Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • CAUSALITY OF JEWISH VS WESTERN THOUGHT Jewish vs Western thought manifests in th

    CAUSALITY OF JEWISH VS WESTERN THOUGHT
    Jewish vs Western thought manifests in the sciences as pragmatism vs truth. And Pragatism in ethics as selfishness vs contribution to commons.
    The pragmatism begins with the jewish seeking agreement regardless of truth (via positiva justification ignoring political consequences at scale) and westerners seeking truth in order to determine agreement (via negativa falsification b/c of political consequences of scale)
    This is why Cantor Bohr Einstein and Feynman relied on pictures not operations, verbalisms rather than operations, and pragmatism rather than truth – and killed progress in physics.
    And it’s why Marx, Boaz, Freud, destroyed behavioral science, the frankfurt school destroyed high culture, the postmodernists destroyed truth, Lysenko, Gould, destroyed evolution, and why Rez, Kelsen, Dworkin destroyed law. From this perspective, like the abrahamic religions, it’s the most destructive force in civilizational history.
    It’s also why jewish and western ethics are incompatible opposite.
    And it’s unfortunate that easy pragmatism is more attractive than difficult truth.
    Especially for women.
    So, oddly enough, it’s correct that the prewar criticism that jewish and western science differs was true.
    And it’s most visible in jewish behavioral sciences.
    And I discovered it in jewish vs western economics and law.
    So (a) Pragmatism (b) evasion of responsibility for the commons (c) mythicism (magical thinking) (d) conflating good/true bad/false, (e) face before truth (f) asymmetric returns as heroic (f) resulting in the female strategy. And that is the mirror image of western ethics that’s been brought to us by christianity, marxism, woke with women and immigrants resisting western truth before face, and maximization of responsibility for private and common(duty).

    (Note: The number of insights I gain by studying philosophers and detecting their lies, excuses, and errors is endless….)

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 09:04:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652962155040260096

  • Reason: “Whiteness” consists of the maximization of individual responsibility fo

    Reason: “Whiteness” consists of the maximization of individual responsibility for self, the private, and the common. Density deprives one of the possibility of responsibility and generates demand for authority. Authority deprives one of truth before face. Truth is determined by testifiability. Science and logic produce testifiability. That’s the reason for the war on science. Non-whites appear to have significant problems with both truth before face and maximum responsibility for self and commons. That’s the purpose of the Marxist-to-Woke/DEI movement: to end Western demand for “Whiteness” (truth before face and maximum responsibility for self, private and common.) So are whites somehow biologically and genetically superior, or are whites just more willing to pay the high psychological, emotional, and social costs of ‘Whiteness’?

    Reply addressees: @ajrwalker @Drew09490585

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 03:22:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652513838502166528

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652472260236656642

  • Reason: “Whiteness” consists of the maximization of individual responsibility fo

    Reason: “Whiteness” consists of the maximization of individual responsibility for self, the private, and the common. Density deprives one of the possibility of responsibility and generates demand for authority. Authority deprives one of truth before face. Truth is determined by testifiability. Science and logic produce testifiability. That’s the reason for the war on science. Non-whites appear to have significant problems with both truth before face and maximum responsibility for self and commons. That’s the purpose of the Marxist-to-Woke/DEI movement: to end Western demand for “Whiteness” (truth before face and maximum responsibility for self, private and common.) So are whites somehow biologically and genetically superior, or are whites just more willing to pay the high psychological, emotional, and social costs of ‘Whiteness’?

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 03:22:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652513838586052610

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652472260236656642

  • (core) (sex differences) Corrective Measures Needed for ‘undergrads’. 😉 P-Law r

    (core) (sex differences)
    Corrective Measures Needed for ‘undergrads’. 😉

    P-Law requires we cognitively switch to the use of series (measures) rather than sets (ideals). So you can’t reduce everything to single test as (archaic) philosophical “set-morons” do. Mathiness, Verbalism, Ideals, and Sets are what prevented and still resist evolution into computation, operations, original measures, and ordinal tests.

    But because you’ve been indoctrinated by religion, philosophy, and moral reasoning into ‘doing it wrong’ – simply because doing it wrong is simpler and requires less knowledge, it’s harder for you to learn how to ‘do it right’.

    Everything we do: disambiguation into a system of measurement, by enumeration serialization and operationalization, producing ordinal measures, from which we produce tests by a series of ordinal measures.

    So, Instead, we test the entire spectrum of sex differences in cognition just as we test the entire spectrum of testimony, reciprocity, and demonstrated interests, and the hierarchy of ternary logic at physical scale to trifunctional behaviors at macro scale.

    So just as we have checklists for testimony(truth), reciprocity(morality), and demonstrated interests (facts), we have checklists for male and female differences – but the list is quite large, and this is only the first order of that list:

    Masculine: Supply: predator, systematizing, over time, physical(outcomes), empirical thinking, political, loyal, harming, productive status via accumulation of responsibility for capital (capitalizing).

    -versus-

    Feminine: Demand: prey, empathizing, in time, emotional(experiential), magical thinking, social, devoted, undermining, parasitic, status via accumulating irresponsibiilty for capital (hyperconsumption).

    Whenever you’re making a comparison between ‘left (feminine) and right (masculine) cognitive and moral biases, then you must run the entire list, lest you misapply causality.

    Fast Focused Predator over time vs Reactive General Prey in time is just the beginning of the sex differences in brain organization that we too often reduce to ‘reals vs feels’.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-28 13:59:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651949376602767362

  • (core) (sex differences) Corrective Measures Needed for ‘undergrads’. 😉 P-Law r

    (core) (sex differences)
    Corrective Measures Needed for ‘undergrads’. 😉

    P-Law requires we cognitively switch to the use of series (measures) rather than sets (ideals). So you can’t reduce everything to single test as (archaic) philosophical “set-morons” do. Mathiness, Verbalism, Ideals, and Sets are what prevented and still resist evolution into computation, operations, original measures, and ordinal tests.

    But because you’ve been indoctrinated by religion, philosophy, and moral reasoning into ‘doing it wrong’ – simply because doing it wrong is simpler and requires less knowledge, it’s harder for you to learn how to ‘do it right’.

    Everything we do: disambiguation into a system of measurement, by enumeration serialization and operationalization, producing ordinal measures, from which we produce tests by a series of ordinal measures.

    So, Instead, we test the entire spectrum of sex differences in cognition just as we test the entire spectrum of testimony, reciprocity, and demonstrated interests, and the hierarchy of ternary logic at physical scale to trifunctional behaviors at macro scale.

    So just as we have checklists for testimony(truth), reciprocity(morality), and demonstrated interests (facts), we have checklists for male and female differences – but the list is quite large, and this is only the first order of that list:

    Masculine: Supply: predator, systematizing, over time, physical(outcomes), empirical thinking, political, loyal, harming, productive status via accumulation of responsibility for capital (capitalizing).

    -versus-

    Feminine: Demand: prey, empathizing, in time, emotional(experiential), magical thinking, social, devoted, undermining, parasitic, status via accumulating irresponsibiilty for capital (hyperconsumption).

    Whenever you’re making a comparison between ‘left (feminine) and right (masculine) cognitive and moral biases, then you must run the entire list, lest you misapply causality.

    Fast Focused Predator over time vs Reactive General Prey in time is just the beginning of the sex differences in brain organization that we too often reduce to ‘reals vs feels’.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-28 13:59:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651949376405753860

  • (core) (sex differences) Corrective Measures Needed for ‘undergrads’. 😉 P-Law r

    (core) (sex differences)
    Corrective Measures Needed for ‘undergrads’. 😉

    P-Law requires we cognitively switch to the use of series (measures) rather than sets (ideals). So you can’t reduce everything to single test as (archaic) philosophical “set-morons” do. Mathiness, Verbalism, Ideals, and Sets are what prevented and still resist evolution into computation, operations, original measures, and ordinal tests.

    But because you’ve been indoctrinated by religion, philosophy, and moral reasoning into ‘doing it wrong’ – simply because doing it wrong is simpler and requires less knowledge, it’s harder for you to learn how to ‘do it right’.

    Everything we do: disambiguation into a system of measurement, by enumeration serialization and operationalization, producing ordinal measures, from which we produce tests by a series of ordinal measures.

    So, Instead, we test the entire spectrum of sex differences in cognition just as we test the entire spectrum of testimony, reciprocity, and demonstrated interests, and the hierarchy of ternary logic at physical scale to trifunctional behaviors at macro scale.

    So just as we have checklists for testimony(truth), reciprocity(morality), and demonstrated interests (facts), we have checklists for male and female differences – but the list is quite large, and this is only the first order of that list:

    Masculine: Supply: predator, systematizing, over time, physical(outcomes), empirical thinking, political, loyal, harming, productive status via accumulation of responsibility for capital (capitalizing).

    -versus-

    Feminine: Demand: prey, empathizing, in time, emotional(experiential), magical thinking, social, devoted, undermining, parasitic, status via accumulating irresponsibiilty for capital (hyperconsumption).

    Whenever you’re making a comparison between ‘left (feminine) and right (masculine) cognitive and moral biases, then you must run the entire list, lest you misapply causality.

    Fast Focused Predator in time vs Reactive General Prey in time is just the beginning of the sex differences in brain organization that we too often reduce to ‘reals vs feels’.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-28 13:59:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651944693884674052

  • THE ORIGINS OF BOAZIAN PSEUDOSCIENCE (I point out the origins of behavioral pseu

    THE ORIGINS OF BOAZIAN PSEUDOSCIENCE
    (I point out the origins of behavioral pseudoscience in the movements by Marx Boaz Freud Lysenko-Gould, Cantor-Bohr-Einstein, and Gramsci-Frankfurt neo-Marxist, and Lyotard, Baudrillard, Derrida Postmodern, and Steinem Friedan feminism, and Rez, Kelsen, Dwaorkin in legal sophistry. this note just reminds us of the relationships and motivations of Boaz. )

    Franz Boas, the father of race denialism, writing to the USSR’s official news propaganda organization, the TASS Agency, in 1941:

    “Our sympathies [regarding WW2] are entirely with the Soviets. Your conception of the equality of men regardless of race is a step forward in the history of mankind that we may well emulate.”

    Boas wrote to the USSR in 1936 to praise Lysenko, who denied natural selection and attacked genetics as a “bourgeois pseudoscience.” Lysenko’s influence contributed to the Great Famine in Communist China.

    Franz Boas was heavily influenced by his uncle Abraham Jacobi, a Communist revolutionary and a close personal friend of Marx and Engels. Boasian anthropology (“race is a social construct”), which dominates the West today, is quite literally a form of Marxism.

    Sources:
    https://t.co/JHPsCNibQE
    https://t.co/cYljEWuTxA
    https://t.co/wRNZNXoxJ9
    https://t.co/Cq3j5LLc1x

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-26 19:33:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651308441715998739

  • Stoicism is reducible to the sum total of the “Greek way”. The Greeks, like the

    Stoicism is reducible to the sum total of the “Greek way”. The Greeks, like the Romans, like the Atlantics, like the Americans, overexpanded, and in the absence of a ‘law’ (body of rules) for the ‘Greek > Roman > European > Anglosphere way, there is no means of intergenerational transfer or indoctrination sufficient to compensate for over expansion in the old world or ‘over-inclusion’ in the present age.

    In other words, not means of resistance to degradation, given that the european way is the most cognitively, psychologically, and emotionally costly group strategy ever invented by mankind, because it maximizes individual responsibility and accountability for the self, the private, and the common.

    So as usual, Christianity did provide a means for women and slaves and immigrants to obtain status and pretense of virtue and morality by ‘doing no harm’ instead of the Greek “contributing to the commons” (that insight should stick with you if you can manage it.).

    But that integration of women, slaves, immigrants, created a pathway for the formation of elites, and elite institutions that favored their (irresponsibility) interests over the aristocratic (responsibility) interests, and between overexpansion, decline in reproduction, over-immigration, and warfare against the barbarians, the aristocracy and the civilization collapsed, and the religion prevented the aristocratic restoration of the empire

    And the Christians set about destroying the arts, letters, schools, and killing or outcasting the philosophers ending the ‘greek way’ just like the marxist-to-woke purge of the academy, state, and media has occurred today.

    So for those reasons (a) we are too tolerant of the Marxists, the Jewish intellectuals, and the Muslims who come to Europe to undermine us as did the Jewish Christians before them. And too tolerant of those who assist them in buying into their sedition against our civilization. (b) the British stored the european nation state to the greek model, and restored greco empiricism in reason and law, and smith restored the ethics of peace through reciprocity (c) the Americans did a fair job of documenting this in the constitution but only a ‘fair’ job. There are about eight major holes in it that we need to fix (with my excruciating level of precision. 😉 ) (d) We are (the rest of the institute and I) documenting it as a strictly constructed scientific (from first principles) law so that we have a ‘bible’ of European civ that is inviolable across time and space.

    The remaining effort is to reform the natural law negative and the Christian love positiva into a reformation of the stoic method that can be taught as the equivalent of a non-false religion.

    If I live long enough. 😉

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-24 17:37:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1650554532705845248

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1650528465018388480

  • Stoicism is reducible to the sum total of the “Greek way”. The Greeks, like the

    Stoicism is reducible to the sum total of the “Greek way”. The Greeks, like the Romans, like the Atlantics, like the Americans, overexpanded, and in the absence of a ‘law’ (body of rules) for the ‘Greek > Roman > European > Anglosphere way, there is no means of intergenerational transfer or indoctrination sufficient to compensate for over expansion in the old world or ‘over-inclusion’ in the present age.

    In other words, not means of resistance to degradation, given that the european way is the most cognitively, psychologically, and emotionally costly group strategy ever invented by mankind, because it maximizes individual responsibility and accountability for the self, the private, and the common.

    So as usual, Christianity did provide a means for women and slaves and immigrants to obtain status and pretense of virtue and morality by ‘doing no harm’ instead of the Greek “contributing to the commons” (that insight should stick with you if you can manage it.).

    But that integration of women, slaves, immigrants, created a pathway for the formation of elites, and elite institutions that favored their (irresponsibility) interests over the aristocratic (responsibility) interests, and between overexpansion, decline in reproduction, over-immigration, and warfare against the barbarians, the aristocracy and the civilization collapsed, and the religion prevented the aristocratic restoration of the empire

    And the Christians set about destroying the arts, letters, schools, and killing or outcasting the philosophers ending the ‘greek way’ just like the marxist-to-woke purge of the academy, state, and media has occurred today.

    So for those reasons (a) we are too tolerant of the Marxists, the Jewish intellectuals, and the Muslims who come to Europe to undermine us as did the Jewish Christians before them. And too tolerant of those who assist them in buying into their sedition against our civilization. (b) the British stored the european nation state to the greek model, and restored greco empiricism in reason and law, and smith restored the ethics of peace through reciprocity (c) the Americans did a fair job of documenting this in the constitution but only a ‘fair’ job. There are about eight major holes in it that we need to fix (with my excruciating level of precision. 😉 ) (d) We are (the rest of the institute and I) documenting it as a strictly constructed scientific (from first principles) law so that we have a ‘bible’ of European civ that is inviolable across time and space.

    The remaining effort is to reform the natural law negative and the Christian love positiva into a reformation of the stoic method that can be taught as the equivalent of a non-false religion.

    If I live long enough. 😉

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @anderstegn @themaxstoic

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-24 17:37:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1650554532483543068

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1650528465018388480

  • THE EXHAUSTION OF ADAPTATION – AND OUR END I’ve failed to keep alive a central c

    THE EXHAUSTION OF ADAPTATION – AND OUR END
    I’ve failed to keep alive a central cause of the present intersexual conflict generated by the marxist-pomo-feminist-woke sequence of undermining our civilization, destroying our politics, our families, and our dating, mating, and rates of reproduction.

    That’s cause is the rate of adaptation to others beginning at puberty and ending at full maturity in our twenties.

    So the combination of extending childhood via school, then college or university, then finally, a decade late, ‘apprenticeship’ in our twenties, during which we finally learn to socialize and cooperate in competing in a market civilization, pay down the indulgence of our educations, satiate the accumulated status seeking desires of consumption, and endure the resulting sexual marketplace we call ‘dating’, consumes the entirety of our incentive to adapt to one another, and form mutual bonds through shared values and the pursuit of shared ambitions, and leaves us islands of selfishness unwilling and biologically unable to exchange the one thing necessary for the formation of a long term mating bond necessary in turn for durable family formation: the exchange of placing one another’s interests ahead of our own whenever possible, to capitalize the relationship, the assets of it, the children from it, the culture and civilization that result from it, and prosperity of the generations yet to come.

    Instead we see women avoiding any possible responsibiity for the commons in favor of maximizing personal hyperconsumption especially of attention, and men desirous of resposibilty for the commons in favor of maximizing intergenerational capital and the status that results – but who are unable to achieve it.

    We are literally dying from a sequence of optimistic follies of the postwar fantasy of the end of scarcity, and therefore the end of responsibility, and therefore the end of history.

    And it was the worst religion ever invented by man. At least the previous lies of previous religions only promised such goods after death.

    We don’t need war plague, solar radiation, volcanic eruption, or asteroidal collision to end civilization. We only need irresponsibility.

    And the failure of good men to act to end that irresponsibility.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-20 20:17:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1649145282641231879