Feb 28, 2020, 10:07 AM Elite universities open the door to cushier jobs – meaning they don’t have to work with commoners – without having to compete in the ‘real’ market. Top universities are, to some degree, a test of character – which is why governments prefer to hire from them when possible. Not because people are more capable, but because they are less likely to take risks that would jeopardize their investments in their privileged and high status positions. This strategy has worked in china and in europe. It has worked less well in the USA for reasons well understood. Creative, innovative, high agency, high risk takers are not suitable for the top universities and the ‘academic grind’. This is the hard wall that I didn’t hit, but Taleb did. It’s why he went off the deep end. Its because it turns out that there is a very good reason those people from good schools get those jobs and more ‘dynamic’ people don’t. Because the more responsibility the higher the risk to those one is responsible to. And europeans do not seize non-productive opportunities. There are opportunities for profit that men of character do not seize because they are unproductive. Taleb did. So did Soros. And Bernie Madoff’s don’t go to Harvard or Yale.
Form: Mini Essay
-
The Social Function of Elite Universities
Feb 28, 2020, 10:07 AM Elite universities open the door to cushier jobs – meaning they don’t have to work with commoners – without having to compete in the ‘real’ market. Top universities are, to some degree, a test of character – which is why governments prefer to hire from them when possible. Not because people are more capable, but because they are less likely to take risks that would jeopardize their investments in their privileged and high status positions. This strategy has worked in china and in europe. It has worked less well in the USA for reasons well understood. Creative, innovative, high agency, high risk takers are not suitable for the top universities and the ‘academic grind’. This is the hard wall that I didn’t hit, but Taleb did. It’s why he went off the deep end. Its because it turns out that there is a very good reason those people from good schools get those jobs and more ‘dynamic’ people don’t. Because the more responsibility the higher the risk to those one is responsible to. And europeans do not seize non-productive opportunities. There are opportunities for profit that men of character do not seize because they are unproductive. Taleb did. So did Soros. And Bernie Madoff’s don’t go to Harvard or Yale.
-
All I see are women whining so that men will protect them.
Feb 28, 2020, 6:01 PM
–“Christians. Really, just take the reigns and rule already. I really don’t care how you do it if you’re trying. But you don’t seem to want to. So stop begging others to do it for you in the manner more to your liking without contributing to rule.”— Ospin88
This is my underlying complaint about christians. I don’t believe them. All I see are women whining so that men will protect them. There was a reason it took the viking invasion and viking warriors to conduct the crusades. There was a reason the french couldn’t resist them. Christianity has only been strong when it wailing women handkerchief that inspires and licenses aryanism (heroic, expansionist, entrepreneurial, militarism). I am not the only person to say that christianity is a means of keeping the peasants pliable and working so that the aristocracy can afford expensive weaponry. Or that the only time christian banners fly is to legitimize aryanism. I mean, what separates a christian monarchy from a kingdom? The license of the church to use violence. If christianity s strong then christian men would be the first in line rather than constitutionalists and pagans, while docile christians show up and wave flags when the hard work is done. Give me a pope who defense europen civilization not the faith. Christianity is a third world religion.
-
All I see are women whining so that men will protect them.
Feb 28, 2020, 6:01 PM
–“Christians. Really, just take the reigns and rule already. I really don’t care how you do it if you’re trying. But you don’t seem to want to. So stop begging others to do it for you in the manner more to your liking without contributing to rule.”— Ospin88
This is my underlying complaint about christians. I don’t believe them. All I see are women whining so that men will protect them. There was a reason it took the viking invasion and viking warriors to conduct the crusades. There was a reason the french couldn’t resist them. Christianity has only been strong when it wailing women handkerchief that inspires and licenses aryanism (heroic, expansionist, entrepreneurial, militarism). I am not the only person to say that christianity is a means of keeping the peasants pliable and working so that the aristocracy can afford expensive weaponry. Or that the only time christian banners fly is to legitimize aryanism. I mean, what separates a christian monarchy from a kingdom? The license of the church to use violence. If christianity s strong then christian men would be the first in line rather than constitutionalists and pagans, while docile christians show up and wave flags when the hard work is done. Give me a pope who defense europen civilization not the faith. Christianity is a third world religion.
-
Why the wealth of western civilization?
Feb 28, 2020, 6:18 PM Why the wealth of western civilization? Greater success at reproductive juvenilization. we are not sure why other than that slowing the rate of maturity is possible in colder climates, whereas accelerating the rate of maturity in warmer clients is necessary for no other reason than to survive the higher incidence of disease, parasites, and predators. Greater success at aggressive culling the size of the underclasses. While it is impolitic to say so, the wealth or poverty of a people is more dependent upon the reduction and elimination of the underclasses than it is upon the production of exceptional people and education. A good rule of thumb is that every person at the bottom is six times as costly as every person at the top is productive. Greater success at eliminating the clannishness impulse. Again, we are not sure if this is an artifact of low population density and cold climates, or purely one of cultural forces influence reproductive choice. In either event, white people (to their detriment) are less tribal and clannish. For reasons we are just beginning to understand, the west made very different cultural choices (a) telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth as highest virtue, despite any impact it would ahve on the dominance hierarchy. (b) Sovereignty and Markets in Everything creating a market for polities, and polities led by markets, rather than monopolistic hierarchies. As a consequence a division of the state into different institutions that competed with one another. This led to deflationary literature where the rest of the world relied on conflationary literature. (c) that the gods, like men, are subject to the laws of the natural universe, and that man can defeat the folly of these gods with cunning and effort. So white people are more trusting, more trustworthy, and have institutions that depend upon more trusting, more trustworthy people, and together these reduce the frictions that constrain non white peoples to lesser conditions. The only people close to whites are the Japanese and south koreans. And even among whites, these rules apply only to whites from above the Hajnal Line (protestants and their descendants) who practiced Bipartite Manorialism. TRUST=COOPERATIVE VELOCITY=RATE OF ECONOMY
-
Why the wealth of western civilization?
Feb 28, 2020, 6:18 PM Why the wealth of western civilization? Greater success at reproductive juvenilization. we are not sure why other than that slowing the rate of maturity is possible in colder climates, whereas accelerating the rate of maturity in warmer clients is necessary for no other reason than to survive the higher incidence of disease, parasites, and predators. Greater success at aggressive culling the size of the underclasses. While it is impolitic to say so, the wealth or poverty of a people is more dependent upon the reduction and elimination of the underclasses than it is upon the production of exceptional people and education. A good rule of thumb is that every person at the bottom is six times as costly as every person at the top is productive. Greater success at eliminating the clannishness impulse. Again, we are not sure if this is an artifact of low population density and cold climates, or purely one of cultural forces influence reproductive choice. In either event, white people (to their detriment) are less tribal and clannish. For reasons we are just beginning to understand, the west made very different cultural choices (a) telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth as highest virtue, despite any impact it would ahve on the dominance hierarchy. (b) Sovereignty and Markets in Everything creating a market for polities, and polities led by markets, rather than monopolistic hierarchies. As a consequence a division of the state into different institutions that competed with one another. This led to deflationary literature where the rest of the world relied on conflationary literature. (c) that the gods, like men, are subject to the laws of the natural universe, and that man can defeat the folly of these gods with cunning and effort. So white people are more trusting, more trustworthy, and have institutions that depend upon more trusting, more trustworthy people, and together these reduce the frictions that constrain non white peoples to lesser conditions. The only people close to whites are the Japanese and south koreans. And even among whites, these rules apply only to whites from above the Hajnal Line (protestants and their descendants) who practiced Bipartite Manorialism. TRUST=COOPERATIVE VELOCITY=RATE OF ECONOMY
-
These are the big questions of our age
Feb 28, 2020, 8:09 PM To: Kimberly Kay Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the are not. To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying. To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud. There is no comparison to the abrahamic dark age, the christian destruction of the arts, letters, knowledge, schools, government, and religion of the roman world; the BILLION DEAD from the islamic destruction of the north african, Egyptian, levantine, Persian, north west indian, byzantine, and balkan civilizations and their reduction to dysgenia, poverty, and ashes; or the Marxist, Bolshevik, holocaust against the russian, and ukrainian peoples, and the millions of eastern europeans who suffered under the bolsheviks including the russians whose development was set back a hundred years or more? So far the Marxist-Communist-Socialist-Postmodernist program has cost 100 Million lives at least. How many more will be lost trying to achieve in europe and america what the russians achieved at huge cost they may never recover from, and the germans achieved at cost of being all but destroyed? Why didn’t china have a problem until marx? Why did india avoid the problem? Why is western civlization experiencing the problem? Why are some ideas – false promises – so insidious that they are worse than drugs? Why are women and underclasses in particular so suggestible and easy to bait into false promise? Why do we tolerate that set of lies which is more murderous than all but the great plagues? And is constructed of lies by false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary law? These are the big questions of our age. BTW: calling people nazis for arguing that some group of religions fosters undermining because of their cultural dogma and training is just evidence of the correctness of doolittle’s criticism. Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the are not. To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying. To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud.
-
These are the big questions of our age
Feb 28, 2020, 8:09 PM To: Kimberly Kay Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the are not. To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying. To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud. There is no comparison to the abrahamic dark age, the christian destruction of the arts, letters, knowledge, schools, government, and religion of the roman world; the BILLION DEAD from the islamic destruction of the north african, Egyptian, levantine, Persian, north west indian, byzantine, and balkan civilizations and their reduction to dysgenia, poverty, and ashes; or the Marxist, Bolshevik, holocaust against the russian, and ukrainian peoples, and the millions of eastern europeans who suffered under the bolsheviks including the russians whose development was set back a hundred years or more? So far the Marxist-Communist-Socialist-Postmodernist program has cost 100 Million lives at least. How many more will be lost trying to achieve in europe and america what the russians achieved at huge cost they may never recover from, and the germans achieved at cost of being all but destroyed? Why didn’t china have a problem until marx? Why did india avoid the problem? Why is western civlization experiencing the problem? Why are some ideas – false promises – so insidious that they are worse than drugs? Why are women and underclasses in particular so suggestible and easy to bait into false promise? Why do we tolerate that set of lies which is more murderous than all but the great plagues? And is constructed of lies by false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary law? These are the big questions of our age. BTW: calling people nazis for arguing that some group of religions fosters undermining because of their cultural dogma and training is just evidence of the correctness of doolittle’s criticism. Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the are not. To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying. To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud.
-
Explaining Anti-Abrahamism
Mar 2, 2020, 9:24 AM (controversial post warning) (explanation of social bias) 1) P-Law and its Logic are universally decidable, because testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence) are universally decidable. (Let that sink in a moment.) 2) Any people can eventually enjoy the benefits of a high trust civlization like europeans if they adopt P-Law, Logic, and Constitution – including market (via-negativa) soft eugenics. 3) While ethnocentrism is the optimum strategy at the local, state and civilizational level – because it decreases genetic, kinship, social, economic and political competition and decreases resistance to trust, reciprocity, and mutual insurance and care; so is heterogeneity polities, producing a market of commons because it allows moral and cognitive biases to play out at the cost, and to the benefit, of those who do it. 4) But groups whose competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), must convert from predatory and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means of survival and competition. And groups that practice any and every strategy habituate, specialize in, and transfer between generations, the strategy, mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits, means of education, and especially means of communication, collaboration and argument that advances that strategy. 5) As such groups need incentives to adapt from destructive, predatory, and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means. To do so requires reformation of mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument, to suit new the new productive strategy. 6) To produce those incentives we can outlaw the expression of those strategies, and use social, economic, and political alienation to cause deprivation of opportunity – and cause them to adapt their mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument. 7) The Purpose of Muslim, Christian, and Jewish religious monopoly monotheism and religious identitarianism; and of Boasianism-and-Freudianism ( pseudo-sociology and psychology), marxism(pseudo-economics), neo-marxism (cultural marxism, undermining), postmodernism (relativism), feminism (undermining the family), and human biodiversity denialism (science denial), were constructed by design to deny and undermine the universal decidability of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence).
—“In response to the post of the Institute regarding Jewish participants [in the Propertarian Movement], I understand the desire to have universal appeal across all groups, but…
A feminine argumentative strategy paired with a parasitic evolutionary strategy knowingly employed to the detriment of European-descended peoples is the Jewish Group strategy, to which anti-Semitism is therefore a logical and natural reaction.
The frame of anti-Semitism in my judgement provides the greatest immunity from resistance to, reversal of, and prevention of, the threats mentioned in the post, all of which originate primarily from those of Jewish descent.”— Reece Haynes via Facebook Correct. Complaints of anti-semitism, whether that semitism is in jewish, christian, or muslim group strategies, are expressions of the attempt to prevent the use of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), in universal decidability, and to preserve the competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), against people who practice testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), and the high trust, productive, evolutionarily successful nations that they parasitically depend upon. Quod Erat Demonstrandum. Thus Endeth The Lesson
-
Explaining Anti-Abrahamism
Mar 2, 2020, 9:24 AM (controversial post warning) (explanation of social bias) 1) P-Law and its Logic are universally decidable, because testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence) are universally decidable. (Let that sink in a moment.) 2) Any people can eventually enjoy the benefits of a high trust civlization like europeans if they adopt P-Law, Logic, and Constitution – including market (via-negativa) soft eugenics. 3) While ethnocentrism is the optimum strategy at the local, state and civilizational level – because it decreases genetic, kinship, social, economic and political competition and decreases resistance to trust, reciprocity, and mutual insurance and care; so is heterogeneity polities, producing a market of commons because it allows moral and cognitive biases to play out at the cost, and to the benefit, of those who do it. 4) But groups whose competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), must convert from predatory and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means of survival and competition. And groups that practice any and every strategy habituate, specialize in, and transfer between generations, the strategy, mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits, means of education, and especially means of communication, collaboration and argument that advances that strategy. 5) As such groups need incentives to adapt from destructive, predatory, and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means. To do so requires reformation of mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument, to suit new the new productive strategy. 6) To produce those incentives we can outlaw the expression of those strategies, and use social, economic, and political alienation to cause deprivation of opportunity – and cause them to adapt their mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument. 7) The Purpose of Muslim, Christian, and Jewish religious monopoly monotheism and religious identitarianism; and of Boasianism-and-Freudianism ( pseudo-sociology and psychology), marxism(pseudo-economics), neo-marxism (cultural marxism, undermining), postmodernism (relativism), feminism (undermining the family), and human biodiversity denialism (science denial), were constructed by design to deny and undermine the universal decidability of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence).
—“In response to the post of the Institute regarding Jewish participants [in the Propertarian Movement], I understand the desire to have universal appeal across all groups, but…
A feminine argumentative strategy paired with a parasitic evolutionary strategy knowingly employed to the detriment of European-descended peoples is the Jewish Group strategy, to which anti-Semitism is therefore a logical and natural reaction.
The frame of anti-Semitism in my judgement provides the greatest immunity from resistance to, reversal of, and prevention of, the threats mentioned in the post, all of which originate primarily from those of Jewish descent.”— Reece Haynes via Facebook Correct. Complaints of anti-semitism, whether that semitism is in jewish, christian, or muslim group strategies, are expressions of the attempt to prevent the use of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), in universal decidability, and to preserve the competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), against people who practice testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), and the high trust, productive, evolutionarily successful nations that they parasitically depend upon. Quod Erat Demonstrandum. Thus Endeth The Lesson