Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • LEADERS? What ‘leaders’ mean is that they want to obtain the power to learn how

    LEADERS?

    What ‘leaders’ mean is that they want to obtain the power to learn how to do the job, that they don’t know how to do, to achieve ends they don’t know how to achieve.

    Either people have a plan of obtaining power, and an institutional means of implementing and operating it with millions of people in a vast array of roles and responsibilities, or they are just asking for permission to figure it out while the enemy is countering at the same time.

    Plan, Demands, Process, Incentives, Shock, Awe, and RESULTS.

    You don’t need to understand the law.

    You need to understand that law is the means by which we engineer the political system that defends us and our civilization while assisting us in cooperating so that we CAN defend ourselves and our civilization and our genes…

    The constitution that expresses that law is something you can understand.

    The policies in that constitution are something you can understand.

    You can’t have EVERYTHING you want but you can get MOST of it, and so, believe it or not, can our friends in the middle and center left. IT’s the state, academy, finance, mediat, and attention whore economy we are going to gut forever from this earth and with that economy the ability of these people to conduct a war upon the rest of us.

    I prefer the old ‘kill them all and let the gods sort it out” approach but I”m willing to settle for peaceful means of change if it’s not too much work.

    Otherwise raise the jolly roger and slit throats….

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 16:13:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102429358949186537

  • IT’S THE WEST’S ENLIGHTENMENT EXPERIMENT OF AN ARISTOCRACY OF EVERYONE THAT’S DE

    IT’S THE WEST’S ENLIGHTENMENT EXPERIMENT OF AN ARISTOCRACY OF EVERYONE THAT’S DEAD – NOT THE WEST

    If you mean ‘the west’s enlightenment experiment of an aristocracy of everyone is dead” then yes I agree. But some men go backward into inferiority and superstition and I want to take us forward into dominance and godhood.

    The West: Militia of Every Able Bodied Man, Excellence and Heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and the Natural Law of Reciprocity, Science and Technology; Ethnocentrism and Commons; Trust and Markets in every aspect of life: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, and polities.

    That is the west. We differ from all other peoples by those virtues, values and collective strategy.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 15:58:32 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102429301915672645

  • HATE HINDERS THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEADERS WHO PRODUCE RESULTS Hate, like all negat

    HATE HINDERS THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEADERS WHO PRODUCE RESULTS

    Hate, like all negative emotions, is for those who are powerless to change the course of events. So ‘hate’ is merely your way of demonstrating your lack of agency, lack of competence, lack of courage, and unwillingness support others with greater agency, competence and willingness in an organized and frankly, more expensive, way of waging war against the enemy.

    Choose to war. Resolve to war. Identify a pack leader that is ‘good enough’ to move your demographic (interests) forward, by any means, and then switch or aggregate behind leaders that are even better as they emerge.

    YOU MUST GENERATE A MARKET FOR LEADERS BY FOLLOWING THEM.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 14:59:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102429069798698581

  • Jun 27, 2019, 6:19 PM I DON’T DO HATE. I DO SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS OF OUR AGE

    Jun 27, 2019, 6:19 PM
    I DON’T DO HATE. I DO SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS OF OUR AGE….

    I don’t hate anyone[1]. I love people. Even those who rarely if ever deserve it. If you wanna hate on people go f*k yourself and don’t waste my, and our, time. I solve problems. The problems of loss of our will to rule, our history and traditions, the genocide against our people, dysgenia, liberalism, socialism, globalism, cosmopolitanism and abrahamism in all its forms, is solvable.

    So focus on implementing the solution to the problem. We have the only implementable solution I know of. Nationalism is good for everyone. We are all cousins raising families according to our differences as members of our nations. We are competitors for power in empires. Small homogenous nation states are the optimum. Rule of law is the optimum. Monarchy with professional bureaucracy gated by rule of law and a militia is the optimum. The militia of ENOUGH able bodied men has to fight to produce those optimums.

    Truth is enough: Excellence and Heroism, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Truth and Duty, Jury and Markets in Everything. Restore our traditional market for prosecution of parasitism and predation: the common law of tort of sovereign men.

    If you’re advocating those solutions, preparing for, and ready to fight – then fine. If you’re not – then you’re part of the problem, not part of the solution. And shut the f*k up, and let men get the work done.

    Cheers.
    (… exasperated …)

    [1] (Full Disclosure: I don’t hate anyone other than my ex-wife’s divorce lawyer and a one particular venture capitalist – both of whom deserve the fires of hell – in this life or the next so to speak.). 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:11:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426285221622251

  • Jun 28, 2019, 9:32 AM THE TRUTH IS ENOUGH. —I’m a universal Nationalist. A wor

    Jun 28, 2019, 9:32 AM
    THE TRUTH IS ENOUGH.

    —I’m a universal Nationalist. A world of small homogenous high trust nation states. I advocate religious, political, legal, and cultural zero tolerance, ‘domestication’ (full integration) of ashkenazim who choose so, and repatriation of those who do not. And the reason is because – while jewish history has been laundered, as much as white history soiled, and Jews, like women, whose cognition they bred, lie like hell to avoid facing the reality of their historical behaviors, and like like hell to avoid taking responsibility for them. I know all too well that the punishment (persecution) was always and everywhere earned ten fold. And that’s just the reality of it. Russian/Eastern european history is the best and most suppressed example. But there is no condition counter to it in all of western european history. How do I know? I read legal(empirical) not literary(fictional) history.—

    Excellence and Heroism
    Truth and Duty
    Sovereignty and Reciprocity
    The Law and Jury
    and Markets in Everything:
    Association, Cooperation, Reproduction, Production, Commons, Polities, Nations.

    The truth is enough….
    … and separate, oppose, conquer, rule, or end those who display, speak, or act otherwise.

    The Oath of Transcendent Man.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:08:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426274991830724

  • Jun 29, 2019, 8:02 AM I had an insight yesterday that’s bothering me, and it’s b

    Jun 29, 2019, 8:02 AM
    I had an insight yesterday that’s bothering me, and it’s bothering me because it’s true.

    the amoral and immoral have an advantage over the moral if we let them.

    The needs for sun tzu’s, aristotle’s machiavelli’s, doolittle’s and martial epistemology, to counter the habituation of morality – while at the same time, the return on the value of the habituation of morality.

    Taleb’s (false) argument about IQ, because he’s talking about amorality and opportunism (semitism), not intelligence and capital accumulation (europeanism).

    The reason the jews have benefitted from polyethicalism (amoralism), so consistently even independent of ashkenazi distributions – vs the problem the english equivalent (“Anglicans, Tories” – the genetic superiority of the british ‘middle'[upper middle]) class at home and in the empire (opportunity diaspora).

    The value of understanding Propertarianism, which, says that we must build that moral civ by due diligence in prosecuting the immoral. The value of P in understanding that much of what appears Amoral is Immoral.

    In other words our strength is our weakness if the “commercial state” (what we have today) or the commercial sector, or the ‘religious’ sector, expand beyond national means into consumption of the accumulated capital in all its forms, including those opportunities that may not be seized amorally.

    In other words, there is an error in our demarcation between moral amoral and immoral commercial, political, religious activity.

    P fixes this implicitly but I don’t TALK about it to provide clarity explicitly.
    Edit

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:59:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426238079433292

  • THE LAW ON GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS Markets are necessary for the production of inves

    THE LAW ON GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS

    Markets are necessary for the production of investments in commons among peoples with uncommon means, uncommon interests, and limited interests to invest. It allows uncommon interests to cooperate by uncommon means, on uncommon ends.

    Voting is only useful for the choice of priority of investments in commons, amongst a group with common means and interest, given limited resources to invest. It allows common interests to cooperate, by common means, on common ends.

    Rule is only useful for the choice of the production of commons in pursuit of a singular design of future conditions, by directing the greatest concentration of resources behind the most direct means of achieving that end.

    Dictatorship is only useful in times of war, when the entirety of the people, their capital, and the territory must be allocated to the production of victory.

    Historically speaking, Durable commons are best produced by monarchy; voting to limit the raising expansion of fees (taxes); and Markets for the production of private goods and services.

    The optimal form of government is the one that makes use of each of these orders only for the circumstances for which it is useful.

    The only possible insurer of that process is a monarchy, professional warriors, and a militia whose franchise depends upon it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:57:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426231781425441

  • (…) THE METHODOLOGY The methodology consists largely of using algorithmic (lik

    (…)

    THE METHODOLOGY

    The methodology consists largely of using algorithmic (like programming) operational language, the vocabulary and concepts of economics and law, to produce operationally formal arguments, that satisfy all dimensions of human perception (consistency, correspondence, operational (existential) possibility, rational choice, reciprocity, limits, full accounting, parsimony, coherence, and warrantied for due diligence against ignorance error bias and deceit for having done so. If you want to learn the methodology, it’s formal, and its relatively difficult, not because the principles are difficult, but because it exposes whether you know what you’re talking about or not, and forces you to speak and write in terms demonstrating that you have the knowledge to claim what you speak is true.

    This method, produces the long sought after ‘strictly constructed law’ closed to interpretation, on one end and the ability to limit political speech to that which is not false parasitic, predatory.

    So that’s the evidence I can and have summarized the work. It’s not philosophy or ideology so it’s not something you intuit, it’s like the calculus, formal logic, programming, economics, and law, which is something you study and learn by repeated application until it’s a skill.

    This is the most important work being produced in the field at present. nothing else compares. I know. And I know why, and I explain why, and it’s not a good thing that the enemy has been so successful at sophism pseudoscience propaganda and denial.

    Now, if that’s too much for your big boy pants, I’m sorry for you. But learning this if you have studied literary philosophy instead of science, logic, algorithms, economics, and law can be burdensome because you are the equivalent of a theologian in the empirical enlightenment, given that this formal logic of the social sciences deprecates literary philosophy forever to the realm of pseudosciences.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:52:34 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426211274373936

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426209481700160

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    (…) 3. A Methodology: i) Epistemology: “The Completion of the Scientific Method and its application to the full scope of human knowledge, resulting in a universal, formal, epistemological method sufficient for adjudication of differences in court.“ ii) Ethics, Law, Politics: “The strict, algorithmic, construction of the natural, common law, of reciprocity (tort);” 4. A Body of Law: ii) Law: “A body of law answering the cannon of questions – providing a common law of equally sovereign men, alternative to Roman, Napoleonic, and Continental law of unequally sovereign men” iii) Constitution: A Constitution of that law, completing the Aristotelian, Roman, British, and American Constitutional Project.” iiii) Policies: “A set of policies under that constitution, solving the otherwise unsolvable problems of the current age.” 5. A Reformation: i) Reformation: “A reformation and unification of all fields” – Language, Logic, and Mathematics – Psychology, Sociology, and Group Strategy – Money, Credit-Finance, and Economics – Ethics, Law, and Politics – Mindfulness-Religion, Education-Academy, and Government-Rule 6. A Solution i) A Solution: “A solution to the political problem of our age.” ii) A Declaration: “A Declaration demanding the implementation of this constitution, as reformations of, by amendments to, the existing American constitution, restoring the historical European, Germanic, English, British, and American rights of equally sovereign men, and a means of successful insurrection to force its adoption if force is required – which it will be.” THE LIST OF IDEAS Too long to list here but the overview lists all of the major themes in order by aristotelian category. From there you have to link to specific articles. ANd then there is the courseware. ANd finally I will ship the book when ready. (…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426209481700160

  • (… continued) Men feel as they do for the simple reason that not all of us are

    (… continued)

    Men feel as they do for the simple reason that not all of us are of merit, but that we must preserve collective care taking while at the same time limiting the reproduction of the undomesticated animal classes who would reverse the past 50K years of evolutionary progress from animal to human.

    Women are the greatest mass murderers in history, since exposure and dumping of babies and children is the most common source of mortality in human history. Men and their wars are nothing by comparison. The great plagues are nothing by comparison. Yet when women and betas like you are able to force costs upon the rest of us, to produce and immigration dysgenia, you no longer limit your reproduction, no longer delay your reproduction, no longer are denied reproduction, no longer face the hard choice of harsh winters or sexual impulse.

    So no. I’s not an ‘opinion’.
    I’m not stating a difference of opinion or value – I’m stating a FACT.
    Dysgenia is measurable.
    The consequences are measurable.

    You are nothing more than a repeat of the jewish-christian-muslim destruction of the ancient world using the same vocabulary arguments and strategy differing only in using pseudoscience and sophism this time versus supernaturalism and sophism the last.

    You and all like you are the source of dark ages.

    You and all like you are a cancer upon this earth – an uncontrolled dysgenic out-of-control, resource consuming disease consuming society, civilization, man, the planet, and the entirety of human potential with your infantilism.

    You and all like you are a disease upon us all.
    A Cancer. A Cancer we are willing to separate from and let run its course.
    But a cancer we must isolate, inoculate, prevent, and cure our people of.

    So when we say ‘be a man’ we mean ‘save yourselves, our people, our civilization, mankind, the planet and the entirety of human potential from that cancerous non-rational infantilized dysenic group we call marxists, socialists, feminists, postmodernists, politically correct, and inadequate.’

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:11:03 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425576276514819

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425573316009260

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    (… continued) So you do not know what and why you feel the way you do. You only sense it is a good. The libertarian does not know why he feels the way he does, he only senses it is good. The conservative does not know why he feels the way he does, only that he senses it is good. However, in the long run the conservative is the only one making use of all available knowledge over the long run. Everything liberals thought would be true in their pseudoscientific rage against the darwinian machine has been false. Man was no oppressed. Semi domesticated human animals like all other animals we domesticated, have been eugenically governed in eastern and western civilization – largely through climate, competitors, and manorialism to produce society with superior distributions. ANd your ‘privilege’ of hyperconsumption and violation of the many compromises between the generations, genders, classes, and masculine-feminine minds, was made and still is made, possible by those who domesticated your ancestors – and apparently failed to domesticate your line. What do we do? We are sufficiently wealthy to separate and go our own ways, and return to our process of speciation. You may pursue your dysgenic goals, and we will pursue our eugenic goals, and we will rapidly see what occurs to a ‘liberal, feminine, redistributionist, equalitarian’ order without the libertarians and conservatives striving at all times to preserve what they and their ancestors have made, while you do nothing but continue to overpopulate a planet, drive down the averages, and reduce you and yours to yet another failed effeminate equalitarian utopia. You will not however take us down with you. (We would rather …. revolt and end you.) We will continue to rebuild our society from the catastrophe of century of pseudoscience (marx, freud, adorno, cantor, derrida, chomsky et al) and their marxism, postmodernism, neoliberalism, feminism, and denialism – and we will continue to build ours on the centuries of western tradition (aristotle, hume, darwin, menger, and the common law of reciprocity. So that is what noah and I are talking about. Him about finding happiness in the present, and I about how to solve the political problem of your feminine dysgenic animal desire to reverse our evolutionary progress and turn us to state of animals, ignorance, and poverty. So no it is not an act of GSRRM to state what I have stated. It is a scientific description of the cognitive processes and their dysgenic (herd) outcomes that you seek to implement despite knowing very little, thinking very little, and feeling only what an animal feels. Women feel as they do for the simple reason that at maturity their nervous system develops into a shared one so that they are willing to bear any cost to preserve a costly offspring regardless of merit. (continued…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425573316009260

  • (… continued) So you do not know what and why you feel the way you do. You onl

    (… continued)

    So you do not know what and why you feel the way you do. You only sense it is a good. The libertarian does not know why he feels the way he does, he only senses it is good. The conservative does not know why he feels the way he does, only that he senses it is good.

    However, in the long run the conservative is the only one making use of all available knowledge over the long run.

    Everything liberals thought would be true in their pseudoscientific rage against the darwinian machine has been false.

    Man was no oppressed. Semi domesticated human animals like all other animals we domesticated, have been eugenically governed in eastern and western civilization – largely through climate, competitors, and manorialism to produce society with superior distributions. ANd your ‘privilege’ of hyperconsumption and violation of the many compromises between the generations, genders, classes, and masculine-feminine minds, was made and still is made, possible by those who domesticated your ancestors – and apparently failed to domesticate your line.

    What do we do? We are sufficiently wealthy to separate and go our own ways, and return to our process of speciation.

    You may pursue your dysgenic goals, and we will pursue our eugenic goals, and we will rapidly see what occurs to a ‘liberal, feminine, redistributionist, equalitarian’ order without the libertarians and conservatives striving at all times to preserve what they and their ancestors have made, while you do nothing but continue to overpopulate a planet, drive down the averages, and reduce you and yours to yet another failed effeminate equalitarian utopia.

    You will not however take us down with you. (We would rather …. revolt and end you.)

    We will continue to rebuild our society from the catastrophe of century of pseudoscience (marx, freud, adorno, cantor, derrida, chomsky et al) and their marxism, postmodernism, neoliberalism, feminism, and denialism – and we will continue to build ours on the centuries of western tradition (aristotle, hume, darwin, menger, and the common law of reciprocity.

    So that is what noah and I are talking about. Him about finding happiness in the present, and I about how to solve the political problem of your feminine dysgenic animal desire to reverse our evolutionary progress and turn us to state of animals, ignorance, and poverty.

    So no it is not an act of GSRRM to state what I have stated. It is a scientific description of the cognitive processes and their dysgenic (herd) outcomes that you seek to implement despite knowing very little, thinking very little, and feeling only what an animal feels.

    Women feel as they do for the simple reason that at maturity their nervous system develops into a shared one so that they are willing to bear any cost to preserve a costly offspring regardless of merit.

    (continued…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:10:18 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425573316009260

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425569468533065

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    HE ANTI-LIBERAL ARGUMENT (fresh weaponry for your use) Do you know the difference between virtue, rule, and outcome ethics? What about the difference between moral, normative, and outcome law? What is the difference between your line of argument(Empathy, Care Taking), Noah Revoy’s line of argument(Psychology, Success), and my line of argument(Law, Limits)? What is the genetic, institutional, traditional, normative, and psychological outcome of those three lines of argument? We demonstrate approximately six general moral rules (foundations) over the use of capital-in-toto. We demonstrate a bias between specializing in them: consumption (caretaking, proportionality) and dysgenia, production (opportunity, reciprocity) and eugenia, and preservation( disgust/purity, loyalty) and eugenia, while only the preservationists practicing all six equally, the productionists dropping loyalty, and the consumptionism dropping all but care and proportionality. These six moral rules roughly are divisible into private and common capital demands in exchange for our cooperation. These capital demands and moral demands roughly correspond to the feminine, ascendent male, and established male distributions. The structure of the human brain both physical, developmental, hormonal, and neurochemical corresponds to about the same distribution between female, beta male, and dominant male. The distribution of mental illness psychotic < solipsistic to < feminine < to > masculine > to autistic > anti-social reflects these brain structures and distributions. These developments appear to follow the general rule of 80% genetic and 20% something else (variation in developmental progress). (continued…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425569468533065