Form: Mini Essay

  • Conservatives are simpletons. I know why. “Get it over and done with.” It’s just

    Conservatives are simpletons. I know why. “Get it over and done with.” It’s just … odd. It leads to dumbness.
    There is no mystery to the problem.
    The question is whether it is one of purely race, or just traditional norms, habits, traditions, and institutions of our race. (I don’t care).
    Different classes require different justifications.
    In the end, there is no solution but rebellion.
    Rebellion will only succeed if the solution is perceived as possible, pragmatic, and just across those factions.
    And then we must operate that government.
    And my job is to ensure we can operate that government.
    And eliminating conflict that would prevent rebellion and restoration of the constitution of independent states of sovereign people.
    Some of whom (the left) will choose to operate their states or city states poorly – in proper european tradition. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 17:17:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627719152826712090

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627717307119308800

  • I’m not even trying to reach numbers – only those who can do the work to produce

    I’m not even trying to reach numbers – only those who can do the work to produce a solution that can function by other than opinion and whining.
    Lindsay is succeeding at reaching people that matter.
    You’re not.
    I’ve learned that the entire rage-boy audience, your audience, is attention-seeking, larping, dead weight, self-destructive, and counterproductive, larpers who the majority of the population has abandoned, and who would never let near any responsibility given their demonstrated life failure of accumulating any.

    It’s true that the left has successfully constructed a repetition of the jewish-christian destruction of the ancient european world. And just as that was a race war, this is a race war. This race war. And this version of the race war is selling a religion of irresponsibility and blame that sells.

    The enemy started with a race war of Judaism against Europeanism. They created marxism to foment class war. Neo-Marxism for culture war. Postmodernism truth war – to deny the ability to reconcile. Feminism for sex war. And Race Marxism (Pc-Woke) explicitly for race war.

    The European Right is selling a religion of responsibility and accountability that doesn’t sell. That’s obvious. Why would I sell something psychologically and emotionally closely, that demonstrates my status and rank as lower than I desire it to be, that demands I take responsibility for myself, others, and the commons, when I could just blame it on oppression, and follow those who promise me irresponsibility?

    So there is no sale to be made to the many. One uses force to obtain the power to deny power to those that would avoid responsibility, or one is deprived of the capacity for self-determination by the accumulation of responsibility.

    Then once power is obtained, how does one rule?

    Obtaining power is easy. Ruling is hard.
    I work on these.
    I don’t work on rallying.
    That’s for you folks to do. It’s simple. It’s emotional. it sells. Though I’m not sure it does much except express dissatisfaction and delegitimize the state.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 17:07:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627716698538115081

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627712724426956802

  • Again, and I know this is a hurdle, you can communicate ideas through theology o

    Again, and I know this is a hurdle, you can communicate ideas through theology or mythologically, through philosophy or sophistry, thru pilpul and critique or essay and analysis, thru magic or pseudoscience through literature or history, through science and constructive logic, or any combination thereof.

    The question is only which of those vehicles increases or decreases the opportunity for falsehood, suggestion, deceit, and fraud.

    Unfortunately to reach computation (the use of science, testimony and logic to produce an operational means of communication) requires great knowledge, while every other method requires less and less, and relies more and more on analogy, suggestion, and pretense of knowledge.

    So the method of teaching while it may allow greater suggestion to a broader audience will also allow deception.

    CRT consists of abrahamic pilpul and critique, which seeks only consensus the way idealsm and sophistry seek some sort of truth upon which we can agree. Furthermore while idealism and sophistry in the western tradition generally favor advocacy of something openly stated (Male means of manipulation), pilpul and critique seek to undermine what is, to bring about something else entirely, indirectly (female means of manipulation)/


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 15:46:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627696325658566657

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627691595335368706

  • I know. Hermes’ cart of lies broke down in the middle east and all the lies were

    I know.
    Hermes’ cart of lies broke down in the middle east and all the lies were stolen from it. Why?

    There is a reason for the Abrahamic theological method of deceit, and its reformation in the Marxist-Sequence pseudoscientific method of deceit, and the use of pilpul and critique in advocacy and defense of deceit.

    And that is the reason for the low trust, absence of truth before face, and the near absence of scientific, technical, economic, and political innovaton in the middle east – and the diaspora – until integrated into the west, which they struggle to undermine.

    Why do they feel superior in ethics and morality despite the evidence of their absence of truth and cooperation and industry, polity, and institution that results?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 15:19:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627689320185270273

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627663032196235264

  • PROBLEM: ADAPTING TO THE UNIFICATION OF THE SCIENCES (our resistance to the form

    PROBLEM: ADAPTING TO THE UNIFICATION OF THE SCIENCES
    (our resistance to the formalization of the behavioral sciences)

    FWIW: One of the problems we (all) face is that people don’t expect to understand the physical sciences but oddly enough, expect to understand the behavioral, ethical, and moral sciences of cooperation and dispute resolution. Why? It’s more tangible to us. Why? It’s the means we use to pretend our negotiating position (justification) of our biases is moral rather than within the limits of what is moral without prosecution and retaliation. 😉

    So, just as we have paid the high cost to transition populations to scientific understanding in the physical world – and the profound returns – we will now have to pay the high cost of transitioning populations to the scientific understanding of the behavioral and evolutionary world – to obtain the even greater profound returns.

    So, in that sense, I expect even greater resistance than Socrates, Aristotle, Copernicus, Galileo, and Darwin, because the progress of science is moving from producing decidability in that which is abstract to the individual, to that which is tangible to his beliefs, to that which is tangible to his display word and deed – and eliminates one’s ability to engage in magical thinking as a means of sedation.

    So I expect far greater resistance to my work than we saw even to Darwin’s. In fact, the post-war ideological warfare consists almost entirely of a counter-enlightenment against the Darwinian explanation for nearly all of existence. So we are still in the throws of denial of Darwin 170 years later. I would expect the same people on the right and left who resist the Darwinian revolution to resist this completion of the unification of the sciences – and for the same reasons.

    Institutions lag. Humans change only when the people who have malinvested in a previous set of errors, die off, and give opportunities to those who invest in something less erroneous. We can thank Kuhn for that uncomfortable truth.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 05:58:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627548243612561408

  • AN INSIGHT INTO INDIAN CULTURAL ORGANIZATION The class-caste system is overlooke

    AN INSIGHT INTO INDIAN CULTURAL ORGANIZATION
    The class-caste system is overlooked as *the least fragile social, economic, political order* because organization is distributed and pushed down to the functional level and so the hierarchy can’t be captured as it can in the east and the west.

    The ME is equally difficult to capture but organization is at the family level ending the utility of class division of labor.

    To some degree it is useful to think of India’s organizing principle as military duty applied from ranks to castes, enabling continuous adaptation without the possible fragility of hierarchical orders.

    From this perspective, indian civ is in a ‘sweet spot’ above the middle east in cooperation and production, and below the east and west in fragility.

    (The west is most fragile but most adaptive, China is less fragile than the west, but more fragile than india, but like india pays high cost of stagnation, though because of the rigidity of the bureaucratic hierarchy (despite meritocracy) vs rigidity of the caste system (and problem of blocking meritocracy).)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 03:36:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627512492640423936

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627395423777263618

  • OPPRESSION THEORIES VS CONSPIRACY THEORIES (And the causes and consequences) Opp

    OPPRESSION THEORIES VS CONSPIRACY THEORIES
    (And the causes and consequences)

    Oppression narratives are the cognitively female and liberal version of the cognitively male and conservative conspiracy narratives.

    This sex difference in cognitive biases originates in sex differences in status-seeking. Females seek status by evasion of responsibility and hyperconsumption, while males seek status by the accumulation of responsibility and capitalization.

    So, the difference as in all things left vs right, is that we take male antisocial nonsense seriously because males are dangerous, and we ignore female antisocial nonsense because women aren’t dangerous.

    At least, women weren’t dangerous until given the franchise. Now the opposite is true, and the present age is caused by the noise as the signal of women’s influence in politics travels through the civilizations’ institutional, traditional, normative, habitual, and cognitive capital structures.

    This particular problem (which I can’t fully determine whether is cultural or biological) has allowed the industrialization of the female method of antisocial behavior using oppression narratives to take root in a population whose education, consumption, and voting is dominated by white females. (white females are the only group that defects from their ethnicity.

    We endured marxism as we brought the lower classes into the franchise – a search for control.

    Now we’re enduring feminism as we bring females into the franchise – a search for control

    And unfortunately we’ve not falsified the female search for control as we have the lower class search for control.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 19:28:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627389607703715841

  • I would say that if we discover a law of nature that we can make use of it, and

    I would say that if we discover a law of nature that we can make use of it, and we can obey it, but we will pay the costs of disregarding it – and there are no exceptions that I know of.

    I’d also say that the universe, the solar system, the geology, the climate, the flora, and fauna have done everything possible to kill us with disturbing regularity. In fact, the universe is a vast irradiated wasteland hostile to life, particularly ours.

    The evidence would strongly suggest that not mother nature, nor gods, nor God care for our condition – only that we achieve their ambitions for us. And those ambitions consider us domesticated animals until at some point in the distant future we face extinction or transformation by evolution into gods ourselves.

    Jesus told us the only way to tolerate the tragic conditions during our journey: the extension of kinship love to all until we determine it’s fruitless.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 03:53:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627154415714029568

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626807406536839168

  • WHICH FALLACY ARE WE ENGAGING IN? Economics whether neurological, behavioral, mi

    WHICH FALLACY ARE WE ENGAGING IN?
    Economics whether neurological, behavioral, micro, political, or macro, asks us to account for the seen and unseen, which overcomes the tendency to engage in foolish judgments.

    In this case, that the costs are avoidable at all, rather than we are trying to pay the lowest costs by using time to our advantage.

    CONTEXT
    Just as the agrarian age, the age of religion, the bronze age, the iron age, and the steel age radiated outward from different points on the planet, causing disruption, modernity is spreading from the most advanced countries in Northwest Europe to the least advanced, and the most independent and federal to the most occupied and imperial.

    In other words, we overestimate world wars as avoidable. They aren’t. They are part of the necessary progress from early tribal, to agrarian imperial, to industrial-sovereign to post-industrial federation as each empire comes to terms with their loss of ability to contain conquered peoples – and prevent the march of self-determination from spreading around the rest of the planet.

    China and Russia are empires. They consist of predatory and deeply corrupt governments of organized crime syndicates. Unlike the Russians who did, and are returning to, the militarization of the labor pool as a discount, China could use currency and debt to discount the costs of their modernization. The Chinese learned from both Russia and the West.

    India may have escaped the modernization crisis – or rather colonialism removed their choice – though the Hindu-Muslim conflict may yet bring it about. India is, despite its modernization, and the vast talent pool of its upper classes, fundamentally a religious society first. It has just as equal a chance to continue its rise, as it does to follow the Muslim golden age into the restoration of fundamentalism and face india’s second intellectual collapse.

    Iran is in the process of trying to create an empire. An empire that monopolized Eurasian petroleum, from which they create a petro-currency, with which to fund their conquest of the middle east.

    Under strong federalism in response to the civil war, and under managerialism and credentialism in the 20th century, America has slipped from a federation organized on the Holy Roman Empire combined with the invention of the British modern government and law, into an empire – at the cost of its founding populations, its law, and the culture that made it possible. Just as have other empires that have overextended. Especially Europeans who repeat overextension with disturbing frequency.

    Europe is failing, or rather, France is failing (thankfully), to federalize Europe into a strong federal version of the USA while at the same time the USA is struggling with NOT devolving back to its constitutional formation as a military, financial, and trade alliance of independent European states, with different norms, traditions, values, and demand for regional and local commons to support those differences. (Which I work to accomplish)

    With Germany overly pacified, Poland on the behalf of itself, with less than half its population and economy, is taking over responsibility once again for defense from the east. and we may see the intermarium states turn into the civilization we’d hoped for, and end both the French and Russian threat, while Germany recovers her willpower.

    Continued…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-18 20:50:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627048026161430529

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627025797239431170

  • Anarchism is the Ideology of Predatory Separatists who wish to deprive the peopl

    Anarchism is the Ideology of Predatory Separatists who wish to deprive the people of protection from parasites and predators – particularly from baiting into hazards.

    I lived not far from Mises home in L’viv. I walked by it a number of times a week, each time reflecting on the rails that led from the street to the inside for what must have been coal carts or other heavy loads.

    Today the people of Ukraine are still the victims of oligarchs. There are two I know personally, at least forty I know of, but numbers range up to eighty. In the past they were the victim of nobility and oligarchs.

    There are three methods of coercion. Warlords exemplify the force point of the triangle, priests the seduction point of the triangle, and lenders and traders the exploitation point of the triangle.

    The reason Rothbard and Mises contributed to what the Austrians called Jewish Economics, is that it was from lived experience and historical tradition. The ethics of the Pale of Settlement. The ethics of artful Organized Crime.

    Ukraine is and was a world of organized crime, and the people suffered exploitation of the population through extractive and abusive credit, gambling, selling alcohol for credit, and the usual traditions others have explained in further detail that I have.

    The germanic tradition whether Continental, Scandinavian, or British, certainly from the beginning of manorialism, was a competition between the nobility and aristocracy for wealth by competitive productivity. And the high trust commons of the Europeans developed because these exploitations were largely regulated or prohibited whenever possible. Read a few books on the economy of Europe in the middle ages and it’s not the dark story (other than the plague) the media advances. (There are few of them worth reading, unfortunately.)

    So warlords, superstitious ignorance-producing religious priesthoods, or organized crime whether purely criminal or under the pretense of commercial volition are all means by which people have suffered the abuses of those who can organize exploitation of producers.

    Whether American Credentialists, French Authoritarians, Putin’s Russia, Jewish Ukraine, any of the middle eastern despots, the tyranny of the pre-Muslim Arab tribal leaders, and even the seemingly merciful thousands of years of stagnation of the Egyptians – only one people has discovered the highest cost civilization that defeated the rest by pure evolutionary velocity in the bronze, iron, steel, and industrial ages: the Europeans.

    Why? Because of citizenship by reciprocal insurance by force of arms of individual sovereignty in demonstrated interest, reciprocity in display word and deed, including truth before face, commons before self, polity before self, regardless of cost, prohibiting all authority, limiting us to truthful debate, the duel, or adversarial competition before our peers, and markets in association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities and war.

    There is no alternative to this insurance. There is no alternative to the priority of the production of non-consumable commons that decreases the cost of daily life for all. It cannot be done. And the attempt to import the Jewish ethics of the pale under the pretense it’s an alternative is simply another feminine bit of denial, wishful thinking, of childish cowardly immature minds – it’s nothing more than the ethics of a separatist people seeking to profit from the commons without paying the high cost of those commons.

    Europeans won the world by producing commons.

    Private monetary velocity is a product of the production of commons. There is no alternative to a militia, the rule of law of the natural law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity, and the devotion of proceeds to the production of sufficient commons that competition for talent, families, and the trade they produce and consume defeats that of competitors.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-18 01:33:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626756753672085509

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1625523422720675842