATTENTION DEFICIT DESPERATION DISORDER The current round of criticism is driven by Josh Jeppeson (Imperius) > Dylan Thomas (TruDilTom) and Dylan’s cohost (I won’t name) > Richard (Dicky) Spencer. Josh recruited Moritz Bierling, [name removed] and Joel Davis from my followers. Young smart guys with great promise but lacking skin in the game (family, career, biz) a need for aesthetics – which means “secular religious zeal”. And some of these folks attempted to stir conflict with me and those people who work with me. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ABOUT YOUNG SMART MEN Those without agency or responsibility in a sphere of influence(family, social, economic, political, military) generate demand for authority whether intelligent or dim, knowledgeable or ignorant. And they do so by means that they can participate in: sophism, supernatural sophism, economic sophism and pseudoscience and political pseudoscience and sophism. Because passion (emotion), persuasion(sophism), and pretense of knowledge, is all that they have to work with. And as with any market product ‘there is a sucker born every minute’ for every grammar of advocacy and persuasion. Each of us demonstrates a moral intuition a grammar of advocacy, argument, and resistance, and these demonstrations reflect our sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value. In other words, our moral intuitions reflect our reproductive strategies; our method of argument reflect those reproductive strategies. Each of us demonstrates at every single moment our sexual social economic, political, and military value with every expression gesture, display, dress, word, and deed – with humans working very hard to signal falsehoods: children their value in association, and women notoriously their youth, and men notoriously their future potential to the pack. So as a result we see the dim pursue religion, the less dim secular spiritualism or the occult, the less dim framing and sophism, the less dim pseudoscience. But those with agency, in a sphere of influence, with assets, relations, knowledge, and experience, simply use truth and utility, and rather than inspire, or persuade, they provide rational incentives for possible practical means of operating the familial, social, economic, political, and military order. Everything you want to know about an individual can be determined by his means of advocacy, argument, and resistance. Grammars of argument, just like vocabulary, are insights into the operations of the human mind. And there exist a limited number of NON CORRESPONDENT grammars to work with just as there are a limited number of personality traits. Megan Usui was an insider advising and promoting me. Unfortunately she was backchannel working with Jeppeson – I love her but good intentioned people are easily fooled. I think they concocted some idea of uniting the hard right. Of “bringing us all together”. Something ‘undesirable’. But Jeppeson is a sociopath and coat-tail rider. He tried to do something himself and couldn’t’. Tried to ride my coattails. And yes, I’m too tolerant of human pound puppies, but you know, after the tenth rage-quit and death threat, even the most tolerant of people disconnect and keep you at arm’s length. Megan worked up the meeting in NY with me Duchesne and Macdonald. Jeppeson spent the entire summer trying to convince megan that I couldn’t do it for some reason and that he should instead. (laughable.) Then another death threat, this time in public, on voice chat. I threatened to turn him into cops. It worked and he got quiet for a bit. Spencer is desperate for relevance, and the rest of the ‘leadership’ so to speak has simply ignored him. However, we are the rising stars and will be able to reach far larger numbers than the ‘alt right’, because we are selling a portfolio of solutions that will produce right, libertarian, and centrist ends, at the sole expense of the very bottom and very top – and natural incentives and pressures will do the rest. The secret to collapsing a dam or a fortress wall, is to weaken it and let the natural gravity of the environment do the work for you as a consequence. A good way of capturing attention is to undermine the competition. This is the strategy of female proxy for violence: undermining. Women gossip, shame, ridicule, rally,moralize (“GSRRM”), and they do so to hold back competitors rather than to to provide opportunities superior to those of competitors. Evidence suggests that the origin of language has as much to do with GSSRM to control alphas and redistribute control of reproduction as it does for hunters to communicate – when hunting is an almost entirely silent occupation. (The counter is that whenever GSSRM is used against you, retaliate with it, then repeat the central point. Use each volley GSSRM as a means of promoting your central point and thesis, and simply wear out the other party’s reliance on GSSRM. Over time people learn that GSSRM “hats are empty” so to speak. This takes patience but it always succeeds.) Dylan seemed interested in P, but I’m guessing was pursued Jeppson, who then rode Dylan’s coattails and rage crashed their group at some point but I don’t know if he still does. He’s riding Richards coattails now, and Jeppeson’s a lot smarter than Spencer. (God knows Spencer’s not smart enough to comprehend my work. What did he accomplish other than being the poster child for what NOT to do?) So Richard makes a good sock puppet for Jeppeson who is hoping to make Spencer relevant again. Despite the fact that Richard is selling inspiration to empty halls and was only relevant as a whipping boy for the press. Jeppeson and Dylan were pitching a somewhat novel version authoritarian postmodernism by combining a bit of pseudoscience and sophism. (Like Derrida, social construction, and therefore authoritarianism.) And it’s going nowhere for obvious reasons. But there are suckers born every minute and suckers for sophism are everywhere, just as suckers for passion, supernaturalism and pseudoscience are everywhere. So these guys, who have never accomplished anything in life – not even so much as a family, career, or small business but have grandiose visions of themselves and their understanding of the world (despite lack of evidence) are merely pursuing self interest – not our group interests. In this sense, in hindsight I almost wish the deplatforming was more successful so that bad I deas could not be funded so easily by donations from those susceptible to each non-correspondent grammar of persuasion. And so between two sock puppets and a sociopath we undrestand the scramble for relevance – the desperate cries for attention. GOING MAINSTREAM We (our folks) have tried the direct message (constitutional change desirable by the majority of our people) with the only method anyone thinks will work (mass resistance, uprising, or conflict) and given that the people are frustrated, they are buying the message because of it. They’re buying it because It isn’t a message about ‘follow me’. Or a message of handwaving. It’s a message that we have the power to alter the course of events if we choose, and we have an actionable plan of change that will restore our laboring working and middle classes at the expense of the financial, media, and political classes, and end the redistribution of our reproduction to invaders. Now this might not work. But it is the only deal on the table at the moment that isn’t evangelism, hand waving, woo, or unmarketable – and it’s certainly open to improvement and revision. LEAVE THEM BEHIND The irrelevant get left behind, because they deserve to be. But we should not expect the irrelevant to continue to disappear without desperately trying to preserve the attention they garner. One bad apple spoils the whole movement. Richard is irrelevant and poisonous to our success, and Jeppeson is just sociopath and cancer and always has been. The rest are probably well intentioned cerebral young men without any agency or experience seeking ideals as substitute for sphere of influence (family, business etc). “CLEAN OUR HOUSE FIRST” (so to speak) -Curt Doolittle

    -The Propertarian Institute

    People Mentioned in this post: – Richard Spencer – Josh Jeppeson (alias Josh Jeppson, “imperius”) – Dylan Thomas (TruDilTom) – Joel Davis ( Joel Davis )

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549802891 Timestamp) FEARFUL CONSERVATIVES: UNDERSTAND YOURSELVES MALE VS FEMALE The female mind fears being alone and left behind. This drives the left. It is a herd behavior like all other herd animals. it drives demand for proportionality and equality. The male mind fears being alone and conquered. This drives the right. it is a pack behavior. It drives demand for meritocracy and pack position. Each of us demonstrates our position on the spectrum of minds from male and female. CONSERVATIVE FEAR Conservatism is a genetic predisposition to fear of systemic risk ( Enlarged Amygdala ). Neuroticism is a personality trait that makes all humans worry. Lack of agency incentivizes worry. Low Sexual, Social, Economic, Political and Military market value creates continuous rejection and reason to worry. Failure of the civil society, religion, and family in the face of second wave abrahamism (islamism, judaism, marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism) provide demonstrable reasons to worry. The extremes of fear produce schizotypal behavior as a consequence: paranoia, conspiracy, dread, powerlessness. DIVISION OF COGNITIVE AND EMOTIONAL LABOR Indoctrination in the fallacies of christian equality, equalitarian democracy, and leftist human equality of ability and value create illusion that we must all agree. In reality tripartism still exists and our ancient classes still exist, and those of us from the martial class that have been in warrior families for four thousand years or more, are very different from those of you who have been peasants or priestly or female for four thousand years or more. NON INTERFERENCE IS THE OPTIMUM SOLUTION And you who are fearful just need to not INTERFERE with the men and women who are not neurotic, not lacking agency, not lacking sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, and not fearful – but instead REVEL IN THE OPPORTUNITY FOR HEROIC ACHIEVEMENT in the model of our ancestors. You only matter in not hindering “Those who fight”. The rest of us not only don’t fear the fight. we are excited at the possibility of conflict; of heroic efforts in the service of our people; of punishing the enemies of our people; and of leaving a mark on history so that we are immortal in the memories of our descendants. THE STRONG DEFEND, CONQUER, AND RULE The rest are along for the ride. Be thankful. See Indo European Tripartism, or more recently The Three Orders: http://historyguide.org/ancient/lecture23b.html

  • On Criticism of Working in Public “Curt: Why No Secrecy!!!”

    AGAINST CRITICISM ON WORKING IN PUBLIC February 9th, 2019 POLICY:TRANSPARENCY (i.e. “CURT: WHY NO SECRECY!!!”) 1 – I do my work out in the open with my real name. I always have. 2 – I educate our people on how to produce and implement a restoration of the constitution that will allow us reclaim our destiny by constitutional amendment, and certainty of members of the state the rebellion to enact it – or to cause secession between those who do and do not wish so. 3 – I do this to provide an actionable solution that will prevent the bloodiest civil war in human history that is one spark from igniting, and one that has been deterministic since the 1965 socialist transition of immigration from kin to aliens. 4 – I NEVER EVER cross the line to advocacy or organization or participation in direct action. I seek only to make our people understand that if we did choose to revolt that our success is a virtual certainty and therefore to make the state end its denial that we would. 5 – If you cannot do the same then I can’t be associated with you, and I don’t want to. You are a danger to me and our people 6 – All ‘secret’ activity only attracts the wrong people, with the wrong incentives, to engaging in the wrong behaviors, that will end in their and our harm. 7 – All any action by the state against me as a thought leader working on restoration of the constitution to prevent its usurpation, and the creation of policies in the defense of our people from economic, cultural, and genetic predation would only serve to demonstrate to the people we seek to reach the corruption of that government, and in turn grant additional legitimacy to both the promise of my work, and the promise of our ability to force our self defense into the body of law. 8 – If we must, at some future time, act, then we must and will act toward a moral end, with an actionable plan, and all act at once. And in the interim we must constraint all lunatics from preventing our expansion into the majority and the provision of solutions for the vast majority of our people – exclusive of those fools, traitors and enemies among them. 9 – Only the more sophisticated followers understand how I use the ‘marketplace’ of the internet to criticize ideas, whittle away at them, and discover those few grains of truth therein. Only the more sophisticated followers understand how I use the king of the hill game to run those tests. At any given time I might be testing any set of ideas by king of the hill games, to get you to defeat them so that I understand how to replace those ideas with better ones. I don’t want you to understand what I am doing. If you undrestand I am playing this game, and running these tests, then their utility declines. The secret to any psychological testing is to work indirectly by appealing to people’s intuitions such that their natural tendency to signal rather than report is circumvented. This is is how I work. I create games that indirectly allow me to discover possibilities. I do not start with presumptions, I simply start with what is presumed, and attack it until only a few grains of truth remain. With those gains of truth I then reconstruct the law. What we do with that law is up to us – should we obtain the power to enforce its adoption. And I must convince you only that we both have the power, and that the laws once enacted will serve our purposes. This means that all my work was in the construction of the law, the rest is only the policy we enact by that law, and the incentives of citizens to use the law to suppress, defeat, or exit those who continue the 2500 year war against our people. Thank you for your time. -Curt Doolittle ====== FROMl: thisisnotmyemail@hotmail.com REGARDING: https://ordoevangelistarum.com/ Sir, I love your thoughts but am not happy with your boomer-tier tools. Thomas Lewis from Ordo Evangelistarum has the right ideas when it comes to implementing websites, forums, and comms. He only uses open source programs that have been rigorously tested. He is also friends with some honorable computer nerds that help him out. You use gmail. For the love of god, why? I’m not emailing you only to be flagged by the crazed technocrats at google for not thinking like them. Discord is run by a bunch of SJWs who do not share anything with you in common either. Once again, I wont be using discord. Open source alternatives like OE is using. 1) comms. Riot app using decentralized matrix servers. Thomas has his own server which he controls. I prefer servers in third world countries because why not. 2) Forum. He uses Discord which is simple and effective and once again, you control it yourself. At least use some free tools that arent made around collecting user data to sell. Other than that, my respect for you overrides any disdain I have for your boomer tech strategy. ====

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549802891 Timestamp) FEARFUL CONSERVATIVES: UNDERSTAND YOURSELVES MALE VS FEMALE The female mind fears being alone and left behind. This drives the left. It is a herd behavior like all other herd animals. it drives demand for proportionality and equality. The male mind fears being alone and conquered. This drives the right. it is a pack behavior. It drives demand for meritocracy and pack position. Each of us demonstrates our position on the spectrum of minds from male and female. CONSERVATIVE FEAR Conservatism is a genetic predisposition to fear of systemic risk ( Enlarged Amygdala ). Neuroticism is a personality trait that makes all humans worry. Lack of agency incentivizes worry. Low Sexual, Social, Economic, Political and Military market value creates continuous rejection and reason to worry. Failure of the civil society, religion, and family in the face of second wave abrahamism (islamism, judaism, marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism) provide demonstrable reasons to worry. The extremes of fear produce schizotypal behavior as a consequence: paranoia, conspiracy, dread, powerlessness. DIVISION OF COGNITIVE AND EMOTIONAL LABOR Indoctrination in the fallacies of christian equality, equalitarian democracy, and leftist human equality of ability and value create illusion that we must all agree. In reality tripartism still exists and our ancient classes still exist, and those of us from the martial class that have been in warrior families for four thousand years or more, are very different from those of you who have been peasants or priestly or female for four thousand years or more. NON INTERFERENCE IS THE OPTIMUM SOLUTION And you who are fearful just need to not INTERFERE with the men and women who are not neurotic, not lacking agency, not lacking sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, and not fearful – but instead REVEL IN THE OPPORTUNITY FOR HEROIC ACHIEVEMENT in the model of our ancestors. You only matter in not hindering “Those who fight”. The rest of us not only don’t fear the fight. we are excited at the possibility of conflict; of heroic efforts in the service of our people; of punishing the enemies of our people; and of leaving a mark on history so that we are immortal in the memories of our descendants. THE STRONG DEFEND, CONQUER, AND RULE The rest are along for the ride. Be thankful. See Indo European Tripartism, or more recently The Three Orders: http://historyguide.org/ancient/lecture23b.html

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549823718 Timestamp) NOBLESSE OBLIGE: THE DUTY OF THE ELITE: A RECIPROCITY “Noblesse oblige” is generally used to imply that with wealth, power, and prestige come responsibilities. In ethical discussion, “Noblesse oblige” summarizes a moral economy wherein privilege (ability and achievement) must be balanced by duty towards those who lack such privilege ability and (achievement) or who cannot perform such duty. Finally, it has been used recently primarily to refer to public responsibilities of the rich, famous and powerful, notably to provide good examples of behaviour or to exceed minimal standards of decency. It has also been used to describe a person taking the blame for something in order to solve an issue or save someone else.