Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544807804 Timestamp) THE GRAMMARS OF THE RED PILL We all get our red pills from different sources. Mine was running businesses, watching the press lie about what my father said in town council, encountering the immorality of the legal system, and the one sidedness and immorality of divorce. I don’t care whether you get it from the manosphere(personal), the alt-light(social), alt-right (political), propertarianism(institutional or intellectual?), nasdap(military) sphere. We all understand the world in the power-language that we are most familiar with, and can best empathize with, and are most motivated by. What matters is that we have an OPERATIONALLY POSSIBLE solution for the survival of our genetic lines, our people, our culture, our civilization, and our ability to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, into the gods we imaged – the universe is ours for the taking. The only thing I focus on is the solution. I’m happy if everyone else focuses on REACH. -hugs

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544920571 Timestamp) No religion should require you believe a falsehood – only pay the cost of initiation and ongoing rituals in exchange for personal, interpersonal, social, political, and universal mindfulness. There is nothing false in the natural law of sovereignty reciprocity, truth, duty, charity, and markets in everything. There is nothing false in the elimination of hatred from the human heart, the extension of kinship love of family to the polity, personal acts of charity, and the exhaustion of forgiveness before abandonment or punishment. There is nothing false in ritual thanks to one another, to our ancestors, to those who made our existence possible, to the natural world, to the universe, and to the universe’s god – in whatever form that might be. There is nothing false in their parables, their myths, their histories other than their ignorance and vulnerability of time and place. There is nothing false in the ritual training of the body, intuition(soul), memory(knowledge), reason (calculation), ethics, morality, the law, and the skills with which to prosper. There is nothing false in that combination of of which will cause us, and any who likewise do the same, to transcend into the gods we have not yet made. That is not a sentimental argument. It is the optimum order for human beings. There is none better possible. It’s just science.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544812047 Timestamp) —“What is the story with your father and the council?”– Steven Jackson I don’t have a lot good to say about my father but he was smart, worked very hard, and would never lie ever. (He’d come very close to killing you for even suggesting it.) I used to go to town council meetings and learn how ‘government was done’. Stupid shit like ‘this sidewalk is expensive’. Ordinary stuff. The newspaper would regularly twist his words out of context in order to imply the direct opposite of what he said. I have vivid memories of lying on the carpet in the living room reading the newspaper saying “I was there. That is not what happened.” And my father saying “news is a best nothing but fictional entertainment, and at worst nothing but lies. Never believe a word they say”. So I get into college and it’s a saturday and I’m wearing faded jeans with holes in them, and a faded blue chamois shirt, and white sneakers, and walking around campus because I did too much writing already and need a break. It’s a rainy day. i walk into the student union, and someone has sponsored this absurd pinball machine where the ball is the size of a softball. So I walk up to this thing and put a quarter in it and try it. Out of nowhere the local news crew comes up and asks if they can film me. I am not and never have been someone who likes public attention, but I said yes. The women then proceeded to start a dozen takes trying to get me to say that I had nothing better to do than play pinball in university. And so I finally said – I’m not going to make a fool of myself. I told you already, that I’m taking a walk because I’ve done too much work already, and this is just something interesting because it’s new.” They aired some choppy thing without me responding that she suggested the same nonsense. I was walking down the street in west hartford just after I had purchased a local business. Some reporter stopped me for one of those 60 second sets of questions. They tried multiple times to force me to say other than what I’d said: that the problem was that hartford had imported too many black families and that the north end in particular was a no-go zone even for the FBI. (This was common knowledge). They did not air my statement. I give press releases all the time. Between the inflation by the marketers, the PR firm, and the press you’d think I claimed I went to Harvard and invented the light bulb. I stopped giving interviews to the press because you simply can’t trust them to get anything right that doesn’t fit their institutional narrative. Every journalist is a professional gossip and nothing more. The same is true for every social scientists, and everyone in the non-stem academy. And you wonder why I want to legislate TRUTH? That’s why.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544807804 Timestamp) THE GRAMMARS OF THE RED PILL We all get our red pills from different sources. Mine was running businesses, watching the press lie about what my father said in town council, encountering the immorality of the legal system, and the one sidedness and immorality of divorce. I don’t care whether you get it from the manosphere(personal), the alt-light(social), alt-right (political), propertarianism(institutional or intellectual?), nasdap(military) sphere. We all understand the world in the power-language that we are most familiar with, and can best empathize with, and are most motivated by. What matters is that we have an OPERATIONALLY POSSIBLE solution for the survival of our genetic lines, our people, our culture, our civilization, and our ability to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, into the gods we imaged – the universe is ours for the taking. The only thing I focus on is the solution. I’m happy if everyone else focuses on REACH. -hugs

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544807368 Timestamp) IF IT WAS COMMON SENSE WE WOULDN’T NEED THE WHITE LAW —“I follow Curt, but most of what he’s says seems like common sense.”— A Friend (from Chat) So yes. It is f–cking common sense. The difference is that I defend that common sense both logically and scientifically, because what is ‘common sense’ to you ‘is not common’. I made a Law of what you consider ‘common sense’. It is that law, the constitution that embodies it, and the logic and science in defense of it, that make it open to utility in persuasion, resistance to falsification, and institutional implementation, rather than simply a difference of moral bias and condition. I wrote our law. No one ever did that before. We just ‘do it’. For thousands of years. Individual Sovereignty, Truth, Duty (and charity), The Natural law of Reciprocity (Tort), the Sovereignty Judge and the Jury, and markets in everything that result. The Militia of a distributed dictatorship of sovereign men.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545059232 Timestamp) UM. THE GENDERS CANNOT TAKE EACH OTHER’S VENTING SERIOUSLY –“I can’t understand men who talk about … putting women back in the kitchen, out of the workforce, or referring to of r_pe during a war. …”— A Female Friend That’s because you aren’t a man. Just like I am not a woman and can’t imagine that they’re serious rather than hyperbolic (LARPing). I have overheard far too many conversations of women talking about their husbands as mere monetary and physical resources to be exploited, and the stupidity of men and how women would do such and such better, and how they need female ‘unity’. I am also aware that women are over-privileged compared to men in everything from moral intuitions, to daily life, to health care, to political processes. These things are simply empirical. But they do not change the opinions of women on their relative status. Naxalt(defense of child) is to some degree a defense against male hyperbole(defense of tribe). This is why it is so hard for males and females to communicate at any scale. This is why men and women cannot work in or debate politics together except under the most optimum of circumstances. Hyperbole (exaggeration) of offense, and NAXALT (exaggeration) of defense. Defending children vs Exciting men. These cognitive differences are real, universal, and inescapable. If men wanted to oppress women they would do so. They do not do so because those women are their wives, daughters, sisters and mothers. But if men agree to do something, there is nothing that can stop them. Because in the end, the use of violence determines all political conflict. And political competition is simply a means of circumventing political violence within the limits of provoking political violence. Western men treat their women better than all other people’s combined. And under majority democracy it has come at the cost of inequality of outcomes for those men. Hence why I recommend houses for the genders, if there is to be a democratic government of any kind: so that we limit each other.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544960640 Timestamp) WE ARE MORE LIKE THE CHINESE THAN THE SEMITES It is nearly impossible to talk to abrahamic monotheists what have not traveled the world and learned about other ‘religions’ because they lack the frame of reference to consider ‘religion’ as it is practiced. The more I undrestand about world religions the more obvious it is that shinto is best, hindu a bit less so, and abrahamism the worst. While buddhism has turned into a religion, and stoicism on the borderline, and chinese folk religion, Taoism, Buddhism, Confucianism. We practice our folk religion still in many ways. And like the chinese we have our germanic tales (hearth religion), our our many versions of our religion, philosophy, and our law. That these are and always have been, ‘cults of the classes’ should be rather obvious. The chinese are ostensibly buddhism but they are so as much as we are christian – not so much. China is confucian. We are the same as china, not the same as the jews and muslims.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545059232 Timestamp) UM. THE GENDERS CANNOT TAKE EACH OTHER’S VENTING SERIOUSLY –“I can’t understand men who talk about … putting women back in the kitchen, out of the workforce, or referring to of r_pe during a war. …”— A Female Friend That’s because you aren’t a man. Just like I am not a woman and can’t imagine that they’re serious rather than hyperbolic (LARPing). I have overheard far too many conversations of women talking about their husbands as mere monetary and physical resources to be exploited, and the stupidity of men and how women would do such and such better, and how they need female ‘unity’. I am also aware that women are over-privileged compared to men in everything from moral intuitions, to daily life, to health care, to political processes. These things are simply empirical. But they do not change the opinions of women on their relative status. Naxalt(defense of child) is to some degree a defense against male hyperbole(defense of tribe). This is why it is so hard for males and females to communicate at any scale. This is why men and women cannot work in or debate politics together except under the most optimum of circumstances. Hyperbole (exaggeration) of offense, and NAXALT (exaggeration) of defense. Defending children vs Exciting men. These cognitive differences are real, universal, and inescapable. If men wanted to oppress women they would do so. They do not do so because those women are their wives, daughters, sisters and mothers. But if men agree to do something, there is nothing that can stop them. Because in the end, the use of violence determines all political conflict. And political competition is simply a means of circumventing political violence within the limits of provoking political violence. Western men treat their women better than all other people’s combined. And under majority democracy it has come at the cost of inequality of outcomes for those men. Hence why I recommend houses for the genders, if there is to be a democratic government of any kind: so that we limit each other.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544960640 Timestamp) WE ARE MORE LIKE THE CHINESE THAN THE SEMITES It is nearly impossible to talk to abrahamic monotheists what have not traveled the world and learned about other ‘religions’ because they lack the frame of reference to consider ‘religion’ as it is practiced. The more I undrestand about world religions the more obvious it is that shinto is best, hindu a bit less so, and abrahamism the worst. While buddhism has turned into a religion, and stoicism on the borderline, and chinese folk religion, Taoism, Buddhism, Confucianism. We practice our folk religion still in many ways. And like the chinese we have our germanic tales (hearth religion), our our many versions of our religion, philosophy, and our law. That these are and always have been, ‘cults of the classes’ should be rather obvious. The chinese are ostensibly buddhism but they are so as much as we are christian – not so much. China is confucian. We are the same as china, not the same as the jews and muslims.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545138415 Timestamp) THE PARADIGM FOR SOLVING AI IS NOT CALCULATION BUT COMPETITION We try to solve the problem of artificial intelligence using the wrong paradigm – a problem in economics we refer to as ‘mathiness’ – when the solution from bayesian accounting to the evolution of consciousness, is not calculation but competition. The other ‘great accident’ is the bilateral revolution, and the competition via necessity of coordination within the nervous system, followed by the division of labor and competition between the functions of our minds as predator and prey. We don’t think of neural economy, or bayesian networks as competitions at the neural-path level, nor do we think of consciousness as the result of memory and competition in a division of labor between layers and functions. The problem of an ethical and moral machine is one that must decide a competition from the forecasting of a decision, and the negative reinforcement of decision networks that lead to involuntary transfers (harms). I understood this from my work in the early 80’s on AI for military games. But the technology wasn’t available at the time to do anything about it. I don’t find any particular mystery to artificial intelligence other than the volume of memory and the necessity of an internal grammar or language to assist in a hierarchy continuous recursive competition between forecasts(predictions). My open questions are the amount of memory required if we want both the benefits of mechanical memory, and the power of reason, without the economy of imprecision. I mean, look at the experiments with chimpanzee image processing vs human. Or put differently, in order to FURTHER divide intelligence more efficiently we might very well have sacrificed memory precision for another ‘n-lateral’ revolution using language and the competition between minds using language. The problem of continuous recursive disambiguation into serial speech requires not the preservation of state (chimp memory) for internal consideration, but the recursive passing of state (human memory) so that we can serialize state into a continuously recursively disambiguous stream of expressions between individuals. We then evolved the ability to plan from this process. It is very hard to try to remember what it’s like to think without language. It’s like trying to measure without numbers. you can do it but only to some rather simple degree. Language is just another form of calculation. Or rather more easily understood, calculation with measurements is just a reductive form of language. The consistency throughout the hierarchy is competition (market) between memory and perception, the competition of the neural economy, competition between neural forecasts, competition between reactions or choice of actions, competition between perceptions and minds, and ability to calculate using language (grammars). It’s this ‘market competition’ that is the model not only for cognition, but for all of social science that results from that cognition. We were fooled by mathiness and justificationism that results from the mathematics – the most simple of logics: the single constant relation provided by the single property of a positional name. Mathematics requires very little difference between construction and deduction. Logics break down rapidly after first or second order. Games do as well. Reason does as well. Markets(competition) doesn’t break down. -Cheers )