Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Race is not a social construct it is a scientific observation of the four main speciation events as groups isolated, adapted, and expanded.

    Causes of Race: Regional Speciation “Race” was and is, the term we use for the observation that present humans (sapiens) were speciating by geography as all animals speciate by geography. Except in human case, distance from Rift Valley Urheimat led to a decrease in aggression and increase in domestication: intelligence, agency, neoteny Evolutionary speciation occurred in four Urheimats: 1) East African Rift Valley through 60k ybp 2) Pre-flood Persian Gulf through 50k ybp 3) North East-Asia through 40k ybp 4) North Eurasia (Russia) 24k ybp. All groups were speciating. And each was as different as Euro and Asians. Evolutionary Hierarchy:

    Most Evolved: East Asian < Europeans < South Eurasians (Afro Asiatic: North African, Semitic, and Iranic: Iranic, Indian) < Africans (east and the rest) : Least Evolved As such ‘race’ accurately describes the evolutionary stages of humans as we once again speciated by geography, with later hybrids ‘replacing’ earlier versions. The Agrarian expansion, then IE (horse) Expansions, the arab expansion, created hybrids today. The European ‘unification of the world’ during the age of sale and the Darwinian revolution explained this history for us.

    • The Han have mastered local hybridization but at high cost.
    • The Koreans and Japanese have resisted it successfully and maintained the gains.
    • The Iranics failed in both India, and to resist the Arabs in Persia.
    • The Indian upper caste and the european upper ‘caste’ succeeded.

    Hybridization of a less evolved people by greater numbers of a more evolved people can produce gains. Hybridization of a more evolved people by greater numbers of a less evolved people produces harms. This ‘harm’ of hybridization as we have seen in the rest of the world, is what the Masculine East and West are trying to prevent. Domestication Race is genetic, meaningful, and more meaningful because of pervasive kin preference in all walks of life, and the VAST differences in sexual, social, economic, political, and military cooperative market value of the different races and subraces. So no, humans are, like every other domesticated animal – with our nearest behavioral relation, wolf-to-dog, that shares our predatory strategy, the closest example. So, can we please stop the social construction of false promise of freedom from physical(scarcity), natural(amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), evolutionary(genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection) laws by virtue signaling to appeal to female magical-thinking? The Left’s Lies:

    • False promise of the end of scarcity by endless growth
    • False promise of the nature of man – when he is amoral, reciprocal, and kin preferential
    • False promise of the malleability of man – genetic determinism, vast differences in group genetic evolution, vast differences in cognitive, social, and institutional evolution.
    • False promise of the end of natural selection – from genetic load, regression to the mean, and necessity of natural selection – especially the constraint heterogeneity places on natural selection.

    Dating of the Death of the Left’s Lies

    • IQ equality died by 2000,
    • Sex equality died by 2012,
    • Race Equality Died by 2018.

    There are material biological differences between the races, that are due to increasing rates of self-domestication as each geographic race isolated, evolved, and expanded in the territory. While our upper classes (above 115 – potential for self study) are commensurable, our classes increase in incommensurability below it. Curing The World of the Left’s Second Dark Age We can ‘cure’ social construction by fake news, political deceit, academic pseudoscience, with one constitutional amendment, but we need to gain political power to implement that amendment. We can impose a warranty of public speech in matters public treating it as COURT TESTIMONY. The false promises of the enlightenment and the Marxist Pomo woke counter-revolution against darwin are over. The left is the impediment to achieving any sense of equality of opportunity. STOP LYING. No more science denial. Stop Lying. Stop the social construction of false promise of freedom from physical(scarcity), natural(amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), evolutionary(genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection) laws by virtue signaling to appeal to female magical-thinking? All you evil people accomplish with your lies is to prevent creating policy that will produce commons suitable for the VAST DIFFERENCES in cognitive, emotional, normative, and traditional differences between groups. The only solution to equality is to continue european and East Asian suppression of the reproduction of the unproductive (bottom) such that proceeds from production can be devoted to the production of commons.  

  • Race is not a social construct it is a scientific observation of the four main speciation events as groups isolated, adapted, and expanded.

    Causes of Race: Regional Speciation “Race” was and is, the term we use for the observation that present humans (sapiens) were speciating by geography as all animals speciate by geography. Except in human case, distance from Rift Valley Urheimat led to a decrease in aggression and increase in domestication: intelligence, agency, neoteny Evolutionary speciation occurred in four Urheimats: 1) East African Rift Valley through 60k ybp 2) Pre-flood Persian Gulf through 50k ybp 3) North East-Asia through 40k ybp 4) North Eurasia (Russia) 24k ybp. All groups were speciating. And each was as different as Euro and Asians. Evolutionary Hierarchy:

    Most Evolved: East Asian < Europeans < South Eurasians (Afro Asiatic: North African, Semitic, and Iranic: Iranic, Indian) < Africans (east and the rest) : Least Evolved As such ‘race’ accurately describes the evolutionary stages of humans as we once again speciated by geography, with later hybrids ‘replacing’ earlier versions. The Agrarian expansion, then IE (horse) Expansions, the arab expansion, created hybrids today. The European ‘unification of the world’ during the age of sale and the Darwinian revolution explained this history for us.

    • The Han have mastered local hybridization but at high cost.
    • The Koreans and Japanese have resisted it successfully and maintained the gains.
    • The Iranics failed in both India, and to resist the Arabs in Persia.
    • The Indian upper caste and the european upper ‘caste’ succeeded.

    Hybridization of a less evolved people by greater numbers of a more evolved people can produce gains. Hybridization of a more evolved people by greater numbers of a less evolved people produces harms. This ‘harm’ of hybridization as we have seen in the rest of the world, is what the Masculine East and West are trying to prevent. Domestication Race is genetic, meaningful, and more meaningful because of pervasive kin preference in all walks of life, and the VAST differences in sexual, social, economic, political, and military cooperative market value of the different races and subraces. So no, humans are, like every other domesticated animal – with our nearest behavioral relation, wolf-to-dog, that shares our predatory strategy, the closest example. So, can we please stop the social construction of false promise of freedom from physical(scarcity), natural(amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), evolutionary(genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection) laws by virtue signaling to appeal to female magical-thinking? The Left’s Lies:

    • False promise of the end of scarcity by endless growth
    • False promise of the nature of man – when he is amoral, reciprocal, and kin preferential
    • False promise of the malleability of man – genetic determinism, vast differences in group genetic evolution, vast differences in cognitive, social, and institutional evolution.
    • False promise of the end of natural selection – from genetic load, regression to the mean, and necessity of natural selection – especially the constraint heterogeneity places on natural selection.

    Dating of the Death of the Left’s Lies

    • IQ equality died by 2000,
    • Sex equality died by 2012,
    • Race Equality Died by 2018.

    There are material biological differences between the races, that are due to increasing rates of self-domestication as each geographic race isolated, evolved, and expanded in the territory. While our upper classes (above 115 – potential for self study) are commensurable, our classes increase in incommensurability below it. Curing The World of the Left’s Second Dark Age We can ‘cure’ social construction by fake news, political deceit, academic pseudoscience, with one constitutional amendment, but we need to gain political power to implement that amendment. We can impose a warranty of public speech in matters public treating it as COURT TESTIMONY. The false promises of the enlightenment and the Marxist Pomo woke counter-revolution against darwin are over. The left is the impediment to achieving any sense of equality of opportunity. STOP LYING. No more science denial. Stop Lying. Stop the social construction of false promise of freedom from physical(scarcity), natural(amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), evolutionary(genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection) laws by virtue signaling to appeal to female magical-thinking? All you evil people accomplish with your lies is to prevent creating policy that will produce commons suitable for the VAST DIFFERENCES in cognitive, emotional, normative, and traditional differences between groups. The only solution to equality is to continue european and East Asian suppression of the reproduction of the unproductive (bottom) such that proceeds from production can be devoted to the production of commons.  

  • The Origin of Money – The Abrahamic Libertarians Are Always Lying

    –“What do you think made gold become money?”- Jeffrey Swann @AgoristView

    1) Gold was a valuable commodity like other commodities, but not ‘money’. I didn’t require refinement, but it was too expensive for use as money. So it was just a commodity. Silver required refinement. The first money was electrum. But any metal will do. The honest question is whether gold, ever in history served as money – and the answer is “no”. Gold coins were too expensive, and served as money-like commodities, only liquid in certain conditions, just as they do today, because the value is too high, and liquidity too low. 2) Metal Commodity Money (money proper) has the properties:

    a) Scarce, non-perishable, commodity(useful), and a universal signal good(luxury), b) Consistent weight and volume, unitizable, countable, with a low ratio of weight and volume to value. c) Trade-markable (warrantable), re-trade-markable (melt, re-stamp), and standard of weight and measure

    Therefore;

    d) STATES can create a market for a universally desirable commodity by demanding taxes paid in a universal commodity e) And POLITIES can increase economic velocity (reduce friction) by converting agricultural goods to money. f) And States can construct, defend, tax, and regulate MARKETS increasing returns. g) States Can Pay SOLDIERS, and scale the number of soldiers to expand markets. 3) Bitcoin in the Financial Product Hierarchy

  • The Origin of Money – The Abrahamic Libertarians Are Always Lying

    –“What do you think made gold become money?”- Jeffrey Swann @AgoristView

    1) Gold was a valuable commodity like other commodities, but not ‘money’. I didn’t require refinement, but it was too expensive for use as money. So it was just a commodity. Silver required refinement. The first money was electrum. But any metal will do. The honest question is whether gold, ever in history served as money – and the answer is “no”. Gold coins were too expensive, and served as money-like commodities, only liquid in certain conditions, just as they do today, because the value is too high, and liquidity too low. 2) Metal Commodity Money (money proper) has the properties:

    a) Scarce, non-perishable, commodity(useful), and a universal signal good(luxury), b) Consistent weight and volume, unitizable, countable, with a low ratio of weight and volume to value. c) Trade-markable (warrantable), re-trade-markable (melt, re-stamp), and standard of weight and measure

    Therefore;

    d) STATES can create a market for a universally desirable commodity by demanding taxes paid in a universal commodity e) And POLITIES can increase economic velocity (reduce friction) by converting agricultural goods to money. f) And States can construct, defend, tax, and regulate MARKETS increasing returns. g) States Can Pay SOLDIERS, and scale the number of soldiers to expand markets. 3) Bitcoin in the Financial Product Hierarchy

  • History: Why The French Must Lose for Europe To Survive

    Schmitt didn’t himself realize how influenced by the French ‘counter-enlightenment’ against British Empirical, Sovereign, Legal, and Prussian Miltary and Tripartist restoration of europe.

    —“Schmitt contends that from 1890 the old Westphalian order of the jus publicum europaeum, born at the end of the Thirty Years’ War (1648), began to dissolve into a ‘universalism without territories’ and into the ’empty’ and abstract normativism of an international legality”— Alain de Benoist @Daily_Benoist

    We should call it what it is: 1) European civ was and remains the Common Law of self determination by sovereignty reciprocity we call Tort, the Holy Roman Empire (HRE), and the federation of states under a weak monarchy the optimum form of european govt – the optimum form of ALL government. 2) France warred against the HRE and Germania organized in response – to resist another French aggression. 3) The european conflict was, is, and remains, the Roman, Catholic, and French Feminine, Semitic, Monopoly, Authoritarian, Arrogant State against the Greek, Aryan(Protestant), Germanic, Masculine, European, Rule of Law, Market, Skeptical State. 4) The USA, a power that Europe seeks to replicate, is very close to a second civil war that will result most likely in a restoration of her original design as a mirror of the HRE with traditional Germanic law as that rule of law. Was preserved in England and never subject to the corrupting influence of Napoleonic law that deprived the people and the law of sovereignty. The rest of Europe should fear a unified Europe that contains Paris more than it should fear a unified Europe that contains Moscow. At least Moscow works in Russian people’s interests. Paris does not. So perhaps the French should look more objectively at the problem. It’s not that Europe fears integration. it’s that the French history of undermining european peoples, and the French authoritarian model rather than the Holy Roman Empire, British, and American model, is a threat to european civilization – as it always has been. That is the cause of the failure of european coherence. Humility, recognition of her role in destroying europe, would serve Paris better than ambitions to rule.

    Latin SemiticGermanic, European
    Roman,Greek,
    CatholicAryan(Protestant),
    FrenchGermanic,
    FeminineMasculine,
    SemiticEuropean,
    AuthoritarianRule of Law,
    MonopolyMarket,
    Arrogant StateSkeptical State.

    The French MUST LOSE for Europe to Survive.  

  • History: Why The French Must Lose for Europe To Survive

    Schmitt didn’t himself realize how influenced by the French ‘counter-enlightenment’ against British Empirical, Sovereign, Legal, and Prussian Miltary and Tripartist restoration of europe.

    —“Schmitt contends that from 1890 the old Westphalian order of the jus publicum europaeum, born at the end of the Thirty Years’ War (1648), began to dissolve into a ‘universalism without territories’ and into the ’empty’ and abstract normativism of an international legality”— Alain de Benoist @Daily_Benoist

    We should call it what it is: 1) European civ was and remains the Common Law of self determination by sovereignty reciprocity we call Tort, the Holy Roman Empire (HRE), and the federation of states under a weak monarchy the optimum form of european govt – the optimum form of ALL government. 2) France warred against the HRE and Germania organized in response – to resist another French aggression. 3) The european conflict was, is, and remains, the Roman, Catholic, and French Feminine, Semitic, Monopoly, Authoritarian, Arrogant State against the Greek, Aryan(Protestant), Germanic, Masculine, European, Rule of Law, Market, Skeptical State. 4) The USA, a power that Europe seeks to replicate, is very close to a second civil war that will result most likely in a restoration of her original design as a mirror of the HRE with traditional Germanic law as that rule of law. Was preserved in England and never subject to the corrupting influence of Napoleonic law that deprived the people and the law of sovereignty. The rest of Europe should fear a unified Europe that contains Paris more than it should fear a unified Europe that contains Moscow. At least Moscow works in Russian people’s interests. Paris does not. So perhaps the French should look more objectively at the problem. It’s not that Europe fears integration. it’s that the French history of undermining european peoples, and the French authoritarian model rather than the Holy Roman Empire, British, and American model, is a threat to european civilization – as it always has been. That is the cause of the failure of european coherence. Humility, recognition of her role in destroying europe, would serve Paris better than ambitions to rule.

    Latin SemiticGermanic, European
    Roman,Greek,
    CatholicAryan(Protestant),
    FrenchGermanic,
    FeminineMasculine,
    SemiticEuropean,
    AuthoritarianRule of Law,
    MonopolyMarket,
    Arrogant StateSkeptical State.

    The French MUST LOSE for Europe to Survive.  

  • Retaliation Rules without Restitution

    (by Brandon Hayes @ThruTheHayes)

    1. Natural law prevents retaliation cycles by requiring all acts, words, & displays to be due diligent & warrantied with promise of restitution for damages. Without restitution comes unmeasured retaliation in seek of Nash equilibration. — Brandon Hayes @ThruTheHayes
    2. The ideology of human rights posits unified humanity at once as a given fact and as an ideal, as something that is and something that should be; in other words, as a sort of potential truth that cannot be verified and would appear fully only when it is realised. — @alaindebenoist

    3. Human rights were developed to force states to internal production rather than conquest. The LEFT twisted this yet again as The False Promise of Freedom from Physical Natural and Evolutionary Laws, given the vast difference in group demographics (eugenics). — Curt Doolittle
    4. The feminine can only manifest as an ideology (the left) when it is itself the beneficiary of freedom from physical nature and evolutionary laws – to offer anything other than that false promise would be to self destruct. — @LukeWeinhagen
    5. But there is no beneficiary of freedom from the laws of physics, nature, and evolution. Because that’s absurd. Wait, that’s his precise point.—@TruthQuest11
    6. It’s insurance from them. A father, a husband or whole social group can insure a woman from effects of nature. It’s stable as long as women don’t get to make decisions about what needs to be insured and how much in place of their insurers. —@WorMartiN

  • Retaliation Rules without Restitution

    (by Brandon Hayes @ThruTheHayes)

    1. Natural law prevents retaliation cycles by requiring all acts, words, & displays to be due diligent & warrantied with promise of restitution for damages. Without restitution comes unmeasured retaliation in seek of Nash equilibration. — Brandon Hayes @ThruTheHayes
    2. The ideology of human rights posits unified humanity at once as a given fact and as an ideal, as something that is and something that should be; in other words, as a sort of potential truth that cannot be verified and would appear fully only when it is realised. — @alaindebenoist

    3. Human rights were developed to force states to internal production rather than conquest. The LEFT twisted this yet again as The False Promise of Freedom from Physical Natural and Evolutionary Laws, given the vast difference in group demographics (eugenics). — Curt Doolittle
    4. The feminine can only manifest as an ideology (the left) when it is itself the beneficiary of freedom from physical nature and evolutionary laws – to offer anything other than that false promise would be to self destruct. — @LukeWeinhagen
    5. But there is no beneficiary of freedom from the laws of physics, nature, and evolution. Because that’s absurd. Wait, that’s his precise point.—@TruthQuest11
    6. It’s insurance from them. A father, a husband or whole social group can insure a woman from effects of nature. It’s stable as long as women don’t get to make decisions about what needs to be insured and how much in place of their insurers. —@WorMartiN

  • The Masculinization of Christianity: Forbearance  Forbearance Not Tolerance

    THE MASCULINIZATION OF CHRISTIANITY: FORBEARANCE  FORBEARANCE NOT TOLERANCE By: Bill Joslin;  @LukeWeinhagen @curtdoolittle @ThruTheHayes Any religion must produce Mindfulness (Self), Humility (Others), Piety (The Universe). The Best religion produces Excellence (investment), Truth (word), reciprocity (action), Duty (Compensation), Charity (Insurance). The reason Christianity spread is that until then the underclasses and women had no means of obtaining virtue. Christianity provides virtue or the illusion of virtue, even if you do nothing except refrain from doing bad. CHRISTIANITY, PRISONERS DILEMMA, AND FORBEARANCE Jesus represents the active statefulness of Christianity for the virtue of forgiveness. “Exhaustive forgiveness (tit-for-tat) solves the prisoner’s dilemma game. In other words, it is the optimum strategy for identifying and sorting the pervasively immoral from the potentially Moral. In almost all cases, including the most addicted and criminal, people who are not otherwise mentally ill, will eventually fall to ‘seduction’ into Cooperation.” Passive statefulness is how the parasite leverages a high-trust group’s virtues against itself. Passive is poison. tolerance is the passive statefulness of the virtue forgiveness, tolerance must be endured – which is why the left loves it. It exposes our empathy to the parasites. Christianity fails where it makes excuses for sin and shortcomings and endures their effects – tolerance. Forbearance is the active state of the virtue “forgiveness”. It is active, meaning it can be withdrawn should violations of reciprocity occur. Forgiveness is important as it is the only way to preserve trust in a high-trust group through the Reality of Human imperfection and accommodating graceful failure at scale. Christianity succeeds where it specifically and intentionally acknowledges sin and shortcomings and then forgives – forbearance. Also: I use tolerance to mean allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs. It’s a passive state. No Agency. I use Forbearance to mean I intentionally take responsibility for the cost to allow someone else not to (ex. my children, my disabled kin, my employee that has not matured fully yet). It is an active state. Allows Agency. Furthermore: Where are you (your Church/belief/community) accepting of others living outside of the model of Christ without repentance? “Repentance is the activity of reviewing one’s actions and feeling contrition or regret for past wrongs, which is accompanied by a commitment to and actual actions that show and prove a change for the better.” – it does not change your mind, it changes your behavior – it is a change in mindfulness itself. Repentance is the Christian restoration of Agency over action, over self. Even hanging from the cross his message to the thief was – own your actions. Do not seek the acknowledgment of your excuses. restore mindfulness. You can not be forgiven for what you did not do of your own accord, so own your choices and repent and you are forgiven. How much of the application of faith today offers “forgiveness” to those who do not yet own their actions? This is not the virtuous forgiveness of forbearance – it can not be – it is tolerance. You literally can nor forbear a sin that has not been owned in repentance – you can only tolerate as ownership has not been claimed. From the perspective of costs: – Actions have associated costs. – Immoral action imposes involuntary costs on others. – Tolerance allows these costs to go unclaimed. – Forbearance requires the costs to be claimed. – Repentance is the claim of ownership over costs an individual previously imposed on others. – Restitution is the covering of costs by the individual that created the costs. – Forbearance is the cover of costs by anyone, not the individual that created the costs – Forgiveness bridges the gap when an individual imposed a cost on others acknowledges ownership of that cost, but can not cover the costs either because they are unable or the cost is one that can not be restored – Virtuous forgiveness is forbearance, it covers the cost without any loss of ownership nor ambiguity of ownership.

  • The Masculinization of Christianity: Forbearance  Forbearance Not Tolerance

    THE MASCULINIZATION OF CHRISTIANITY: FORBEARANCE  FORBEARANCE NOT TOLERANCE By: Bill Joslin;  @LukeWeinhagen @curtdoolittle @ThruTheHayes Any religion must produce Mindfulness (Self), Humility (Others), Piety (The Universe). The Best religion produces Excellence (investment), Truth (word), reciprocity (action), Duty (Compensation), Charity (Insurance). The reason Christianity spread is that until then the underclasses and women had no means of obtaining virtue. Christianity provides virtue or the illusion of virtue, even if you do nothing except refrain from doing bad. CHRISTIANITY, PRISONERS DILEMMA, AND FORBEARANCE Jesus represents the active statefulness of Christianity for the virtue of forgiveness. “Exhaustive forgiveness (tit-for-tat) solves the prisoner’s dilemma game. In other words, it is the optimum strategy for identifying and sorting the pervasively immoral from the potentially Moral. In almost all cases, including the most addicted and criminal, people who are not otherwise mentally ill, will eventually fall to ‘seduction’ into Cooperation.” Passive statefulness is how the parasite leverages a high-trust group’s virtues against itself. Passive is poison. tolerance is the passive statefulness of the virtue forgiveness, tolerance must be endured – which is why the left loves it. It exposes our empathy to the parasites. Christianity fails where it makes excuses for sin and shortcomings and endures their effects – tolerance. Forbearance is the active state of the virtue “forgiveness”. It is active, meaning it can be withdrawn should violations of reciprocity occur. Forgiveness is important as it is the only way to preserve trust in a high-trust group through the Reality of Human imperfection and accommodating graceful failure at scale. Christianity succeeds where it specifically and intentionally acknowledges sin and shortcomings and then forgives – forbearance. Also: I use tolerance to mean allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs. It’s a passive state. No Agency. I use Forbearance to mean I intentionally take responsibility for the cost to allow someone else not to (ex. my children, my disabled kin, my employee that has not matured fully yet). It is an active state. Allows Agency. Furthermore: Where are you (your Church/belief/community) accepting of others living outside of the model of Christ without repentance? “Repentance is the activity of reviewing one’s actions and feeling contrition or regret for past wrongs, which is accompanied by a commitment to and actual actions that show and prove a change for the better.” – it does not change your mind, it changes your behavior – it is a change in mindfulness itself. Repentance is the Christian restoration of Agency over action, over self. Even hanging from the cross his message to the thief was – own your actions. Do not seek the acknowledgment of your excuses. restore mindfulness. You can not be forgiven for what you did not do of your own accord, so own your choices and repent and you are forgiven. How much of the application of faith today offers “forgiveness” to those who do not yet own their actions? This is not the virtuous forgiveness of forbearance – it can not be – it is tolerance. You literally can nor forbear a sin that has not been owned in repentance – you can only tolerate as ownership has not been claimed. From the perspective of costs: – Actions have associated costs. – Immoral action imposes involuntary costs on others. – Tolerance allows these costs to go unclaimed. – Forbearance requires the costs to be claimed. – Repentance is the claim of ownership over costs an individual previously imposed on others. – Restitution is the covering of costs by the individual that created the costs. – Forbearance is the cover of costs by anyone, not the individual that created the costs – Forgiveness bridges the gap when an individual imposed a cost on others acknowledges ownership of that cost, but can not cover the costs either because they are unable or the cost is one that can not be restored – Virtuous forgiveness is forbearance, it covers the cost without any loss of ownership nor ambiguity of ownership.