Anti-Abrahamism (ideas) Is Different from Anti Semitism (people) – I’m Not Anti-Anyone Except Parasites (thieves, Murderers) Abrahamism is an ideology, philosophy, and theology of sophism and deceit. Semitism is a language, and a genetic distribution. I’m not anti-semitic. I’m not anti-anyone (although everyone wishes I was). I’m against the use of Abrahamism to undermine host civilizations, and especially ours. And I am pro science and evidence not intuition, what passes for common sense. And the science says something that is undesirable to the left’s intuition, ideology, philosophy, secular, theology, and theology. Small ethnocentric nation states provide markets for the commons suitable to the development of people with different genetic intuitions. And the market results of competition between those nation states will tell us whose intuitions, ideologies philosophies, secular theologies, and theologies are harmful to the people who intuit them. I am, absolutely positively in favor of every current civilization except the semitic. Because every civlization except the semitic has chosen productive, reciprocal, and responsible self evolution without imposition of costs upon others using ideology, philosophy, secular theology, or theology as justification for imposition of costs, undermining, invasion, replacement, consumption, destruction, and reduction to ashes. This century is the one in which the world either contains the Abrahamic ideology, philosophy, theology of deceit, or one in which the world continues to lose civilization to the abrahamic disaster of de-civilization that has destroyed every civlization it has touched. … What is abrahamism? “Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty, by Pretense of Plausible Deniability, Despite Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s) – And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence (power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”
Form: Mini Essay
-
Anti-Abrahamism (ideas) Is Different from Anti Semitism (people)
Anti-Abrahamism (ideas) Is Different from Anti Semitism (people) – I’m Not Anti-Anyone Except Parasites (thieves, Murderers) Abrahamism is an ideology, philosophy, and theology of sophism and deceit. Semitism is a language, and a genetic distribution. I’m not anti-semitic. I’m not anti-anyone (although everyone wishes I was). I’m against the use of Abrahamism to undermine host civilizations, and especially ours. And I am pro science and evidence not intuition, what passes for common sense. And the science says something that is undesirable to the left’s intuition, ideology, philosophy, secular, theology, and theology. Small ethnocentric nation states provide markets for the commons suitable to the development of people with different genetic intuitions. And the market results of competition between those nation states will tell us whose intuitions, ideologies philosophies, secular theologies, and theologies are harmful to the people who intuit them. I am, absolutely positively in favor of every current civilization except the semitic. Because every civlization except the semitic has chosen productive, reciprocal, and responsible self evolution without imposition of costs upon others using ideology, philosophy, secular theology, or theology as justification for imposition of costs, undermining, invasion, replacement, consumption, destruction, and reduction to ashes. This century is the one in which the world either contains the Abrahamic ideology, philosophy, theology of deceit, or one in which the world continues to lose civilization to the abrahamic disaster of de-civilization that has destroyed every civlization it has touched. … What is abrahamism? “Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty, by Pretense of Plausible Deniability, Despite Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s) – And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence (power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”
-
REQUEST OF JEWISH MEMBERS OF P-COMMUNITY
(a) P-law is for everyone, but in the process of teaching it, it’s very much anti the abrahamic method of argument used in judaism, christianity, and islam in the ancient world, and marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, HBD-Denialism, and anti-white sentiment in general in the modern world. (b) This easily comes across as anti-semitic, rather than anti-arguing theologically as in judaism, islam, christianity or pseudo-scientifically as in marxism, postmodernism, feminism and human diversity denialism. (c) Just as in the past Americans blamed everything on the europeans, then the germans, then the Russians during past conflicts – education against the left, because of jewish dominance of left thought leadership, attracts people who want to ‘blame everything on the jews’. It takes a lot of work to pull them into recognizing that ‘rule of law fixes us all’. That means ALL OF US who are not crazy leftists regardless of our ethnicity. So if you are jewish and participate in our movement, in the institute, or in our politics, it will help us and the movement a great deal – but you must endure these people and help us help them them:
–“We all follow our traditions until we know which of them not to follow – we have no choice.”–
But we teach:
–“We can’t change the past. The past doesn’t matter. The future does. And Rule Of Law, Fixes Us All.”–
That includes the absolutely-crazy science-denying left in every single ethnic group – including the whites. This is why we seem to attract ex muslims, half-jews, and some secular jews. And this group helps Bring everyone along into “Rule of Law Fixes Us All”. So if you sign up with the institute, you have to sign up knowing that this is what you’re going to have to deal with – and what we all need.
-
REQUEST OF JEWISH MEMBERS OF P-COMMUNITY
(a) P-law is for everyone, but in the process of teaching it, it’s very much anti the abrahamic method of argument used in judaism, christianity, and islam in the ancient world, and marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, HBD-Denialism, and anti-white sentiment in general in the modern world. (b) This easily comes across as anti-semitic, rather than anti-arguing theologically as in judaism, islam, christianity or pseudo-scientifically as in marxism, postmodernism, feminism and human diversity denialism. (c) Just as in the past Americans blamed everything on the europeans, then the germans, then the Russians during past conflicts – education against the left, because of jewish dominance of left thought leadership, attracts people who want to ‘blame everything on the jews’. It takes a lot of work to pull them into recognizing that ‘rule of law fixes us all’. That means ALL OF US who are not crazy leftists regardless of our ethnicity. So if you are jewish and participate in our movement, in the institute, or in our politics, it will help us and the movement a great deal – but you must endure these people and help us help them them:
–“We all follow our traditions until we know which of them not to follow – we have no choice.”–
But we teach:
–“We can’t change the past. The past doesn’t matter. The future does. And Rule Of Law, Fixes Us All.”–
That includes the absolutely-crazy science-denying left in every single ethnic group – including the whites. This is why we seem to attract ex muslims, half-jews, and some secular jews. And this group helps Bring everyone along into “Rule of Law Fixes Us All”. So if you sign up with the institute, you have to sign up knowing that this is what you’re going to have to deal with – and what we all need.
-
RULE OF LAW’S CHAIN OF COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES
by James Dmitro Makienko [R]ule of law fixes all male-cognitives (regardless of the present level of their civilization or their background). Which enables them to fix female-cognitives through patriarchy. By giving them a framework to direct their female cognition toward raising children, stay faithful to their husbands and keeping a family unit and healthy community (gives male-cognitives something worthy of defending, fighting and if necessary dying for). This is why traditional religion can work as this framework – as it gives female cognitives a weekly ritual with someone continuously telling them how to behave (like an orthodox priest – the one in my church actually loves studying aristotle and plato, you can have a good philosophy discussion with him after service). As long as male-cognitives keep a close watch over the weekly ritual to ensure it is not used for undermining of commons by female-cognitives, and law, logic and reason remain superior. === 1) James is very talented, developing fast, and this is great stuff. 2) I am increasingly convinced that Orthodoxy works precisely because it didn’t try to fake a bridge. It’s like: … i) Orthodox = God, without interference in the state. … ii) Catholicsm = Churchanity: god and jesus plus interference in the state. … iii) Evangelical=Jesus and ignoring the state. … iv) Secular Christians = Ritual Loyalty to Christians and maybe ‘deism’
-
RULE OF LAW’S CHAIN OF COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES
by James Dmitro Makienko [R]ule of law fixes all male-cognitives (regardless of the present level of their civilization or their background). Which enables them to fix female-cognitives through patriarchy. By giving them a framework to direct their female cognition toward raising children, stay faithful to their husbands and keeping a family unit and healthy community (gives male-cognitives something worthy of defending, fighting and if necessary dying for). This is why traditional religion can work as this framework – as it gives female cognitives a weekly ritual with someone continuously telling them how to behave (like an orthodox priest – the one in my church actually loves studying aristotle and plato, you can have a good philosophy discussion with him after service). As long as male-cognitives keep a close watch over the weekly ritual to ensure it is not used for undermining of commons by female-cognitives, and law, logic and reason remain superior. === 1) James is very talented, developing fast, and this is great stuff. 2) I am increasingly convinced that Orthodoxy works precisely because it didn’t try to fake a bridge. It’s like: … i) Orthodox = God, without interference in the state. … ii) Catholicsm = Churchanity: god and jesus plus interference in the state. … iii) Evangelical=Jesus and ignoring the state. … iv) Secular Christians = Ritual Loyalty to Christians and maybe ‘deism’
-
RELIGION AND WOMEN – AND A VECTOR OF SOLUTION
RELIGION AND WOMEN – AND A VECTOR OF SOLUTION by Maria Al Masani Makienko ( FROM CURT: Learn Please. I will delete all counter-signaling.) As a Muslim woman, I have to make a comment about ex Muslim women. My issue is when they leave the faith, they cut their hair short, become rad feminists, sleep with every man they can, then they get into their 30s and want to settle down and men are not interested. My issue with ex Muslim men is they enable this behavior, encourage it, but don’t marry them. I think religion is an excellent tool to manage women and prevent them from eating each other and destroying their marriage marketplace value and policing weak beta males who put them on a pedestal and become their slaves when they know better. Female cognition is highly emotional, made to care for infants – something autistic women such as myself are terrible at. Female cognitives and their emotion-based thinking must be managed not to destroy themselves and society. I think for male cognitive with an IQ 115 and above that are not slaves to women, P is excellent. In a way, P creates a cognitive aristocracy and a traditional masculine religion is the only effective tool for cognitive commoner management. The utility of religion is domesticating the slaves of emotion-based thinking. The aristocracy should use philosophy, logic, and reason for decision making. In leading Orthodox, Catholic and Muslim seminaries, Aristotle is studied a lot – as my husband said, why can’t that be updated with P? — by CurtD: It can be updated with P. But I didn’t think through the universal application of aristotle in doing so until you just mentioned it. (FYI: @adam … wth is Adam’s alias now?) — by Maria Al Masani Makienko They as in ex Muslim women, the men who enable them? As for they can be… my favorite response is Dr Johanthan Haidt on decay. The issue with 6 pronged conservative values is they prevent decay. Every generation of secular women is more degenerate than the next and eats each other. I am a sufi, a moderate who used to go after religious conservatives and moved to Canada .. but then in 15 years I saw the decay of each subsequent generation. Women from when I came to Canada are Audrey Hepburn compared to the blue and green hair tattooed feminist monsters coming out of the schools. And then at 30, they are tired and spent. And the religious immigrant girls who don’t integrate from a patriarchal faith have their pick of men here. If the woman has male cognition and is an ex Muslim autist, she would agree with me about what happens to female cognitive ex Muslim women over time. Female cognition is a problem: if you give them power they ruin everything! And the way you control them is not the way you think for yourself. When one is motivated by logic and reason, they first go to Aristotle for their thinking, Marcus Aurellius … but its so nice to have something modern and even more relevant like P. P for the aristocracy – a traditional religion for the underclass — by CurtD: Smart. Very smart. WOMEN Agreed, but In our culture we must state this differently: “We have had centuries to develop many institutional means of controlling men’s bad behavior when they have gained social, economic, and political freedom, but we have not had time to create institutions to control women’s bad behavior when they have social economic and political freedom – and women, just like men, clearly have many bad behaviors we need institutions to control.” ARISTOCRACY: Agreed .. But in our culture, where the majority is in the middle, not the bottom, we use tri-partism and tri-functionalism, so we must have three: “Law for the aristocracy who have power to limit its use, philosophy for the middle have some to use it well, and theology for the bottom, that have least, so that they are not used by others. Limits for the top and bottom and choices for the middle.” ARISTOTLE I have so many projects I would like to finish: 1) to rewrite all of Aristotle in propertarian prose. 2) to write a tripartite theology for western peoples 3) to try write one book that tries to reform christianity, islam, judaism, buddhism – if not hinduism (i don’t think I can understand it) so that they are rational as well as spiritual, but not in conflict with the natural law. But I think you have given me the right wisdom: that if I start with aristotle then all will follow. @adam (Don Miguel) suggested this last year I just didn’t piece it together until you said it here. I will not live long enough to do all these things. But I’ll do the best I can.
-
RELIGION AND WOMEN – AND A VECTOR OF SOLUTION
RELIGION AND WOMEN – AND A VECTOR OF SOLUTION by Maria Al Masani Makienko ( FROM CURT: Learn Please. I will delete all counter-signaling.) As a Muslim woman, I have to make a comment about ex Muslim women. My issue is when they leave the faith, they cut their hair short, become rad feminists, sleep with every man they can, then they get into their 30s and want to settle down and men are not interested. My issue with ex Muslim men is they enable this behavior, encourage it, but don’t marry them. I think religion is an excellent tool to manage women and prevent them from eating each other and destroying their marriage marketplace value and policing weak beta males who put them on a pedestal and become their slaves when they know better. Female cognition is highly emotional, made to care for infants – something autistic women such as myself are terrible at. Female cognitives and their emotion-based thinking must be managed not to destroy themselves and society. I think for male cognitive with an IQ 115 and above that are not slaves to women, P is excellent. In a way, P creates a cognitive aristocracy and a traditional masculine religion is the only effective tool for cognitive commoner management. The utility of religion is domesticating the slaves of emotion-based thinking. The aristocracy should use philosophy, logic, and reason for decision making. In leading Orthodox, Catholic and Muslim seminaries, Aristotle is studied a lot – as my husband said, why can’t that be updated with P? — by CurtD: It can be updated with P. But I didn’t think through the universal application of aristotle in doing so until you just mentioned it. (FYI: @adam … wth is Adam’s alias now?) — by Maria Al Masani Makienko They as in ex Muslim women, the men who enable them? As for they can be… my favorite response is Dr Johanthan Haidt on decay. The issue with 6 pronged conservative values is they prevent decay. Every generation of secular women is more degenerate than the next and eats each other. I am a sufi, a moderate who used to go after religious conservatives and moved to Canada .. but then in 15 years I saw the decay of each subsequent generation. Women from when I came to Canada are Audrey Hepburn compared to the blue and green hair tattooed feminist monsters coming out of the schools. And then at 30, they are tired and spent. And the religious immigrant girls who don’t integrate from a patriarchal faith have their pick of men here. If the woman has male cognition and is an ex Muslim autist, she would agree with me about what happens to female cognitive ex Muslim women over time. Female cognition is a problem: if you give them power they ruin everything! And the way you control them is not the way you think for yourself. When one is motivated by logic and reason, they first go to Aristotle for their thinking, Marcus Aurellius … but its so nice to have something modern and even more relevant like P. P for the aristocracy – a traditional religion for the underclass — by CurtD: Smart. Very smart. WOMEN Agreed, but In our culture we must state this differently: “We have had centuries to develop many institutional means of controlling men’s bad behavior when they have gained social, economic, and political freedom, but we have not had time to create institutions to control women’s bad behavior when they have social economic and political freedom – and women, just like men, clearly have many bad behaviors we need institutions to control.” ARISTOCRACY: Agreed .. But in our culture, where the majority is in the middle, not the bottom, we use tri-partism and tri-functionalism, so we must have three: “Law for the aristocracy who have power to limit its use, philosophy for the middle have some to use it well, and theology for the bottom, that have least, so that they are not used by others. Limits for the top and bottom and choices for the middle.” ARISTOTLE I have so many projects I would like to finish: 1) to rewrite all of Aristotle in propertarian prose. 2) to write a tripartite theology for western peoples 3) to try write one book that tries to reform christianity, islam, judaism, buddhism – if not hinduism (i don’t think I can understand it) so that they are rational as well as spiritual, but not in conflict with the natural law. But I think you have given me the right wisdom: that if I start with aristotle then all will follow. @adam (Don Miguel) suggested this last year I just didn’t piece it together until you said it here. I will not live long enough to do all these things. But I’ll do the best I can.
-
Heaping of Undue Praise: All Left Political Behavior Is Expression of Female Cognitive Warfare
HEAPING OF UNDUE PRAISE: ALL LEFT POLITICAL BEHAVIOR IS FEMALE COGNITIVE WARFARE EXPRESSION
—“Heaping of undue praise, or “Praise Bombing”. Praise (love) bombing is baiting into hazard. The goal is for the target to lower their defenses. Manipulation and Betrayal only work if trust is first established.”– Andrew M Gilmour
Again, the female strategy: heaping of undue praise is how women encourage children to continue in the face of failure and adversity. That’s the positive. In the negative, it’s heaping undue praise on that which is undeserving of it, in order to undermine that which is deserving of it. in other words, the female intuition applied to the negative. ===
Ryan Drummond From a mother to her child, it’s a good thing as long as it doesn’t induce narcissism in the child. In the realm of politics, education, the state, or anything that expands beyond the closed family circle, it is absolutely dangerous. Risking narcissism to one child through misguided motherhood is…managable, because it is just one input that doesn’t hold THAT much weight (beyond the family circle). Risking that narcissism penetrating the volksgeist, through the input of organisations or governments seen as powerful, can simply cause the fall of civilisations. Andrew M Gilmour Genuine praise vs fraudulent praise. Andrew Spivak Conservatives do this appeal to vanity too when you try to argue for positions or actions that would actually be effective. “You’re better than that”. Patrick Smyth This is why I would prefer that boys be educated by men rather than women. I anticipate that we could get rid of a lot of the entitlement issues young people tend to have now if people aren’t educated solely by indulgent females.
-
Heaping of Undue Praise: All Left Political Behavior Is Expression of Female Cognitive Warfare
HEAPING OF UNDUE PRAISE: ALL LEFT POLITICAL BEHAVIOR IS FEMALE COGNITIVE WARFARE EXPRESSION
—“Heaping of undue praise, or “Praise Bombing”. Praise (love) bombing is baiting into hazard. The goal is for the target to lower their defenses. Manipulation and Betrayal only work if trust is first established.”– Andrew M Gilmour
Again, the female strategy: heaping of undue praise is how women encourage children to continue in the face of failure and adversity. That’s the positive. In the negative, it’s heaping undue praise on that which is undeserving of it, in order to undermine that which is deserving of it. in other words, the female intuition applied to the negative. ===
Ryan Drummond From a mother to her child, it’s a good thing as long as it doesn’t induce narcissism in the child. In the realm of politics, education, the state, or anything that expands beyond the closed family circle, it is absolutely dangerous. Risking narcissism to one child through misguided motherhood is…managable, because it is just one input that doesn’t hold THAT much weight (beyond the family circle). Risking that narcissism penetrating the volksgeist, through the input of organisations or governments seen as powerful, can simply cause the fall of civilisations. Andrew M Gilmour Genuine praise vs fraudulent praise. Andrew Spivak Conservatives do this appeal to vanity too when you try to argue for positions or actions that would actually be effective. “You’re better than that”. Patrick Smyth This is why I would prefer that boys be educated by men rather than women. I anticipate that we could get rid of a lot of the entitlement issues young people tend to have now if people aren’t educated solely by indulgent females.