Form: Mini Essay

  • DOGE ISN’T NOVEL: ANCESTRAL EVIDENCE In 1954, President Dwight D. Eisenhower com

    DOGE ISN’T NOVEL: ANCESTRAL EVIDENCE

    In 1954, President Dwight D. Eisenhower commissioned Lieutenant General James H. Doolittle to conduct a comprehensive review of the Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA) covert operations.

    The resulting document, known as the “Doolittle Report,” was a 69-page classified study focusing on the CIA’s personnel, security, adequacy, and efficacy.

    The report emphasized the severity of the Cold War threat, stating:

    “It is now clear that we are facing an implacable enemy whose avowed objective is world domination by whatever means and at whatever cost.”

    To counter this threat, the report recommended that the United States adopt a more aggressive stance in its intelligence operations, suggesting that traditional American concepts of “fair play” might need to be reconsidered in the context of national survival.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-24 02:19:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882614276801847296

  • (Personal – Political Rates of Change – The Childish Right) Interesting. I have

    (Personal – Political Rates of Change – The Childish Right)
    Interesting. I have had declining patience for the whining right wing since 2020 when they turned on us for not resorting to violence – but showing how to disarm the left’s ‘baiting into hazard’ instead.

    But I have found that over the past few days, what little tolerance I have for their petty whining and complaining about imperfections in the face of obvious incremental improvements – and radical change right and rates of change right now.

    What? Are y’all like little girls complaining that you want attention? Makes me disgusted really.

    Celebrate our progress. Feed it. And apply that victory to fully defeat the enemy. Don’t complain that there is work left to do. Demoralize them with the evidence they’ve lost and lost forever any pretense of moral high ground. They’re just parasites and thieves and evaders of the responsibility necessary to preserve our competitive advantage.

    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-22 20:35:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882165287526748160

  • All disciplines study problems, methods of measurement, and solutions. They are

    All disciplines study problems, methods of measurement, and solutions. They are the Before, during, and after states. The measurement consists of a grammar of continuous recursive disambiguation within the paradigmatic limits defined by the permissible and impermissible dimension, bounding statements to inputs outputs and transformations that do not violate those limits, which would result in preventing tests of identity, consistency, correspondence and constructability and therefore both measurement and its products. Because this is a statement of universals – what humans (and the universe for that matter) are capable of, philosophy consists of the attempt to solve problems within the paradigmatic limits of it’s applicability – just like all other grammars.

    Reply addressees: @ArgonGruber @RussellJohnston


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-22 17:09:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882113404837728256

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882110843795734908

  • WHY DO THE FRENCH HATE THE ANGLOSPHERE – AND TRUMP IN PARTICULAR? The french hav

    WHY DO THE FRENCH HATE THE ANGLOSPHERE – AND TRUMP IN PARTICULAR?
    The french have retained (a) pagan era venus worship (the feminine), (b) the feudal feminization of the language (c) the feminization of the catholic church (d) the authoritarianism of the feminine (d) the invention of socialism as an extension of feminine, catholic, authoritarian MATERNALISM, and so of COURSE the french favor the feminine > venus-worship > maternal > abrahamic Socialist > marxist > feminist > woke > face-before-truth objection to the steppe, ancient aristocratic, germanic, masculine, rational, empirical, truth-before-face of the anglosphere and it’s PATERNALISM in order to maximize individual responsibility and therefore liberty versus maternal minimization of individual responsibility and therefore a preference for authority.
    I mean, who started this cascade of feminine destruction of the west? It was the french, industrialized and institutionalized by the jews, and adopted almost universally by the irresponsible majority of women.
    Women hate men. Women hate responsibility. Women hate accountability. Women hate truth before face. And so women hate paternalism.
    It stops them from seducing, parasitism, undermining, and lying to avoid responsibility and accountability.
    The french are the political expression of the authoritarian feminine, just as the jews are the political expression of the seditious feminine.
    It’s not complicated.
    In fact, it’s deterministic.
    And obvious.
    It’s just offensive.
    Because it’s truth before face.

    RE: https://t.co/S1bSKDdlxH

    Reply addressees: @expatanon


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 21:40:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881819211871436800

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881812861816865086

  • Today: David Shapiro Confirms AI Commoditization. AI’s are a basic technology th

    Today: David Shapiro Confirms AI Commoditization.
    AI’s are a basic technology that is easily reproducible.
    We can literally compress all human knowledge into a single model (see my work on representation).
    DeepSeekR1 proves there is no moat.
    AIs are a massive capital investment on the scale of the internet boom – but worse.
    AIs can vary in specialization, sure. But they need to be faster, cheapter, or smarter to find market space.
    You can run DeepSeek on a mac mini for goodness sake because M(x) chips come with onboard NPUs.
    AI’s are going to be ubiquitous and commoditized. Every nation will have it (truly, all organizations and most people can have one – the difference is in the bias you insert into your data structures.
    For example, once the printing press was invented within a decade it jumped borders, and was universal within a century. The ottomans were the only people to prohibit it (defending islamic ignorance) and they fell behind.
    Cooperation and competition between AIs is mutually improving. (just like us, just like neurons…)
    In other words, there will be no competitive advantage to the AI, only on the materialization of AI IDEAS into research, development, production, and trade.
    Governments are gonna have a HELL OF A TIME with propaganda. And early uses of AI for spam are going to be in a race for attention vs filtering.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 20:57:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881808382165991424

  • EXPLANATION: “What’s going on here?” GROK: —“Does Curt Doolittle use “testifya

    EXPLANATION: “What’s going on here?”

    GROK: —“Does Curt Doolittle use “testifyable testimony” to mean something specific or is it a typo?”—

    OK this is an awesome example of hallucination. lol.

    The encoder doesn’t retain the text, it only converts it to a numerical code, and then the decoder just spits out the original term.

    So the AI can’t tell the difference in this case between “Testifiable” and “Testifyable” because roughly speaking, numerically it’s encoded as two numbers for “Testify” and “able”.

    Secondly, it’s because I DO redefine or modify terms to remove ambiguity so that terms can be used as measurements. So it’s ‘Assumption’ (hallucination) is rationally explicable in the context of my work.

    It’s just wrong. lol

    And yeah, it’s a typo. And at this point in my life my reputation for typos will never die even if I could find a spell checker that didn’t cause hanging from memory leakage. 😉

    Thanks for the chuckle. 😉

    Reply addressees: @CuriousKonkie @RichardArion1


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 19:18:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881783363792752640

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881780702859120996

  • WHY AM I AN ANTI-PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHER? 😉 (I consider myself a scientist, even

    WHY AM I AN ANTI-PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHER? 😉
    (I consider myself a scientist, even if that science is largely epistemology. For what is science but epistemic?)
    Philosophy is best understood as a record of the history of our attempt at understanding by the middle and upper middle class’ attempt to persuade the aristocracy to modify their and collective behavior. I didnt study philosophy until I wanted to know what went wrong. And then I studied it from recent to historical – backwards. This is why I have a low opinion of people who try to USE philosophy, despite saying philosophy is often very hard.
    You almost can’t grasp all the traps and errors in human thinking whether present or historical without that study, but you can’t really find any answers there. The answers are in history (evidence) and science (and in my case, operationalism which is the end point of science.)

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 18:22:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881769414959452160

  • BANS ON TIKTOK, ONLYFANS, PORNHUB: Bans on Undermining Familial, Social, Politic

    BANS ON TIKTOK, ONLYFANS, PORNHUB:
    Bans on Undermining Familial, Social, Political Internal Production of Concurrency and Settlement by Suppression of Suggestion Instead of Facilitation of Debate by Free Speech

    —“I would argue that PornHub and OnlyFans are a bigger threat to the American family than TikTok, however their owners are safe from interference of the US government.”–@calabrianvice

    The purpose of freedom of speech is the preservation of the sovereignty of the people, both individually and collectively, necessary for self government under natural law (neutral), commonality in law (negativa), and concurrency in legislation (positiva).

    However as I have tried to emphasize of late, there is a difference between Truthful (Testifiable), Reciprocal(Ethical/Moral), Speech that Seeks to Understand, and facilitate the production of Settlement by Concurrency, and thus preserves the sovereignty of all, versus suggestion and manipulation that seek to deceive and deny commensurability, understanding, and capacity for Settlement by Concurrency.

    (Note: there is more political science in that paragraph than in all the volumes on the greco-roman, germanic, anglo american evolution of our civilization, government and law.)

    I think we would agree when we discuss the family and as a consequence ‘society’ (where the purpose of the commons is the raising of family, and not the maximization of individual consumptive hedonism), but that the treat to the political capacity and concurrency of the citizenry in democratic polities given the public’s suggestibility by manipulation and in particular undermining and trust destruction.

    Affections
    CD

    PS: If you don’t share these things I produce for our people to understand their predicament, then you’re not helping to solve the problem. ;). -hugs.

    Reply addressees: @calabrianvice @ovensoflove @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 17:21:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881753962329907200

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881690144010596828

  • IS THE USA STILL A REPUBLIC AND NOT AN OLIGARCHY? Assertion:–“The USA is an oli

    IS THE USA STILL A REPUBLIC AND NOT AN OLIGARCHY?

    Assertion:–“The USA is an oligarchy. The democracy is just a mask for oligarchy.”– @AutistocratMS

    Yes, elements of oligarchic influence—lobbying, corporate donations, and elite power concentration—are undeniable. However, these influences exist within the framework of a constitutional republic, where competing interests, public accountability, and the rule of law continue to hold significant sway. The presence of oligarchic tendencies does not erase the broader system of representative democracy, nor does it eliminate the checks and balances designed to prevent the consolidation of unaccountable power.

    Oligarchy is defined by the dominance of a small, cohesive ruling class. In contrast, the U.S. operates as a vast marketplace of competing interests—corporations, unions, grassroots movements, NGOs, and factions of varying size and strength. These factions vie for influence in a contest that prevents any single oligarchy from consolidating unchecked power. This competition is further counterbalanced by electoral cycles, judicial independence, public opinion, and institutional safeguards.

    The U.S. remains a constitutional republic. Its structure—separation of powers, regular elections, judicial review—prevents the indefinite dominance of any single entity or group. While abuses occur, the system provides mechanisms for correction and redress over time, even if such redress escalates to the extreme, such as civil war.

    The fragmentation of the population has exacerbated perceptions of oligarchic dominance. Immigration from lower-trust cultures, the incorporation of women whose preferences skew toward infantilism (evasion of responsibility framed as caretaking), the divisiveness of Marxist-feminist ideologies, and the resulting frustration of the citizenry have collectively weakened civic engagement and most importantly loyalty and trust. This decline, more than structural inevitability, explains the perception of oligarchy. Sedition, conflict, frustration, and apathy—not systemic inevitability—are the greater threats.

    If one claims the U.S. is an oligarchy, one must demonstrate how it meets the criteria—static, unaccountable, concentrated power—and explain how competing interests and institutional safeguards fail to disqualify that claim. Ergo, it is insufficient to label the system an oligarchy without addressing the mechanisms that counterbalance elite power.

    The U.S. remains a republic. It faces challenges from concentrated power but is fundamentally structured as a system of competing interests governed by laws and public accountability. By focusing on its mechanisms for correction and the ongoing contest of principles, we can clearly counter the claim that it has devolved into an oligarchy.

    Cheers,
    CD

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @Lord__Sousa


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 19:55:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881430336330178560

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881424525679882713

  • IS A RESTORATION OF CHRISTENDOM POSSIBLE? (Of the Church and Dogma? Not without

    IS A RESTORATION OF CHRISTENDOM POSSIBLE?
    (Of the Church and Dogma? Not without collapse and even then unlikely. Given the requirements for suspension of disbelief necessary for supernatural faith:(a) cognitively feminine cognition (b) familial and social indoctrination, (c) feeling of being ‘left behind’ – then, as we see in the rapid accumulation of data, around 1/5 of the population will remain devoted to the religion, and the rest will seek some alternative frame of reference even if they preserve the underlying moral biases.)

    I have spent years on this problem and my understanding of the progress of what we call religions is that the unification of masculilne-master-nature-techne in european civilization with the feminine-slave-people-occult in semitic civilization will continue to progress as a spectrum from fundamentalist(theological) to humanist (philosophical) to natural law (scientific) while continuing the incremental dilution of the semitic occult.

    This civic religion will still be ‘christianity’ in that it is a synthesis of masculine european aristocratic and feminine semitic peasant cognitive demands, but the exact form it will take, and the institutional structure that will propagate and preserve it is open to question. IMO it will require a reformation in education and the use of education as the institution.

    My (our) opinion is that the church succeeded in discovery of natural law and the founders of its expression as constitutional law – at least as complete as they good at the time. Natural law is consistent with greek philosophy and christian theology, as well as the unification of the sciences. By teaching the natural law the difference between causality (divine, natural, man made) is irrelevant. The words we use will be the only difference. Our behavior will be the same.

    Clearly education has been captured by the Marxist sequence, just as the ancient world was captured by the abrahamic sequence. The first led to a dark age and the second was ‘getting there’ as it has already destroyed education, the university, the media, government, and much of business and industry’s international competitiveness.

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @TheBlackHorse65


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 00:09:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881131910375845888

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881083322727842289