Eric Danelaw shared a link. Mar 2, 2020, 12:14 PM Class: The Little Word the Elites Want You to Forget, from truthdig.comTHE LAW OF THE CYCLES OF POLITICAL ORDERS (thanks for the invite to comment) Organizations evolve to exploit an opportunity that can only be exploited by organizations. The organizational myth, history, tradition, rules, methods of description, persuasion, and argument expand until all available opportunity, rents, extractions, and predations under it are exhausted and all incentives to persist the organization are exhausted by enough of the population that they are incentivized to seek other opportunities. At that point in the shift of incentives, the opportunity that evolves is radical extra-political reorganization of capital, elites, and institutions, to eliminate the accumulated, rents, extractions, and predations so that incentive to persist organization of the polity, society, community, is restored. This reorganization can consist of three possibilities, including i) retention of strategy but redistribution of capital and restructuring of institutions (best if say, under rule of law), ii) rotation of strategy, elites, and restructuring of institutions (best if say, under rule of legislation), or iii) replacement of strategy, elites, institutions altogether (best if under tyranny). For example Picketty is right in some sense, but it turns out that the aristocracies were actually better than we thought because they had Hoppeian incentives to avoid the tragedy of the commons, and to persist the polity and society while continuously reorganizing the institutions and elites. This is why we ( or at least I) have recommended (in the new constitutional amendments) capital reallocation, institutional reformation, and a shift back to intergenerational elites, on a scale not seen since the roman reforms. We don’t do things too badly. But our 20th century experiments in variations on the ancient tripartite order under rule of law largely didn’t work. There is a reason we evolved so quickly compared to other civilizations despite the dark ages. We already invented perfect government. We just didn’t adapt it correctly in response to the industrial revolution. Because we didn’t understand why we’d been successful. Now we do. Cheers.
Form: Mini Essay
-
The Law of The Cycles of Political Orders
Eric Danelaw shared a link. Mar 2, 2020, 12:14 PM Class: The Little Word the Elites Want You to Forget, from truthdig.comTHE LAW OF THE CYCLES OF POLITICAL ORDERS (thanks for the invite to comment) Organizations evolve to exploit an opportunity that can only be exploited by organizations. The organizational myth, history, tradition, rules, methods of description, persuasion, and argument expand until all available opportunity, rents, extractions, and predations under it are exhausted and all incentives to persist the organization are exhausted by enough of the population that they are incentivized to seek other opportunities. At that point in the shift of incentives, the opportunity that evolves is radical extra-political reorganization of capital, elites, and institutions, to eliminate the accumulated, rents, extractions, and predations so that incentive to persist organization of the polity, society, community, is restored. This reorganization can consist of three possibilities, including i) retention of strategy but redistribution of capital and restructuring of institutions (best if say, under rule of law), ii) rotation of strategy, elites, and restructuring of institutions (best if say, under rule of legislation), or iii) replacement of strategy, elites, institutions altogether (best if under tyranny). For example Picketty is right in some sense, but it turns out that the aristocracies were actually better than we thought because they had Hoppeian incentives to avoid the tragedy of the commons, and to persist the polity and society while continuously reorganizing the institutions and elites. This is why we ( or at least I) have recommended (in the new constitutional amendments) capital reallocation, institutional reformation, and a shift back to intergenerational elites, on a scale not seen since the roman reforms. We don’t do things too badly. But our 20th century experiments in variations on the ancient tripartite order under rule of law largely didn’t work. There is a reason we evolved so quickly compared to other civilizations despite the dark ages. We already invented perfect government. We just didn’t adapt it correctly in response to the industrial revolution. Because we didn’t understand why we’d been successful. Now we do. Cheers.
-
The Propertarian Question
Mar 2, 2020, 12:40 PM THE PROPERTARIAN QUESTION (core) “Why is western civilization successfully undermined by the marxist, postmodernist, feminist, politically correct, science-denialist ant-western, anti-christian, anti-white, anti-male sequence of movements? Who created those movements? Why are europeans vulnerable to it, but why are Indians and east asians not vulnerable to it? Why is europe’s traditional system of development by incremental suppression of falsehood, free riding, and underclass reproduction, culminating in Darwin and the american eugenics movement so antithetical to the left? Why did the left invent a hierarchy of pseudosciences and lies to deny western civilization and the darwinian explanation for it? Why is the left’s strategy disapproval of truth, undermining through gossiping rallying shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, shrilling, outraging, and reputation destruction? Why is the truth so dangerous? And why has the thought leadership of each of these movements been Jewish? And why don’t Jews, like europeans, stop their own from undermining by creating distributing and reinforcing falsehoods? What do Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida-Lyotard, Friedan all share in common? And why do they so successfully produce falsehoods: pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit? Answer: groups evolve strategies, and genes adapt relatively rapidly to those strategies, and myths, traditions, and methods warfare and methods of argument replicate, reinforce, and express that strategy: in other words, we don’t know what we’re doing. So, incrementally suppress the female means of undermining and as we have incrementally suppressed all other forms of criminal activity as it has been invented, applied, and discovered. It is possible to construct the law so that the left’s means of undermining lying are illegal – and it turns out to be relatively easy. The only problem is that christianity, judaism, and islam are propagated by the same false means, which is why marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism were produced by the same group strategy as the abrahamic religions. Why aren’t members of the group that claim innocence stopping the members of their group from destroying the host civilization?” EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION’S EUGENIC, DARWINIAN, STRATEGY The European peoples have been able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples in the ancient and modern worlds because of our traditions of: … self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life; WHERE … the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, THEREBY … advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, THEREBY … allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. THEREFORE Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment. THE RESTORATION OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATIONAND THE RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS I – The restoration of Aristotle, the restoration of writing, and the Re-separation of Germanic from Latin Civilization. … 1. 1100-1300- The turn of islam to fundamentalism, the flight of islamic scholars, the return of Aristotle by muslim scholars, their translation into latin, … 2. The European Re-Conquest of spain. … 3. The Evolution of the Hansa and the completion under the Holy Roman Empire of the Rule of Law project, contractualism, individual sovereignty, mobile labor, capital concentration, the corporation. … 3. The Ottoman conquest of Byzantium, fall of Constantinople, the muslim blockade, the search for alternate trade routes, the age of sail, the age of muslim piracy, the age of exploration, the age of colonization. II – The First British Scientific Revolution 1600’s+ … 1. Newton 1660, Locke, Smith, Hume. … 2. The defeat of the ottomans, and the final constraint of islam after a thousand years of raids, slaving, piracy, conquest and subjugation. III – The Continental Secular Theological Counter-Revolution … 1. The French Counter-Revolution Rousseau (1700’s) … 2. The German Counter-Revolution Kant et al (1800’s) IV – The Second Anglo-German Scientific Revolution 1830+ (Menger, Darwin, Spencer, Maxwell, Hilbert…)
- The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850
… The anglo enfranchisement of the jews
… (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the HRE.
… (a) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization
… (b) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization
… (c) The Communist seizure of power in France.
… (d) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.
V – The Anglo American Technological Revolution (Turing, Edison-N, Telecom, Radio, Transistors, Computers,) 1930+ … (a) (Ongoing.) THE CENTURY OF THE JEWISH COUNTER-REVOLUTION AGAINST DARWIN AND DARWINIAN CIVILIZATION
- Marxism(1850+): To cast jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine white ascent into capital concentration.
- Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts
- Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration
- Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism.
- Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity.
(Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci) - Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family.
- Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin,Truth, Science, Reason.
- HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution
- Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian White Peoples
THE GROUP STRATEGY OF THE LEFT: DEFEAT DARWIN TO FACILITATE SEPARATISM. The entire ideology of the left is to resist integration, to preserve their parasitic group strategy, to preserve their female means of undermining, to deny the Darwinian revolution and the necessity of paternal, hierarchical, market meritocratic consumption and reproduction. All political conflict is reducible to this question The right practices markets in everything: darwinian evolution. The ideological left denies evolutionary pressure exists. The theological right only debates its cause. This is why the right is ‘right’ even if for the wrong reason. LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary -vs- RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary. Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate. or Return to our ancestral means of conquest, rule, and darwinian domestication of man by markets. THE PURSUIT OF NON-FALSE RELIGION P-Law is compatible with religion. It’s that
(a) While christianity is compatible with natural law, Abrahamic religion as practiced is incompatible with testimonial truth;
(b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man;
(c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love. We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline. The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.
- The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850
-
The Propertarian Question
Mar 2, 2020, 12:40 PM THE PROPERTARIAN QUESTION (core) “Why is western civilization successfully undermined by the marxist, postmodernist, feminist, politically correct, science-denialist ant-western, anti-christian, anti-white, anti-male sequence of movements? Who created those movements? Why are europeans vulnerable to it, but why are Indians and east asians not vulnerable to it? Why is europe’s traditional system of development by incremental suppression of falsehood, free riding, and underclass reproduction, culminating in Darwin and the american eugenics movement so antithetical to the left? Why did the left invent a hierarchy of pseudosciences and lies to deny western civilization and the darwinian explanation for it? Why is the left’s strategy disapproval of truth, undermining through gossiping rallying shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, shrilling, outraging, and reputation destruction? Why is the truth so dangerous? And why has the thought leadership of each of these movements been Jewish? And why don’t Jews, like europeans, stop their own from undermining by creating distributing and reinforcing falsehoods? What do Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida-Lyotard, Friedan all share in common? And why do they so successfully produce falsehoods: pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit? Answer: groups evolve strategies, and genes adapt relatively rapidly to those strategies, and myths, traditions, and methods warfare and methods of argument replicate, reinforce, and express that strategy: in other words, we don’t know what we’re doing. So, incrementally suppress the female means of undermining and as we have incrementally suppressed all other forms of criminal activity as it has been invented, applied, and discovered. It is possible to construct the law so that the left’s means of undermining lying are illegal – and it turns out to be relatively easy. The only problem is that christianity, judaism, and islam are propagated by the same false means, which is why marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism were produced by the same group strategy as the abrahamic religions. Why aren’t members of the group that claim innocence stopping the members of their group from destroying the host civilization?” EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION’S EUGENIC, DARWINIAN, STRATEGY The European peoples have been able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples in the ancient and modern worlds because of our traditions of: … self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life; WHERE … the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, THEREBY … advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, THEREBY … allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. THEREFORE Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment. THE RESTORATION OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATIONAND THE RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS I – The restoration of Aristotle, the restoration of writing, and the Re-separation of Germanic from Latin Civilization. … 1. 1100-1300- The turn of islam to fundamentalism, the flight of islamic scholars, the return of Aristotle by muslim scholars, their translation into latin, … 2. The European Re-Conquest of spain. … 3. The Evolution of the Hansa and the completion under the Holy Roman Empire of the Rule of Law project, contractualism, individual sovereignty, mobile labor, capital concentration, the corporation. … 3. The Ottoman conquest of Byzantium, fall of Constantinople, the muslim blockade, the search for alternate trade routes, the age of sail, the age of muslim piracy, the age of exploration, the age of colonization. II – The First British Scientific Revolution 1600’s+ … 1. Newton 1660, Locke, Smith, Hume. … 2. The defeat of the ottomans, and the final constraint of islam after a thousand years of raids, slaving, piracy, conquest and subjugation. III – The Continental Secular Theological Counter-Revolution … 1. The French Counter-Revolution Rousseau (1700’s) … 2. The German Counter-Revolution Kant et al (1800’s) IV – The Second Anglo-German Scientific Revolution 1830+ (Menger, Darwin, Spencer, Maxwell, Hilbert…)
- The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850
… The anglo enfranchisement of the jews
… (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the HRE.
… (a) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization
… (b) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization
… (c) The Communist seizure of power in France.
… (d) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.
V – The Anglo American Technological Revolution (Turing, Edison-N, Telecom, Radio, Transistors, Computers,) 1930+ … (a) (Ongoing.) THE CENTURY OF THE JEWISH COUNTER-REVOLUTION AGAINST DARWIN AND DARWINIAN CIVILIZATION
- Marxism(1850+): To cast jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine white ascent into capital concentration.
- Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts
- Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration
- Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism.
- Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity.
(Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci) - Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family.
- Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin,Truth, Science, Reason.
- HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution
- Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian White Peoples
THE GROUP STRATEGY OF THE LEFT: DEFEAT DARWIN TO FACILITATE SEPARATISM. The entire ideology of the left is to resist integration, to preserve their parasitic group strategy, to preserve their female means of undermining, to deny the Darwinian revolution and the necessity of paternal, hierarchical, market meritocratic consumption and reproduction. All political conflict is reducible to this question The right practices markets in everything: darwinian evolution. The ideological left denies evolutionary pressure exists. The theological right only debates its cause. This is why the right is ‘right’ even if for the wrong reason. LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary -vs- RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary. Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate. or Return to our ancestral means of conquest, rule, and darwinian domestication of man by markets. THE PURSUIT OF NON-FALSE RELIGION P-Law is compatible with religion. It’s that
(a) While christianity is compatible with natural law, Abrahamic religion as practiced is incompatible with testimonial truth;
(b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man;
(c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love. We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline. The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.
- The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850
-
Communism vs Islam: Totalitarian Monopolies
Mar 5, 2020, 9:40 PM by Frank Roman (2103) Communism is governance usurping the House of Religion; Islam is religion usurping the Halls of Governance. The superiority of the State, the Laws of the State, and the Party Leaders being the final authority in Communism, Islam replaces the State with Allah, the State Laws with the Koran and the Hadith, and the Party Leaders with the Imams. In Communism one is expected to fully surrender themselves to the dictates of the State while Islam demands on surrendering themselves to Allah and the defined laws attributed to Allah by Muhammad. Communism grants to the Party Leaders the power to define the desires and rules of the State while Islam gives the power to issue religious edicts known a Fatwas to the Imams. In addition, the Imams also have the power to choose which verses of the Koran, as many are contradictory, the faithful must follow and also interpret the Hadiths and define the actions attributed to Muhammad which are to be imitated by true followers of Islam. Communism fully expected that their form of governance was superior and would inevitably spread throughout the world, even if it needed a little help by conquest when any resisted the march of Communism. Communists defined peace as the lack of opposition thus peace could only be attained once everyone had surrendered and fallen under the control of the World-Wide Communist State. Islam believes it is the final and ultimate religion and fully defines what one must obey to lead a perfect life. Islamic leaders and many of their followers believe that not only is Islam the only true path, but that Islam must be spread, even by the sword, until every single person has surrendered to Allah and follows the edicts of the Imams. Islam divides the world into two states, the World of Islam (Dar al-Islam) and the World of War (Dar al-Harb). In Islam peace is defined as the point at which the entire population of the world follows Islam and fully surrenders to Allah and Islam. Communism often used propaganda and would intentionally misrepresent production in order to guarantee that every quota set was met or exceeded. Misrepresenting and outright falsehoods would be used by Communist countries, especially in negotiations with non-Communist nations and would break treaties whenever it served their purposes. In Islam, all these same attributes are referred to as Taqiyya. In simple English one would define Taqiyya as lying. In a political and more general sense Taqiyya would be considered as propaganda, misrepresentation, or misleading all in an effort to further the aims of Islam, especially in order to gain influence or territories. Further, should one reach a treaty of peace with an Islamic Country, they would refer to the negotiation not to be an actual peace treaty but rather a Hudna. A Hudna is, in truth, a truce negotiated not to exceed ten years and may be broken at any point where the Muslim side feels it then has gained military advantage and will defeat their foe. A Hudna is the only allowance in Islam to be negotiated between Islamic entities and any non-Islamic entities. The only real peace in Islam is the complete and total defeat and surrender of the foes of Islam, thus no such thing as a peace treaty can be negotiated with an Islamic Country. In Communist States the Party Leaders are considered infallible and their rule is absolute. Party Leaders have the power to arbitrarily change the rules and invent charges in order to arrest and remove any persons who are seen as obstructing the State and imprison them in a work camp for life or execute them should they pose a real threat. In Islam the Imams are considered to speak for Allah as his representatives on Earth and as such are infallible. The Imams have the power to arbitrarily change the rules as they see fit and accuse and convict any person who has become troublesome of working against Allah and thus be incarcerated indefinitely or simply executed. The actual difference between Communism and Islam is one of emphasis. Communism is a form of governance that makes the State the highest authority and thus makes worship of the state as a substitute for religion. Islam is a religion that has total rules for all aspects of life including the establishment of a theocracy placing the Imams, Islamic religious leaders, as the rulers, courts, and authority responsible for governance as demanded by their religion. To put it in a nutshell, Communism is governance usurping the House of Religion; Islam is religion usurping the Halls of Governance. Edit
-
Communism vs Islam: Totalitarian Monopolies
Mar 5, 2020, 9:40 PM by Frank Roman (2103) Communism is governance usurping the House of Religion; Islam is religion usurping the Halls of Governance. The superiority of the State, the Laws of the State, and the Party Leaders being the final authority in Communism, Islam replaces the State with Allah, the State Laws with the Koran and the Hadith, and the Party Leaders with the Imams. In Communism one is expected to fully surrender themselves to the dictates of the State while Islam demands on surrendering themselves to Allah and the defined laws attributed to Allah by Muhammad. Communism grants to the Party Leaders the power to define the desires and rules of the State while Islam gives the power to issue religious edicts known a Fatwas to the Imams. In addition, the Imams also have the power to choose which verses of the Koran, as many are contradictory, the faithful must follow and also interpret the Hadiths and define the actions attributed to Muhammad which are to be imitated by true followers of Islam. Communism fully expected that their form of governance was superior and would inevitably spread throughout the world, even if it needed a little help by conquest when any resisted the march of Communism. Communists defined peace as the lack of opposition thus peace could only be attained once everyone had surrendered and fallen under the control of the World-Wide Communist State. Islam believes it is the final and ultimate religion and fully defines what one must obey to lead a perfect life. Islamic leaders and many of their followers believe that not only is Islam the only true path, but that Islam must be spread, even by the sword, until every single person has surrendered to Allah and follows the edicts of the Imams. Islam divides the world into two states, the World of Islam (Dar al-Islam) and the World of War (Dar al-Harb). In Islam peace is defined as the point at which the entire population of the world follows Islam and fully surrenders to Allah and Islam. Communism often used propaganda and would intentionally misrepresent production in order to guarantee that every quota set was met or exceeded. Misrepresenting and outright falsehoods would be used by Communist countries, especially in negotiations with non-Communist nations and would break treaties whenever it served their purposes. In Islam, all these same attributes are referred to as Taqiyya. In simple English one would define Taqiyya as lying. In a political and more general sense Taqiyya would be considered as propaganda, misrepresentation, or misleading all in an effort to further the aims of Islam, especially in order to gain influence or territories. Further, should one reach a treaty of peace with an Islamic Country, they would refer to the negotiation not to be an actual peace treaty but rather a Hudna. A Hudna is, in truth, a truce negotiated not to exceed ten years and may be broken at any point where the Muslim side feels it then has gained military advantage and will defeat their foe. A Hudna is the only allowance in Islam to be negotiated between Islamic entities and any non-Islamic entities. The only real peace in Islam is the complete and total defeat and surrender of the foes of Islam, thus no such thing as a peace treaty can be negotiated with an Islamic Country. In Communist States the Party Leaders are considered infallible and their rule is absolute. Party Leaders have the power to arbitrarily change the rules and invent charges in order to arrest and remove any persons who are seen as obstructing the State and imprison them in a work camp for life or execute them should they pose a real threat. In Islam the Imams are considered to speak for Allah as his representatives on Earth and as such are infallible. The Imams have the power to arbitrarily change the rules as they see fit and accuse and convict any person who has become troublesome of working against Allah and thus be incarcerated indefinitely or simply executed. The actual difference between Communism and Islam is one of emphasis. Communism is a form of governance that makes the State the highest authority and thus makes worship of the state as a substitute for religion. Islam is a religion that has total rules for all aspects of life including the establishment of a theocracy placing the Imams, Islamic religious leaders, as the rulers, courts, and authority responsible for governance as demanded by their religion. To put it in a nutshell, Communism is governance usurping the House of Religion; Islam is religion usurping the Halls of Governance. Edit
-
If You Don’t Want to See the Religious Sausage Being Made…
IF YOU DON’T WANT TO SEE THE RELIGIOUS SAUSAGE BEING MADE THEN STAY OUT OF THE KITCHEN
- Christianity is becoming a third world religion of the underclasses, and disappearing from the POLITICAL and social basis.
Christianity is TRANSMITTED as a superstitious falsehood that prevents the evolution of a natural religion.
Christians like you (but not like me, and all other secular christians) are using the abrahamic method to justify superstitious falsehood,
… AND learning that form of lying extends into the rest of your life. (It does).You are presuming there isn’t a better version of christianity possible that will preserve it for future generations.
5 – My Christianity: … a) I’m a deist – gods exist as information. … b) I”m a jeffersonian christian – jesus was a philosopher … c) I’m a scientist that finds: … … Christianity was an innovation that made virtue possible for the underclasses (those without ability or means), … … AND that it was the optimum via positiva extension to natural law of western women and underclass men. … … AND Christianity is the optimum religion for a majority middle class polity because it trains people to treat one another as ‘customers’. … … AND christianity brings prosperity where it goes as long as the law also goes there. 6) I’m a stoic – mindfulness does not need falsehoods and false promises but training, and anyone can be trained. The difference is that religion is cheap (ritual indoctrination) and stoicism is expensive (repetitive education). 7) I’m an advocate of public religions (local organization by non profit, non-power church instead of profit and power state ) 8) I’m a tri-functionalist – I understand that the competition between masculine and feminine biases of military and religion, moderated by the law maximize the use and utility of both while limiting the extremes, or producing a mediocrity (as did the founders). SO I HAVE A MORE MATURE UNDERSTANDING of religion, of christianity, and how to modernize it so that it survives.
-
If You Don’t Want to See the Religious Sausage Being Made…
IF YOU DON’T WANT TO SEE THE RELIGIOUS SAUSAGE BEING MADE THEN STAY OUT OF THE KITCHEN
- Christianity is becoming a third world religion of the underclasses, and disappearing from the POLITICAL and social basis.
Christianity is TRANSMITTED as a superstitious falsehood that prevents the evolution of a natural religion.
Christians like you (but not like me, and all other secular christians) are using the abrahamic method to justify superstitious falsehood,
… AND learning that form of lying extends into the rest of your life. (It does).You are presuming there isn’t a better version of christianity possible that will preserve it for future generations.
5 – My Christianity: … a) I’m a deist – gods exist as information. … b) I”m a jeffersonian christian – jesus was a philosopher … c) I’m a scientist that finds: … … Christianity was an innovation that made virtue possible for the underclasses (those without ability or means), … … AND that it was the optimum via positiva extension to natural law of western women and underclass men. … … AND Christianity is the optimum religion for a majority middle class polity because it trains people to treat one another as ‘customers’. … … AND christianity brings prosperity where it goes as long as the law also goes there. 6) I’m a stoic – mindfulness does not need falsehoods and false promises but training, and anyone can be trained. The difference is that religion is cheap (ritual indoctrination) and stoicism is expensive (repetitive education). 7) I’m an advocate of public religions (local organization by non profit, non-power church instead of profit and power state ) 8) I’m a tri-functionalist – I understand that the competition between masculine and feminine biases of military and religion, moderated by the law maximize the use and utility of both while limiting the extremes, or producing a mediocrity (as did the founders). SO I HAVE A MORE MATURE UNDERSTANDING of religion, of christianity, and how to modernize it so that it survives.
-
Reason for Western Decline
Mar 8, 2020, 10:29 AM 1) Western genetic, cultural, institutional, and technical advantage has been redistributed to most of the world. 2) Our internal redistributive politics have ended our genetic advantage because e have stopped breeding in sufficient numbers. 3) Our civil war (World Wars) destroyed our aggression and willpower. 4) Immigration of postwar Jewish intellectuals created the second abrahamic dark age with the false promises of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD-Denialism, and sold them to immigrants, the underclass and enough of white women, through the university system, consumer marketing, entertainment and media – undermining our cultural advantage. 5) Immigration and underclass reproduction have eroded our institutional advantage.
-
Reason for Western Decline
Mar 8, 2020, 10:29 AM 1) Western genetic, cultural, institutional, and technical advantage has been redistributed to most of the world. 2) Our internal redistributive politics have ended our genetic advantage because e have stopped breeding in sufficient numbers. 3) Our civil war (World Wars) destroyed our aggression and willpower. 4) Immigration of postwar Jewish intellectuals created the second abrahamic dark age with the false promises of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD-Denialism, and sold them to immigrants, the underclass and enough of white women, through the university system, consumer marketing, entertainment and media – undermining our cultural advantage. 5) Immigration and underclass reproduction have eroded our institutional advantage.