(FB 1545061608 Timestamp) RESTORING VIOLENCE TO THE STUDY OF POLITICS We removed violence from the discourse in order to accommodate women into the political system – despite the fact that the market for politics, like all other markets, is simply a proxy for violence. I set out to restore violence to libertarianism and it resulted in “Sovereigntarianism” (Propertarianism). Noah brings up the current context: –“Another big hurdle is adjusting mens relationship to violence. I have no problem with women saying “I disavow all violence” but I don’t want to hear men saying such weak things. We men need to embrace violence and the consequences of violence. The more comfortable we are with hard edged solutions the better. We don’ t seek them, but we don’t avoid what’s necessary. A failure to account for the power of violence has been a weakness of the right for too long.”—– Noah J Revoy You can’t peace your way into power unless you have power, and if you peace your way into power you will not retain it. Empires fall for this reason as much ore more so than any other. Pacifism is just rent seeking by avoidance of the cost of preservation of the natural order of reciprocity.
Form: Mini Essay
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545138415 Timestamp) THE PARADIGM FOR SOLVING AI IS NOT CALCULATION BUT COMPETITION We try to solve the problem of artificial intelligence using the wrong paradigm – a problem in economics we refer to as ‘mathiness’ – when the solution from bayesian accounting to the evolution of consciousness, is not calculation but competition. The other ‘great accident’ is the bilateral revolution, and the competition via necessity of coordination within the nervous system, followed by the division of labor and competition between the functions of our minds as predator and prey. We don’t think of neural economy, or bayesian networks as competitions at the neural-path level, nor do we think of consciousness as the result of memory and competition in a division of labor between layers and functions. The problem of an ethical and moral machine is one that must decide a competition from the forecasting of a decision, and the negative reinforcement of decision networks that lead to involuntary transfers (harms). I understood this from my work in the early 80’s on AI for military games. But the technology wasn’t available at the time to do anything about it. I don’t find any particular mystery to artificial intelligence other than the volume of memory and the necessity of an internal grammar or language to assist in a hierarchy continuous recursive competition between forecasts(predictions). My open questions are the amount of memory required if we want both the benefits of mechanical memory, and the power of reason, without the economy of imprecision. I mean, look at the experiments with chimpanzee image processing vs human. Or put differently, in order to FURTHER divide intelligence more efficiently we might very well have sacrificed memory precision for another ‘n-lateral’ revolution using language and the competition between minds using language. The problem of continuous recursive disambiguation into serial speech requires not the preservation of state (chimp memory) for internal consideration, but the recursive passing of state (human memory) so that we can serialize state into a continuously recursively disambiguous stream of expressions between individuals. We then evolved the ability to plan from this process. It is very hard to try to remember what it’s like to think without language. It’s like trying to measure without numbers. you can do it but only to some rather simple degree. Language is just another form of calculation. Or rather more easily understood, calculation with measurements is just a reductive form of language. The consistency throughout the hierarchy is competition (market) between memory and perception, the competition of the neural economy, competition between neural forecasts, competition between reactions or choice of actions, competition between perceptions and minds, and ability to calculate using language (grammars). It’s this ‘market competition’ that is the model not only for cognition, but for all of social science that results from that cognition. We were fooled by mathiness and justificationism that results from the mathematics – the most simple of logics: the single constant relation provided by the single property of a positional name. Mathematics requires very little difference between construction and deduction. Logics break down rapidly after first or second order. Games do as well. Reason does as well. Markets(competition) doesn’t break down. -Cheers )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545061608 Timestamp) RESTORING VIOLENCE TO THE STUDY OF POLITICS We removed violence from the discourse in order to accommodate women into the political system – despite the fact that the market for politics, like all other markets, is simply a proxy for violence. I set out to restore violence to libertarianism and it resulted in “Sovereigntarianism” (Propertarianism). Noah brings up the current context: –“Another big hurdle is adjusting mens relationship to violence. I have no problem with women saying “I disavow all violence” but I don’t want to hear men saying such weak things. We men need to embrace violence and the consequences of violence. The more comfortable we are with hard edged solutions the better. We don’ t seek them, but we don’t avoid what’s necessary. A failure to account for the power of violence has been a weakness of the right for too long.”—– Noah J Revoy You can’t peace your way into power unless you have power, and if you peace your way into power you will not retain it. Empires fall for this reason as much ore more so than any other. Pacifism is just rent seeking by avoidance of the cost of preservation of the natural order of reciprocity.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1545235231 Timestamp) YES THE MUSLIM EXPANSION WAS CATASTROPHIC FOR THE WORLD – JUST AS WAS THE JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN. The west in the ancient and modern world raised mankind out of superstition, ignorance, poverty and dysgenia. The muslim world put people into superstition, ignorance, poverty, decline, and disgenia. It’s not complicated.There was no golden age any more than napoleonic artwork. The islamic destruction of every great civilization of the ancient world and the descent into ignorance, poverty, and genetic dysgenia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7y2LRcf4kc ⦠The west fell by overexpansion into the middle east in a foolish attempt to maintain alexander’s empire. The result was inability to resist the germans given the migration due to the Celtic Holocaust. The spread of jews into the empire, and resulting Jewish revolutionary undermining, spread via women and slaves, later imposed by emperors in the east as a means of destroying the aristocracy and the empire, and the islamic prevention of the restoration of roman population and order after war, and plague. The muslims then conducted 1400 years of raids against europe – we invented castles to stop them. Everywhere the west touches people get wealthier (or die) Everywhere islam went people declined. If it wasn’t for the turks providing new genes arabian lands would be indifferent from africa.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1545235231 Timestamp) YES THE MUSLIM EXPANSION WAS CATASTROPHIC FOR THE WORLD – JUST AS WAS THE JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN. The west in the ancient and modern world raised mankind out of superstition, ignorance, poverty and dysgenia. The muslim world put people into superstition, ignorance, poverty, decline, and disgenia. It’s not complicated.There was no golden age any more than napoleonic artwork. The islamic destruction of every great civilization of the ancient world and the descent into ignorance, poverty, and genetic dysgenia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7y2LRcf4kc ⦠The west fell by overexpansion into the middle east in a foolish attempt to maintain alexander’s empire. The result was inability to resist the germans given the migration due to the Celtic Holocaust. The spread of jews into the empire, and resulting Jewish revolutionary undermining, spread via women and slaves, later imposed by emperors in the east as a means of destroying the aristocracy and the empire, and the islamic prevention of the restoration of roman population and order after war, and plague. The muslims then conducted 1400 years of raids against europe – we invented castles to stop them. Everywhere the west touches people get wealthier (or die) Everywhere islam went people declined. If it wasn’t for the turks providing new genes arabian lands would be indifferent from africa.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545321350 Timestamp) THE FUTURE OF EDUCATION You know, we taught Propertarianism (social science), Economics (micro, human, and macro), and Stoicism (mental fitness), and Fighting (physical fitness and war) then it would be possible to read Spengler, Nietzsche, and Hegel (not kant), without doing harm along with the good. Not sure yet about any of the others. The difference between the anglo scientific and german experiential is almost as vast as between the german experiential, russian spiritual, and the semitic supernatural. The problem is, that accessibility to anglo-scandinavians, continentals, orthodoxy, and semitism increases along that spectrum. Once we have the criticism of religion, abrahamism, sophisms and sentimentalisms written down as a science, they become nothing more than a spectrum of literature just like science, history, biography, novel, myth, and parable. I mean I know that my distaste for continental thought has declined rapidly with my increase in articulate criticism of nonsense-religion and abrahamism. I assume this would serve as a subconscious reaction by everyone educated. We saw the same thing with empiricism and the scientific revolution that we are seeing with the biological and computer science revolution. As I said in the past, I am pretty sure the leap in cognitive ability of the average person under Propertarianism would be as large as the leap of the average person under sciences. in other words we might be able to DRAMATICALLY SHIFT the demographic burden of demonstrated intelligence. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545396786 Timestamp) GENERATIVE GRAMMAR SOPHISTS ARE NEO ABRAHAMISTS (((yes))) 1) Generative Grammar refers to the theory that we are born with an innate capacity for producing speech, according to some rules or patterns, and that all languages evolve from this innate ability. (Ai would say serialization of information into streams of … 2) … continuously disambiguating symbols (phonemes) is a limit of neural economy – particularly short term memory. Opponents to generative grammar don’t use AI examples, they use studies out outliers and their answer reflects the AI: that it is simply a product of …. 3) … the limits of sense perception (Homunculus), and the limits of information processing ability – particularly integration. 4) Generative Anthropology refers to the theory that the history of human culture is a genetic or “generative” development stemming from the development of language rather than language assists in the distribution of processing power calculation and falsifiability, and that … 5) … all social language is merely an act of negotiating cooperation, fraud, and deceit in the furtherance of dividing labor, processing power, calculation, and FALSIFIABILITY OR UNFALSIFIABILITY. In other words, that language assists in the negotiating distributed … 6) … computation, valuation, and action (or prohibiting, computation, valuation, and action) is not something open to dispute. Nor is the great leap forward provided by the singularity of development of language in the division of sense, perception, memory, and cognition. 7) The technical debate is over whether there is an innate facility for language or it is simply a function of increased neural capacity and density given our rather rare capacity for complex movement whether limbs, fingers, lips, throat, or even control over our breathing. 8) However, this has nothing to do with and is merely an EXCUSE for Gans’ writing and the scope of the GA writing available, and the GA Blog for example, consists of little more than the ‘astrology and numerology of speech’ and simply a revision of the sophism of abrahamic and .. 10) … platonic, speech. While we find mythological speech in hinduism, and we find idealism in Sinic philosophy and religion, and we find pseudoscientific speech in buddhism, and Legal speech in Aristotelianism – if not all european folk language – we do not find them … 11) … conflated into argument until semitic abrahamic speech, and the incorporation of semitic abrahamic speech into western discourse under the christian theologian attempts to reconcile european truth and semitic lie. Wisdom was not Argument employed as ‘truth’- just wisdom. 12) so the question is, why is it that the anglos and scandinavians retain western truth, germans resist restoring it to german, french have abandoned it at least in parisian education, and the jews and muslims have done everything in their intellectual and cultural power… 13) … to preserve sophism, despite the fact that jews contributed nothing to history other than sophisms, and that muslims have destroyed (culturally and genetically) every great people of the ancient world. And the reason is very simple: INTROSPECTION, SOPHISM, … 14) … and CONFIRMATION and DECEIT are cheaper than investigation, falsification, and action in the real world. In other words, why lie EXCEPT to entice people into moral hazard? The answer is simple: there isn’t any reason except competence at coercion and deceit. Why Josh and Tom have trouble understanding this rather obvious dichotomy between truth/error/lies is INCENTIVE, is evidence of their justification of desirable, convenient, or utilitarian lying. End Abrahamic Supernaturalism, Sophism and Pseudoscience forever: NO MORE LIES. It’s one thing to use violence or shame against fraud and deceit, and quite another to use violence or deceit as a means of criticizing truth. Science is the universal language of truth,and operations its grammar of measurement. To restore the west,truth is enough. No More Lies. It’s bad enough we have left wing liars taking advantage of women and the underclass, but it’s hard to understand why there are those of you who want to take advantage of lost, underachieving young man and throw them in the degenerative maelstrom with the women and fools. —@TrueDilTom: Curt I see how you could think that given Chomskyâs âGenerative Grammarâ, but theyre different things. GA sees neuro-structural explanations of culture as having little room for non-instinctive abstraction to account for the arbitrariness of language. There is no science envy.”— Um. What science? There isn’t any science behind GA. It’s just Gans, who is a career postmodernist, doing exactly what I said he is. THERE ISN’T ANY SCIENCE. The structure of language is determined by analogies to experience (the homunculus) and the recursive depth of memory. There is nothing to understand. GA is just postmodern Social Construction of Reality with Chomsky added to convert a sophism into a pseudoscience. Josh has intellectual penis envy, which is why he pisses on others and pursues nonsense rather than producing intellectual works. The fact that we forecast a combination of real world and imaginary (fictional) models is simply our ability (or inability to resist) conflation of the imagined and the real. People need frames to calculate action. They can have a mixture of false, analogistic, and true frames.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545315514 Timestamp) THE DIFFERENCE IN GRAMMARS IS A DIFFERENCE IN METHOD BTW: Regarding Greg, Richard, (and many others): I respect both of them (and those less well known) and their heroic efforts – and I won’t speak other than in support of them. But I will ask you to notice in them the study of philosophy and their advocacy by moral and sentimental appeal to generate understanding and consent. The spectrum of argumentative methods: 1) Religion and Theology to agree on a means of resistance for the collective good. 2) Philosophy and Morality to create understanding and to obtain consent on a collective good. 3) Science, Economics, Law, and War to impose a collective good regardless of resistance, understanding, and consent. We are and always have been the minority. We drag mankind behind us on a heavy sled. There is no sovereignty by undrestanding or consent, only the organized application of violence to deny anyone and everyone the alternative. If they understand and consent all the better. But understanding an consent are not necessary. This is the difference in my message. War.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545488904 Timestamp) (Revised Intro To Propertarianism) THE NATURAL LAW PROPERTARIANISM IS TO NATURAL LAW AS PHYSICS IS TO THE LAWS OF NATURE But what are we more precisely referring to when we use the term âPropertarianismâ? 1) The completion of the scientific method and its application to social science. The completion of the scientific method is the core achievement of the work, and in retrospect it explains the reason for the rise of social pseudoscience from Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Mainstream Economics, The Frankfurt School, The Success in circumventing the Constitution, the libertarianism of Rothbard/Rand, and the Neoconservatism of Strauss. The Postmodernists and the rise of postmodernism in the academy. And the Feminists, and the feminization of markets, the workplace, norms, educations, and institutions, and the infantilization of the population as a consequence. 2) The Natural Law of Human Cooperation However we focus our application of the completed scientific method on Economics, Ethics, Law Politics, and Group Evolutionary Strategy, and we use demonstrated property in its totality as a unit of measure â in not only economic, but ethical, moral, legal, and political commensurability. So the word âpropertarianismâ refers to the use of demonstrated interests, and the defense of those interests, as a unit of measure providing commensurability, and the test of reciprocity as truth or falsehood, good or bad, ethical or unethical, moral or immoral, and legal or illegal. And in fact, this is how all law is constructed today in one way or another, and to one degree or another. So, the correct name for the work we call âpropertarianismâ would be The Natural Law. We just canât use it because the term has been so loaded throughout history, on the one hand, and because itâs not an identifiable âbrandâ on the other. So the simple version is: Laws of Nature = The Physical Sciences. Natural Law = The Social Sciences. Sorry but itâs a paradigm shift that we just have to pay the cost of learning. 3) A Set of Related and Dependent Ideas We use the âbrand nameâ Propertarianism to refer collectively to three different sets of ideas:
- Methodology: The Natural Law including restatements of metaphysics, psychology, sociology, epistemology, ethics, politics, and group evolutionary strategy (the cooperation, competition, and conflict of civilizations).
Application: The Use of the Natural Law to Produce Constitutions, and therefore Societies, Nations, and Civilizations, in Accordance with Natural Law.
Explanation: The reason for the disproportionate contribution an success of the west in the ancient and modern worlds. And The history of the cycles of conflict between western(european) and eastern(asian) masculine civilizations against and central(semitic) feminine civilizations.
Counsel: Given that we are now in the post subsistence-agrarian era, we are wealthy enough to express our genetic differences, and as such are entering into political conflict between the ancient female herd reproductive strategy and civilizations, and the male pack reproductive strategy and civilizations. It appears we can no longer compromise, and neither interest can be pursued without some sort of oppression or genocide. So we can no longer assume we will create a one-world-government and a uniformity among peoples, but instead, we must separate, prospert, and speciate according to our genetic interests, and our differences in moral intuition because of those interests. As such the constitutions we recommend, are those that facilitate âletting a thousand nations bloomâ and returning to the speciation that we were in the process of achieving prior to both the anglo conquest of the world by sea, and the gradual transformation of our means of production from hunter-gathering and speciation, to agrarianism and unification. The future is very different from that under which the majority of our history was written down. It is often challenging to understand which of these things we are discussing in at any given moment even if they are independent, because we use them in concert in most of our discussions. The reason is that we tend to be working on Counsel, because we already understand Methodology, Application, and Explanation. Summary: Only europeans could invent The Laws of Nature and the Natural Laws â but EVERY people can use them to prosper. And to some degree, our future prosperity, is dependent upon doing so.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545488904 Timestamp) (Revised Intro To Propertarianism) THE NATURAL LAW PROPERTARIANISM IS TO NATURAL LAW AS PHYSICS IS TO THE LAWS OF NATURE But what are we more precisely referring to when we use the term âPropertarianismâ? 1) The completion of the scientific method and its application to social science. The completion of the scientific method is the core achievement of the work, and in retrospect it explains the reason for the rise of social pseudoscience from Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Mainstream Economics, The Frankfurt School, The Success in circumventing the Constitution, the libertarianism of Rothbard/Rand, and the Neoconservatism of Strauss. The Postmodernists and the rise of postmodernism in the academy. And the Feminists, and the feminization of markets, the workplace, norms, educations, and institutions, and the infantilization of the population as a consequence. 2) The Natural Law of Human Cooperation However we focus our application of the completed scientific method on Economics, Ethics, Law Politics, and Group Evolutionary Strategy, and we use demonstrated property in its totality as a unit of measure â in not only economic, but ethical, moral, legal, and political commensurability. So the word âpropertarianismâ refers to the use of demonstrated interests, and the defense of those interests, as a unit of measure providing commensurability, and the test of reciprocity as truth or falsehood, good or bad, ethical or unethical, moral or immoral, and legal or illegal. And in fact, this is how all law is constructed today in one way or another, and to one degree or another. So, the correct name for the work we call âpropertarianismâ would be The Natural Law. We just canât use it because the term has been so loaded throughout history, on the one hand, and because itâs not an identifiable âbrandâ on the other. So the simple version is: Laws of Nature = The Physical Sciences. Natural Law = The Social Sciences. Sorry but itâs a paradigm shift that we just have to pay the cost of learning. 3) A Set of Related and Dependent Ideas We use the âbrand nameâ Propertarianism to refer collectively to three different sets of ideas:
- Methodology: The Natural Law including restatements of metaphysics, psychology, sociology, epistemology, ethics, politics, and group evolutionary strategy (the cooperation, competition, and conflict of civilizations).
Application: The Use of the Natural Law to Produce Constitutions, and therefore Societies, Nations, and Civilizations, in Accordance with Natural Law.
Explanation: The reason for the disproportionate contribution an success of the west in the ancient and modern worlds. And The history of the cycles of conflict between western(european) and eastern(asian) masculine civilizations against and central(semitic) feminine civilizations.
Counsel: Given that we are now in the post subsistence-agrarian era, we are wealthy enough to express our genetic differences, and as such are entering into political conflict between the ancient female herd reproductive strategy and civilizations, and the male pack reproductive strategy and civilizations. It appears we can no longer compromise, and neither interest can be pursued without some sort of oppression or genocide. So we can no longer assume we will create a one-world-government and a uniformity among peoples, but instead, we must separate, prospert, and speciate according to our genetic interests, and our differences in moral intuition because of those interests. As such the constitutions we recommend, are those that facilitate âletting a thousand nations bloomâ and returning to the speciation that we were in the process of achieving prior to both the anglo conquest of the world by sea, and the gradual transformation of our means of production from hunter-gathering and speciation, to agrarianism and unification. The future is very different from that under which the majority of our history was written down. It is often challenging to understand which of these things we are discussing in at any given moment even if they are independent, because we use them in concert in most of our discussions. The reason is that we tend to be working on Counsel, because we already understand Methodology, Application, and Explanation. Summary: Only europeans could invent The Laws of Nature and the Natural Laws â but EVERY people can use them to prosper. And to some degree, our future prosperity, is dependent upon doing so.