[W]hy is it do you suppose that I have to work on natural law, and this fellow in genetic mapping, outside of the academy if there isn’t truth-suppression?
These maps illustrate that the spectrum of IQ reflects the spectrum of (a) wisdom literature (b) institutions, (c) norms. IQ isn’t everything but it’s enough.
Why? It’s a proxy for neotenic evolution that produces both conscientiousness (agency) and IQ (adaptability).
[W]hy is it do you suppose that I have to work on natural law, and this fellow in genetic mapping, outside of the academy if there isn’t truth-suppression?
These maps illustrate that the spectrum of IQ reflects the spectrum of (a) wisdom literature (b) institutions, (c) norms. IQ isn’t everything but it’s enough.
Why? It’s a proxy for neotenic evolution that produces both conscientiousness (agency) and IQ (adaptability).
Regarding:
—“I suppose it means we just accept our fate, without any resistance or action?”— Rockwell.
Well, we showed up. At personal cost. At personal risk. We launched a campaign, we delivered a strategy, and a set of demands, and what happened? Morons cared about john maintaining his anonymity, and me sweating and getting heat exhaustion in the hot July sun, and pandering to BLM to prevent a dispute with the second amendment crowd, so that we didn’t have another catastrophic failure like Charlottesville.
They didn’t care that we did something. That we showed up. That we launched a campaign. Or paied attention to our message. And didn’t defend us when were undermined by Christians, Nazis, and White Nationalists for taking the same approach as the founders instead of extremist positions – despite the fact that our solution would have provided for christians, separatists, ethnocentrists, and statists, to continue the big sort, and establish regional cultures. Nor that if the solution was refused by the public or the state, then the state had defacto admitted to being the enemy of the people’s right to self-determination by self-determined means. An as such we would have the moral hight ground in a civil war, and a plan for the settlement of the civil war in everyone’s interests (restoring the original constitution and the alliance of independent states).
So, before you or anyone else complains: Did you show? Would you show? What would it take for you to show up? If you didn’t show, then Did you defend john, I, and the rest of the leadership online? Did you spread our message online? Did you donate to john (or the institute?)
You see, most of the leave-me-alone right wants to prep and let others do the work, while they hide – as if hiding will do anything other than let the left win. The ‘loser-right’ just wants to rage. The incel right wants the optics of better men fighting for them while they cower in basements behind keyboards. The ‘decent right’ wants someone else to solve the problem or won’t show until others have shown first, and have born all the risk. And the few people who want to solve the problem and are willing to show are too angry and impulsive to tolerate a political-first rather than military-first strategy. So the only strategy anyone will show up for is military-first, but a military-first strategy without political solutions will fail because resistance will be too high, and oppression and violence against them economically, politically, and socially justified.
So only a tiny number will fund a movement, only a few people show up for it, and even fewer of those who show will take a winning strategy, and no matter what, the Christians and the Nazis will complain that we aren’t advocating for Christian tyranny of ignorance and superstition, or nazi tyranny of economic ignorance and pseudoscience, when self-selection of these ‘theology-philosophy-ideologies’ are just measures of one’s ignorance of operating an empire, a state, a military, a government, an economy, and a society, with the only operational means of doing so with any degree of non-corruption: the law and a market for the prosecution of treason, corruption, theft, fraud, violence, and murder under that law.
Knowing what to do. It wasn’t hard to figure out. But without controlling the public narrative we can’t reduce resistance so that the state capitulates without reducing the country to ashes. But you can’t fix stupid. You can’t convince arrogant. You can’t fund a movement with people who won’t contribute just a little money. You can’t fight with cowards and no shows. And you can’t rally a movement with Christians and Nazis undermining every step you take. So, like I’ve said. I’ll show up. I know how to win. But there are too few good people. Because whites are lazy privileged, soft, spoiled children that want better men to save them. The dissident right, the loser right, is as impoverished, disenfranchised, and infantilized as the dissident left. And because of these behaviors, we can’t bring about a peaceful settlement, and we can’t even organize into enough of a threat to reach an non-peaceful settlement, and we certainly can’t execute a strategy that will win against our ancient enemy, the left, a frightened populace, a frightened government, and a frightened financial sector, and a military that has been gutted of all Prussian discipline, and constitutional conviction.
And so it’s pretty clear the left and the state will win by continuing the process of incremental suppression of opinion, organization, funding, and then gradually picking off outliers, until the few that are left who are willing to fight are overwhelmed by events.
So yes, fate is sealed. Because the right is too stupid, too ignorant, too infantilized, too poor, too lazy, and too cowardly to follow, fund, advocate, and show up for, a strategy that will win.
To win requires a small number of men who will stay in the field and fight for three to six months, a set of demands that the majority of our own population finds desirable, a set of demands that the opposition doesn’t find undesirable, and where the enemy is the state and the financial sector thus turning the entire population in one way or another into the enemy of the academy-state-financial sector that is the source of the conflict of our age.
Regarding:
—“I suppose it means we just accept our fate, without any resistance or action?”— Rockwell.
Well, we showed up. At personal cost. At personal risk. We launched a campaign, we delivered a strategy, and a set of demands, and what happened? Morons cared about john maintaining his anonymity, and me sweating and getting heat exhaustion in the hot July sun, and pandering to BLM to prevent a dispute with the second amendment crowd, so that we didn’t have another catastrophic failure like Charlottesville.
They didn’t care that we did something. That we showed up. That we launched a campaign. Or paied attention to our message. And didn’t defend us when were undermined by Christians, Nazis, and White Nationalists for taking the same approach as the founders instead of extremist positions – despite the fact that our solution would have provided for christians, separatists, ethnocentrists, and statists, to continue the big sort, and establish regional cultures. Nor that if the solution was refused by the public or the state, then the state had defacto admitted to being the enemy of the people’s right to self-determination by self-determined means. An as such we would have the moral hight ground in a civil war, and a plan for the settlement of the civil war in everyone’s interests (restoring the original constitution and the alliance of independent states).
So, before you or anyone else complains: Did you show? Would you show? What would it take for you to show up? If you didn’t show, then Did you defend john, I, and the rest of the leadership online? Did you spread our message online? Did you donate to john (or the institute?)
You see, most of the leave-me-alone right wants to prep and let others do the work, while they hide – as if hiding will do anything other than let the left win. The ‘loser-right’ just wants to rage. The incel right wants the optics of better men fighting for them while they cower in basements behind keyboards. The ‘decent right’ wants someone else to solve the problem or won’t show until others have shown first, and have born all the risk. And the few people who want to solve the problem and are willing to show are too angry and impulsive to tolerate a political-first rather than military-first strategy. So the only strategy anyone will show up for is military-first, but a military-first strategy without political solutions will fail because resistance will be too high, and oppression and violence against them economically, politically, and socially justified.
So only a tiny number will fund a movement, only a few people show up for it, and even fewer of those who show will take a winning strategy, and no matter what, the Christians and the Nazis will complain that we aren’t advocating for Christian tyranny of ignorance and superstition, or nazi tyranny of economic ignorance and pseudoscience, when self-selection of these ‘theology-philosophy-ideologies’ are just measures of one’s ignorance of operating an empire, a state, a military, a government, an economy, and a society, with the only operational means of doing so with any degree of non-corruption: the law and a market for the prosecution of treason, corruption, theft, fraud, violence, and murder under that law.
Knowing what to do. It wasn’t hard to figure out. But without controlling the public narrative we can’t reduce resistance so that the state capitulates without reducing the country to ashes. But you can’t fix stupid. You can’t convince arrogant. You can’t fund a movement with people who won’t contribute just a little money. You can’t fight with cowards and no shows. And you can’t rally a movement with Christians and Nazis undermining every step you take. So, like I’ve said. I’ll show up. I know how to win. But there are too few good people. Because whites are lazy privileged, soft, spoiled children that want better men to save them. The dissident right, the loser right, is as impoverished, disenfranchised, and infantilized as the dissident left. And because of these behaviors, we can’t bring about a peaceful settlement, and we can’t even organize into enough of a threat to reach an non-peaceful settlement, and we certainly can’t execute a strategy that will win against our ancient enemy, the left, a frightened populace, a frightened government, and a frightened financial sector, and a military that has been gutted of all Prussian discipline, and constitutional conviction.
And so it’s pretty clear the left and the state will win by continuing the process of incremental suppression of opinion, organization, funding, and then gradually picking off outliers, until the few that are left who are willing to fight are overwhelmed by events.
So yes, fate is sealed. Because the right is too stupid, too ignorant, too infantilized, too poor, too lazy, and too cowardly to follow, fund, advocate, and show up for, a strategy that will win.
To win requires a small number of men who will stay in the field and fight for three to six months, a set of demands that the majority of our own population finds desirable, a set of demands that the opposition doesn’t find undesirable, and where the enemy is the state and the financial sector thus turning the entire population in one way or another into the enemy of the academy-state-financial sector that is the source of the conflict of our age.
WE CAN REBUILD IT
—“Does anyone think it would be better if Czechoslovakia still existed as an integrated state?”—Outsideness
1) Does anyone NOT think NE Italy, Austria, Hungary, Czechs, Romanians, West Ukraine(Galacia), Slovakia, and whatever non-muslim Balkans would be better if the Austro-Hungarian empire still existed? … Or that Europe wouldn’t be better if the Holy Roman (German) empire existed?
2) France is, and always has been, the enemy of European civilization. France is the fountain of bad ideas. Napoleon it’s downfall, french ‘counter-empiricism’ we falsely call the enlightenment, and french revolution, and political theory the origins of decline.
3) There is no superior government to rule of law, by intolerant, ethnocentric, common law of tort, monarchy as judge of last resort, houses as markets for production of commons between classes, and markets association, reproduction, cooperation, production.
4) The germans evolved, the British implemented it, the Americans codified it, and the french destroyed germanic civilization, the germans tried to restore it, the rest of Europe tried to prevent it, and now french in Europe jews in America win by immigration not achievements.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-19 14:51:43 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105062013530203233
THE SECOND JEWISH WAR AGAINST TRUTH
1) To the young, it appears as though we have learned as much since 1999 as we did since 1830. But this isn’t true. It’s that it took us from 1980 until today to reverse the Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter-Revolution and the postwar destruction of our intellectual institutions.
2) Freud (pseudoscientific nature of the mind), Boaz (of societies), Marx (economics and politics), Gramsci- Adorno-Fromm (culture, values, aesthetics), Friedan (marriage and family), Derrida (truth, reason, science), the HBD-Denialists (sex, class, culture and race differences).
3) By 1955 we falsified marxism-socialism, by ’70 the great society and soviet models, by ’80 psychology, by 90 sociology, Neoteny, IQ, Conscientiousness and class differences, by 2000 the blank slate, by 2012 sex differences, by 2019 race differences, and soon, civ differences.
4) So we have been in a race between western civilization and western science to preserve Darwinian revolution, and the Jewish counter-revolution against western truth, reason, the Darwinian revolution, by failed ideas, with our defeat only by invasion by less capable peoples.
5) In other words we win or lose by our tolerance for invasion and undermining, not because of our ideas. But becaue of our tolerance and compassion and christian optimism (faith) over aristotelian reason (evidence).
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-19 14:26:49 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105061915620364042
Boost of @curtd THE SECOND JEWISH WAR AGAINST TRUTH
1) To the young, it appears as though we have learned as much since 1999 as we did since 1830. But this isn’t true. It’s that it took us from 1980 until today to reverse the Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter-Revolution and the postwar destruction of our intellectual institutions.
2) Freud (pseudoscientific nature of the mind), Boaz (of societies), Marx (economics and politics), Gramsci- Adorno-Fromm (culture, values, aesthetics), Friedan (marriage and family), Derrida (truth, reason, science), the HBD-Denialists (sex, class, culture and race differences).
3) By 1955 we falsified marxism-socialism, by ’70 the great society and soviet models, by ’80 psychology, by 90 sociology, Neoteny, IQ, Conscientiousness and class differences, by 2000 the blank slate, by 2012 sex differences, by 2019 race differences, and soon, civ differences.
4) So we have been in a race between western civilization and western science to preserve Darwinian revolution, and the Jewish counter-revolution against western truth, reason, the Darwinian revolution, by failed ideas, with our defeat only by invasion by less capable peoples.
5) In other words we win or lose by our tolerance for invasion and undermining, not because of our ideas. But becaue of our tolerance and compassion and christian optimism (faith) over aristotelian reason (evidence).
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-19 14:26:49 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105752517665701409
SPEECH IS AN INSUFFICIENT CRITERIA FOR THE CATEGORY “HUMAN”
This is why I say that there is a vast difference between declaring people HUMAN just because they can speak, instead of declaring people HUMAN because they have AGENCY.
Speech is an insufficient test of sufficient agency to enter into a contract, for the same reason that children lack sufficient agency to enter into contract.
You can only cooperate with whom you can cooperate, and you cannot enter into contract with people who lack agency – because they are not yet domesticated (fully human).
So:
… 1) it is one thing to have your human potential BLOCKED (addiction to supernatural religions);
… 2) and another lack the TRAINING to transition from primate to human; and another to seek to circumvent the LABOR of exercising agency;
… 3) and another to possess agency because you have the ability, training, and WILL to possess and therefore demonstrate agency.
(That was important, so read it again.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-18 19:21:41 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105057412769554165
RELIGIONS GODS, AND WISDOM
1) In the ancient world, words of wisdom were attributed to the gods, just as memes falsely attributed today. This is why words of saints, heroes, demigods, and in particular, gods, are inconsistent. Odin has many personalities, and Jehova and Allah are evil.
2) The Hindu gods are at least wise and natural. The only worthy god is Buddha’s, and it was a fabrication against Buddha’s will. The Chinese and Japanese managed to preserve the natural religion of ancestors and nature – thus escaping the great lies of history: gods unnecessary.
3) Chinese ancestor worship for all, sun tzu for the ruling class, confucian philosophy for middle class, and the Dao for the lower classes survived. The Jews/Xians/Muslims destroyed Aristotle(thought), Stoicism(character), Epicureanism(happiness) – the natural european religion.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-17 14:28:02 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105050595778315591
THE WORD OF THE GODS IS TOO TERRIBLE TO HEAR, SO MEN INVENTED LIES TO DISTRACT THEM
—“You should go to Divine Liturgy and learn about our theology. Become Orthodox the church established by Christ and his apostilles.”—
I do not need the word of primitive men about god. I have mastered the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe written in the hand of god, in the language of god, directly from the mind of god. I think and speak in the laws of the universe, and if there is a god, then these are his words. If they are not his words, then he is not god.
God’s laws are not kind, but true. Man’s words lie to hide the truth.
That said, I understand that all but a few men are too weak to bear the burden of god’s words. That is why men lie about them – to provide them false comforts.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-17 13:51:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105050453343748256
