“ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST!!” (Connecticut in decline series) United Technologies, one of the only substantial companies remaining in the State of Connecticut has announced a merger with Raytheon, and will divest itself of chinese-competitive products, to focus on military, and move its HQ to Boston where there is a more favorable Political, Tax, and Talent structure. BUT WHY? Connecticut, Massachusetts and California were the three states most desperate to imitate the Soviet model. Of the three states only Massachusetts self corrected after the tech crisis of the 80’s saw the center of computer science move from Boston to San Francisco – when Boston area homes lost a third of their value. And while Mass has MIT and Harvard, and California has Stamford, Connecticut has only Yale, Wesleyan, and Trinity – all of whom were less successful than Harvard at migrating from theological institutions to scientific and technical institutions. Worse, instead of bulldozing the north or south ends of Hartford – some of the worst slums in the state, Connecticut built its major state school in the far reaches of rural eastern connecticut, guaranteeing that it would not be a draw, nor would the city benefit from the influx of capital and talent. Worse, the state budget is burdened by state employee pensions to the same degree it’s burdened by poor and elderly care. Worse, CT allowed the entire Arsenal (military) industry to collapse, by voting against it and propagandizing against it without somehow grasping that it was fed by military research and development – the primary source of 20th century scientific and technological advantage – and all that wealth went to other states – primarily northern california and western washington. Worse, this left a train of slums in the Connecticut river valley along the 91 and then 95 corridors and beyond, as the state redistributed to state employees rather than invested in maintaining economic position. So Springfield, Hartford, New Britain, Meriden, (less so Bristol), Hamden, North Haven, New Haven, Bridgeport, Derby, Waterbury, Danbury, Norwalk, New London – even the soviet style ‘relocation’ programs that destroyed Middletown and Bloomfield – resulted in following Baltimore (once the rival of NYC) and Detroit (Once the rival to Chicago). There is only one variable in the state that will allow it to recover financially, and that is the vacating (nullification by bankruptcy) of the state employee pensions – the very people who have destroyed connecticut through the same sequential corruption by continuous evolution of state payments that has taken down Greece. The only reason CT is not equivalent to Greece today (limited to low return agricultural products) is the southeast – a virtual annex of NYC. Worse, the state cannot go bankrupt to exit those pensions, and use the money for reformation of the demographics and economy, because the federal constitution has provision only for cities not states – one constitutional amendment that will be necessary in short order (particularly for California). The only companies left in Connecticut are those that cannot afford to leave. The only people left in Connecticut who have any talent are those who cannot afford to leave. The only students left in Connecticut are those that cannot afford to leave. But slowly, each urban center in the state is depopulated of the middle class and repopulated by the dependent immigrant underclass – whose lack of forcible integration drags down what remains of the integrated american underclass. America is a vast, open-air concentration camp, gradually killing off the european population, by forcing them out of urban areas with low costs of commons and low cost of opportunity, then taxing them out of replacement reproduction, and replacing them with dependents upon them to justify it. Why? LIBERALS. Where did liberals come from? European Jews and Anglo Protestant Women. That’s where it came from. (Yes the academic research on this subject has been around for decades. Even Rothbard. And precursors in the 1920’s, and late 19th century.) The tax-privileged and financial extraction privileged top and their clients in the top-dependent bottom – the unproductive against the working and middle productive. My ancestors founded good parts of Connecticut State and they would be horrified what liberals have done to it in just sixty years with their anti-empirical, history-denying, economic-denying, science-denying ideology. And they would be equally horrified that five thousand years of european aristocratic (meritocratic) development were squandered by an ignorant envious selfish virtue-signaling and destructive people who have brought about precisely what conservatives (middle class rule of law) predicted. The dirty secret of north western and east asian civilizations is continuous soft eugenics – not oppression, but domestication, like every other domesticated animal – by limiting harm done by the underclasses by limiting their reproduction, leaving them to survive on merit, aggressive punishment of their malfeasance. Darwin’s Laws are just extensions of the laws of thermodynamics at scale. There is no defeating them, only temporarily cheating them at tragic high cost. It’s Liberals that killed democracy. It’s conservatives and libertarians that let them. I’m all done with ‘letting’. Are you? Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute “Truth is Enough” https://propertarianinstitute.com
Form: Mini Essay
-
“Another One Bites the Dust!!” (Connecticut in decline series)
“ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST!!” (Connecticut in decline series) United Technologies, one of the only substantial companies remaining in the State of Connecticut has announced a merger with Raytheon, and will divest itself of chinese-competitive products, to focus on military, and move its HQ to Boston where there is a more favorable Political, Tax, and Talent structure. BUT WHY? Connecticut, Massachusetts and California were the three states most desperate to imitate the Soviet model. Of the three states only Massachusetts self corrected after the tech crisis of the 80’s saw the center of computer science move from Boston to San Francisco – when Boston area homes lost a third of their value. And while Mass has MIT and Harvard, and California has Stamford, Connecticut has only Yale, Wesleyan, and Trinity – all of whom were less successful than Harvard at migrating from theological institutions to scientific and technical institutions. Worse, instead of bulldozing the north or south ends of Hartford – some of the worst slums in the state, Connecticut built its major state school in the far reaches of rural eastern connecticut, guaranteeing that it would not be a draw, nor would the city benefit from the influx of capital and talent. Worse, the state budget is burdened by state employee pensions to the same degree it’s burdened by poor and elderly care. Worse, CT allowed the entire Arsenal (military) industry to collapse, by voting against it and propagandizing against it without somehow grasping that it was fed by military research and development – the primary source of 20th century scientific and technological advantage – and all that wealth went to other states – primarily northern california and western washington. Worse, this left a train of slums in the Connecticut river valley along the 91 and then 95 corridors and beyond, as the state redistributed to state employees rather than invested in maintaining economic position. So Springfield, Hartford, New Britain, Meriden, (less so Bristol), Hamden, North Haven, New Haven, Bridgeport, Derby, Waterbury, Danbury, Norwalk, New London – even the soviet style ‘relocation’ programs that destroyed Middletown and Bloomfield – resulted in following Baltimore (once the rival of NYC) and Detroit (Once the rival to Chicago). There is only one variable in the state that will allow it to recover financially, and that is the vacating (nullification by bankruptcy) of the state employee pensions – the very people who have destroyed connecticut through the same sequential corruption by continuous evolution of state payments that has taken down Greece. The only reason CT is not equivalent to Greece today (limited to low return agricultural products) is the southeast – a virtual annex of NYC. Worse, the state cannot go bankrupt to exit those pensions, and use the money for reformation of the demographics and economy, because the federal constitution has provision only for cities not states – one constitutional amendment that will be necessary in short order (particularly for California). The only companies left in Connecticut are those that cannot afford to leave. The only people left in Connecticut who have any talent are those who cannot afford to leave. The only students left in Connecticut are those that cannot afford to leave. But slowly, each urban center in the state is depopulated of the middle class and repopulated by the dependent immigrant underclass – whose lack of forcible integration drags down what remains of the integrated american underclass. America is a vast, open-air concentration camp, gradually killing off the european population, by forcing them out of urban areas with low costs of commons and low cost of opportunity, then taxing them out of replacement reproduction, and replacing them with dependents upon them to justify it. Why? LIBERALS. Where did liberals come from? European Jews and Anglo Protestant Women. That’s where it came from. (Yes the academic research on this subject has been around for decades. Even Rothbard. And precursors in the 1920’s, and late 19th century.) The tax-privileged and financial extraction privileged top and their clients in the top-dependent bottom – the unproductive against the working and middle productive. My ancestors founded good parts of Connecticut State and they would be horrified what liberals have done to it in just sixty years with their anti-empirical, history-denying, economic-denying, science-denying ideology. And they would be equally horrified that five thousand years of european aristocratic (meritocratic) development were squandered by an ignorant envious selfish virtue-signaling and destructive people who have brought about precisely what conservatives (middle class rule of law) predicted. The dirty secret of north western and east asian civilizations is continuous soft eugenics – not oppression, but domestication, like every other domesticated animal – by limiting harm done by the underclasses by limiting their reproduction, leaving them to survive on merit, aggressive punishment of their malfeasance. Darwin’s Laws are just extensions of the laws of thermodynamics at scale. There is no defeating them, only temporarily cheating them at tragic high cost. It’s Liberals that killed democracy. It’s conservatives and libertarians that let them. I’m all done with ‘letting’. Are you? Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute “Truth is Enough” https://propertarianinstitute.com
-
Perhaps we can restore the British Empire post-Brexit and grant exceptional trad
Perhaps we can restore the British Empire post-Brexit and grant exceptional trade status to US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and do what we should have done all along – which is make a government for the english speaking peoples instead of being torn apart by others.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-03 16:33:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1135585209787867140
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1135585208323981312
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Trump’s not trying to SELL you, but trying to TELL you: the postwar order is over; the Marxist, Postmodern, Internationalist project is over; Islamization is over. And with it, British pretentious, moralizing, and virtue signaling is over – and that you better get back to work. https://twitter.com/ByDonkeys/status/1135521581701181440
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1135585208323981312
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
Trump’s not trying to SELL you, but trying to TELL you: the postwar order is over; the Marxist, Postmodern, Internationalist project is over; Islamization is over. And with it, British pretentious, moralizing, and virtue signaling is over – and that you better get back to work. https://t.co/dfPd70UbxV
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1135585208323981312
-
All people when prosperous and not forced into roles tend toward biases – not to
All people when prosperous and not forced into roles tend toward biases – not together but separate. We did not converge but diverge. So the federal government is now a problem prohibiting divergence rather than a good.Time to separate into nations and let the big sort finish.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-01 00:00:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1134610755419066374
Reply addressees: @IntelligenceSpe @hardball @DavidJollyFL
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1134608106271494144
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1134608106271494144
-
WHAT MUELLER REALLY SAID(revolution comes) –“Drudge is saying he just retired a
WHAT MUELLER REALLY SAID(revolution comes)
–“Drudge is saying he just retired and told everyone goodbye.”–Jay Schmitt
1. That’s one of the things Mueller said.
2. The second thing he said is that if he could have cleared the president he would have.
3. The third thing he said is that obstruction was not something that the justice department could charge, and that it was up to congress.
THE UNDERLYING LAWThis case comes down to whether we believe the president thought that there was (is) a deep state conspiracy against him and therefore was acting morally or not.
Since this is only ascertainable by sympathy and empathy, it is only decidable by a jury.
Since the only jury in this matter is the houses of congress.
THE CONSEQUENCESince taking him to court over his state of mind will require him to expose the clinton’s, obama, dnc, deeps state conspiracy against him, he will have the power to expose all that information.
We will, as a result, get our civil war.
Because there is no procedural way of resolving this conflict EXCEPT civil war.
Revolution Comes!!!!
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-29 15:36:47 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/10755940758355778
-
I think we confuse the world with our forecast of the word predictions, and our
I think we confuse the world with our forecast of the word predictions, and our predictions vary a great deal. It’s clear women live in a different world from men. It’s clear hindus in a different from europeans. But it is a difference in prediction (imagination) not experience.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-28 17:04:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133418692849602567
Reply addressees: @2ndofhisname86
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133392409348497408
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133392409348497408
-
There is no comparison on earth to american health care. There is however, no in
There is no comparison on earth to american health care. There is however, no insurer of last resort for catastrophic illness. There is no possible way to replicate american health care (life prolongation, speed, service, variety, research) at the prices europeans experience.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-27 21:06:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133117260862840832
Reply addressees: @Aki_Yo1 @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133080906372067328
IN REPLY TO:
@Jepjep_wtf
@StefanMolyneux Finland has one of the best health care in the world. USA can’t even compaired. first 3 visits costs only 30 dollars after that whole year is free. So totally you pay about 90 dollars and then rest of visit are free. If you think that is bad then continue on the same path.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133080906372067328
-
THE QUESTION OF MARRIAGE: SURVIVAL lolz…. yeah, well, you know, it turns out t
THE QUESTION OF MARRIAGE: SURVIVAL
lolz…. yeah, well, you know, it turns out that men living largely with men, f-cking a range of women, and letting them keep the kids (how africa works) is much better… for men. The boys will defect as soon as they can, and join the men. Restoring the masculine feminine divergence. In these worlds women to much more of the work, and men much less because our needs are so much less.
We just built all this marriage sh-t so that we could keep capital (property) in the family (See the Marxists on Family).
Realistically unless you’re a hypergamic windfall, women don’t love us or want us they just want their matrilineal family and a few men to fuck for fun, manipulation, market value testing (status), and resources.
The only material value of a dedicated mate is that compromise is cheap and habituated so you get a real ‘friend’ – as long as hypergamy(upward) or opportunity(lateral) don’t interfere too much.
So given that this is true, what does the future of society mean when property (capital) is no longer meaningful because we are too productive (stuff is too cheap, we are too wealthy) to need each other.
I mean, in the end men are sovereign by default but women want sovereignty so the choice of marriage, matrilineal family, or single motherhood because it’s affordable, is a matter of obtaining sovereignty by one means or the other.
I dont’ see this as complicated. But you know, people don’t want to admit that the homogeneous society is falling apart because we are too wealthy to need one another for anything other than sex and entertainment.
My understanding from the evidence is that since the rate of reproduction wins, and dedicated motherhood wins reproduction, then those who practice marriage will exterminate those who don’t and that’s certainly what the evidence is showing.
In this sense it’s better to separate politically into intergenerational and surviving, vs generational consumption and extinction.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-15 22:03:43 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/10637302357148622
-
THE PEOPLE AND THE FINANCIAL SECTOR: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CASH FLOW AND “DEBT
THE PEOPLE AND THE FINANCIAL SECTOR: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CASH FLOW AND “DEBT AS CAPITAL”
—I was thinking about precisely this problem this morning. If capital is aligned with the left, then the only way for the middle to win is to take military action against capital. That is asking people who have jobs and houses and trucks and wives and kids to basically go out and knock out the pillars of the system, thereby ending their ability finance said jobs and houses and trucks and wives and kids.
This is actually the point the Yellow Vest movement is at right now. The middle is out there walking the streets every Saturday. But so what? They don’t want to blow up the means of production because that is what feeds them. So capital + the left waits them out. Successfully.
The middle is dependent on capital to support itself, can capital undermines the middle via its alliance with the left. Every single time.— Michael
Is this true? If they had nationalized the banks in 08, wiped out all the investors, and imprisoned the management, and installed new management …. the employees would have done their jobs at the financial institutions. But the management would have been gutted, and the investors too, and the capital in the banks liquidated and replaced from capital from the treasury. The only reason this didn’t happen is that they were afraid the cash machines would stop working, and they weren’t prepared with a replacement plan. Really. That’s the only reason. Otherwise it would have happened. Iceland did it. Harder for iceland than the states.The people care about cash flow and commons they don’t care about capital in the sense you mean it because capital is always available from the treasury to replace capital lost in the financial sector. The consequences are simply redistribution of capital INTERESTS in debt from the financial to the middle and working class, just as capital INTERESTS in territory have been frequently redistributed for the same reason.
Now I am not advocating this I’m just demonstrating that it’s clearly not true. The state can run anything for a while at poor returns on capital – most of the world does it – the value of the private sector is higher return on capital because the market forces continuous innovation.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-14 15:30:34 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/10626303457026616
-
Wars are wonderful things, and the most profitable of ventures, if you fight the
Wars are wonderful things, and the most profitable of ventures, if you fight them brutally to the end. We will fight Iran eventually because the world cannot afford her to control the transport and sale of petroleum. Adults decide these things. Petty moralizing is for schoolgirls
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-07 00:27:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1125557735221862403
Reply addressees: @Stonekettle
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1125455790586892288
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1125455790586892288