(FB 1550108977 Timestamp) OF METAPHYSICS, TRUST, AND LYING. — Claire Rae Randall — ‘Cogito ergo sum’ ~ Rene Descartes. ‘I think, therefore I exist’. The foundational statement of modern metaphysical philosophy. Some say it is a lie because it examines metaphysics. Can you prove that to be the case? (CURTD: you can’t prove a positive, only say whether it is tautological(meaningless), consistent(possible), or inconsistent (false). ). — Claire Rae Randall — The existence of God in this one is a sidetrack. To say that one thinks, or is aware, demonstrates that at least something, the ‘thinker’, or the experience, exists. Something is happening, something is experiencing, which clearly means that something exists. (CURTD: Short version: 1 – the criteria for existence is persistence in time. 2 – awareness of persistence requires memory 4 – experience is recreated from intermixture of sensation, incentive(‘focus’) and memory. 5 – experience of stimuli and memory is continuous recursive, reconstructive and (very) faulty 6 – reason tests experience 7 – action tests reason 8 – memory recalls the result of tests – and I learn. So the more correct answer is: “I remember, and remember remembering and therefore ‘I’ exist, because ‘I’ consist of my memories, and the body that allows me to reconstruct, experience, reason, and act upon them, therefore testing my existence. Conversely, I will cease to exist when my body will no longer sustain the continuous recursive production of experience using sense, memory, cognition, reason, and action.” This, is the short version, but operationally answers the question. There was no hard problem of cognition. there was no mind body problem. Just the continuous reaction of the old, middle and new brain by the ‘persistence of vision’ of normal chemical reactions over multiple cycles of sense-perception. ) It is not a truism, because that would mean that ‘To exist is to think’, which is clearly not the case. Even ‘I exist, therefore I think’ is not a necessary inference, as existence and thinking are not identical. The inference in Descartes is clearly an ‘If A then B’, but not ‘If B then A’. A tautology is reversible, an inference is not. I was mostly hoping that Curt Doolittle would pick up on this since he claims that all metaphysical investigation is a lie, which this statement from Descartes demonstrates to be a false statement. ( I do not make that statement. I make the statement that (a) operations consist of measurements in time that are falsifiable, subjectively testiable, and testifiable, (b) truth consists and must consist of testimony (promise), (c) what we call science consists of testimony of operations beyond the frail limits of human perception and warranty of due diligence of having done so, (d) operations are the most parsimonious and testable paradigms, (e) there are only so many grammars of paradigms, and they very from the most deflationary to the descriptive to the inflationary to the conflationary to the fictionalisms, (f) hierarchies of paradigms (networks of categories, relations and values) which are dependent upon the fictionalisms demonstrate an absence of knowledge to make truth (testimony) claims. And (g) that if it is possible to discover a motive for the pretense of knowledge (deceit), then we CAN personally, and MUST publicly (to insure others) err on the side of the attempted deceit (fraud) to defend ourselves other and the commons from ignorance, error, fraud and deceit. And it is up to the individual to defend himself from prosecution for attempted deceit. ) The next stage of investigation is the simple question ‘Is an error a lie?’ Clearly not, since a lie is a false statement, knowingly made, while an error is a false statement made unknowingly. (CURTD: This is the difference you see… 1) The optimistic test of TRUST of EQUALS which is to presume ignorance and error. 2) The practical test of DOUBT of UNEQUALS is to presume failure of due diligence. 3) The pessimistic PROSECUTION of an ENEMY is ignorance error, bias and deceit. Notice the difference between operations and sets. Notice how I use series rather than ideals Note how I use a supply demand curve rather than ideal types. In other words, plato and descartes were still using theological and ideal language. They were not using ‘real’ language: operations and testimony deflated into series, and tested by using supply and demand, which make conflation and inference of fallacies impossible. ) So, even in the event that Descartes was making a false assertion, if he did it with an honest intention, and wasn’t aware of any contradictions in his reasoning, then he may not have been ‘telling the truth’, but he certainly wasn’t lying. (CURTD: But someone who makes a descartes error today is. Because today we are failing to do due diligence. ) — Claire Rae Randall — I’m concerned that you’re making it more of a problem than it needs to be. All I’m seeking to establish is that investigation into consciousness and underlying realities is a legitimate endeavour and does not necessarily involve lying. Really, it’s that simple. (CURTD: There is only one means of doing so and that is science (operational language). Because science is the only means of doing so without failing a test of due diligence and therefore lying. If you use another means and the means is fictionalism, and a the fictionalism provides incentive, then you are in fact lying, whether conscious of it nor not. We lack agency. We negotiate on part of our genes unconsciously. We are forever lacking agency, for this reason. We can therefore: Lie by design; or Lie by failure of due diligence. (convenience) Because to lie mens to testify. And to testify means performing due diligence. All truth claims are in fact promises. (testimony) Because there is no ‘truth’ it’s not possible. Instead, wea either speak truthfully or not. And to speak truthfully requires due diligence against ignorance, error, bias deceit, and malincentive. ) You often seem to conflate things that are not within the parameters of what I consider to be ‘Metaphysics’ with the subject itself. And some things cannot be materially tested, but can be examined with language and logic so as to find out what that yields us. (CURTD: Metaphysics “after the physics” If metaphysics consist of something other than cognitive science then please tell me how. I understand metaphysics to consist of is almost entirely of experiments in the construction of paradigms of internally constant relations but incompatible external constant relations. In other words I cannot find any discourse on metaphysics that is not ‘word play’, entertainment, and an attempt to deceive, escape, or defraud. Conversely, we know many paradigmatic systems of education and transfer of meaning. Much of philosophy consists of fictional experiential literature whose effects are caused by stimulation using vocabulary to induce free association of imprecise and highly loaded terms. sort of a drug for nerds. Just like poetry. or comedy. or fictional literature. ) I certainly have little truck with postmodernism (my forthcoming book is almost a non stop attack on the vile plague) and am no advocate of supernatural authoritarianism, since if ‘supernatural’ beings exist (I’m not keen on the term ‘supernatural’) then they should abide within terms of some law and don’t need to be authoritarian. About rationalism, well I don’t want to constrain things within artificial limits, but at the same time we do need to be rational. (CURTD: dream, daydream, free association, think, reason, rationalism, calculation, computation. This spectrum is available to us. With increasing demands on short term memory and rigidity of categories. rational(choice), rational (logical) ) — Claire Rae Randall — I’m anxious not to confuse Metaphysics and Theology. If someone thinks that Metaphysical inquiry is in some way dependent on Theological assumptions then they are making a mistake. ( CURTD: No. Metaphysics gives license to theology. and all fictionalisms. Because it claims (falsey) that there is suspect causal relation between perception and reality. Only outside of human scale. ) Also, lying is knowingly telling a falsehood. Examining ideas and establishing postulates which have not been proven false is not lying. ( CURTD: This is demonstrably not true since most people are lie-carriers and repeat lies simply because it is in their self interest to repeat lies, because they have not done due diligence to insure they are not lying in matters of self interest. We do not know whether you lie by intent or not. We only know you tell a lie by stating a falsehood that you cannot testify to. Your intention not do perform due diligence (via negativa) is the only test we have of whether you lie by intent, or by incentive. (excuse) Baiting in to moral hazard is how ((()))) we were destroyed by jews (christians), marxist, postmoderns. If we raise the standard from high trust to low trust we end their ability to lie while claiming just thinking. In other words you are to blame whether you intend to state a falsehood or not. So stop letting your cultural ‘metaphysical assumption of the necessity of high trust’ make you a sucker like the rest of our people. 😉 Liars take advantage of us. Because we don’t do due diligence because we trust – because we didn’t evolve lying – they did. and we are vulnerable to it because of our trust. Stop being illogical. Stop trusting rather than doing due diligence. ) — Claire Rae Randall — Ok. I need to solve this problem for a lot of people so I’m going to move this to the main page and we’ll work through it.
Form: Full Essay
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553015139 Timestamp) ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF NEW EUROPEAN ZONE —“Curt, Can you please write a post on the economic feasibility of banning imports outside of a New European zone? I want to see what the king of the hill process does to the proposal on page 67 of NZM”— Oliver New European Zone? I assume that means Australia, NZ, USA, Canada, Europe, Eastern Europe, Russia, (But South America?, India?). (Short version: easy for everyone except aussie/nz who pay the distance cost. But its easy to do, yes.) I’m not going to go into world balances of trade between the parties. It would take me all day to write this post. And I’m going to state the obvious that other countries would retaliate. But if you look at the list at the end of this post you will rapidly see that the USA and canada can easily survive it. The outliers are NZ and Aussies who are for all intents and purposes, client states of asia. Cutting out africa (minerals), the middle east(oil), and asia(manufacturing capacity) is entirely possible. and the result would largely be transfer of japanese and chinese manufacturing capacity to Germany and the USA, and the strategic transfer of the Japanese relationship to Asia, and an axis of japan and south korea that might perhaps ally with india. It is hard to choose whether to exclude or include india and south america, both of which are european admixtures. Russia is also integrated with (northern) Kazakhstan and imports 1/10th of its oil. Russia India and China have large trade relationships. The west would have to subsidize russian military production by buying their equipment as a replacement for the asian and middle eastern markets. China wold be able to build her military technology by finding ready markets middle eastern, african, and asian realms. Russia would roughly exchange its role as an asian trade power for the role of the middle east and asia in supplying oil and resources. And so it is russia that is the ‘power position’ in any such negotiation, and putting her in this position of power would tempt russian nature, but restore her to world power status which she desires. However russia cannot compete as a world power with her population and economy; asia as an interest in reclaiming russian territory and resources. Her interest given her nature might be swiss neutrality. We would have to buy russian involvement which would require american military exit from europe and a general comfort on the part of eastern europeans that is hard to imagine. THE ALTERNATIVE 1 Limit trade to raw materials and food, and autarky on goods produced by transformation of them. This is the optimum balance of providing world trade in territorial differences but ameliorating differences in degrees of development of human capital by eliminating wage arbitrage (differences in cost of living and purchasing power). THE ALTERNATIVE 2 The Anglosphere Alternative (restoration of the british empire). is somewhat easier to pull off since we are already autarkic with only Australian and NZ the outliers. Australia: ***China 32.2%, ***Japan 15.9%, ***South Korea 7.1%, US 5.4%, ***India 4.2% (2015) New Zealand: ***China: US$9.6 billion (24.9% of New Zealandâs total exports) Australia: $5.7 billion (14.8%) United States: $3.7 billion (9.6%) ***Japan: $2.4 billion (6.3%) ***South Korea: $1.2 billion (3.1%) United Kingdom: $1 billion (2.7%) ***Singapore: $832.5 million (2.2%) ***Taiwan: $831.8 million (2.2%) ***Hong Kong: $761.5 million (2%) ***Malaysia: $702.5 million (1.8%) ***Indonesia: $675.8 million (1.8%) ***Thailand: $638.2 million (1.7%) Netherlands: $586 million (1.5%) Germany: $579 million (1.5%) ***United Arab Emirates: $533.8 million (1.4%) Canada: United States: US$337.8 billion (75.1% of total Canadian exports) ***China: $21.3 billion (4.7%) United Kingdom: $12.6 billion (2.8%) ***Japan: $10 billion (2.2%) Mexico: $6.3 billion (1.4%) South Korea: $4.5 billion (1%) Germany: $3.7 billion (0.8%) Netherlands: $3.7 billion (0.8%) ***India: $3.2 billion (0.7%) ***Hong Kong: $3 billion (0.7%) Belgium: $2.8 billion (0.6%) France: $2.6 billion (0.6%) Italy: $2.3 billion (0.5%) Norway: $1.9 billion (0.4%) ***Brazil: $1.7 billion (0.4%) America: Canada: US$298.7 billion (18% of total US exports) ***Mexico: $265 billion (15.9%) ***China: $120.3 billion (7.2%) ***Japan: $75 billion (4.5%) United Kingdom: $66.2 billion (4%) Germany: $57.7 billion (3.5%) ***South Korea: $56.3 billion (3.4%) Netherlands: $49.4 billion (3%) ***Brazil: $39.5 billion (2.4%) Hong Kong: $37.5 billion (2.3%) France: $37.4 billion (2.2%) ***Singapore: $33.1 billion (2%) ***India: $33.1 billion (2%) Belgium: $31.4 billion (1.9%) ***Taiwan: $30.2 billion (1.8%) UK: United States: US$64.4 billion (13.3% of total UK exports) Germany: $47 billion (9.7%) Netherlands: $33.3 billion (6.9%) France: $31.8 billion (6.6%) Ireland: $28.3 billion (5.9%) ***China: $27.5 billion (5.7%) Switzerland: $25.4 billion (5.2%) Belgium: $19.1 billion (4%) Italy: $14.1 billion (2.9%) Spain: $13.9 billion (2.9%) ***Hong Kong: $10.3 billion (2.1%) ***United Arab Emirates: $10 billion (2.1%) ***Turkey: $9.5 billion (2%) ***Japan: $8.3 billion (1.7%) ***South Korea: $7.8 billion (1.6%) Ireland: United States: US$46 billion (27.9% of total Irish exports) Belgium: $21.7 billion (13.2%) United Kingdom: $18.7 billion (11.4%) Germany: $12.2 billion (7.4%) Netherlands: $9 billion (5.4%) Switzerland: $7.7 billion (4.6%) France: $6.2 billion (3.8%) China: $5.4 billion (3.3%) Japan: $4.6 billion (2.8%) Italy: $4.3 billion (2.6%) Spain: $3 billion (1.8%) ***Mexico: $1.7 billion (1%) Canada: $1.6 billion (1%) Poland: $1.4 billion (0.8%) Sweden: $1.1 billion (0.7%) LATIN BLOCK France: (FRANCE IS, LIKE THE USA, AUTARKIC) Germany: US$83.3 billion (14.7% of total French exports) United States: $45.3 billion (8%) Spain: $44.3 billion (7.8%) Italy: $42.8 billion (7.5%) Belgium: $40.4 billion (7.1%) United Kingdom: $38.6 billion (6.8%) ***China: $24.5 billion (4.3%) Netherlands: $20.9 billion (3.7%) Switzerland: $18.9 billion (3.3%) Poland: $11.7 billion (2.1%) ***Singapore: $9.7 billion (1.7%) ***Japan: $7.8 billion (1.4%) ***Hong Kong: $7.3 billion (1.3%) ***Turkey: $7.1 billion (1.2%) ***India: $6.5 billion (1.1%) Spain France: US$48.5 billion (15.1% of total Spanish exports) Germany: $36.1 billion (11.3%) Italy: $25.1 billion (7.8%) Portugal: $22.6 billion (7.1%) United Kingdom: $22 billion (6.9%) United States: $14.1 billion (4.4%) Netherlands: $10.8 billion (3.4%) Belgium: $9.6 billion (3%) Morocco: $9 billion (2.8%) ***China: $7.1 billion (2.2%) Poland: $6.5 billion (2%) Turkey: $6.5 billion (2%) Mexico: $5.2 billion (1.6%) Switzerland: $4.7 billion (1.5%) Romania: $3.2 billion (1%) Portugal Spain: US$17.4 billion (25.3% of total Portuguese exports) France: $8.7 billion (12.7%) Germany: $7.9 billion (11.5%) United Kingdom: $4.3 billion (6.3%) United States: $3.4 billion (5%) Italy: $2.9 billion (4.3%) Netherlands: $2.6 billion (3.8%) Angola: $1.8 billion (2.6%) Belgium: $1.6 billion (2.3%) Brazil: $957.5 million (1.4%) Poland: $897.2 million (1.3%) ***Morocco: $819.4 million (1.2%) China: $777.6 million (1.1%) Sweden: $686.8 million (1%) Switzerland: $681.6 million (1%) ITALY: Germany: US$62.9 billion (12.4% of total Italian exports) France: $51.9 billion (10.3%) United States: $45.8 billion (9%) Spain: $26.1 billion (5.2%) United Kingdom: $26 billion (5.1%) Switzerland: $23.4 billion (4.6%) ***China: $15.3 billion (3%) Belgium: $15.2 billion (3%) Poland: $14.2 billion (2.8%) Netherlands: $11.8 billion (2.3%) ***Turkey: $11.4 billion (2.3%) Austria: $10.7 billion (2.1%) Russia: $9 billion (1.8%) Romania: $8.2 billion (1.6%) ***Japan: $7.4 billion (1.5%) GERMAN BLOCK Netherlands Germany: US$146.8 billion (22.5% of total Dutch exports) Belgium: $68.3 billion (10.5%) United Kingdom: $56.6 billion (8.7%) France: $55.3 billion (8.5%) Italy: $25.7 billion (3.9%) United States: $22.7 billion (3.5%) Spain: $19.9 billion (3.1%) Poland: $15.6 billion (2.4%) Sweden: $14.7 billion (2.2%) ***China: $13.5 billion (2.1%) Czech Republic: $11.2 billion (1.7%) Austria: $8.6 billion (1.3%) Switzerland: $7.9 billion (1.2%) Denmark: $7.8 billion (1.2%) ***Turkey: $7.2 billion (1.1%) Belglum Germany: US$70.7 billion (16.5% of total Belgian exports) France: $63.8 billion (14.9%) Netherlands: $51.4 billion (12%) United Kingdom: $36 billion (8.4%) Italy: $20.9 billion (4.9%) United States: $20.6 billion (4.8%) Spain: $11.8 billion (2.8%) Poland: $9.2 billion (2.1%) ***India: $8.9 billion (2.1%) ***China: $8.9 billion (2.1%) Sweden: $7.5 billion (1.7%) Switzerland: $7 billion (1.6%) Luxembourg: $6.4 billion (1.5%) ***Turkey: $5.8 billion (1.4%) Russia: $4.4 billion (1%) Over three-quarters (77.1%) of Belgian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners. Germany: United States: US$134 billion (8.6% of total German exports) France: $124.4 billion (8%) ***China: $109.9 billion (7.1%) Netherlands: $99.8 billion (6.4%) United Kingdom: $96.8 billion (6.2%) Italy: $82.6 billion (5.3%) Austria: $75.2 billion (4.8%) Poland: $74.7 billion (4.8%) Switzerland: $64.3 billion (4.1%) Spain: $52.4 billion (3.4%) Belgium: $52.3 billion (3.4%) Czech Republic: $51.8 billion (3.3%) Sweden: $31.1 billion (2%) Hungary: $31 billion (2%) Russia: $30.6 billion (2%) Austria Germany: US$48.7 billion (29.0% of total Austrian exports) United States: $10.3 billion (6.1%) Italy: $10.2 billion (6.1%) Switzerland: $8.5 billion (5.1%) Slovakia: $8.1 billion (4.8%) France: $7.9 billion (4.7%) Czech Republic: $5.9 billion (3.5%) Hungary: $5.5 billion (3.3%) Poland: $5.2 billion (3.1%) ***China: $4.4 billion (2.6%) United Kingdom: $4.4 billion (2.6%) Slovenia: $3.2 billion (1.9%) Netherlands: $2.9 billion (1.7%) Romania: $2.7 billion (1.6%) Spain: $2.7 billion (1.6%) Over three-quarters (77.6%) of Austrian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners. Denmark: Germany: US$15.6 billion (14.5% of total Danish exports) Sweden: $11.3 billion (10.5%) United Kingdom: $6.7 billion (6.2%) Norway: $6.3 billion (5.9%) United States: $4.7 billion (4.4%) Netherlands: $4.6 billion (4.3%) France: $3.3 billion (3.1%) ***China: $3.2 billion (2.9%) Poland: $3 billion (2.8%) Italy: $2.4 billion (2.2%) Finland: $2 billion (1.9%) Spain: $1.9 billion (1.8%) Belgium: $1.7 billion (1.6%) ***Japan: $1.5 billion (1.4%) Australia: $959.3 million (0.9%) Sweden Germany: US$16.4 billion (10.7% of total Swedish exports) Norway: $15.5 billion (10.1%) Finland: $10.5 billion (6.9%) Denmark: $10.4 billion (6.8%) United States: $10.1 billion (6.6%) United Kingdom: $9.3 billion (6.1%) Netherlands: $8.3 billion (5.4%) ***China: $6.8 billion (4.4%) Belgium: $6.5 billion (4.3%) France: $6.3 billion (4.1%) Poland: $4.6 billion (3%) Italy: $4 billion (2.6%) Spain: $2.9 billion (1.9%) ***Japan: $2.2 billion (1.5%) Russia: $2.1 billion (1.4%) Norway: United Kingdom: US$26.5 billion (21.6% of Norwayâs total exports) Germany: $19.7 billion (16%) Netherlands: $13.1 billion (10.7%) Sweden: $8.2 billion (6.7%) France: $8.2 billion (6.7%) Belgium: $6.4 billion (5.2%) Denmark: $5.8 billion (4.7%) United States: $5.7 billion (4.7%) Poland: $2.8 billion (2.3%) ***China: $2.6 billion (2.1%) Spain: $2.2 billion (1.8%) Finland: $2 billion (1.6%) Italy: $1.6 billion (1.3%) ***Japan: $1.4 billion (1.2%) ***South Korea: $1.4 billion (1.1%) Finland: Germany: US$9.3 billion (13.7% of total Finnish exports) Sweden: $6.3 billion (9.3%) Netherlands: $4.4 billion (6.5%) United States: $4.4 billion (6.4%) Russia: $3.7 billion (5.5%) ***China: $3.7 billion (5.4%) United Kingdom: $2.8 billion (4.2%) Belgium: $2.1 billion (3.1%) France: $2 billion (3%) Estonia: $1.9 billion (2.8%) Norway: $1.6 billion (2.4%) Poland: $1.6 billion (2.4%) Italy: $1.5 billion (2.2%) ***Japan: $1.1 billion (1.7%) Spain: $1.1 billion (1.6%) Lithuania Russia: US$4.7 billion (14% of total Lithuanian exports) Latvia: $3.2 billion (9.7%) Poland: $2.7 billion (8.2%) Germany: $2.5 billion (7.4%) United States: $1.7 billion (5.2%) Estonia: $1.7 billion (5%) Sweden: $1.6 billion (4.9%) Belarus: $1.3 billion (3.8%) United Kingdom: $1.3 billion (3.8%) Netherlands: $1.1 billion (3.3%) Ukraine: $1 billion (3.1%) Norway: $933.8 million (2.8%) France: $837 million (2.5%) Denmark: $833.9 million (2.5%) Italy: $727.3 million (2.2%) INTERMARIUM BLOCK Poland: Germany: US$63.3 billion (27.4% of total Polish exports) Czech Republic: $14.8 billion (6.4%) United Kingdom: $14.7 billion (6.4%) France: $12.9 billion (5.6%) Italy: $11.3 billion (4.9%) Netherlands: $10.1 billion (4.4%) Russia: $7 billion (3%) Sweden: $6.4 billion (2.8%) Spain: $6.2 billion (2.7%) United States: $6.2 billion (2.7%) Hungary: $6.1 billion (2.6%) Slovakia: $5.8 billion (2.5%) Belgium: $5.1 billion (2.2%) Ukraine: $4.8 billion (2.1%) Austria: $4.4 billion (1.9%) Ukraine Russia: US$3.9 billion (9.1% of total Ukrainian exports) Poland: $2.7 billion (6.3%) ***Turkey: $2.5 billion (5.8%) Italy: $2.5 billion (5.7%) ***India: $2.2 billion (5.1%) ***China: $2.1 billion (4.9%) ***Egypt: $1.8 billion (4.2%) Germany: $1.8 billion (4%) Netherlands: $1.7 billion (3.9%) Hungary: $1.3 billion (3.1%) Spain: $1.3 billion (2.9%) Belarus: $1.1 billion (2.6%) Romania: $844.2 million (1.94%) United States: $834 million (1.92%) Czech Republic: $715.4 million (1.6%) Almost two-thirds (63.1%) of Ukrainian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trading partners. Slovakia Germany: US$17.5 billion (20.7% of total Slovak exports) Czech Republic: $9.8 billion (11.6%) Poland: $6.5 billion (7.7%) France: $5.3 billion (6.3%) Italy: $5.1 billion (6.1%) United Kingdom: $5.1 billion (6%) Hungary: $5.1 billion (6%) Austria: $5.1 billion (6%) Spain: $2.5 billion (2.9%) United States: $2.3 billion (2.7%) Netherlands: $2.2 billion (2.6%) Romania: $2.1 billion (2.5%) Russia: $1.8 billion (2.1%) China: $1.4 billion (1.6%) Switzerland: $1.3 billion (1.6%) Romania Germany: US$16.2 billion (22.9% of total Romanian exports) Italy: $7.9 billion (11.1%) France: $4.8 billion (6.7%) Hungary: $3.3 billion (4.7%) United Kingdom: $2.9 billion (4.1%) Bulgaria: $2.34 billion (3.3%) Turkey: $2.33 billion (3.3%) Poland: $2.2 billion (3.1%) Spain: $2.1 billion (3%) Czech Republic: $2 billion (2.9%) Netherlands: $1.8 billion (2.6%) Austria: $1.6 billion (2.3%) Belgium: $1.4 billion (2%) Russia: $1.25 billion (1.8%) Slovakia: $1.21 billion (1.7%) Czech Republic: Germany: US$65.2 billion (32.2% of total Czechian exports) Slovakia: $15.2 billion (7.5%) Poland: $12.2 billion (6%) France: $10.2 billion (5.1%) United Kingdom: $9.5 billion (4.7%) Austria: $9 billion (4.4%) Italy: $7.8 billion (3.9%) Netherlands: $7.5 billion (3.7%) Spain: $6 billion (3%) Hungary: $6 billion (3%) Belgium: $4.3 billion (2.1%) Russia: $4.1 billion (2%) United States: $4.1 billion (2%) Sweden: $3.5 billion (1.7%) Romania: $3 billion (1.5%) Over four-fifths (82.9%) of Czechian exports in 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners. RUSSIAN IMPERIAL BLOCK Russia: ***China: US$56 billion (12.5% of total Russian exports) Netherlands: $43.5 billion (9.7%) Germany: $34.1 billion (7.6%) Belarus: $21.8 billion (4.9%) ***Turkey: $21.3 billion (4.8%) ***South Korea: $17.8 billion (4%) Poland: $16.5 billion (3.7%) Italy: $16.4 billion (3.7%) Kazakhstan: $12.9 billion (2.9%) United States: $12.5 billion (2.8%) ***Japan: $12.5 billion (2.8%) Finland: $11.4 billion (2.5%) United Kingdom: $9.8 billion (2.2%) Ukraine: $9.5 billion (2.1%) Belgium: $9.2 billion (2%) Belarus Russia: US$12.9 billion (38.5% of total Belarusian exports) Ukraine: $4.1 billion (12.1%) United Kingdom: $3.1 billion (9.2%) Germany: $1.4 billion (4.3%) Netherlands: $1.4 billion (4.3%) Poland: $1.3 billion (4%) Lithuania: $1.2 billion (3.4%) Kazakhstan: $780.1 million (2.3%) Brazil: $585.1 million (1.7%) Latvia: $471.9 million (1.4%) China: $467.9 million (1.4%) India: $299 million (0.9%) United States: $274.3 million (0.8%) Indonesia: $227.4 million (0.7%) Azerbaijan: $223.8 million (0.7%) Approaching nine-tenths (85.8%) of Belarusian exports in 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners. Georgia: Russia: US$400.8 million (15.8% of Georgiaâs total exports) Bulgaria: $250 million (9.8%) Turkey: $226.3 million (8.9%) China: $181.3 million (7.1%) Azerbaijan: $165.8 million (6.5%) United States: $157.8 million (6.2%) Ukraine: $119.1 million (4.7%) Armenia: $105.6 million (4.2%) Spain: $65.8 million (2.6%) Switzerland: $62.5 million (2.5%) Iran: $60.6 million (2.4%) Uzbekistan: $58.7 million (2.3%) Romania: $56.1 million (2.2%) Germany: $47 million (1.9%) France: $43.3 million (1.7%) Almost four-fifths (78.8%) of Georgian exports during 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners. OLD EUROPE Greece Italy: US$4.1 billion (10.3% of total Greek exports) Germany: $2.5 billion (6.4%) Turkey: $2.4 billion (6.1%) Cyprus: $2.2 billion (5.7%) Bulgaria: $1.8 billion (4.5%) Lebanon: $1.8 billion (4.5%) United States: $1.6 billion (4.1%) United Kingdom: $1.4 billion (3.6%) Egypt: $1.4 billion (3.5%) Spain: $1.3 billion (3.3%) France: $1.2 billion (3%) Romania: $1.1 billion (2.9%) China: $1.1 billion (2.7%) Macedonia: $939.7 million (2.4%) Saudi Arabia: $850.4 million (2.2%) Almost two-thirds (65.1%) of Greek exports in 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners. Bulgaria Germany: US$3.6 billion (13.6% of total Bulgarian exports) Italy: $2.4 billion (9.2%) Romania: $2.3 billion (8.8%) Turkey: $2.1 billion (8%) Greece: $1.8 billion (7%) France: $1.2 billion (4.5%) Spain: $733.1 million (2.8%) Belgium: $715.1 million (2.7%) Netherlands: $706.3 million (2.7%) United Kingdom: $656.3 million (2.5%) Poland: $648.2 million (2.5%) Austria: $507.5 million (1.9%) Serbia: $494.9 million (1.9%) China: $481.2 million (1.8%) Czech Republic: $445.3 million (1.7%) Almost three-quarters (71.8%) of Bulgarian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners. (apologies to the rest)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553088531 Timestamp) THE NATURAL LAW ON THE SEXES, HOMOSEXUALITY, GAY MARRIAGE, PEDOPHILIA (but not incest) (repost from March 2018) (Note: I write using essay (discussion), argument, and law forms. This is argument form. The law form would include slightly more rigorous outlining, dimensional tests, limits, restitutions and punishments. But the argument would not change.) —“Curt: How should the (ideal) relationship between homosexuals and society exist or be constructed, to make homosexuals experience of society be the best it can be, while also making society’s experience of homosexuals be the best it can be? There are a lot of mixed messages out there… and you actually make sense and can justify why you make sense. I would appreciate your comment.”— Ok, Here is a rough outline of the argument in natural law: GIVEN 1) As far as I know homosexuality is a non-rare in utero developmental disorder. I suspect this current scientific hypothesis to survive – although we might discover the cause is or is not an immune system reaction to testosterone (which it appears to be), and we may discover that it can be limited by natal treatments in the future – it does run in families. 2) If you read enough of my work, you’ll encounter the hypothesis that humans are not only able to adapt intellectually and emotionally to changes but that we can create very different distributions of traits in populations using very small variations in endocrine expression. We can express these by stresses and by selection. The male-vs female physical, and male-vs-female reward systems, and male vs female brain structures included in those distributions. 3) It is unclear whether or not the ability to produce homosexuals of either gender is a necessary consequence of our ability to produce those distributions. And secondly, whether or not the result is harmful or not. (apparently not). the reason being that there is greater value in productivity in service of reproduction than reproduction. 4) It is unclear how much of homosexuality is produced in utero, in early development, and in late development. My understanding at present, is that many sexual identity disorders can occur during development without sufficient physical exercise, and sufficient role play by either gender. (And that is before we account for the hormones in the modern chemical environment.) AND WHEREAS That we incrementally demonstrate our fitness (non parasitism, and productive contribution) by: 1) Forgoing crimes both private and public. 2) Demonstrate payment for the franchise by continuous military/militial/sheriff service. 3) Demonstrating worthiness by self sufficiency by productive contribution, thereby forgoing free riding and parasitism 4) Demonstrate worthiness to the intergenerational polity by marriage and family and the support thereof. 5) Demonstrate worthiness to productivity by the voluntary organization of business and industry. 7) Demonstrate worthiness to the polity by organization of the finance, industry, business, trade, and labor in a territory. 8) Demonstrate worthiness by the correct adjudication of disputes between in and out group members under the natural law of reciprocity. AND WHEREAS 1) That the family is the first demonstration of organizational capacity upon which the intergenerational family is dependent. 2) That families are a costly but necessary contribution to the family, clan, tribe, nation, and polity. 3) That families must work tirelessly to insulate generations from consumptive and hedonistic interests and behaviors. 4) That individuals who do not serve, do not produce families, do not produce businesses or industries, do not manage territories, or do not adjudicate differences under the natural law of property, are at best not harmful, and if engaged in criminal or free riding or parasitic activities are a a dead weight loss to the family, clan, tribe, nation, and polity. THEREFORE 1) Homosexuality is a birth defect, and not voluntary. Women are less sexually dedicated than males. Trauma in women especially can cause homosexuality at any point in life. 2) Anything that occurs between adults in private is a voluntary exchange between them and nothing else. 3) Anything that occurs in public (speech/sound, sight/display, or behavior/action) imposes an involuntary cost upon others. 4) Any speech, display, or action that is contrary to the preservation of the intergenerational investment in the commons, and in particular conspicuous hedonism or conspicuous consumption is damaging to the informational commons, and damaging to those who pay higher costs within it. 5) Marriage is a contract for corporation between a man, a woman, and the polity, for the intergeneration production of offspring, and reciprocal care, and reciprocal insurance. However, this contract consists almost entirely of (a)a transfer of all personal property to community property, (c) a reciprocal grant of power of attorney. (d) reciprocal ownership of offspring until the age of maturity. (e) an implied but unenforced insurance against hardship, infirmity, and old age. This corporation dramatically reduces the cost of household production and maintenance. Without this relationship household costs rise disproportionately and therefore standards of living drop accordingly. (as we have seen) 6) Natural Reproduction and parenting by individual homosexuals by whatever means, and by pairs of homosexuals by whatever means, is difficult to argue with, however any suggestion or influence by such parents that their children’s gender is flexible, that male and female minds and bodies are not different, and that male and female roles in family and society are not necessary, must be prosecuted as a developmental crime on the scale of any other child abuse or torture. 7) Public displays of affection in furtherance of paying the high cost of reproductive persistence, training an intergenerational family, and ensuring that families can produce intra and intergenerational insurance of one another rewards those that so contribute. 8) Public displays of non-reproductive affection shall be limited to those that are demonstrated between heterosexual members of the same sex. 9) Under no condition shall heterosexual and homosexual males be forced into one another’s company. Homosexual males are unfit for military participation by virtue of a birth defect that may hinder trust. 10) Prosecution of homosexual hedonism in any public form shall be vigorous such that it is entirely suppressed. (ie: no more of this public bathroom nonsense and drug use.) CLOSING In other words, the low temporal investment of homosexuals must be removed from visibility in the commons so that there is every incentives for the high intertemporal investment in families. The direction of homosexual relations to the construction of families despite the extraordinary fragility of such families due to the fragility of homosexual relationships, and suppression of public hedonism has proven a successfully means of both reducing public hostility to homosexual behavior and increased the positive signaling behavior of homosexuals. SPECIAL TREATMENT the only special treatment we must give to any behavior in society is that which perpetuates investment in the high cost of producing high investment families. The age of individualism has been a catastrophe for the very reason it was intended to be: to destroy the influence of intergenerational middle and upper middle class families. Just as the ancient attack on the aristocracy was an attack on intergenerational aristocracy. (The Ten Planks were available for all to see.) —MORE— NATURAL LAW ON GENDER https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/06/02/natural-law-on-gender/ TWO GENDERS, MANY DISORDERS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/09/14/two-genders-many-disorders/ NATURAL LAW ON PEDOPHILLIA https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10157059209177264 GAY MARRIAGE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2013/05/31/why-are-gay-people-asking-for-the-right-to-marry-if-it-is-legal-stuff-they-are-asking-for-cant-they-go-to-some-separate-setup-for-partners/
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553088531 Timestamp) THE NATURAL LAW ON THE SEXES, HOMOSEXUALITY, GAY MARRIAGE, PEDOPHILIA (but not incest) (repost from March 2018) (Note: I write using essay (discussion), argument, and law forms. This is argument form. The law form would include slightly more rigorous outlining, dimensional tests, limits, restitutions and punishments. But the argument would not change.) —“Curt: How should the (ideal) relationship between homosexuals and society exist or be constructed, to make homosexuals experience of society be the best it can be, while also making society’s experience of homosexuals be the best it can be? There are a lot of mixed messages out there… and you actually make sense and can justify why you make sense. I would appreciate your comment.”— Ok, Here is a rough outline of the argument in natural law: GIVEN 1) As far as I know homosexuality is a non-rare in utero developmental disorder. I suspect this current scientific hypothesis to survive – although we might discover the cause is or is not an immune system reaction to testosterone (which it appears to be), and we may discover that it can be limited by natal treatments in the future – it does run in families. 2) If you read enough of my work, you’ll encounter the hypothesis that humans are not only able to adapt intellectually and emotionally to changes but that we can create very different distributions of traits in populations using very small variations in endocrine expression. We can express these by stresses and by selection. The male-vs female physical, and male-vs-female reward systems, and male vs female brain structures included in those distributions. 3) It is unclear whether or not the ability to produce homosexuals of either gender is a necessary consequence of our ability to produce those distributions. And secondly, whether or not the result is harmful or not. (apparently not). the reason being that there is greater value in productivity in service of reproduction than reproduction. 4) It is unclear how much of homosexuality is produced in utero, in early development, and in late development. My understanding at present, is that many sexual identity disorders can occur during development without sufficient physical exercise, and sufficient role play by either gender. (And that is before we account for the hormones in the modern chemical environment.) AND WHEREAS That we incrementally demonstrate our fitness (non parasitism, and productive contribution) by: 1) Forgoing crimes both private and public. 2) Demonstrate payment for the franchise by continuous military/militial/sheriff service. 3) Demonstrating worthiness by self sufficiency by productive contribution, thereby forgoing free riding and parasitism 4) Demonstrate worthiness to the intergenerational polity by marriage and family and the support thereof. 5) Demonstrate worthiness to productivity by the voluntary organization of business and industry. 7) Demonstrate worthiness to the polity by organization of the finance, industry, business, trade, and labor in a territory. 8) Demonstrate worthiness by the correct adjudication of disputes between in and out group members under the natural law of reciprocity. AND WHEREAS 1) That the family is the first demonstration of organizational capacity upon which the intergenerational family is dependent. 2) That families are a costly but necessary contribution to the family, clan, tribe, nation, and polity. 3) That families must work tirelessly to insulate generations from consumptive and hedonistic interests and behaviors. 4) That individuals who do not serve, do not produce families, do not produce businesses or industries, do not manage territories, or do not adjudicate differences under the natural law of property, are at best not harmful, and if engaged in criminal or free riding or parasitic activities are a a dead weight loss to the family, clan, tribe, nation, and polity. THEREFORE 1) Homosexuality is a birth defect, and not voluntary. Women are less sexually dedicated than males. Trauma in women especially can cause homosexuality at any point in life. 2) Anything that occurs between adults in private is a voluntary exchange between them and nothing else. 3) Anything that occurs in public (speech/sound, sight/display, or behavior/action) imposes an involuntary cost upon others. 4) Any speech, display, or action that is contrary to the preservation of the intergenerational investment in the commons, and in particular conspicuous hedonism or conspicuous consumption is damaging to the informational commons, and damaging to those who pay higher costs within it. 5) Marriage is a contract for corporation between a man, a woman, and the polity, for the intergeneration production of offspring, and reciprocal care, and reciprocal insurance. However, this contract consists almost entirely of (a)a transfer of all personal property to community property, (c) a reciprocal grant of power of attorney. (d) reciprocal ownership of offspring until the age of maturity. (e) an implied but unenforced insurance against hardship, infirmity, and old age. This corporation dramatically reduces the cost of household production and maintenance. Without this relationship household costs rise disproportionately and therefore standards of living drop accordingly. (as we have seen) 6) Natural Reproduction and parenting by individual homosexuals by whatever means, and by pairs of homosexuals by whatever means, is difficult to argue with, however any suggestion or influence by such parents that their children’s gender is flexible, that male and female minds and bodies are not different, and that male and female roles in family and society are not necessary, must be prosecuted as a developmental crime on the scale of any other child abuse or torture. 7) Public displays of affection in furtherance of paying the high cost of reproductive persistence, training an intergenerational family, and ensuring that families can produce intra and intergenerational insurance of one another rewards those that so contribute. 8) Public displays of non-reproductive affection shall be limited to those that are demonstrated between heterosexual members of the same sex. 9) Under no condition shall heterosexual and homosexual males be forced into one another’s company. Homosexual males are unfit for military participation by virtue of a birth defect that may hinder trust. 10) Prosecution of homosexual hedonism in any public form shall be vigorous such that it is entirely suppressed. (ie: no more of this public bathroom nonsense and drug use.) CLOSING In other words, the low temporal investment of homosexuals must be removed from visibility in the commons so that there is every incentives for the high intertemporal investment in families. The direction of homosexual relations to the construction of families despite the extraordinary fragility of such families due to the fragility of homosexual relationships, and suppression of public hedonism has proven a successfully means of both reducing public hostility to homosexual behavior and increased the positive signaling behavior of homosexuals. SPECIAL TREATMENT the only special treatment we must give to any behavior in society is that which perpetuates investment in the high cost of producing high investment families. The age of individualism has been a catastrophe for the very reason it was intended to be: to destroy the influence of intergenerational middle and upper middle class families. Just as the ancient attack on the aristocracy was an attack on intergenerational aristocracy. (The Ten Planks were available for all to see.) —MORE— NATURAL LAW ON GENDER https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/06/02/natural-law-on-gender/ TWO GENDERS, MANY DISORDERS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/09/14/two-genders-many-disorders/ NATURAL LAW ON PEDOPHILLIA https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10157059209177264 GAY MARRIAGE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2013/05/31/why-are-gay-people-asking-for-the-right-to-marry-if-it-is-legal-stuff-they-are-asking-for-cant-they-go-to-some-separate-setup-for-partners/
-
The Europeans – Lex Europaei
Lex Europaei “The Law of the Europeans”
“The Production of Transcendence”Adaptation: Speed, Maneuver, Initiative, Adaptability, by Loyalty, Heroism, Excellence, Technology, Beauty, Truth, Reciprocity
Our People: Europeans
Definition;
That group of West Eurasians, descended from Ancient North Eurasians, by first the Early Neolithic Farmer expansion, their monolith civilization replacing the european hunter gatherers, then by the Western Indo European (Aryan) Expansion and Replacement of The Early Neolithic Farmers, The West Indo European (Aryan) Cultural and Technological Revolution, that together evolved into the Finnic, Baltic, Slavic, Germanic, Celtic, Italic (now Romance), and Hellenic(Now Greek) Languages, and the shared experiences of The Indo European (Aryan) religion of The Father of the Daylight Sky, The Beaker People and their Sacrifice, The Greek Intellectual Revolution, The Roman Administrative and Legal Revolution, The Germanic Religion, The Christian Religion, The Mediterranean Collapse, The Semitic Dark Age and Wars against Islam, The Holy Roman Empire of the Germanic Peoples, The Rule of Law Revolution, The Renaissance, The Aristotelian Restoration, The Empirical Revolution, The Reformation, The Agrarian and Financial Evolution, The Age of Exploration, The Industrial Revolution, The Scientific Revolution, The Darwinian Revolution, The Technological Revolution, and the Informational Revolution, Residing between the Iberian Peninsula and the Urals, the artic and the Mediterranean, Black, and Caspian seas, and during the Age of sail, Domesticating, and Settling the American and Australian continents and their various islands, currently classified as Haplogroups R1b, R1a, N, I1, and I2 and and no other. With political if not genetic inclusion of early neolithic farmers and anatolians in sardinia, sicily, the italian boot, greece, and those remaining Old Europeans in the Balkans. And specifically excluding those competing west eurasians of the indo-iranian, and indian genetic spectra, and the ancestral anatolians and caucasians that are now extinct.
Our Law: Lex Europaei. Or, The Law of The European People, The Natural Law of the European People, The Natural Law, The Law of Sovereignty, Sovereigntarianism.
Definition;
Our Ancient, Ancestral, And Traditional rules of display word and deed, by which we agree to refrain from: eradication, predation, and parasitism, by: war, genocide, conquest, destruction, plunder, pillage, killing, violence, enslavement, enserfment, and tax farming, and instead to cooperate by: exchange of, and reciprocal insurance of, sovereignty, and reciprocity, truth and duty, regardless of cost so that together we may profit from our domestication of ourselves, others, and nature as we transcend the universe into heavens, and ourselves into the gods we imagined.
Our Order
Military The production of status by heroic sacrifice to the commons. Triparism
He who can destroy a thing controls a thing. He who can defend a thing, owns a thing. The men who can defend or destroy, always own and control things. The question is only whether they act to control things they own. This is why a universal militia is required to produce rule of law. And this is why only western man has rule of law – individual sovereignty. The purpose of the militia is to create the power to deny power, so that no one else has the power to control things or destroy things – leaving only sovereignty and reciprocity under the natural law as means of survival. Therefore the host of men must exercise control of things in order to prevent control of things, leaving only the natural law, and the markets for reciprocity within them.
The Rise The Ancient Greek Way The Ancient Roman Way The Medieval Holy Roman Empire Way The North Sea (Scandinavian) Way The Modern (British, American) Way The Fall The European peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples because of our traditions of self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, thereby advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, thereby allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment.
Our Purpose
Origins
Maneuver Velocity
Adaptation
Initiative
Innovation
Loyalty Our Group Strategy Is Adaptive Velocity Graceful Ascent in success, Graceful Failure To Success A via=negativa not via-positiva strategy eliminate the false, evil, and bad, and all else is true, good, or excellen The law is more important than government. Whereas;
Capturing energy creates the ability to defeat the dark forces of entropy and time. Acting creates the ability to obtain the difference between our expenditure and capture of energy. Memory creates the possibility of acting to alter the course of regular events to defeat the dark forces of ignorance. Reason creates the possibility of inventing increasingly complex means of acting. (Adaptation …)And Whereas;
Agency is necessary for Self Determination Self Determination is Necessary for Transcendence Transcendence is necessary to evolve into the gods we imagine.And Whereas;
Godhood is only possible under Omniscience and Omnipotence Omniscience and Omnipotence are only possible by Transcendence Transcendence is only possible by Self Determination Self Determination is only possible by Agency Agency is only possible Under Sovereignty Sovereignty is Only Possible Under Natural Law (Reciprocity). Natural Law of Reciprocity is Only Possible Under Market (Adversarial) Law. Market Law is only Possible Under Common (Empirical) Law. Common Law is only possible under Testimonial Truth. Testimonial Truth is only Possible Under Physical Law (Laws of Nature). Physical Law is Possible only under Determinism. Determinism is Possible only if the universe demonstrates Regularity. Regularity is possible to know only if we possess Memory and Reason. Memory and Reason are necessary for AgencyAnd Whereas
Self Determination is only possible by Sovereignty Sovereignty is only possible by the force to deny alternatives. Sufficient Force under Sovereignty is only possible for a Universal Militia A Universal Militia under … is only possible
Our Way:
—“Liberalism [Rule of Law] works for the English because they are essentially Viking pirates —“England did away with the principle of the organized state, and put in its place the notion of the free private citizen. The citizen demands permission to fight alone in the ruthless struggle for existence, for this is the only way he can satisfy his Viking instincts. Buckle, Malthus, and Darwin later postulated that the basic essence of “society” was the naked struggle for existence. And they were absolutely right, at least as far as their own country and people were concerned. To be sure, in modern England this principle operates in a highly refined and perfected fashion. But evidence of a more rudimentary adherence to it can be found in the Icelandic sagas, where such behavior is obviously spontaneous and not borrowed from another culture. The forces with which William the Conqueror took England in 1066 could be called a “society” of knightly adventurers, and English trading companies have subdued and expropriated entire countries—most recently, since 1390, the inland regions of South Africa. Gradually the entire English nation assumed the characteristics of a “society.” The Old Norse instinct for piracy and clever trading has, in the end. influenced the Englishman’s attitude toward all of reality, including property, work, foreign peoples, and the weaker individuals and classes among his own people. The same instinct has also yielded political techniques that are extremely effective weapons in the struggle for mastery of the globe. A concept complementary to that of “society” is the “private citizen.” He represents the sum of certain positive ethical qualities which like all great. ethical virtues are not acquired through training or education, but are borne in the blood and perfected after “passing through generation after generation. The peculiarly English style of politics is essentially one that involves private citizens or groups of such individuals. This, and only this, is the very meaning of parliamentary government. Cecil Rhodes was a private citizen who conquered foreign countries. The American billionaires are private citizens who rule foreign countries by means of an inferior class of professional politicians. German liberalism, on the other hand, is ethically valueless. It merely says “No!” to the state, and is unable to justify its opposition by offering equally high-minded and vigorous positive- suggestions.”— Spengler
Transcendence
Competitive Excellence
Maneuver, Adaptability Agency, Initiative
Requiring: Sovereignty;
Requiring: Reciprocity (regardless of cost)
Consisting of: Productive, Fully Informed,, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests, Free of Imposition upon the Demonstrated interests of others by Externality, Warrantied within the limits of possible restitution.
Preventing: ( … )
Producing: Martial Reporting and Warranty (Testimony regardless of cost) Oath(promise) and Contract(regardless of cost) Natural Law of Tort and Restitution (regardless of cost) Jury of Peers (thang, jury, house, senate) and Judge of Last Resort (king)
Producing: Demand for Productivity and Meritocracy (non-parasitism regardless of cost) Demand for Incremental Suppression (defense regardless of cost)
Producing: Markets in Everything: … Exercise of Demonstrated Due Diligence … … Beast … … Slave … … Serf … … Freeman (Freedom) … … Citizen (Liberty) … … Sovereign (Peer) (insurance of All) … Limiting ourselves to reciprocity in: … Markets for: … … association, … … cooperation, … … production, … … reproduction, … … commons, … … polities, … … and war
Producing: Natural Eugenics, With the direction of surplus proceeds of production To the production of Commons And the asymmetric returns on investments in commons
Producing: The optimum human organization With the fastest innovation With the least resistance With the greatest competitive advantage With the maximum quality of life, With the Maximum adaptation, With maximum evolution, In the shortest possible time.
Given: The limitations of man, The vicissitudes of nature, And a universe hostile, To the evolution of man, Into the gods we imagine.
Because: Every man taking the oath is, … a son (daughter) … a brother (sister) … a father (mother) And; … a laborer … a craftsman, … an artist And; … a warrior, … a soldier, … a sheriff, And; … a judge, … a legislator, … and a sovereign, And; … warranties the demonstrated interests of his peers, … in the distributed dictatorship … of sovereign men. And every woman taking the oath is. … a daughter … a sister … a mother And; … a laborer … a craftsman, … an artist And; … a caretaker, … a protector, … a sheriff, And; … warranties the demonstrated interests of her peers, … in the distributed dictatorship … of sovereign women.
The Transcendence of man (into gods) Agency: The Transcendence of Man
Producing: omniscience, omnipotence, excellence, truth, beauty
Using The Industrialization of Agency. Truth and Oath Duty and Commons Excellence and Heroism Sovereignty and Reciprocity The Natural Law, Judge, and Jury Markets in … association, … cooperation, … production, … reproduction, … commons, … polities, and … war.
Our Way of Sovereigns, From Individuals, to States to Empires to Civilizations
Our Law of Sovereign Peoples
Our People
( … ) define
Genetics:
Our genetics are our common capital, an inheritance from our ancestors, a competitive advantage for each of us and all of our people. You have no right to harm or dilute asset this advantage for personal gain or preference. Other peoples have no right to purchase or steal it from us.
–“Not One Drop”–
Our Oath:
–“(I shall not lie, deceive, cheat, bait, steal, harm, conspire, … submit, or show cowardice in battle. I shall …. hinder not, assist when possible, help when called, defend the commons, safeguard the weak, punish the wicked, .. and kill the evil ).”—
Our Debts:
–“( … ) Christian, Heathen Pagan, Aryan, Aristotelian”–Our Law of Sovereigns:
—“One-against-one, the Spartans are as good as anyone in the world. But when they fight in a body, they are the best of all the world. For though they are free men, they are not entirely free. They accept Law as their master. And they respect this master more than your subjects respect you. Whatever he commands, they do. And his command never changes: It forbids them to flee in battle, whatever the number of their foes. He requires them to stand firm — to conquer or die.”—Damaratus to Xerxes.
Sovereignty. ( … definition … )
Every man shall act, and none shall prevent him from acting, as his own nation, army, state, judiciary, monarchy, legislature, economy, and joins with allies to create polities, or exits from them to join another of his own accord.
There is no reciprocity, morality, or law between nations other than violence. As such, man need never submit – he can always resort to war – and defeat if he chooses.
Decidability
No Authority Only Markets : Survival by Competition
ReciprocityOur Duty of Care :
1. Reciprocity in Transcendence
Self Determination is only possible by Agency Agency is only possible Under Sovereignty Sovereignty is Only Possible Under Natural Law (Reciprocity).
2. Reciprocity in Non-imposition
Thou shalt not, by display, word, or deed, or absence of display, word or deed, impose costs upon the demonstrated Interests of others (property-in-toto), either directly or indirectly, where those Interests were obtained by Settlement (conversion, or first use) or productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange in the absence of such imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others.
Your Demonstrated Interests Include:
1. Natural Interests:
(1) Self: Life, Body, Genes, Memories, Mind, Attention Time, Action, Consumption of air, water, food, space, shelter; (2) Privacy: (Exit from the Commons) That which is not ‘of or in the commons’: body, bodily functions, sexual functions, mind, memories, and external records thereof – the mind is not action. (3) Opportunity for Action, Stimulation, Experience, Acquisition. (4) Status and Class (reputation, honor): Self-Image, Status, Reputation Social, Sexual, Economic, Political, and Military Market Value (5) Kith and Kin and Interpersonal (Relationship) Interests: Mates (access to sex/reproduction), and Marriage Children (genetic reproduction) Consanguineous Relations (family, kin, clan, tribal and national relations) (6) Association and Dissociation: Association for, and Disassociation and Exit from: Cooperation, Insurance, Reproduction, Production, Distribution, and Trade: Friends, Acquaintances, Neighbors, Cooperative Relations, Commercial Relations, Political Relations, and Military Relations
2. Several (Personal) Interests:
(1) Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.” Several-Property: Those things we claim a monopoly of control over. (2) Shareholder (Fractional) Interests: Shares in property: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (claims for partial ownership) (3) Title Interests (Weights and Measures) Trademarks and Brands (prohibitions on fraudulent transfers within a geography). (4) Artificial Interests (Privileges): Letters of Marque, Patents, Copyrights, Grants of License.
3. Common Interests, or “Commons” (Community Property)
Physical Capital (1) Resources: natural resources. (2) Formal (Physical) Commons: waterways, parks, buildings, improvements, and infrastructure. (3) Monuments: arts and artifacts.
Formal Institutional Capital (4) Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Government, Laws, Courts, Banking, Treasury, Education (5) Cooperative Institutions: Family, Neighborhood, Polity, (6) Opportunity Interests: Un-homesteaded Opportunities, Markets
Informal Institutional Capital (7) Informal (Traditional) Institutions : Religion, Mythology, History, Tradition (8) Informal (Normative Tacit) Institutions: Our norms: habits, manners, ethics, and morals, Trust, Truthful Speech (10) Informational (Explicit) Commons: Knowledge. Information.
Human Capital (11) Skills (Training, General Knowledge, Explicit Knowledge) (12) Population and Distribution: The distribution of our classes (13) Genetic Interests: Our Genome
Civilizational Capital ( … )
Definition: We may refer to the complete set of ‘demonstrated interests’, including the Personal, Several, and Common, as “Property-in-Toto”
3. Reciprocity in Deed
Thou shalt not, by absence of display, word or deed, allow the the imposition of, costs upon the demonstrated Interests of others (property-in-toto), either directly or indirectly, where those Interests were obtained by Settlement (conversion, or first use) or productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange in the absence of such imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others.
4. Reciprocity in Speech
in western natural law, one can propose a superior, reciprocal and truthful solution, but one cannot undermining the current solution without providing one that is better.
5. Reciprocity in Display
( .. )
6. Reciprocity in Defense
Thou shalt not, by display, word, or deed, or absence of display, word or deed, tolerate the imposition of costs upon the demonstrated Interests of others (property-in-toto), either directly or indirectly, where those Interests were obtained by Settlement (conversion, or first use) or productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange in the absence of such imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others.
Our People shall be Sovereign Individually and Collectively
Self Determination
Self Defense
Self Rule
Self Government
Self Sufficient
Self Development
Agency
(Treason to submit)
Every Man A Deputy, Every Man A Sheriff, Every Man a Warrior
( … )
The Natural Law’s Absence of Need For Letter of Marque
( … and profit fro having done so)
7. Reciprocity in Restitution, Punishment and Prevention
Limitless Restitution, punishment prevention
( … ) our people shall be free of harm anywhere they tread.
If given entry into a domain, he shall be constrained under our laws, and no other, and he remains insured by our people, under our law,
8. Reciprocity in Inalienation
(Treason to submit)Our Scope of Duty of Care (rights and obligations)
( … display ) sacred behavior in commons
( … word ) non interference, non-interruption
( …. deed ) service, assistance, help, charity (duty to help solve question, problem, etc)
( … duel ) (‘niggering’ – right of kill)
(… intolerance )
( Human life is not intrinsically valuable. either reciprocal and transcendent or harmful as such reciprocity is the minimum standard for circumvention of conquest, deprivation, rule, serfdom, enslavement, and death.)
The Crimes
undermining
solutions not complaintsOur Limit To Duty of Care
( … ) rationality. three threes….
The first question is why not to suicide? This choice is that of personal philosophy.
The Three Choices avoidance, cooperation, predation. The second question one must answer is why engage in cooperation rather than free riding, parasitism, and predation? This question is that of ethics.
The first question of politics (cooperation) is why don’t I kill you and take your stuff?
If we cooperate for mutual gain then I agree not to kill you and take your stuff.
If you want to conduct a positive trade with me I will not kill you and take your stuff.
If you try to blackmail me or cheat me or my friends and allies, then I will kill you and take your stuff.
It is only rational not to kill you and take your stuff if you engage in mutually beneficial exchange.
The third question, and one that a group must answer, is why engage in cooperation rather than free-riding, parasitism, and predation? This question is that of politics.
3. ???????A Challenge to Duty of Care
(challenge someone) opportunity
3. Accusation
4. Prosecution
5. Conviction
6. Judgment
7. Restitution
8. Punishment
9. Prevention
3. InsuranceOur Failure of Duty of Care.
And should you fail in your Duty of Care, and bound by Duty of Care will be accused, brought before the court to be judged by a jury of your peers.
And should others fail their duty of care, you shall accuse them, bring them, even against their will, before the court to be judged by a jury of his peers.Our Jurisprudence
And the court shall determine whether a harm has been done – and whether the accused possessed sufficient intent, means, motive, and opportunity for performance of the harm, or failure to prevent the harm.
If the court cannot determine if a harm has been done, ……
One may claim guilt or innocence, and trial before his peers, or trial by combat (suicide).
If the accused claims innocence or partial innocence, he may ask to argue his case before the court, or before the jury referee’d by the court.
And the court shall apportion a jury in number according to the severity of the harm, whether harmed by the individual, group, organization, cult, family, clan, tribe, nation, or civilization, by his judgment and his judgment alone.
After arguments, made before the referee of the court, and upon demand of the court, the jury shall deliver judgment, of innocent with nullification, prejudice for the accuser for dishonest accusation, innocent of the charge, innocent by uncertainty, guilty as charged, with prejudice for the accused of dishonest defense, or guilty, which shall be recorded by the court;
If innocent he shall go free. If wrongly accused in error, sue for restitution. If wrongly accused with intent harm, sue for restitution and punishment.
If guilty the court shall decide upon the demand for restitution, punishment, and punishment sufficient for the prevention of others from the same;
Whereupon the accused may appeal to a higher court if one exists, whereupon the higher court will determine and take the appeal, only if the judicial process failed.
The guilty party shall pay the costs of the court, stayed until denial of appeal.
And every Man under the defense of the law and bound by that law, having given the oath to that law, to his peers, is bound to enforce it – or likewise fail his duty of care, and shall be prosecuted as a conspirator in the crimes adjudged.
And every able-bodied man, having taken The Oath in exchange for reciprocal defense under the law, and thereby bearing Duty of Care, under the law, for self, mate, family, kin, kith, commons and polity, shall keep and bear arms sufficient for the enforcement of The Law, whether in defense of self, as sheriff in defense of the commons, or as a warrior in defense of the polity, people, nation, and civilization.Organization of Sovereigns
Ternary Law of Cooperation
( … )
Ternary Law of Coercions
-
- Physical Coercive Power – The use of “armies and weapons” in order to coerce people to behave in a way under the threat of physical violence (physical costs).
- Economic Coercive Power – The use of “money and assets” in order to compel people to behave in a way by the promise of material rewards (goods and services).
- Moral Coercive Power – The use of “words and signals” in order to influence people to behave in a way by the threat of imposition of social costs (opportunity costs).
Trifunctionalism
North – Physical: Military, Law, Sheriff, Limits (Limits) West – Persistence: Family, Generations, Consumption (Demand) East – Economic: Trade, Production, Science (Supply) South – Moral: Fitness, Faith, Education (Ambitions)
Tripartism
Cooperation between the classes
Such that: Within Markets, we Cooperate on similar means despite differing ends. And Compatibility and Hierarchy Despite Differences (tripartism > quadripartite-ism )
1. Force and Order “Those Who Fight” > (Generation of Limits: Order) … … Those Who Enforce The Natural Law; (Military, Judiciary, Sheriffs)
2. Remuneration and Production “Those Who Discover” > (Generation of Opportunity) … … Those who discover resources, science, technology, information “Those Who Organize” > (Generation of Supply) … … Those Who Organize: Those Who Labor Under the Natural and Physical laws … … (Middle Class); “Those Who Labor” > (Generation of Transformation) … … Those Who Labor Under The Natural and Physical Laws; … … (Lower middle, Working, Laboring):
3. Exclusion, Inclusion and Care “Those Who Reproduce” > (Generation of Generations) … … Mothers and their Offspring “Those Who Depend” > (Generation of Insurance) … … The Aged, The Unable, Disabled, and Infirmed. “Those Who Pray” > (Generation of Demand) … … Those Who Teach The Natural and Physical Laws (Academy);
Our Organization of Sovereign States States serve as a Market for Polities that produce Suitable Commons.
Organization of States The only form of organization (order) possible under Sovereignty is:
The Military: The Monopoly Production of Order A Military Consisting of: … A Universal Militia of Every Able Sovereign Man … A Set of Regiments for every Region … A Standing Military of Professional Warriors.
The Judiciary: Rule: Market for Resolution of Differences Rule of Law of Reciprocity by the Juris Europaei An Independent Judiciary A Constitution as a Contract of Terms Between Sovereigns.
The Government: Market for Commons The Production of Organization A Corporation called The State … A Set of Assets of the State … A Treasury for the State … An Insurer of Last Resort A Hereditary Monarchy as the Judge of Last Resort A Cabinet of Professional Executives … The Military, The State (Trade), The Treasury, The Insurer of Last Resort A Market for the Commons Consisting of: … A House of Territories called the Senate … A House of Commerce … A House of Commons … A House of Family
The Economy: Market for Consumption The Market for Goods, Services, Information. The Trades, Arts and Sciences The People
The Family: Market for Generations A Church a Religion The School, Trades, Academy The Families
The Markets for Failure: The Court to punish individuals and groups for failure under our Law The Vote To Punish Government and Cabinet for failure under our Law The Militia to Punish Monarchy for failure under our LawOur Organization of Sovereign Empires Empires serve for the Federation of States
Rule of Law of Reciprocity by the Juris Europaei An Independent Judiciary A Constitution as a Contract of Terms Between States. A Corporation called The Empire … A Set of Assets of the Empire … A Treasury for the Empire … An Insurer of Last Resort A Hereditary Emperor as the Judge of Last Resort A Cabinet of Professional Executives … The Military, The State (Trade), The Treasury, The Insurer of Last Resort A Market for the Commons Consisting of: … A House of Territories called the Senate The Benefit of Empire is :
Discounts on Scale of the Military Discounts on Trade Negotiations Discounts on Borrowing(Debt) Capacity Discounts on Resolution of Disputes between States
Our Success in Transcendence
The European peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples because of our traditions of self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, thereby advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, thereby allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment.
Our Oath of Rule
The state’s only power is violence. That power comes from its claim to a geographic monopoly on violence. That is what a state is: a group of men who lay claim to a monopoly on violence. All actions which compel a person to do other than he wishes in the use of his property, his body and his time in the peaceful and honest exchange of goods, services, information, and affection, are acts of violence. Consequently, there is no action that a state needs to take, and therefore no action a state can possibly take, by the application of law, that is not an act of violence no matter the form or ceremony the state drapes over such actions. A state is the administration of organized violence.
The state exists, and possesses that monopoly on violence, because men grant their capacity for violence to the state, so that it may dispense it as needed from a judicial bench – military and civilian. By granting our violence to the state we remove from ourselves the daily administrative responsibility of parenting society, defending life and property, and resolving conflicts over property, so that we may devote ourselves to the pursuit of specialization in our division of knowledge and labor, and thereby develop our skills so that we can achieve our ambitions, and amuse ourselves, in whatever way we see fit, while decreasing the cost for others to do the same. By the act of granting our violence to the state, we assume that our violence is justly dispensed on our behalf. That is the term of our agreement with the state. It is what makes a man a citizen by choice rather than a subject or slave.
We are all capable of violence. It can never be taken from us as long as we live. We carry it with us as a constant potential. It grows, it matures, and it dissipates with age. It is not a right, or a privilege, because rights and privileges are things we give to each other. Violence is not given, it simply exists in all men at all times. Some of us are wealthier in violence than others. Some men are capable of very little violence, some men are capable of physical violence, some men capable of organized rabble and protest, and some of us, men like me, capable of revolution and civil war. as such, we do not contribute our violence to the state in equal measure.
The state’s power to organize society by way of its laws, institutions, and processes is an illusion constructed by the accumulation of habits in the citizenry; habits which are perpetuated by the daily use of those habits, and where those habits are reinforced by small and instructional displays of violence by the state, so that it may maintain the illusion of a monopoly on violence, and therefore encourage among the citizens, the retention of those habits. The potential for violence within the citizenry vastly outweighs the limited violence that can be distributed by the state. It is a credit to our habits that so little violence need be distributed at any one time that the illusion of the state monopoly can be preserved so cheaply, by so few people, and using so little violence. The actors in the state, in whatever capacity, who make use of my violence on our behalf, are few and comparatively weak. And the state can only dispense my violence, on my behalf, from a judicial bench, because of the illusion of strength that comes from the presence of those habits, and its promise of enforcement by the grant of violence from citizens.
As long as any agent of the state justly parents nation, tribes, clans, families and individuals to reach their greatest potential, as long as any agent of the state justly resolves differences in property, as long as any agent of the state protects life and property — any agents of the state have my consent to maintain that illusion of strength, and to dispense my violence on my behalf to maintain those habits, and that illusion, so that all men may continue to participate in productive exchange, or in humble amusement in the activity of their daily affairs.
But if for one moment, you seek to treat me unjustly, and you begin to believe your own illusion, and you forget that you are dispensing my violence on my behalf, and you seek to treat me not as a citizen who bestows upon you my violence, to be justly administered, but a subject who must obey rules, and if you believe and act as though the law exists not as a convenient tool for the resolution of differences between peers, but a command or scripture that I must obey as a subject, then it is not only my right, but my duty to myself my people, to take from you my given violence, and to remind you if I can, and teach you if I must, that the source of that violence is in its citizens; so that the state understands those habits, their cause, and purpose.
If I must remind the state, I hope it is by this simple, gentle oratory. If that will not suffice, I will not resort to the display of petty personal violence, nor to the disorder of rabblery and protest. Because that is not the capacity of violence that I gave to the state. Then I will instead raise an army and show you what violence it is that I do restrain so that you are once again reminded that you are an actor on my behalf, and that of my fellow citizens, and nothing more. And if you doubt for a moment that I can do such a thing, I will be only so happy to prove it to you, by starting in this very room, on this very day, if necessary.
This duty is what it means to be a citizen; to grant your violence to the state so that it may be justly administered; and to dismantle that state should it unjustly use your given violence.
Foolish men find comfort in the sameness of life, without understanding that such constancy, and the illusion of control we have over our daily affairs, can be rapidly changed by one small spark, one man’s choice, one seemingly random act. Foolish men and even more foolish women, believe habits and rules are truths and words of material substance, rather than conveniences; that their power is divine or systemic, and that their methods and rules are wise and scientific, rather than the accidental, pragmatic and convenient efforts of simple men fitfully crafting an edifice in anticipation of the turbulent events of an unknown future. These rules and ideas are nothing more than the limited judgments, habits, and fantasies of such men, however well their intentions.
And if at any point such foolish men lose sight of the fact that these convenient methods and tools are less important than, and subservient to, the men whose lives are affected by the use of my violence on my behalf, or if such foolish men forget that rules have no wisdom of their own, without the wisdom to interpret them, and that the use of them must result in the betterment of each man, then, they have forgotten the purpose of those rules. That purpose is the perfection of each individual man, and in that perfection, to parent each generation that follows so that it may reach its greatest potential. The perfection of man is our only just purpose, not the perfection of our methods and tools, or the ease and efficiency by which we administer them. The man is important, not the rules.
And I will not allow my violence to be misused against any man. And in particular I will not allow the abuse of my fellow citizens or of myself for no other than methodological or procedural reasons, so that another man, an agent of the state, whose only power comes from my given violence, may be absolved of the difficulty and effort expended in justly administering the violence I so entrusted to him. I will not permit men to suffer for another man’s laziness, or folly, when it is my violence at the expense of my fellow men, that he wields in order to obtain such leisure.
And when a citizen is abused by the criminalization of administrative rules, of petty regulatory processes and efficiencies, or of manners and disrespect of the court so that it can maintain its illusion and habituation, or when he is abused by prosecutors who are the worst ideological acolytes and to whose advantage these rules are biased, or when he is abused by the state’s staff, composed of common people endowed by procedure with powers incommensurate with their abilities, and the ability to abdicate responsibility for treating citizens with manners and good service, the state engages in the most heinous form of laziness, and the most intolerable misuse of our violence on our behalf.
Revolutions are not made from single heinous crimes, but from the compounded layering of administrative abuses of citizens. It is not only citizens that must develop habits, but the state, for it is the state who must use greater manners when dispensing our violence, whether that violence is dispensed from the court, the prosecution, the staff, the police, and especially when doing so inspires the understandable and desirable disgust and displeasure of those men unjustly victimized because of the state’s laziness and irresponsibility with our violence.
If the state’s ambition is the restitution of property, or the collection of collection for contract violations, even social contract violations, or procedural errors, for which such fines are simply a form of restitution, then this is its duty, so granted by us. but if it is punishment rather than restitution that the state seeks to render, then I do not, and no citizen should, permit any man to punish me, and will return that punishment in kind. Restitution is the means by which we correct errors, selfish weakness, and human frailties among peers and is the only reason we give our violence to the state to administer on our behalf. Punishment is the submission of slaves to an authority. If you seek to punish me, or my fellow citizens, rather than to give restitution, you seek to enslave us. and I will not suffer your enslavement, nor tolerate the enslavement of my fellow citizens.
Foolish men have come to believe that by legislation, regulation, and dictate, unlike the law, is likened to the laws of physics: that they are tools that override our wisdom and senses, and which if followed produce scientific results. But this is an error. Laws are principles for wise men to refer to, no different from myths, traditions, and stories, to make use of in resolving conflicts among men, providing restitution in the case of loss, so that we may exchange property instead of violence, cooperate peacefully in doing so, and develop specialization so that we may increase productivity in safety, decrease the cost of goods and services to each other because of specialization and competition, and therefore improve the quality of our lives, at lowest cost and risk.
I say this because I love life. I love mankind. I love my fellow citizens. I love each one of them. Fit or not, wise or not, young or old, wealthy or poor, healthy or ill. and I would gladly give my life in their defense, rather than allow someone, in his foolhardy and misguided illusion, to use my violence against them unjustly. And it is that statement, its passion, and conviction, and its promise of consequence, that makes me a citizen and no other.
So, I ask you to understand this appeal: I do not fear you. and you need not fear me if you are just, and care for my people.
But if you are unjust, and do not understand what I have said, then fear me. if you do not fear me then I must make you fear me. I must teach you the accountancy of the state, and its currency of violence. So that you never forget the origin of the violence you wield on our behalf, and in doing so abuse or enslave me or my fellow citizens.
The state must fear its citizens. It is the duty of citizens to maintain that fear. That fear is the fear of violence. I am a citizen by the granting of my violence. The violence that we give to the state, the violence that we possess as men, and is only granted to the state under the condition that it be administered justly, on our behalf, to parent the society, to protect life and property, to resolve conflicts over property, and to administer restitution for conflicts over property. For those reasons and no other.
Our Natural Religion
The Demand for Sovereignty creates a “The Cult of Non-Submission.”
The Creed:
A European, a Pagan(heathen), a Christian, an Aryan, a Warrior, a Man Transcendent
(Needs Updating) ( … )
I am a Heathen if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Heathen.
I am a Pagan If 1) I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and 2) treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors and archetypes for groups of ancestors whom I may seek to imitate/emulate/aspire to, to whom I may speak in public thanks, and with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 3) if I participate with others of my society in the recognition of debts, the repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of theses to my children, kin, and kith.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Pagan.
I am a Christian if I have adopted the teaching of Christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love and forgiveness to one’s people. 3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, 4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian.
I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe, and my people.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan.
I am a Warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with joy, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior.
I am a Saint if …
I am a Woman if ..
A am a Man if …
I am a European If ….
We are Europeans if …
We have Transcended Into Gods If …
As far as I know, if I succeed as a Heathen, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man.
And that is the objective of heroes, demigods, and gods. We leave the rest for ordinary men.
Our Law of Gods
The Law of God, if There Is One Is ‘Win’.
If there is a god, his only law was entropy (dissipation)
The only law of biochemistry is accumulation of information to defeat entropy (memory). The only law of life is accumulation of information to defeat of entropy and reproduce (reproduction). The only law of organisms is accumulation of information to defeat entropy and compete with other organisms (evolution). The only law of sentient organisms is accumulating enough information to defeat entropy and other organisms by cooperation (reciprocity). The only law of conscious organisms is accumulating enough information to defeat entropy, organisms, and their production, by calculation (instrumentation). The only law of calculating organisms is accumulation of enough information to defeat evolution (eugenics). The only law of eugenic organisms is accumulation of enough information to defeat entropy and transcend into gods. Defeat of entropy but accumulating information until we transcend into gods.
The Choice of Relationship with Gods
( … ) what relationshp do we have with our gods?
The Choice of Gods
Europeans are the gods among men, and first among men. Not because we are yet gods ourselves. But because we think, speak, write, work, create, and spread the evidence of God’s words, his hands, and his will in the language of god’s words, hands, and will: Mathematics (geometry), Science, Economics, and Natural Law of Sovereign Men.
For gods must be Sovereign, Omniscient and Omnipotent. And only Sovereign men may transcend into peerage with gods.
And that’s why European man has almost exclusively dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death by mastery of god’s word, written in god’s hand – against other’s false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies.
And if European man did not drag a people out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, diseases, suffering and early death using god’s words, then those people are suffering because god punishes them for their false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies.
And for all people, we are challenged to choose which god is the true god: an impersonal god who tests our ability to achieve sovereignty, omniscience and omniscience by learning his words, hands, and will; a god with whom we trade as allies; or a god who we obey as slaves.
Will you transcend into gods, remain a client, or obey as slave?
Our Law Regarding Others
Our Terms of Cooperation
We prefer to cooperate morally – meaning beneficially – with you.
If we cannot cooperate beneficially with you on fully moral terms – meaning without parasitism, then we have only four choices:
1) Pay the cost of your parasitism and suffer the consequences, in exchange for avoiding the cost of defending against your parasitism.
2) Boycott you and bearing the costs of boycotting you in exchange for avoiding the cost of transforming you into a moral individual or group.
3) Colonize you and bear the cost of evolving you, in exchange for creating a valued member of mankind.
4) Conquering you and bearing the cost of exterminating you in exchange for freedom from your parasitism.
So, you have a choice: limit your actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, constrained to externalities under the same conditions.
Or we will eventually colonize and reform you, or conquer and exterminate you.
You may have the ambition of mere survival. Our ambition is to make mankind moral. For it is only in moral mankind that the evil and immoral are exterminated forever, and man is transcended into the gods we aspire to.
Exceptionaless Reciprocity.
( … ) If you do x, we do x.
The Unfit
When you seek any condition other than sovereignty, the natural law of reciprocity, markets in everything, including Nations, then you are UNFIT to cohabitate with Europeans, UNFIT to govern with Europeans, and UNFIT to govern Europeans – whether your UNFITNESS may be genetic, cultural, religious or any combination thereof.
The UNFIT may not rule the Fit. The Unfit may separate from Fit. The Fit may conquer, rule, and domesticate the Unfit into Fitness. But it is a crime against our people, and a crime against mankind to pollute the Fit with the Unfit: whether genetic, cultural, or religious or any combination thereof.
If the Truth is not enough, and therefore law is not enough, then you are weak – and lack the agency necessary for demands of reciprocity between sovereigns. As such you may not rule, or govern, and may have only liberty(capital), freedom(property), and subsidy(insurance), by permission, as the sovereign see fit. And you may purchase liberty, freedom, subsidy, and defense under the natural law of sovereigns, by acts of military and civic defense of the commons, civil contribution by payment of fees, and the reciprocal defense of the subsidy, property, and liberty of peers.
Enemies of The Brotherhood of Men
We talk of rule of law, but Rule of Law is our defense against the dysgenic, parasitic, envious, and evil. We mention sovereignty, and Transcendence. We rarely mention reciprocal insurance of that sovereignty of all men by all other men. And we never mention that reciprocal insurance creates a brotherhood of men – which is the civil society we all desire – and the means by which we enjoy the labor of transcending man into gods.
As for the enemies of the brotherhood of men:
We don’t use the Truth to convince you. You are immoral, dishonest, dysgenic and lack the agency to use the Truth. We use the Truth to convince ourselves, who are moral, honest, eugenic, and possess of agency, that it is right, just and moral, to separate from you – and if not, then conquer, kill, enslave, en-serf, and subjugate you in self-defense – not only of ourselves – but of all we have made, and the future of mankind yet unmade.
We alone possess agency, will to create sovereignty, and demand for transcendence. There is no transcendence, no sovereignty, no agency for the weak, the cowardly, the timid, or the dim. And no liberty, nor freedom, nor subsidy for any if we fail.
Our Great Enterprise
—“Europeans do not know how to live unless they are engaged in some great enterprise. When this is lacking, they grow petty and feeble and their souls disintegrate.”—José Ortega y Gasset, Spanish Philosopher
This is our next great enterprise. To rid humanity of the Abrahamic falsehoods whether they be supernatural, sophistry, or pseudoscience.
The revolt against us in the ancient world brought about a dark age – we were far too tolerant.
The Abrahamic revolt against us in the modern world using collectivist pseudoscience and postmodern sophism, and the systematic use of pilpul and critique in the reputation destruction of our great civilization – a civilization that has dragged humanity out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of nature. This revolt against civilization has not yet been stopped – we have been too tolerant.
The most intolerant of peoples wins.
We must rule by our law, out of self-defense, and drag mankind kicking and screaming once again by transcendence into the gods we may yet be, in a universe hostile to all but gods.
Transcendence by Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets in Everything: the continuous calculation of our ascent into godhood.
Until we know better, the universe is ours to convert into a Garden, Whether the Man’s Valhalla, or Woman’s Eden.No Law is Higher than This Law – No law can be higher than this law.
-
-
The Europeans – Lex Europaei
Lex Europaei “The Law of the Europeans”
“The Production of Transcendence”Adaptation: Speed, Maneuver, Initiative, Adaptability, by Loyalty, Heroism, Excellence, Technology, Beauty, Truth, Reciprocity
Our People: Europeans
Definition;
That group of West Eurasians, descended from Ancient North Eurasians, by first the Early Neolithic Farmer expansion, their monolith civilization replacing the european hunter gatherers, then by the Western Indo European (Aryan) Expansion and Replacement of The Early Neolithic Farmers, The West Indo European (Aryan) Cultural and Technological Revolution, that together evolved into the Finnic, Baltic, Slavic, Germanic, Celtic, Italic (now Romance), and Hellenic(Now Greek) Languages, and the shared experiences of The Indo European (Aryan) religion of The Father of the Daylight Sky, The Beaker People and their Sacrifice, The Greek Intellectual Revolution, The Roman Administrative and Legal Revolution, The Germanic Religion, The Christian Religion, The Mediterranean Collapse, The Semitic Dark Age and Wars against Islam, The Holy Roman Empire of the Germanic Peoples, The Rule of Law Revolution, The Renaissance, The Aristotelian Restoration, The Empirical Revolution, The Reformation, The Agrarian and Financial Evolution, The Age of Exploration, The Industrial Revolution, The Scientific Revolution, The Darwinian Revolution, The Technological Revolution, and the Informational Revolution, Residing between the Iberian Peninsula and the Urals, the artic and the Mediterranean, Black, and Caspian seas, and during the Age of sail, Domesticating, and Settling the American and Australian continents and their various islands, currently classified as Haplogroups R1b, R1a, N, I1, and I2 and and no other. With political if not genetic inclusion of early neolithic farmers and anatolians in sardinia, sicily, the italian boot, greece, and those remaining Old Europeans in the Balkans. And specifically excluding those competing west eurasians of the indo-iranian, and indian genetic spectra, and the ancestral anatolians and caucasians that are now extinct.
Our Law: Lex Europaei. Or, The Law of The European People, The Natural Law of the European People, The Natural Law, The Law of Sovereignty, Sovereigntarianism.
Definition;
Our Ancient, Ancestral, And Traditional rules of display word and deed, by which we agree to refrain from: eradication, predation, and parasitism, by: war, genocide, conquest, destruction, plunder, pillage, killing, violence, enslavement, enserfment, and tax farming, and instead to cooperate by: exchange of, and reciprocal insurance of, sovereignty, and reciprocity, truth and duty, regardless of cost so that together we may profit from our domestication of ourselves, others, and nature as we transcend the universe into heavens, and ourselves into the gods we imagined.
Our Order
Military The production of status by heroic sacrifice to the commons. Triparism
He who can destroy a thing controls a thing. He who can defend a thing, owns a thing. The men who can defend or destroy, always own and control things. The question is only whether they act to control things they own. This is why a universal militia is required to produce rule of law. And this is why only western man has rule of law – individual sovereignty. The purpose of the militia is to create the power to deny power, so that no one else has the power to control things or destroy things – leaving only sovereignty and reciprocity under the natural law as means of survival. Therefore the host of men must exercise control of things in order to prevent control of things, leaving only the natural law, and the markets for reciprocity within them.
The Rise The Ancient Greek Way The Ancient Roman Way The Medieval Holy Roman Empire Way The North Sea (Scandinavian) Way The Modern (British, American) Way The Fall The European peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples because of our traditions of self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, thereby advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, thereby allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment.
Our Purpose
Origins
Maneuver Velocity
Adaptation
Initiative
Innovation
Loyalty Our Group Strategy Is Adaptive Velocity Graceful Ascent in success, Graceful Failure To Success A via=negativa not via-positiva strategy eliminate the false, evil, and bad, and all else is true, good, or excellen The law is more important than government. Whereas;
Capturing energy creates the ability to defeat the dark forces of entropy and time. Acting creates the ability to obtain the difference between our expenditure and capture of energy. Memory creates the possibility of acting to alter the course of regular events to defeat the dark forces of ignorance. Reason creates the possibility of inventing increasingly complex means of acting. (Adaptation …)And Whereas;
Agency is necessary for Self Determination Self Determination is Necessary for Transcendence Transcendence is necessary to evolve into the gods we imagine.And Whereas;
Godhood is only possible under Omniscience and Omnipotence Omniscience and Omnipotence are only possible by Transcendence Transcendence is only possible by Self Determination Self Determination is only possible by Agency Agency is only possible Under Sovereignty Sovereignty is Only Possible Under Natural Law (Reciprocity). Natural Law of Reciprocity is Only Possible Under Market (Adversarial) Law. Market Law is only Possible Under Common (Empirical) Law. Common Law is only possible under Testimonial Truth. Testimonial Truth is only Possible Under Physical Law (Laws of Nature). Physical Law is Possible only under Determinism. Determinism is Possible only if the universe demonstrates Regularity. Regularity is possible to know only if we possess Memory and Reason. Memory and Reason are necessary for AgencyAnd Whereas
Self Determination is only possible by Sovereignty Sovereignty is only possible by the force to deny alternatives. Sufficient Force under Sovereignty is only possible for a Universal Militia A Universal Militia under … is only possible
Our Way:
—“Liberalism [Rule of Law] works for the English because they are essentially Viking pirates —“England did away with the principle of the organized state, and put in its place the notion of the free private citizen. The citizen demands permission to fight alone in the ruthless struggle for existence, for this is the only way he can satisfy his Viking instincts. Buckle, Malthus, and Darwin later postulated that the basic essence of “society” was the naked struggle for existence. And they were absolutely right, at least as far as their own country and people were concerned. To be sure, in modern England this principle operates in a highly refined and perfected fashion. But evidence of a more rudimentary adherence to it can be found in the Icelandic sagas, where such behavior is obviously spontaneous and not borrowed from another culture. The forces with which William the Conqueror took England in 1066 could be called a “society” of knightly adventurers, and English trading companies have subdued and expropriated entire countries—most recently, since 1390, the inland regions of South Africa. Gradually the entire English nation assumed the characteristics of a “society.” The Old Norse instinct for piracy and clever trading has, in the end. influenced the Englishman’s attitude toward all of reality, including property, work, foreign peoples, and the weaker individuals and classes among his own people. The same instinct has also yielded political techniques that are extremely effective weapons in the struggle for mastery of the globe. A concept complementary to that of “society” is the “private citizen.” He represents the sum of certain positive ethical qualities which like all great. ethical virtues are not acquired through training or education, but are borne in the blood and perfected after “passing through generation after generation. The peculiarly English style of politics is essentially one that involves private citizens or groups of such individuals. This, and only this, is the very meaning of parliamentary government. Cecil Rhodes was a private citizen who conquered foreign countries. The American billionaires are private citizens who rule foreign countries by means of an inferior class of professional politicians. German liberalism, on the other hand, is ethically valueless. It merely says “No!” to the state, and is unable to justify its opposition by offering equally high-minded and vigorous positive- suggestions.”— Spengler
Transcendence
Competitive Excellence
Maneuver, Adaptability Agency, Initiative
Requiring: Sovereignty;
Requiring: Reciprocity (regardless of cost)
Consisting of: Productive, Fully Informed,, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests, Free of Imposition upon the Demonstrated interests of others by Externality, Warrantied within the limits of possible restitution.
Preventing: ( … )
Producing: Martial Reporting and Warranty (Testimony regardless of cost) Oath(promise) and Contract(regardless of cost) Natural Law of Tort and Restitution (regardless of cost) Jury of Peers (thang, jury, house, senate) and Judge of Last Resort (king)
Producing: Demand for Productivity and Meritocracy (non-parasitism regardless of cost) Demand for Incremental Suppression (defense regardless of cost)
Producing: Markets in Everything: … Exercise of Demonstrated Due Diligence … … Beast … … Slave … … Serf … … Freeman (Freedom) … … Citizen (Liberty) … … Sovereign (Peer) (insurance of All) … Limiting ourselves to reciprocity in: … Markets for: … … association, … … cooperation, … … production, … … reproduction, … … commons, … … polities, … … and war
Producing: Natural Eugenics, With the direction of surplus proceeds of production To the production of Commons And the asymmetric returns on investments in commons
Producing: The optimum human organization With the fastest innovation With the least resistance With the greatest competitive advantage With the maximum quality of life, With the Maximum adaptation, With maximum evolution, In the shortest possible time.
Given: The limitations of man, The vicissitudes of nature, And a universe hostile, To the evolution of man, Into the gods we imagine.
Because: Every man taking the oath is, … a son (daughter) … a brother (sister) … a father (mother) And; … a laborer … a craftsman, … an artist And; … a warrior, … a soldier, … a sheriff, And; … a judge, … a legislator, … and a sovereign, And; … warranties the demonstrated interests of his peers, … in the distributed dictatorship … of sovereign men. And every woman taking the oath is. … a daughter … a sister … a mother And; … a laborer … a craftsman, … an artist And; … a caretaker, … a protector, … a sheriff, And; … warranties the demonstrated interests of her peers, … in the distributed dictatorship … of sovereign women.
The Transcendence of man (into gods) Agency: The Transcendence of Man
Producing: omniscience, omnipotence, excellence, truth, beauty
Using The Industrialization of Agency. Truth and Oath Duty and Commons Excellence and Heroism Sovereignty and Reciprocity The Natural Law, Judge, and Jury Markets in … association, … cooperation, … production, … reproduction, … commons, … polities, and … war.
Our Way of Sovereigns, From Individuals, to States to Empires to Civilizations
Our Law of Sovereign Peoples
Our People
( … ) define
Genetics:
Our genetics are our common capital, an inheritance from our ancestors, a competitive advantage for each of us and all of our people. You have no right to harm or dilute asset this advantage for personal gain or preference. Other peoples have no right to purchase or steal it from us.
–“Not One Drop”–
Our Oath:
–“(I shall not lie, deceive, cheat, bait, steal, harm, conspire, … submit, or show cowardice in battle. I shall …. hinder not, assist when possible, help when called, defend the commons, safeguard the weak, punish the wicked, .. and kill the evil ).”—
Our Debts:
–“( … ) Christian, Heathen Pagan, Aryan, Aristotelian”–Our Law of Sovereigns:
—“One-against-one, the Spartans are as good as anyone in the world. But when they fight in a body, they are the best of all the world. For though they are free men, they are not entirely free. They accept Law as their master. And they respect this master more than your subjects respect you. Whatever he commands, they do. And his command never changes: It forbids them to flee in battle, whatever the number of their foes. He requires them to stand firm — to conquer or die.”—Damaratus to Xerxes.
Sovereignty. ( … definition … )
Every man shall act, and none shall prevent him from acting, as his own nation, army, state, judiciary, monarchy, legislature, economy, and joins with allies to create polities, or exits from them to join another of his own accord.
There is no reciprocity, morality, or law between nations other than violence. As such, man need never submit – he can always resort to war – and defeat if he chooses.
Decidability
No Authority Only Markets : Survival by Competition
ReciprocityOur Duty of Care :
1. Reciprocity in Transcendence
Self Determination is only possible by Agency Agency is only possible Under Sovereignty Sovereignty is Only Possible Under Natural Law (Reciprocity).
2. Reciprocity in Non-imposition
Thou shalt not, by display, word, or deed, or absence of display, word or deed, impose costs upon the demonstrated Interests of others (property-in-toto), either directly or indirectly, where those Interests were obtained by Settlement (conversion, or first use) or productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange in the absence of such imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others.
Your Demonstrated Interests Include:
1. Natural Interests:
(1) Self: Life, Body, Genes, Memories, Mind, Attention Time, Action, Consumption of air, water, food, space, shelter; (2) Privacy: (Exit from the Commons) That which is not ‘of or in the commons’: body, bodily functions, sexual functions, mind, memories, and external records thereof – the mind is not action. (3) Opportunity for Action, Stimulation, Experience, Acquisition. (4) Status and Class (reputation, honor): Self-Image, Status, Reputation Social, Sexual, Economic, Political, and Military Market Value (5) Kith and Kin and Interpersonal (Relationship) Interests: Mates (access to sex/reproduction), and Marriage Children (genetic reproduction) Consanguineous Relations (family, kin, clan, tribal and national relations) (6) Association and Dissociation: Association for, and Disassociation and Exit from: Cooperation, Insurance, Reproduction, Production, Distribution, and Trade: Friends, Acquaintances, Neighbors, Cooperative Relations, Commercial Relations, Political Relations, and Military Relations
2. Several (Personal) Interests:
(1) Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.” Several-Property: Those things we claim a monopoly of control over. (2) Shareholder (Fractional) Interests: Shares in property: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (claims for partial ownership) (3) Title Interests (Weights and Measures) Trademarks and Brands (prohibitions on fraudulent transfers within a geography). (4) Artificial Interests (Privileges): Letters of Marque, Patents, Copyrights, Grants of License.
3. Common Interests, or “Commons” (Community Property)
Physical Capital (1) Resources: natural resources. (2) Formal (Physical) Commons: waterways, parks, buildings, improvements, and infrastructure. (3) Monuments: arts and artifacts.
Formal Institutional Capital (4) Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Government, Laws, Courts, Banking, Treasury, Education (5) Cooperative Institutions: Family, Neighborhood, Polity, (6) Opportunity Interests: Un-homesteaded Opportunities, Markets
Informal Institutional Capital (7) Informal (Traditional) Institutions : Religion, Mythology, History, Tradition (8) Informal (Normative Tacit) Institutions: Our norms: habits, manners, ethics, and morals, Trust, Truthful Speech (10) Informational (Explicit) Commons: Knowledge. Information.
Human Capital (11) Skills (Training, General Knowledge, Explicit Knowledge) (12) Population and Distribution: The distribution of our classes (13) Genetic Interests: Our Genome
Civilizational Capital ( … )
Definition: We may refer to the complete set of ‘demonstrated interests’, including the Personal, Several, and Common, as “Property-in-Toto”
3. Reciprocity in Deed
Thou shalt not, by absence of display, word or deed, allow the the imposition of, costs upon the demonstrated Interests of others (property-in-toto), either directly or indirectly, where those Interests were obtained by Settlement (conversion, or first use) or productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange in the absence of such imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others.
4. Reciprocity in Speech
in western natural law, one can propose a superior, reciprocal and truthful solution, but one cannot undermining the current solution without providing one that is better.
5. Reciprocity in Display
( .. )
6. Reciprocity in Defense
Thou shalt not, by display, word, or deed, or absence of display, word or deed, tolerate the imposition of costs upon the demonstrated Interests of others (property-in-toto), either directly or indirectly, where those Interests were obtained by Settlement (conversion, or first use) or productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange in the absence of such imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others.
Our People shall be Sovereign Individually and Collectively
Self Determination
Self Defense
Self Rule
Self Government
Self Sufficient
Self Development
Agency
(Treason to submit)
Every Man A Deputy, Every Man A Sheriff, Every Man a Warrior
( … )
The Natural Law’s Absence of Need For Letter of Marque
( … and profit fro having done so)
7. Reciprocity in Restitution, Punishment and Prevention
Limitless Restitution, punishment prevention
( … ) our people shall be free of harm anywhere they tread.
If given entry into a domain, he shall be constrained under our laws, and no other, and he remains insured by our people, under our law,
8. Reciprocity in Inalienation
(Treason to submit)Our Scope of Duty of Care (rights and obligations)
( … display ) sacred behavior in commons
( … word ) non interference, non-interruption
( …. deed ) service, assistance, help, charity (duty to help solve question, problem, etc)
( … duel ) (‘niggering’ – right of kill)
(… intolerance )
( Human life is not intrinsically valuable. either reciprocal and transcendent or harmful as such reciprocity is the minimum standard for circumvention of conquest, deprivation, rule, serfdom, enslavement, and death.)
The Crimes
undermining
solutions not complaintsOur Limit To Duty of Care
( … ) rationality. three threes….
The first question is why not to suicide? This choice is that of personal philosophy.
The Three Choices avoidance, cooperation, predation. The second question one must answer is why engage in cooperation rather than free riding, parasitism, and predation? This question is that of ethics.
The first question of politics (cooperation) is why don’t I kill you and take your stuff?
If we cooperate for mutual gain then I agree not to kill you and take your stuff.
If you want to conduct a positive trade with me I will not kill you and take your stuff.
If you try to blackmail me or cheat me or my friends and allies, then I will kill you and take your stuff.
It is only rational not to kill you and take your stuff if you engage in mutually beneficial exchange.
The third question, and one that a group must answer, is why engage in cooperation rather than free-riding, parasitism, and predation? This question is that of politics.
3. ???????A Challenge to Duty of Care
(challenge someone) opportunity
3. Accusation
4. Prosecution
5. Conviction
6. Judgment
7. Restitution
8. Punishment
9. Prevention
3. InsuranceOur Failure of Duty of Care.
And should you fail in your Duty of Care, and bound by Duty of Care will be accused, brought before the court to be judged by a jury of your peers.
And should others fail their duty of care, you shall accuse them, bring them, even against their will, before the court to be judged by a jury of his peers.Our Jurisprudence
And the court shall determine whether a harm has been done – and whether the accused possessed sufficient intent, means, motive, and opportunity for performance of the harm, or failure to prevent the harm.
If the court cannot determine if a harm has been done, ……
One may claim guilt or innocence, and trial before his peers, or trial by combat (suicide).
If the accused claims innocence or partial innocence, he may ask to argue his case before the court, or before the jury referee’d by the court.
And the court shall apportion a jury in number according to the severity of the harm, whether harmed by the individual, group, organization, cult, family, clan, tribe, nation, or civilization, by his judgment and his judgment alone.
After arguments, made before the referee of the court, and upon demand of the court, the jury shall deliver judgment, of innocent with nullification, prejudice for the accuser for dishonest accusation, innocent of the charge, innocent by uncertainty, guilty as charged, with prejudice for the accused of dishonest defense, or guilty, which shall be recorded by the court;
If innocent he shall go free. If wrongly accused in error, sue for restitution. If wrongly accused with intent harm, sue for restitution and punishment.
If guilty the court shall decide upon the demand for restitution, punishment, and punishment sufficient for the prevention of others from the same;
Whereupon the accused may appeal to a higher court if one exists, whereupon the higher court will determine and take the appeal, only if the judicial process failed.
The guilty party shall pay the costs of the court, stayed until denial of appeal.
And every Man under the defense of the law and bound by that law, having given the oath to that law, to his peers, is bound to enforce it – or likewise fail his duty of care, and shall be prosecuted as a conspirator in the crimes adjudged.
And every able-bodied man, having taken The Oath in exchange for reciprocal defense under the law, and thereby bearing Duty of Care, under the law, for self, mate, family, kin, kith, commons and polity, shall keep and bear arms sufficient for the enforcement of The Law, whether in defense of self, as sheriff in defense of the commons, or as a warrior in defense of the polity, people, nation, and civilization.Organization of Sovereigns
Ternary Law of Cooperation
( … )
Ternary Law of Coercions
-
- Physical Coercive Power – The use of “armies and weapons” in order to coerce people to behave in a way under the threat of physical violence (physical costs).
- Economic Coercive Power – The use of “money and assets” in order to compel people to behave in a way by the promise of material rewards (goods and services).
- Moral Coercive Power – The use of “words and signals” in order to influence people to behave in a way by the threat of imposition of social costs (opportunity costs).
Trifunctionalism
North – Physical: Military, Law, Sheriff, Limits (Limits) West – Persistence: Family, Generations, Consumption (Demand) East – Economic: Trade, Production, Science (Supply) South – Moral: Fitness, Faith, Education (Ambitions)
Tripartism
Cooperation between the classes
Such that: Within Markets, we Cooperate on similar means despite differing ends. And Compatibility and Hierarchy Despite Differences (tripartism > quadripartite-ism )
1. Force and Order “Those Who Fight” > (Generation of Limits: Order) … … Those Who Enforce The Natural Law; (Military, Judiciary, Sheriffs)
2. Remuneration and Production “Those Who Discover” > (Generation of Opportunity) … … Those who discover resources, science, technology, information “Those Who Organize” > (Generation of Supply) … … Those Who Organize: Those Who Labor Under the Natural and Physical laws … … (Middle Class); “Those Who Labor” > (Generation of Transformation) … … Those Who Labor Under The Natural and Physical Laws; … … (Lower middle, Working, Laboring):
3. Exclusion, Inclusion and Care “Those Who Reproduce” > (Generation of Generations) … … Mothers and their Offspring “Those Who Depend” > (Generation of Insurance) … … The Aged, The Unable, Disabled, and Infirmed. “Those Who Pray” > (Generation of Demand) … … Those Who Teach The Natural and Physical Laws (Academy);
Our Organization of Sovereign States States serve as a Market for Polities that produce Suitable Commons.
Organization of States The only form of organization (order) possible under Sovereignty is:
The Military: The Monopoly Production of Order A Military Consisting of: … A Universal Militia of Every Able Sovereign Man … A Set of Regiments for every Region … A Standing Military of Professional Warriors.
The Judiciary: Rule: Market for Resolution of Differences Rule of Law of Reciprocity by the Juris Europaei An Independent Judiciary A Constitution as a Contract of Terms Between Sovereigns.
The Government: Market for Commons The Production of Organization A Corporation called The State … A Set of Assets of the State … A Treasury for the State … An Insurer of Last Resort A Hereditary Monarchy as the Judge of Last Resort A Cabinet of Professional Executives … The Military, The State (Trade), The Treasury, The Insurer of Last Resort A Market for the Commons Consisting of: … A House of Territories called the Senate … A House of Commerce … A House of Commons … A House of Family
The Economy: Market for Consumption The Market for Goods, Services, Information. The Trades, Arts and Sciences The People
The Family: Market for Generations A Church a Religion The School, Trades, Academy The Families
The Markets for Failure: The Court to punish individuals and groups for failure under our Law The Vote To Punish Government and Cabinet for failure under our Law The Militia to Punish Monarchy for failure under our LawOur Organization of Sovereign Empires Empires serve for the Federation of States
Rule of Law of Reciprocity by the Juris Europaei An Independent Judiciary A Constitution as a Contract of Terms Between States. A Corporation called The Empire … A Set of Assets of the Empire … A Treasury for the Empire … An Insurer of Last Resort A Hereditary Emperor as the Judge of Last Resort A Cabinet of Professional Executives … The Military, The State (Trade), The Treasury, The Insurer of Last Resort A Market for the Commons Consisting of: … A House of Territories called the Senate The Benefit of Empire is :
Discounts on Scale of the Military Discounts on Trade Negotiations Discounts on Borrowing(Debt) Capacity Discounts on Resolution of Disputes between States
Our Success in Transcendence
The European peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples because of our traditions of self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, thereby advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, thereby allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment.
Our Oath of Rule
The state’s only power is violence. That power comes from its claim to a geographic monopoly on violence. That is what a state is: a group of men who lay claim to a monopoly on violence. All actions which compel a person to do other than he wishes in the use of his property, his body and his time in the peaceful and honest exchange of goods, services, information, and affection, are acts of violence. Consequently, there is no action that a state needs to take, and therefore no action a state can possibly take, by the application of law, that is not an act of violence no matter the form or ceremony the state drapes over such actions. A state is the administration of organized violence.
The state exists, and possesses that monopoly on violence, because men grant their capacity for violence to the state, so that it may dispense it as needed from a judicial bench – military and civilian. By granting our violence to the state we remove from ourselves the daily administrative responsibility of parenting society, defending life and property, and resolving conflicts over property, so that we may devote ourselves to the pursuit of specialization in our division of knowledge and labor, and thereby develop our skills so that we can achieve our ambitions, and amuse ourselves, in whatever way we see fit, while decreasing the cost for others to do the same. By the act of granting our violence to the state, we assume that our violence is justly dispensed on our behalf. That is the term of our agreement with the state. It is what makes a man a citizen by choice rather than a subject or slave.
We are all capable of violence. It can never be taken from us as long as we live. We carry it with us as a constant potential. It grows, it matures, and it dissipates with age. It is not a right, or a privilege, because rights and privileges are things we give to each other. Violence is not given, it simply exists in all men at all times. Some of us are wealthier in violence than others. Some men are capable of very little violence, some men are capable of physical violence, some men capable of organized rabble and protest, and some of us, men like me, capable of revolution and civil war. as such, we do not contribute our violence to the state in equal measure.
The state’s power to organize society by way of its laws, institutions, and processes is an illusion constructed by the accumulation of habits in the citizenry; habits which are perpetuated by the daily use of those habits, and where those habits are reinforced by small and instructional displays of violence by the state, so that it may maintain the illusion of a monopoly on violence, and therefore encourage among the citizens, the retention of those habits. The potential for violence within the citizenry vastly outweighs the limited violence that can be distributed by the state. It is a credit to our habits that so little violence need be distributed at any one time that the illusion of the state monopoly can be preserved so cheaply, by so few people, and using so little violence. The actors in the state, in whatever capacity, who make use of my violence on our behalf, are few and comparatively weak. And the state can only dispense my violence, on my behalf, from a judicial bench, because of the illusion of strength that comes from the presence of those habits, and its promise of enforcement by the grant of violence from citizens.
As long as any agent of the state justly parents nation, tribes, clans, families and individuals to reach their greatest potential, as long as any agent of the state justly resolves differences in property, as long as any agent of the state protects life and property — any agents of the state have my consent to maintain that illusion of strength, and to dispense my violence on my behalf to maintain those habits, and that illusion, so that all men may continue to participate in productive exchange, or in humble amusement in the activity of their daily affairs.
But if for one moment, you seek to treat me unjustly, and you begin to believe your own illusion, and you forget that you are dispensing my violence on my behalf, and you seek to treat me not as a citizen who bestows upon you my violence, to be justly administered, but a subject who must obey rules, and if you believe and act as though the law exists not as a convenient tool for the resolution of differences between peers, but a command or scripture that I must obey as a subject, then it is not only my right, but my duty to myself my people, to take from you my given violence, and to remind you if I can, and teach you if I must, that the source of that violence is in its citizens; so that the state understands those habits, their cause, and purpose.
If I must remind the state, I hope it is by this simple, gentle oratory. If that will not suffice, I will not resort to the display of petty personal violence, nor to the disorder of rabblery and protest. Because that is not the capacity of violence that I gave to the state. Then I will instead raise an army and show you what violence it is that I do restrain so that you are once again reminded that you are an actor on my behalf, and that of my fellow citizens, and nothing more. And if you doubt for a moment that I can do such a thing, I will be only so happy to prove it to you, by starting in this very room, on this very day, if necessary.
This duty is what it means to be a citizen; to grant your violence to the state so that it may be justly administered; and to dismantle that state should it unjustly use your given violence.
Foolish men find comfort in the sameness of life, without understanding that such constancy, and the illusion of control we have over our daily affairs, can be rapidly changed by one small spark, one man’s choice, one seemingly random act. Foolish men and even more foolish women, believe habits and rules are truths and words of material substance, rather than conveniences; that their power is divine or systemic, and that their methods and rules are wise and scientific, rather than the accidental, pragmatic and convenient efforts of simple men fitfully crafting an edifice in anticipation of the turbulent events of an unknown future. These rules and ideas are nothing more than the limited judgments, habits, and fantasies of such men, however well their intentions.
And if at any point such foolish men lose sight of the fact that these convenient methods and tools are less important than, and subservient to, the men whose lives are affected by the use of my violence on my behalf, or if such foolish men forget that rules have no wisdom of their own, without the wisdom to interpret them, and that the use of them must result in the betterment of each man, then, they have forgotten the purpose of those rules. That purpose is the perfection of each individual man, and in that perfection, to parent each generation that follows so that it may reach its greatest potential. The perfection of man is our only just purpose, not the perfection of our methods and tools, or the ease and efficiency by which we administer them. The man is important, not the rules.
And I will not allow my violence to be misused against any man. And in particular I will not allow the abuse of my fellow citizens or of myself for no other than methodological or procedural reasons, so that another man, an agent of the state, whose only power comes from my given violence, may be absolved of the difficulty and effort expended in justly administering the violence I so entrusted to him. I will not permit men to suffer for another man’s laziness, or folly, when it is my violence at the expense of my fellow men, that he wields in order to obtain such leisure.
And when a citizen is abused by the criminalization of administrative rules, of petty regulatory processes and efficiencies, or of manners and disrespect of the court so that it can maintain its illusion and habituation, or when he is abused by prosecutors who are the worst ideological acolytes and to whose advantage these rules are biased, or when he is abused by the state’s staff, composed of common people endowed by procedure with powers incommensurate with their abilities, and the ability to abdicate responsibility for treating citizens with manners and good service, the state engages in the most heinous form of laziness, and the most intolerable misuse of our violence on our behalf.
Revolutions are not made from single heinous crimes, but from the compounded layering of administrative abuses of citizens. It is not only citizens that must develop habits, but the state, for it is the state who must use greater manners when dispensing our violence, whether that violence is dispensed from the court, the prosecution, the staff, the police, and especially when doing so inspires the understandable and desirable disgust and displeasure of those men unjustly victimized because of the state’s laziness and irresponsibility with our violence.
If the state’s ambition is the restitution of property, or the collection of collection for contract violations, even social contract violations, or procedural errors, for which such fines are simply a form of restitution, then this is its duty, so granted by us. but if it is punishment rather than restitution that the state seeks to render, then I do not, and no citizen should, permit any man to punish me, and will return that punishment in kind. Restitution is the means by which we correct errors, selfish weakness, and human frailties among peers and is the only reason we give our violence to the state to administer on our behalf. Punishment is the submission of slaves to an authority. If you seek to punish me, or my fellow citizens, rather than to give restitution, you seek to enslave us. and I will not suffer your enslavement, nor tolerate the enslavement of my fellow citizens.
Foolish men have come to believe that by legislation, regulation, and dictate, unlike the law, is likened to the laws of physics: that they are tools that override our wisdom and senses, and which if followed produce scientific results. But this is an error. Laws are principles for wise men to refer to, no different from myths, traditions, and stories, to make use of in resolving conflicts among men, providing restitution in the case of loss, so that we may exchange property instead of violence, cooperate peacefully in doing so, and develop specialization so that we may increase productivity in safety, decrease the cost of goods and services to each other because of specialization and competition, and therefore improve the quality of our lives, at lowest cost and risk.
I say this because I love life. I love mankind. I love my fellow citizens. I love each one of them. Fit or not, wise or not, young or old, wealthy or poor, healthy or ill. and I would gladly give my life in their defense, rather than allow someone, in his foolhardy and misguided illusion, to use my violence against them unjustly. And it is that statement, its passion, and conviction, and its promise of consequence, that makes me a citizen and no other.
So, I ask you to understand this appeal: I do not fear you. and you need not fear me if you are just, and care for my people.
But if you are unjust, and do not understand what I have said, then fear me. if you do not fear me then I must make you fear me. I must teach you the accountancy of the state, and its currency of violence. So that you never forget the origin of the violence you wield on our behalf, and in doing so abuse or enslave me or my fellow citizens.
The state must fear its citizens. It is the duty of citizens to maintain that fear. That fear is the fear of violence. I am a citizen by the granting of my violence. The violence that we give to the state, the violence that we possess as men, and is only granted to the state under the condition that it be administered justly, on our behalf, to parent the society, to protect life and property, to resolve conflicts over property, and to administer restitution for conflicts over property. For those reasons and no other.
Our Natural Religion
The Demand for Sovereignty creates a “The Cult of Non-Submission.”
The Creed:
A European, a Pagan(heathen), a Christian, an Aryan, a Warrior, a Man Transcendent
(Needs Updating) ( … )
I am a Heathen if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Heathen.
I am a Pagan If 1) I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and 2) treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors and archetypes for groups of ancestors whom I may seek to imitate/emulate/aspire to, to whom I may speak in public thanks, and with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 3) if I participate with others of my society in the recognition of debts, the repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of theses to my children, kin, and kith.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Pagan.
I am a Christian if I have adopted the teaching of Christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love and forgiveness to one’s people. 3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, 4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian.
I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe, and my people.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan.
I am a Warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with joy, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior.
I am a Saint if …
I am a Woman if ..
A am a Man if …
I am a European If ….
We are Europeans if …
We have Transcended Into Gods If …
As far as I know, if I succeed as a Heathen, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man.
And that is the objective of heroes, demigods, and gods. We leave the rest for ordinary men.
Our Law of Gods
The Law of God, if There Is One Is ‘Win’.
If there is a god, his only law was entropy (dissipation)
The only law of biochemistry is accumulation of information to defeat entropy (memory). The only law of life is accumulation of information to defeat of entropy and reproduce (reproduction). The only law of organisms is accumulation of information to defeat entropy and compete with other organisms (evolution). The only law of sentient organisms is accumulating enough information to defeat entropy and other organisms by cooperation (reciprocity). The only law of conscious organisms is accumulating enough information to defeat entropy, organisms, and their production, by calculation (instrumentation). The only law of calculating organisms is accumulation of enough information to defeat evolution (eugenics). The only law of eugenic organisms is accumulation of enough information to defeat entropy and transcend into gods. Defeat of entropy but accumulating information until we transcend into gods.
The Choice of Relationship with Gods
( … ) what relationshp do we have with our gods?
The Choice of Gods
Europeans are the gods among men, and first among men. Not because we are yet gods ourselves. But because we think, speak, write, work, create, and spread the evidence of God’s words, his hands, and his will in the language of god’s words, hands, and will: Mathematics (geometry), Science, Economics, and Natural Law of Sovereign Men.
For gods must be Sovereign, Omniscient and Omnipotent. And only Sovereign men may transcend into peerage with gods.
And that’s why European man has almost exclusively dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death by mastery of god’s word, written in god’s hand – against other’s false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies.
And if European man did not drag a people out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, diseases, suffering and early death using god’s words, then those people are suffering because god punishes them for their false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies.
And for all people, we are challenged to choose which god is the true god: an impersonal god who tests our ability to achieve sovereignty, omniscience and omniscience by learning his words, hands, and will; a god with whom we trade as allies; or a god who we obey as slaves.
Will you transcend into gods, remain a client, or obey as slave?
Our Law Regarding Others
Our Terms of Cooperation
We prefer to cooperate morally – meaning beneficially – with you.
If we cannot cooperate beneficially with you on fully moral terms – meaning without parasitism, then we have only four choices:
1) Pay the cost of your parasitism and suffer the consequences, in exchange for avoiding the cost of defending against your parasitism.
2) Boycott you and bearing the costs of boycotting you in exchange for avoiding the cost of transforming you into a moral individual or group.
3) Colonize you and bear the cost of evolving you, in exchange for creating a valued member of mankind.
4) Conquering you and bearing the cost of exterminating you in exchange for freedom from your parasitism.
So, you have a choice: limit your actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, constrained to externalities under the same conditions.
Or we will eventually colonize and reform you, or conquer and exterminate you.
You may have the ambition of mere survival. Our ambition is to make mankind moral. For it is only in moral mankind that the evil and immoral are exterminated forever, and man is transcended into the gods we aspire to.
Exceptionaless Reciprocity.
( … ) If you do x, we do x.
The Unfit
When you seek any condition other than sovereignty, the natural law of reciprocity, markets in everything, including Nations, then you are UNFIT to cohabitate with Europeans, UNFIT to govern with Europeans, and UNFIT to govern Europeans – whether your UNFITNESS may be genetic, cultural, religious or any combination thereof.
The UNFIT may not rule the Fit. The Unfit may separate from Fit. The Fit may conquer, rule, and domesticate the Unfit into Fitness. But it is a crime against our people, and a crime against mankind to pollute the Fit with the Unfit: whether genetic, cultural, or religious or any combination thereof.
If the Truth is not enough, and therefore law is not enough, then you are weak – and lack the agency necessary for demands of reciprocity between sovereigns. As such you may not rule, or govern, and may have only liberty(capital), freedom(property), and subsidy(insurance), by permission, as the sovereign see fit. And you may purchase liberty, freedom, subsidy, and defense under the natural law of sovereigns, by acts of military and civic defense of the commons, civil contribution by payment of fees, and the reciprocal defense of the subsidy, property, and liberty of peers.
Enemies of The Brotherhood of Men
We talk of rule of law, but Rule of Law is our defense against the dysgenic, parasitic, envious, and evil. We mention sovereignty, and Transcendence. We rarely mention reciprocal insurance of that sovereignty of all men by all other men. And we never mention that reciprocal insurance creates a brotherhood of men – which is the civil society we all desire – and the means by which we enjoy the labor of transcending man into gods.
As for the enemies of the brotherhood of men:
We don’t use the Truth to convince you. You are immoral, dishonest, dysgenic and lack the agency to use the Truth. We use the Truth to convince ourselves, who are moral, honest, eugenic, and possess of agency, that it is right, just and moral, to separate from you – and if not, then conquer, kill, enslave, en-serf, and subjugate you in self-defense – not only of ourselves – but of all we have made, and the future of mankind yet unmade.
We alone possess agency, will to create sovereignty, and demand for transcendence. There is no transcendence, no sovereignty, no agency for the weak, the cowardly, the timid, or the dim. And no liberty, nor freedom, nor subsidy for any if we fail.
Our Great Enterprise
—“Europeans do not know how to live unless they are engaged in some great enterprise. When this is lacking, they grow petty and feeble and their souls disintegrate.”—José Ortega y Gasset, Spanish Philosopher
This is our next great enterprise. To rid humanity of the Abrahamic falsehoods whether they be supernatural, sophistry, or pseudoscience.
The revolt against us in the ancient world brought about a dark age – we were far too tolerant.
The Abrahamic revolt against us in the modern world using collectivist pseudoscience and postmodern sophism, and the systematic use of pilpul and critique in the reputation destruction of our great civilization – a civilization that has dragged humanity out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of nature. This revolt against civilization has not yet been stopped – we have been too tolerant.
The most intolerant of peoples wins.
We must rule by our law, out of self-defense, and drag mankind kicking and screaming once again by transcendence into the gods we may yet be, in a universe hostile to all but gods.
Transcendence by Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets in Everything: the continuous calculation of our ascent into godhood.
Until we know better, the universe is ours to convert into a Garden, Whether the Man’s Valhalla, or Woman’s Eden.No Law is Higher than This Law – No law can be higher than this law.
-
-
THE NATURAL LAW ON THE SEXES, HOMOSEXUALITY, GAY MARRIAGE, PEDOPHILIA (but not i
THE NATURAL LAW ON THE SEXES, HOMOSEXUALITY, GAY MARRIAGE, PEDOPHILIA (but not incest)
(repost from March 2018)
(Note: I write using essay (discussion), argument, and law forms. This is argument form. The law form would include slightly more rigorous outlining, dimensional tests, limits, restitutions and punishments. But the argument would not change.)
—“Curt: How should the (ideal) relationship between homosexuals and society exist or be constructed, to make homosexuals experience of society be the best it can be, while also making society’s experience of homosexuals be the best it can be? There are a lot of mixed messages out there… and you actually make sense and can justify why you make sense. I would appreciate your comment.”—
Ok, Here is a rough outline of the argument in natural law:
GIVEN
1) As far as I know homosexuality is a non-rare in utero developmental disorder. I suspect this current scientific hypothesis to survive – although we might discover the cause is or is not an immune system reaction to testosterone (which it appears to be), and we may discover that it can be limited by natal treatments in the future – it does run in families.
2) If you read enough of my work, you’ll encounter the hypothesis that humans are not only able to adapt intellectually and emotionally to changes but that we can create very different distributions of traits in populations using very small variations in endocrine expression. We can express these by stresses and by selection. The male-vs female physical, and male-vs-female reward systems, and male vs female brain structures included in those distributions.
3) It is unclear whether or not the ability to produce homosexuals of either gender is a necessary consequence of our ability to produce those distributions. And secondly, whether or not the result is harmful or not. (apparently not). the reason being that there is *greater value in productivity in service of reproduction than reproduction*.
4) It is unclear how much of homosexuality is produced in utero, in early development, and in late development. My understanding at present, is that many sexual identity disorders can occur during development without sufficient physical exercise, and sufficient role play by either gender. (And that is before we account for the hormones in the modern chemical environment.)
AND WHEREAS
That we incrementally demonstrate our fitness (non parasitism, and productive contribution) by:
1) Forgoing crimes both private and public.
2) Demonstrate payment for the franchise by continuous military/militial/sheriff service.
3) Demonstrating worthiness by self sufficiency by productive contribution, thereby forgoing free riding and parasitism
4) Demonstrate worthiness to the intergenerational polity by marriage and family and the support thereof.
5) Demonstrate worthiness to productivity by the voluntary organization of business and industry.
7) Demonstrate worthiness to the polity by organization of the finance, industry, business, trade, and labor in a territory.
8) Demonstrate worthiness by the correct adjudication of disputes between in and out group members under the natural law of reciprocity.
AND WHEREAS
1) That the family is the first demonstration of organizational capacity upon which the intergenerational family is dependent.
2) That families are a costly but necessary contribution to the family, clan, tribe, nation, and polity.
3) That families must work tirelessly to insulate generations from consumptive and hedonistic interests and behaviors.
4) That individuals who do not serve, do not produce families, do not produce businesses or industries, do not manage territories, or do not adjudicate differences under the natural law of property, are at best not harmful, and if engaged in criminal or free riding or parasitic activities are a a dead weight loss to the family, clan, tribe, nation, and polity.
THEREFORE
1) Homosexuality is a birth defect, and not voluntary. Women are less sexually dedicated than males. Trauma in women especially can cause homosexuality at any point in life.
2) Anything that occurs between adults in private is a voluntary exchange between them and nothing else.
3) Anything that occurs in public (speech/sound, sight/display, or behavior/action) imposes an involuntary cost upon others.
4) Any speech, display, or action that is contrary to the preservation of the intergenerational investment in the commons, and in particular conspicuous hedonism or conspicuous consumption is damaging to the informational commons, and damaging to those who pay higher costs within it.
5) Marriage is a contract for corporation between a man, a woman, and the polity, for the intergeneration production of offspring, and reciprocal care, and reciprocal insurance. However, this contract consists almost entirely of (a)a transfer of all personal property to community property, (c) a reciprocal grant of power of attorney. (d) reciprocal ownership of offspring until the age of maturity. (e) an implied but unenforced insurance against hardship, infirmity, and old age. This corporation dramatically reduces the cost of household production and maintenance. Without this relationship household costs rise disproportionately and therefore standards of living drop accordingly. (as we have seen)
6) Natural Reproduction and parenting by individual homosexuals by whatever means, and by pairs of homosexuals by whatever means, is difficult to argue with, however any suggestion or influence by such parents that their children’s gender is flexible, that male and female minds and bodies are not different, and that male and female roles in family and society are not necessary, must be prosecuted as a developmental crime on the scale of any other child abuse or torture.
7) Public displays of affection in furtherance of paying the high cost of reproductive persistence, training an intergenerational family, and ensuring that families can produce intra and intergenerational insurance of one another rewards those that so contribute.
8) Public displays of non-reproductive affection shall be limited to those that are demonstrated between heterosexual members of the same sex.
9) Under no condition shall heterosexual and homosexual males be forced into one another’s company. Homosexual males are unfit for military participation by virtue of a birth defect that may hinder trust.
10) Prosecution of homosexual hedonism in any public form shall be vigorous such that it is entirely suppressed. (ie: no more of this public bathroom nonsense and drug use.)
CLOSING
In other words, the low temporal investment of homosexuals must be removed from visibility in the commons so that there is every incentives for the high intertemporal investment in families.
The direction of homosexual relations to the construction of families despite the extraordinary fragility of such families due to the fragility of homosexual relationships, and suppression of public hedonism has proven a successfully means of both reducing public hostility to homosexual behavior and increased the positive signaling behavior of homosexuals.
SPECIAL TREATMENT
the only special treatment we must give to any behavior in society is that which perpetuates investment in the high cost of producing high investment families. The age of individualism has been a catastrophe for the very reason it was intended to be: to destroy the influence of intergenerational middle and upper middle class families. Just as the ancient attack on the aristocracy was an attack on intergenerational aristocracy.
(The Ten Planks were available for all to see.)
—MORE—
NATURAL LAW ON GENDER
https://propertarianism.com/2017/06/02/natural-law-on-gender/
TWO GENDERS, MANY DISORDERS
https://propertarianism.com/2017/09/14/two-genders-many-disorders/
NATURAL LAW ON PEDOPHILLIA
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10157059209177264
GAY MARRIAGE
https://propertarianism.com/2013/05/31/why-are-gay-people-asking-for-the-right-to-marry-if-it-is-legal-stuff-they-are-asking-for-cant-they-go-to-some-separate-setup-for-partners/
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-20 09:28:00 UTC
-
Constitution: The Government of the Several States
Constitution: The Government of the Several States
ARTICLE VII
The Government of the Several States, Possessions and Territories
“The Market for Production of Commons”
Whereas; The Purpose of Governments is the creation, maintenance, and preservation of the disproportionate returns on the production of Commons free from privatization of those commons, free riding upon those commons, and and socialization of losses into those commons; All peoples differ in distribution, ability, wants, and needs, and require the political, economic, social, and interpersonal incentives, information, services, and goods, to serve themselves, their kin, friends, and fellows. As such while The Law remains constant across all life, the means of production of commons and the choice of commons, and the processes, rules, norms, and signals used in the construction, maintenance, and preservation of those commons, differs between individuals and groups. Therefore; This Constitution provides a means by which groups may produced commons, processes, rules, norms and signals best suited to their interests, by providing a choice of means of governance that prohibit corruption, parasitism, fraud, and deceit in the production of commons. Conversely, this constitution provides a means by which people may choose their interests poorly – and therefore pay the consequences of that poor choice And Whereas; Governments, like all Organizations, universally evolve to maximize Rent Seeking (Parasitism) and Fragility rather than the optimum production of returns on Commons, or sufficient reserves and flexibility that they can survive and adapt to socks. Therefore; This Constitution eliminates and shall eliminate, Parasitism, bureaucracies, politicians, political parties and limits political discourse to the voluntary production of commons of benefit to the local polity; (Counsel: by removing politicians and political parties, and false, irreciprocal, and unwarrantable speech from the political discourse, we are left with a wide range of choices of government, from the least to the most participatory, and from the most corporate to the most kinship. In this Article, the Several States may choose that method of government free of political corruption, but suitable to their demographics and interests.) And Whereas; People, as an organization will as readily use their political order to seek privatization of others commons, or to free ride upon others commons, or to socialize losses into others commons; as they will upon one another; Therefore; This constitution eliminates and shall eliminate, predation, parasitism, and harm by one polity, upon the commons of another polity. And Whereas; (….) challenge of our age Therefore; And this Constitution reverses and shall reverse the ability of Cities and non-cities to force policies that they favor upon one another; And Therefore; We Ascend the following Requirements, Rights, Obligations, Prohibitions and Warnings: Requirements Territories 1. A Territory shall consist of areas under control of the State, whether or not the State possesses the territory that area occupies. 2. A Territory shall be formed or dissolved by the State by whatever means the State decides. 3. Territories shall include but not be limited to Embassies, Offices, Military Bases, Protectorates, Private Territory Unders State Protection. Trade Routes. Waters. Airspace. Terrestrial Underground, Terrestrial Underwater, and Extra-terrestrial Routes, Ways, Spaces, objects, territories, resources, and undergrounds. Possessions 1. A Possession shall differ from a Territory in that (a) a Possession contains a population, (b) that the People of the Possession may organize a government to produce commons, (c) the State shall limit the production of those commons, (d) the State shall appoint Governors, Judges, Sheriffs, The Regiment or Regiments, and all other roles responsibilities and functions within that Possession, to regulate and insure the conformity of that Possession with the Law and this Constitution. 2. A Possession shall have no influence upon the State or its holdings, whether Information, Political, Military, or Strategic. 3. A Possession shall be formed by not less than fifty-thousand people in a contiguous territory. A possession may form a Several State upon meeting and warranting the criteria for Several States. Several States 1. The purpose of a Several State is to provide for its People those commons most suitable or desirable to those people, and no other purpose whatsoever external to that Several State and its people. 2. A Several State shall be formed by not less than five hundred thousand People in a contiguous territory. ( Counsel: One my not ‘block’ a voluntary transaction for gain. If such an attempt is made the individual shall be compensated at market value plus twenty percent, and the territory appropriated and transferred. This is defense against violation of reciprocity by interference in production for personal gain, rather than contribution to production for personal gain.) 3. For the purpose of sovereign administration, Several States shall divide into Cities, and Counties. Cities shall divide into Districts, Districts into Neighborhoods, and Neighborhoods into Homes. Counties shall divide into Shires, and Shires into towns, villages, and homes. City States 1. Any City with population greater than five hundred thousand people with at least five hundred people per square mile shall involuntarily Ascend to a Several State, and submit a constitution to the State (the court), or shall be involuntarily converted to a Possession and have a constitution imposed upon it by the State (Court). Any city which devolves from such condition may dissolve in an organized manner by submission to and acceptance by, a plan by the State (Court). (Counsel: As in all things, Nor shall any art or artifice be used to circumvent this charge.) ( Counsel: Cities may no longer impose will upon those with lower population density. Cities may not) Regions 1. A Region shall be formed by a treaty between three or more contiguous Several States, and shall be formed by and within the same criteria as the Several States. (Counsel: Permits regional governments for the organized production of mutually beneficial economic policy.) Cities 1. A City shall be formed by of not less than ten thousand people of at least five hundred people per square mile. Must conduct business by a mayor, a city council, and pay for its own Justices, Sheriffs, Police and Emergency Services. (Counsel: Limits Cities to minimum population density.) Districts 1. A City, County, Town, and Shire shall be divided into districts of common interest, each consisting of not less than ten thousand people, over which the citizens determine district policy. Neighborhoods 1. A District shall be divided into neighborhoods of common interest, each consisting of not less than one hundred people in contiguous space, over which the citizens determine neighborhood policy. (Counsel: Cities and City States shall divide into districts, shall divide into neighborhoods, shall divide into homes.) Counties and Shires 1. A County shall be formed from not less than twenty five square miles of contiguous territory, regardless of population, or density, by the citizens residing within it; with those few counties under that size at the time of this writing, grandfathered. A County shall conduct business by a County Council and pay for its own Sheriffs, and Emergency Services. Towns 1. A town shall be formed by and consist of, not less than ten thousand people. Shall conduct business by a mayor, a town council and pay for its own Sheriffs, and Emergency Services. Villages 1. A village shall be formed by and consist of, not less than one thousand people, residing in a contiguous space, who shall select at least one secretary whether paid or not, and shall select and must pay for at least one Sheriff. Homesteads 1. As of the writing of this Constitution, there is no land open to homesteading on this planet. However, in the event the possibility exists, to homestead property, one shall (a) improve it for permanent habitation by the construction of a home that will survive for one hundred years, (b) fence the territory, (c) improve it for permanent production of goods, services, or information, (d) do so for a period of not less than three years, during which no other may lay claim. 2. Under no conditions shall a ‘squatter’ hold rights for any reason or any duration, without exception. (Counsel: Squatting is theft.) Vagrants 1. Under no conditions shall ‘migrants’, ‘vagrants’, ‘tinkers’, ‘gypsies’ be permitted movement or stay. Instead such people shall be relocated to wilderness camps, and their means of transport destroyed, thereby prohibiting their further movement. ( Counsel: Vagrancy is theft, and export of hazard and risk. ) Rights 1. All Citizens of all territories have the right to self determination in the production of those commons best suited to their interests, that do not impose costs upon the demonstrated interests of others. (a) Any territory of any State any scale, may Secede, Transfer, or Ascend, if in the chosen interests of the people of that territory should they fully conform to this constitution. (b) Any territory of any State may secede, and transfer between states, or ascend to Several Statehood if in the chosen intersets of the people of that territory should they fully conform to this constitution. (c) Any territory of that today called Canada may join these states if in the chosen intersets of the people of that territory should they fully conform to this constitution. (d) Any territory of that today called Mexico may join these states if in the interests of the people of that territory, should they fully conform to this constitution. Obligations 1. Constitutions and Amendments. 1. Each of the Several States shall construct a and Propose a Constitution for self government, according to requirements and demands of The Law set forth in this Constitution. The Court shall approve or reject these Constitutions within one hundred and twenty days, with or without comment. Should a Several State fail to produce a constitution that passes Juridical Assent within a period of six months, then the Military Shall Take Possession, thereby converting the State to a Possession, establish martial law; and a constitution shall be provided to that Possession by the Court within ninety days, and a government imposed for a period of three years; after which the polity may resume self governance as a Several State. ( Counsel: Enforces strict construction of constitutions, gives opportunity for reformation, and Eliminates the “Quebec Strategy”) 2. Any of the Several States may Propose an Amendment to this Constitution, where such an amendment alters Practice and Policy not Declaration and Claim; and then submit it to Supreme the Court. It shall Ascend upon approval (a) by three fourths of the states, (b) by over three fourths of the population, (c) populating three fourths of the territory, (d) the Supreme Court, (d) the military, and if extant, (e) the Monarchy. 2. Acts 1. The Several States shall produce Acts in the form of Contracts of the Commons, by whatever means they choose; where the scope of such acts is limited to their territorial jurisdiction; but such acts shall be constructed according to demands of The Law set forth in this Constitution and where where not in contradiction, conflict, or conflation, or confusion with this constitution, whether in whole, in part, or in definition. ( Counsel: (a) The term “legislation”, being a lie is prohibited. Governments produce Acts. The law is the law and only the law is law. (b) this clause maintains separation between Law and Mythology, Propaganda, or Positioning. ) 2. No Act shall Ascend without Assent by the Court. The Court shall Assent if and only if the Act is constructed according to demands of The Law set forth in this Constitution and where where not in contradiction, conflict, or conflation, or confusion with this constitution, whether in whole, in part, or in definition. Otherwise the court shall Dissent and thereby Veto the Act, prohibiting it in whole, in part, and in definition. The Court shall determine the means and methods by which it reviews, Ascends or Dissent and Veto Acts. 3. Acts constraining or licensing Public behaviors in display, word, and deed shall be determined by the smallest, most local, governmental body extant, and no higher government shall interfere save limiting the export of costs of lesser limitations on display, word, and deed into other polities with greater limitations on display word and deed. (Counsel: Norms shall be determined locally and greater discipline prioritized over less discipline.) 3. The Production of Acts 1. The States and their Subdivisions may form Governments for the Production of Acts (Contracts of the Commons) by any combination of the following means: Optionally: 1. Monarchical (Hereditary, Familial, European Model) 1. A Monarch shall be elected or appointed from a member of the military from a family demonstrating no less than six generations of military service in a combat capacity, and of exclusively European descent, and exclusively European religion. 2. The Monarchy shall be inherited by the eldest male of exclusively european descent, and exclusively European religion, heir having performed military service, who voluntarily accepts the duty. 3. If necessary, a Regent of the Monarchical Family’s choosing shall be appointed until an Heir comes of age. 4. The Monarchy shall be subsidized or paid for by the Polity at no less than twenty times the median income of the polity. 4. The Monarch shall appoint a Professional Executive who serves at the Monarchy’s discretion. (See Professional Executive below). 5. The Monarchy shall call upon a Jury of the People, randomly selected from the Citizenry, and apportioned by productive Class; Gender; Family, Business, Industry; and Region, wherein each class is named a ‘House’; and serving at the will of the monarchy; to choose whether to Approve or Veto each of the Propositions advanced by the Executive; 6. As such, all Acts shall ascend, only upon survival of veto by The Houses of the Citizens, the Executive, The Courts, and the Monarch or his Regent. 7. Conversely, any Act may be overturned by the courts, in whole or in part either prior or post Assent. ( Counsel: A National (Kinship) Militia, Administered by A Monarchy, Under Rule of Law, with Houses for the Classes, each of which Assents or Dissents from Propositions of the Monarchy or its Ministers, is the best form of government Possible because it has the best incentives possible, by providing the least malincentives possible. The principle innovation that is necessary is the Court of the Natural Law, which provides a market for dismissal of impositions by governments.) And Necessarily; 2. Professional Executive ( Corporate, Chinese Model ) 1. An Executive may be Elected, Appointed, and Removed by whatever means, for whatever duration embodied in the constitution of the Several State, as long as their is a means of removal in the case of failure as defense against the need for insurrection to correct an executive failure. In all cases, an executive can be removed by the Court, and the Military, as a last resort. 2. The Executive shall be a Citizen, exclusively heterosexually male, of no less than sixty years of age, having fulfilled his military service, and having served for no less than twenty years as a Primary Executive in the Court, Military, or Industry. (Counsel: the limitation on political careerism is by design) 3. The Executive shall Advance Propositions, in form of Contracts of the Commons, by Filing with the Court, and obtaining Assent. All acts not vetoed by the Court Ascend. 4. The Executive shall Appoint a Cabinet of Ministers for the administration of the Several State. 5. Ministers shall hire and fire individuals and organizations as necessary to perform the Minister’s functions. And Optionally; 3. Aristocratic (Kinship model) 1. A Titled Family of the hierarchy of Duke, Count, or Baron shall be elected or appointed from a family of exceptional performance, consistency, privacy, stoicism, and demonstrating no less than six generations of military service, and of exclusively European descent, and exclusively European religion. 2. The Title shall be inherited by the any heir of exclusively european descent, and exclusively European religion, having performed military service, who voluntarily accepts the duty. 3. If necessary, a Regent of the Titled Family’s choosing shall be appointed until an Heir comes of age. 4. The purpose of these Titled families is to raise and train intergenerational families for the sole purpose of successful administration of the territory over which they have responsibility. 5. A Family may lose Title and Office by action of the Court for criminal malfeasance in Governance of the territory – and when exclusively of malfeasance and not of natural error. 6. Titled families shall be subsidized by or paid for by the Polity at no less than four times the median income of the polity, such that their means of status and income is successful service of the polity. (Counsel: Propaganda of the past centuries being merely that, the evidence is clearly in favor of intergenerational, titled, families when they are subject to the negative market of the courts, rather than the negative market of elections. There is no better form of government.) Or; 4. Juried (Old English Model) 1. An Executive shall Advance Propositions, in form of Contracts of the Commons, by Filing with the Court, obtaining Assent. Then promoting their Propositions. 2. The Executive shall call upon a Jury of the People, randomly selected from the Citizenry, and apportioned by Class; Gender; Family, Business, Industry; and Region wherein each class is named a ‘House’; to Approve or Dissent each of the Propositions advanced by the Executive. 3. If the Executive submits and Approves, the Court Approves and all houses Approve, then Proposition shall Ascend. Or; 5. Market Between Classes ( Market ) 1. Citizens shall be divided into Classes and Genders, that represent ‘Houses‘ of common interest. Revenues shall be apportioned equally to each house. 2. Any Citizen or Citizens shall Advance Propositions, in form of Contracts of the Commons, consisting of exchanges between the Classes, by Filing with the Court; obtaining Assent from the Court; Then promoting their Propositions. 3. If a Proposition receives both (a) sufficient funding and (b) survives Veto from all houses, shall Ascend. Or; 6. Direct (Democratic – Majoritarian – Populist ) 1. Any Citizen or Citizens shall Advance Propositions, in form of Contracts of the Commons, by Filing with the Court, obtaining Assent. Then promoting their Propositions. And Then; 2. At a scheduled time, at a scheduled interval, Voters may Choose from those Advanced Contracts of the Commons: by Direct Democracy (Majoritarianism): a) Vote by Family (equality between families consisting of man woman and children.) or; b) Vote by Individual (equality by individual) or; Where: Winner takes all; Or; by Economic Democracy (Auction): c) Vote By Proportional Contribution (By current monetary contribution to revenues), or; d) Vote by Equal Distribution (By current equidistribution of revenues). Where; The Auction continues until all funds are allocated, with ‘rolling over’ to the next cycle permitted. ( Counsel: Opinion: It is possible that this is the best means of funding the production of commons, because it puts the greatest pressure for performance on the production of commons, and allows gradual funding by the people as they see fit. Conversely it is suitable only for polities of development that they are capable of informed making informed decisions. If they are not capable of making informed decisions, then no form of democracy is suitable for them.) 2. If Voting exists, then Voting shall be voluntary. (Counsel: Mandatory voting is prohibited.) 3. If Voting exists, then no vote, no matter by what method, shall be proxied directly or indirectly, other than to one’s husband or wife, father or mother, or son or daughter; And no art or artifice shall circumvent this intent. 4. The formation of a government by representatives (politicians) shall be prohibited. 5. Political Parties and Organizations shall be prohibited regardless of means of construction or purpose or intent. 6. The Debts from all Acts shall be distributed to the Treasury Accounts of all Citizens by either equal or proportional means; settled by income as it is repaid; and inescapable.) (Counsel: The practice of running up debt then fleeing a territory shall be prohibited. The practice of maintaining the ignorance of the individual’s relative cost or value to others shall be prohibited. ) 2. Language 1. All public speech in all forms, including display, word ,and deed, in every and all venues, shall be be limited exclusively to the English Language, with no exceptions, no grandfathering, and zero tolerance. (Counsel: prevention of separation by language) 3. Passports. Definition; A Passport provides evidence of Insurance of a the unique identity of a human, animal, life form, artificial intelligence, or object, by an insurer of last resort (State), and evidence of the liability for defense of the insured, and warranty of others from harm by the Insured. And all that descends from such liability and warranty. Therefore; 1. Each of the Several States shall issue Passports of the Several States for their Citizens and only their citizens. 2. The State and Only the State shall issue Imperial Passports for functionaries of the State. 3. Imperial Passports shall be issued in addition to a Passports of the Several States. Imperial Passports shall be used exclusive for State Operations and purposes. Several State Passports shall be used for all other Personal travel and personal purposes. (Counsel: Preservation of State Sovereignty over commerce, culture, and residency.) 4. The Military shall show zero tolerance for harms those Insured under Imperial or Several State Passports, and shall immediately and relentlessly severely punish or terminate all actors and the families of such actors for three generations, and the organizations and members of those organizations, which direct those actors, in retaliation for any such harms. Conversely, the Insured shall be returned to jurisdiction, prosecuted for any such crime under our law. But if an complaint is not a crime under The Law, it is not a crime, and it may not be prosecuted, either in the foreign state or in the Empire. 4. Containment 1. Any polity of any scale shall lose its sovereignty, be forcibly converted to a Territory, and have a new constitution imposed upon it, if it cannot contain the export of Costs to other polities. Thes Costs shall include but not be limited to: containing the population, pollution or any other matter, light, sound, vibration, conflict, crime, goods, services, information, and disinformation. 5. Rent (Fee,Taxes) 1. State Revenues. The State shall own all time and space under its control (jurisdiction). The state shall generate revenue by Renting time and space under its control (jurisdiction). The State shall charge rent to any and all under its control (Jurisdiction). The amount of this rent shall be fifteen percent of gross domestic product of each Several State, Possession, or Territory; and Thirty Percent in Time of War. These funds shall be appropriated incrementally and daily from the Treasury. 2. Several State Revenues. In addition to State Rent, the Several States and Possessions and all forms of government therein, shall design, charge, collect, and use additional revenues as they see fit, within the limits of the Law and within this Constitution. 6. Money and Money Substitutes 1. (foreign exchange in foreign currency) ( … ) 7. Debt ( … ) 8. Bankruptcy 1. All citizens have the right to Personal and Corporate Bankruptcy. All Political organizations whether state, city, county, township, village, the right to political bankruptcy. But the Citizens do not have a right to escape political bankruptcy. As such upon the bankruptcy of a political order, the debts shall be allocated pro rata to the Citizens, and inescapable. (Counsel: To prevent populations, bureaucracies, and politicians from running up debts and escaping them. There shall be no ‘starting over’ from political financial crime. )Public Services.
Whereas; The tendency of monopoly bureaucracy is self interest, limited effort, the illusion of self import, due to insulation from competition, and ever increasing accumulation of rents, all at the expense of the people; Therefore;1. All public services shall be delegated to private contractors, such that bureaucracies are eliminated, and the ‘favor economy’ of bureaucrats and politicians is deprived of opportunity.
2. All public services shall remain open for business from 6:00 AM to 10:00 PM, so that the public need not refrain from working in order to obtain services or comply with regulations.
3. All public services shall staff such that the maximum waiting time for any resident or citizen is twenty minutes. All individuals appearing and waiting for service must be clean, dressed appropriately, quiet, still, and if ill, wearing face and hand coverings.
4. All public service employees shall be accountable for the truthfulness of their speech and the right of the people to compel truthful speech shall not be infringed. Right of accurate speech shall not be infringed, and the people compensated for any inaccurate speech.
5. Personal transportation taxes and fees shall be terminated and the people’s freedom from imposition of costs upon their transportation shall be ended. Meaning all drivers license and car registration fees will be prohibited except payment for the original. Citizens shall be responsible for keeping their licenses in good condition, photograph or to pay for a replacement.
6. Personal no-fault insurance shall be required for drivers of vehicles open to harm.
7. Driver’s licenses shall be granted by the insurer for life until the age of 65 at which we require fitness tests by the insurer every two years to continue driving; and must have the photo (if required) renewed every ten years so that they are identifiable.
(a) Drivers licenses are not a valid form of id. Only residency identification for each class of attainment. 8. At birth, or upon request any time thereafter, all Residents shall be given a durable passport, a residency identification; benefit accounts, and instrument of access to those accounts. Regarding The Police (government rather than courts) (see sheriffs under court) (civil responsibility for most policing, police as emergency services) Prohibitions Irreversible or Unrestitutable 1. ( … ) Corruptible 1. ( … ) Inactionable and Unenforceable 1. All Acts shall be actionable, enforceable, paid for, and constrain the few who commit violations not the many who do not. Ceremony, Posturing, Signaling (Symbolism) 1. All Acts shall not consist of Ceremonial, Posturing or Virtue Signaling, but shall be limited to actionable changes in condition of affairs. Defamation (Speech) 1. Defamation of the State or the Several States and their Acts shall be prohibited. (Counsel: One and all can use the courts to overturn the false, improper, and irreciprocal. One has no right to poison the well.) Undermining (Action) 1. Undermining of the State or the Several States and their Acts shall be prohibited. (Counsel: One and all can use the courts to overturn the false, improper, and irreciprocal. One has no right to undermine them.) Conspiracy (Conspiracy) 1. No Several State nor its People shall conspire with any other party, Imperial or foreign, to deny opportunity to any other Several State, and in particular, to conspire to terms of exclusivity, nor form a Cartel, nor a Monopoly, nor any semblance thereof. (Counsel: If a Several State cannot compete by price and quality it cannot compete, and must reform such that it is able to complete by price and quality.) Armament 1. The Regions, Several States, or their Divisions shall not form, hold, or assist Military or Paramilitary forces, nor bear military nor paramilitary arms, except those delegated to the regiments, the militia, and the Citizenry by the State. 2. The Several States shall not organize, hold, assist, or support, any political, religious, ideological, or informational forces, organizations, movements, or individuals external to their borders. (Counsel: Deny Several States Interference, Expansion, Conflict, Conquest, limiting them to social and economic activities on behalf of their people.) Treaty 1. Several States may form Treaties limited to commerce and trade. Treaties with the Military, Political, Religious, or Ideological content are specifically prohibited. (Counsel: “Mind your own business”. The production of commons is different from production of power; And the Several States are prohibited from the production and projection of power of coercion by any means.) Warnings ( Counsel: Choosing one’s form of government, means also choosing the consequence of one’s choices. Choosing poorly can result in a suit before the Court whereby the judiciary authorizes the military to punish not only those who govern, but those who chose them to govern. One’s right to state formation and preservation is limited to the internal observance of the Law and externalization of harm to others or other Territories. ) — End of Article VII — -
Constitution: The Government of the Several States
Constitution: The Government of the Several States
ARTICLE VII
The Government of the Several States, Possessions and Territories
“The Market for Production of Commons”
Whereas; The Purpose of Governments is the creation, maintenance, and preservation of the disproportionate returns on the production of Commons free from privatization of those commons, free riding upon those commons, and and socialization of losses into those commons; All peoples differ in distribution, ability, wants, and needs, and require the political, economic, social, and interpersonal incentives, information, services, and goods, to serve themselves, their kin, friends, and fellows. As such while The Law remains constant across all life, the means of production of commons and the choice of commons, and the processes, rules, norms, and signals used in the construction, maintenance, and preservation of those commons, differs between individuals and groups. Therefore; This Constitution provides a means by which groups may produced commons, processes, rules, norms and signals best suited to their interests, by providing a choice of means of governance that prohibit corruption, parasitism, fraud, and deceit in the production of commons. Conversely, this constitution provides a means by which people may choose their interests poorly – and therefore pay the consequences of that poor choice And Whereas; Governments, like all Organizations, universally evolve to maximize Rent Seeking (Parasitism) and Fragility rather than the optimum production of returns on Commons, or sufficient reserves and flexibility that they can survive and adapt to socks. Therefore; This Constitution eliminates and shall eliminate, Parasitism, bureaucracies, politicians, political parties and limits political discourse to the voluntary production of commons of benefit to the local polity; (Counsel: by removing politicians and political parties, and false, irreciprocal, and unwarrantable speech from the political discourse, we are left with a wide range of choices of government, from the least to the most participatory, and from the most corporate to the most kinship. In this Article, the Several States may choose that method of government free of political corruption, but suitable to their demographics and interests.) And Whereas; People, as an organization will as readily use their political order to seek privatization of others commons, or to free ride upon others commons, or to socialize losses into others commons; as they will upon one another; Therefore; This constitution eliminates and shall eliminate, predation, parasitism, and harm by one polity, upon the commons of another polity. And Whereas; (….) challenge of our age Therefore; And this Constitution reverses and shall reverse the ability of Cities and non-cities to force policies that they favor upon one another; And Therefore; We Ascend the following Requirements, Rights, Obligations, Prohibitions and Warnings: Requirements Territories 1. A Territory shall consist of areas under control of the State, whether or not the State possesses the territory that area occupies. 2. A Territory shall be formed or dissolved by the State by whatever means the State decides. 3. Territories shall include but not be limited to Embassies, Offices, Military Bases, Protectorates, Private Territory Unders State Protection. Trade Routes. Waters. Airspace. Terrestrial Underground, Terrestrial Underwater, and Extra-terrestrial Routes, Ways, Spaces, objects, territories, resources, and undergrounds. Possessions 1. A Possession shall differ from a Territory in that (a) a Possession contains a population, (b) that the People of the Possession may organize a government to produce commons, (c) the State shall limit the production of those commons, (d) the State shall appoint Governors, Judges, Sheriffs, The Regiment or Regiments, and all other roles responsibilities and functions within that Possession, to regulate and insure the conformity of that Possession with the Law and this Constitution. 2. A Possession shall have no influence upon the State or its holdings, whether Information, Political, Military, or Strategic. 3. A Possession shall be formed by not less than fifty-thousand people in a contiguous territory. A possession may form a Several State upon meeting and warranting the criteria for Several States. Several States 1. The purpose of a Several State is to provide for its People those commons most suitable or desirable to those people, and no other purpose whatsoever external to that Several State and its people. 2. A Several State shall be formed by not less than five hundred thousand People in a contiguous territory. ( Counsel: One my not ‘block’ a voluntary transaction for gain. If such an attempt is made the individual shall be compensated at market value plus twenty percent, and the territory appropriated and transferred. This is defense against violation of reciprocity by interference in production for personal gain, rather than contribution to production for personal gain.) 3. For the purpose of sovereign administration, Several States shall divide into Cities, and Counties. Cities shall divide into Districts, Districts into Neighborhoods, and Neighborhoods into Homes. Counties shall divide into Shires, and Shires into towns, villages, and homes. City States 1. Any City with population greater than five hundred thousand people with at least five hundred people per square mile shall involuntarily Ascend to a Several State, and submit a constitution to the State (the court), or shall be involuntarily converted to a Possession and have a constitution imposed upon it by the State (Court). Any city which devolves from such condition may dissolve in an organized manner by submission to and acceptance by, a plan by the State (Court). (Counsel: As in all things, Nor shall any art or artifice be used to circumvent this charge.) ( Counsel: Cities may no longer impose will upon those with lower population density. Cities may not) Regions 1. A Region shall be formed by a treaty between three or more contiguous Several States, and shall be formed by and within the same criteria as the Several States. (Counsel: Permits regional governments for the organized production of mutually beneficial economic policy.) Cities 1. A City shall be formed by of not less than ten thousand people of at least five hundred people per square mile. Must conduct business by a mayor, a city council, and pay for its own Justices, Sheriffs, Police and Emergency Services. (Counsel: Limits Cities to minimum population density.) Districts 1. A City, County, Town, and Shire shall be divided into districts of common interest, each consisting of not less than ten thousand people, over which the citizens determine district policy. Neighborhoods 1. A District shall be divided into neighborhoods of common interest, each consisting of not less than one hundred people in contiguous space, over which the citizens determine neighborhood policy. (Counsel: Cities and City States shall divide into districts, shall divide into neighborhoods, shall divide into homes.) Counties and Shires 1. A County shall be formed from not less than twenty five square miles of contiguous territory, regardless of population, or density, by the citizens residing within it; with those few counties under that size at the time of this writing, grandfathered. A County shall conduct business by a County Council and pay for its own Sheriffs, and Emergency Services. Towns 1. A town shall be formed by and consist of, not less than ten thousand people. Shall conduct business by a mayor, a town council and pay for its own Sheriffs, and Emergency Services. Villages 1. A village shall be formed by and consist of, not less than one thousand people, residing in a contiguous space, who shall select at least one secretary whether paid or not, and shall select and must pay for at least one Sheriff. Homesteads 1. As of the writing of this Constitution, there is no land open to homesteading on this planet. However, in the event the possibility exists, to homestead property, one shall (a) improve it for permanent habitation by the construction of a home that will survive for one hundred years, (b) fence the territory, (c) improve it for permanent production of goods, services, or information, (d) do so for a period of not less than three years, during which no other may lay claim. 2. Under no conditions shall a ‘squatter’ hold rights for any reason or any duration, without exception. (Counsel: Squatting is theft.) Vagrants 1. Under no conditions shall ‘migrants’, ‘vagrants’, ‘tinkers’, ‘gypsies’ be permitted movement or stay. Instead such people shall be relocated to wilderness camps, and their means of transport destroyed, thereby prohibiting their further movement. ( Counsel: Vagrancy is theft, and export of hazard and risk. ) Rights 1. All Citizens of all territories have the right to self determination in the production of those commons best suited to their interests, that do not impose costs upon the demonstrated interests of others. (a) Any territory of any State any scale, may Secede, Transfer, or Ascend, if in the chosen interests of the people of that territory should they fully conform to this constitution. (b) Any territory of any State may secede, and transfer between states, or ascend to Several Statehood if in the chosen intersets of the people of that territory should they fully conform to this constitution. (c) Any territory of that today called Canada may join these states if in the chosen intersets of the people of that territory should they fully conform to this constitution. (d) Any territory of that today called Mexico may join these states if in the interests of the people of that territory, should they fully conform to this constitution. Obligations 1. Constitutions and Amendments. 1. Each of the Several States shall construct a and Propose a Constitution for self government, according to requirements and demands of The Law set forth in this Constitution. The Court shall approve or reject these Constitutions within one hundred and twenty days, with or without comment. Should a Several State fail to produce a constitution that passes Juridical Assent within a period of six months, then the Military Shall Take Possession, thereby converting the State to a Possession, establish martial law; and a constitution shall be provided to that Possession by the Court within ninety days, and a government imposed for a period of three years; after which the polity may resume self governance as a Several State. ( Counsel: Enforces strict construction of constitutions, gives opportunity for reformation, and Eliminates the “Quebec Strategy”) 2. Any of the Several States may Propose an Amendment to this Constitution, where such an amendment alters Practice and Policy not Declaration and Claim; and then submit it to Supreme the Court. It shall Ascend upon approval (a) by three fourths of the states, (b) by over three fourths of the population, (c) populating three fourths of the territory, (d) the Supreme Court, (d) the military, and if extant, (e) the Monarchy. 2. Acts 1. The Several States shall produce Acts in the form of Contracts of the Commons, by whatever means they choose; where the scope of such acts is limited to their territorial jurisdiction; but such acts shall be constructed according to demands of The Law set forth in this Constitution and where where not in contradiction, conflict, or conflation, or confusion with this constitution, whether in whole, in part, or in definition. ( Counsel: (a) The term “legislation”, being a lie is prohibited. Governments produce Acts. The law is the law and only the law is law. (b) this clause maintains separation between Law and Mythology, Propaganda, or Positioning. ) 2. No Act shall Ascend without Assent by the Court. The Court shall Assent if and only if the Act is constructed according to demands of The Law set forth in this Constitution and where where not in contradiction, conflict, or conflation, or confusion with this constitution, whether in whole, in part, or in definition. Otherwise the court shall Dissent and thereby Veto the Act, prohibiting it in whole, in part, and in definition. The Court shall determine the means and methods by which it reviews, Ascends or Dissent and Veto Acts. 3. Acts constraining or licensing Public behaviors in display, word, and deed shall be determined by the smallest, most local, governmental body extant, and no higher government shall interfere save limiting the export of costs of lesser limitations on display, word, and deed into other polities with greater limitations on display word and deed. (Counsel: Norms shall be determined locally and greater discipline prioritized over less discipline.) 3. The Production of Acts 1. The States and their Subdivisions may form Governments for the Production of Acts (Contracts of the Commons) by any combination of the following means: Optionally: 1. Monarchical (Hereditary, Familial, European Model) 1. A Monarch shall be elected or appointed from a member of the military from a family demonstrating no less than six generations of military service in a combat capacity, and of exclusively European descent, and exclusively European religion. 2. The Monarchy shall be inherited by the eldest male of exclusively european descent, and exclusively European religion, heir having performed military service, who voluntarily accepts the duty. 3. If necessary, a Regent of the Monarchical Family’s choosing shall be appointed until an Heir comes of age. 4. The Monarchy shall be subsidized or paid for by the Polity at no less than twenty times the median income of the polity. 4. The Monarch shall appoint a Professional Executive who serves at the Monarchy’s discretion. (See Professional Executive below). 5. The Monarchy shall call upon a Jury of the People, randomly selected from the Citizenry, and apportioned by productive Class; Gender; Family, Business, Industry; and Region, wherein each class is named a ‘House’; and serving at the will of the monarchy; to choose whether to Approve or Veto each of the Propositions advanced by the Executive; 6. As such, all Acts shall ascend, only upon survival of veto by The Houses of the Citizens, the Executive, The Courts, and the Monarch or his Regent. 7. Conversely, any Act may be overturned by the courts, in whole or in part either prior or post Assent. ( Counsel: A National (Kinship) Militia, Administered by A Monarchy, Under Rule of Law, with Houses for the Classes, each of which Assents or Dissents from Propositions of the Monarchy or its Ministers, is the best form of government Possible because it has the best incentives possible, by providing the least malincentives possible. The principle innovation that is necessary is the Court of the Natural Law, which provides a market for dismissal of impositions by governments.) And Necessarily; 2. Professional Executive ( Corporate, Chinese Model ) 1. An Executive may be Elected, Appointed, and Removed by whatever means, for whatever duration embodied in the constitution of the Several State, as long as their is a means of removal in the case of failure as defense against the need for insurrection to correct an executive failure. In all cases, an executive can be removed by the Court, and the Military, as a last resort. 2. The Executive shall be a Citizen, exclusively heterosexually male, of no less than sixty years of age, having fulfilled his military service, and having served for no less than twenty years as a Primary Executive in the Court, Military, or Industry. (Counsel: the limitation on political careerism is by design) 3. The Executive shall Advance Propositions, in form of Contracts of the Commons, by Filing with the Court, and obtaining Assent. All acts not vetoed by the Court Ascend. 4. The Executive shall Appoint a Cabinet of Ministers for the administration of the Several State. 5. Ministers shall hire and fire individuals and organizations as necessary to perform the Minister’s functions. And Optionally; 3. Aristocratic (Kinship model) 1. A Titled Family of the hierarchy of Duke, Count, or Baron shall be elected or appointed from a family of exceptional performance, consistency, privacy, stoicism, and demonstrating no less than six generations of military service, and of exclusively European descent, and exclusively European religion. 2. The Title shall be inherited by the any heir of exclusively european descent, and exclusively European religion, having performed military service, who voluntarily accepts the duty. 3. If necessary, a Regent of the Titled Family’s choosing shall be appointed until an Heir comes of age. 4. The purpose of these Titled families is to raise and train intergenerational families for the sole purpose of successful administration of the territory over which they have responsibility. 5. A Family may lose Title and Office by action of the Court for criminal malfeasance in Governance of the territory – and when exclusively of malfeasance and not of natural error. 6. Titled families shall be subsidized by or paid for by the Polity at no less than four times the median income of the polity, such that their means of status and income is successful service of the polity. (Counsel: Propaganda of the past centuries being merely that, the evidence is clearly in favor of intergenerational, titled, families when they are subject to the negative market of the courts, rather than the negative market of elections. There is no better form of government.) Or; 4. Juried (Old English Model) 1. An Executive shall Advance Propositions, in form of Contracts of the Commons, by Filing with the Court, obtaining Assent. Then promoting their Propositions. 2. The Executive shall call upon a Jury of the People, randomly selected from the Citizenry, and apportioned by Class; Gender; Family, Business, Industry; and Region wherein each class is named a ‘House’; to Approve or Dissent each of the Propositions advanced by the Executive. 3. If the Executive submits and Approves, the Court Approves and all houses Approve, then Proposition shall Ascend. Or; 5. Market Between Classes ( Market ) 1. Citizens shall be divided into Classes and Genders, that represent ‘Houses‘ of common interest. Revenues shall be apportioned equally to each house. 2. Any Citizen or Citizens shall Advance Propositions, in form of Contracts of the Commons, consisting of exchanges between the Classes, by Filing with the Court; obtaining Assent from the Court; Then promoting their Propositions. 3. If a Proposition receives both (a) sufficient funding and (b) survives Veto from all houses, shall Ascend. Or; 6. Direct (Democratic – Majoritarian – Populist ) 1. Any Citizen or Citizens shall Advance Propositions, in form of Contracts of the Commons, by Filing with the Court, obtaining Assent. Then promoting their Propositions. And Then; 2. At a scheduled time, at a scheduled interval, Voters may Choose from those Advanced Contracts of the Commons: by Direct Democracy (Majoritarianism): a) Vote by Family (equality between families consisting of man woman and children.) or; b) Vote by Individual (equality by individual) or; Where: Winner takes all; Or; by Economic Democracy (Auction): c) Vote By Proportional Contribution (By current monetary contribution to revenues), or; d) Vote by Equal Distribution (By current equidistribution of revenues). Where; The Auction continues until all funds are allocated, with ‘rolling over’ to the next cycle permitted. ( Counsel: Opinion: It is possible that this is the best means of funding the production of commons, because it puts the greatest pressure for performance on the production of commons, and allows gradual funding by the people as they see fit. Conversely it is suitable only for polities of development that they are capable of informed making informed decisions. If they are not capable of making informed decisions, then no form of democracy is suitable for them.) 2. If Voting exists, then Voting shall be voluntary. (Counsel: Mandatory voting is prohibited.) 3. If Voting exists, then no vote, no matter by what method, shall be proxied directly or indirectly, other than to one’s husband or wife, father or mother, or son or daughter; And no art or artifice shall circumvent this intent. 4. The formation of a government by representatives (politicians) shall be prohibited. 5. Political Parties and Organizations shall be prohibited regardless of means of construction or purpose or intent. 6. The Debts from all Acts shall be distributed to the Treasury Accounts of all Citizens by either equal or proportional means; settled by income as it is repaid; and inescapable.) (Counsel: The practice of running up debt then fleeing a territory shall be prohibited. The practice of maintaining the ignorance of the individual’s relative cost or value to others shall be prohibited. ) 2. Language 1. All public speech in all forms, including display, word ,and deed, in every and all venues, shall be be limited exclusively to the English Language, with no exceptions, no grandfathering, and zero tolerance. (Counsel: prevention of separation by language) 3. Passports. Definition; A Passport provides evidence of Insurance of a the unique identity of a human, animal, life form, artificial intelligence, or object, by an insurer of last resort (State), and evidence of the liability for defense of the insured, and warranty of others from harm by the Insured. And all that descends from such liability and warranty. Therefore; 1. Each of the Several States shall issue Passports of the Several States for their Citizens and only their citizens. 2. The State and Only the State shall issue Imperial Passports for functionaries of the State. 3. Imperial Passports shall be issued in addition to a Passports of the Several States. Imperial Passports shall be used exclusive for State Operations and purposes. Several State Passports shall be used for all other Personal travel and personal purposes. (Counsel: Preservation of State Sovereignty over commerce, culture, and residency.) 4. The Military shall show zero tolerance for harms those Insured under Imperial or Several State Passports, and shall immediately and relentlessly severely punish or terminate all actors and the families of such actors for three generations, and the organizations and members of those organizations, which direct those actors, in retaliation for any such harms. Conversely, the Insured shall be returned to jurisdiction, prosecuted for any such crime under our law. But if an complaint is not a crime under The Law, it is not a crime, and it may not be prosecuted, either in the foreign state or in the Empire. 4. Containment 1. Any polity of any scale shall lose its sovereignty, be forcibly converted to a Territory, and have a new constitution imposed upon it, if it cannot contain the export of Costs to other polities. Thes Costs shall include but not be limited to: containing the population, pollution or any other matter, light, sound, vibration, conflict, crime, goods, services, information, and disinformation. 5. Rent (Fee,Taxes) 1. State Revenues. The State shall own all time and space under its control (jurisdiction). The state shall generate revenue by Renting time and space under its control (jurisdiction). The State shall charge rent to any and all under its control (Jurisdiction). The amount of this rent shall be fifteen percent of gross domestic product of each Several State, Possession, or Territory; and Thirty Percent in Time of War. These funds shall be appropriated incrementally and daily from the Treasury. 2. Several State Revenues. In addition to State Rent, the Several States and Possessions and all forms of government therein, shall design, charge, collect, and use additional revenues as they see fit, within the limits of the Law and within this Constitution. 6. Money and Money Substitutes 1. (foreign exchange in foreign currency) ( … ) 7. Debt ( … ) 8. Bankruptcy 1. All citizens have the right to Personal and Corporate Bankruptcy. All Political organizations whether state, city, county, township, village, the right to political bankruptcy. But the Citizens do not have a right to escape political bankruptcy. As such upon the bankruptcy of a political order, the debts shall be allocated pro rata to the Citizens, and inescapable. (Counsel: To prevent populations, bureaucracies, and politicians from running up debts and escaping them. There shall be no ‘starting over’ from political financial crime. )Public Services.
Whereas; The tendency of monopoly bureaucracy is self interest, limited effort, the illusion of self import, due to insulation from competition, and ever increasing accumulation of rents, all at the expense of the people; Therefore;1. All public services shall be delegated to private contractors, such that bureaucracies are eliminated, and the ‘favor economy’ of bureaucrats and politicians is deprived of opportunity.
2. All public services shall remain open for business from 6:00 AM to 10:00 PM, so that the public need not refrain from working in order to obtain services or comply with regulations.
3. All public services shall staff such that the maximum waiting time for any resident or citizen is twenty minutes. All individuals appearing and waiting for service must be clean, dressed appropriately, quiet, still, and if ill, wearing face and hand coverings.
4. All public service employees shall be accountable for the truthfulness of their speech and the right of the people to compel truthful speech shall not be infringed. Right of accurate speech shall not be infringed, and the people compensated for any inaccurate speech.
5. Personal transportation taxes and fees shall be terminated and the people’s freedom from imposition of costs upon their transportation shall be ended. Meaning all drivers license and car registration fees will be prohibited except payment for the original. Citizens shall be responsible for keeping their licenses in good condition, photograph or to pay for a replacement.
6. Personal no-fault insurance shall be required for drivers of vehicles open to harm.
7. Driver’s licenses shall be granted by the insurer for life until the age of 65 at which we require fitness tests by the insurer every two years to continue driving; and must have the photo (if required) renewed every ten years so that they are identifiable.
(a) Drivers licenses are not a valid form of id. Only residency identification for each class of attainment. 8. At birth, or upon request any time thereafter, all Residents shall be given a durable passport, a residency identification; benefit accounts, and instrument of access to those accounts. Regarding The Police (government rather than courts) (see sheriffs under court) (civil responsibility for most policing, police as emergency services) Prohibitions Irreversible or Unrestitutable 1. ( … ) Corruptible 1. ( … ) Inactionable and Unenforceable 1. All Acts shall be actionable, enforceable, paid for, and constrain the few who commit violations not the many who do not. Ceremony, Posturing, Signaling (Symbolism) 1. All Acts shall not consist of Ceremonial, Posturing or Virtue Signaling, but shall be limited to actionable changes in condition of affairs. Defamation (Speech) 1. Defamation of the State or the Several States and their Acts shall be prohibited. (Counsel: One and all can use the courts to overturn the false, improper, and irreciprocal. One has no right to poison the well.) Undermining (Action) 1. Undermining of the State or the Several States and their Acts shall be prohibited. (Counsel: One and all can use the courts to overturn the false, improper, and irreciprocal. One has no right to undermine them.) Conspiracy (Conspiracy) 1. No Several State nor its People shall conspire with any other party, Imperial or foreign, to deny opportunity to any other Several State, and in particular, to conspire to terms of exclusivity, nor form a Cartel, nor a Monopoly, nor any semblance thereof. (Counsel: If a Several State cannot compete by price and quality it cannot compete, and must reform such that it is able to complete by price and quality.) Armament 1. The Regions, Several States, or their Divisions shall not form, hold, or assist Military or Paramilitary forces, nor bear military nor paramilitary arms, except those delegated to the regiments, the militia, and the Citizenry by the State. 2. The Several States shall not organize, hold, assist, or support, any political, religious, ideological, or informational forces, organizations, movements, or individuals external to their borders. (Counsel: Deny Several States Interference, Expansion, Conflict, Conquest, limiting them to social and economic activities on behalf of their people.) Treaty 1. Several States may form Treaties limited to commerce and trade. Treaties with the Military, Political, Religious, or Ideological content are specifically prohibited. (Counsel: “Mind your own business”. The production of commons is different from production of power; And the Several States are prohibited from the production and projection of power of coercion by any means.) Warnings ( Counsel: Choosing one’s form of government, means also choosing the consequence of one’s choices. Choosing poorly can result in a suit before the Court whereby the judiciary authorizes the military to punish not only those who govern, but those who chose them to govern. One’s right to state formation and preservation is limited to the internal observance of the Law and externalization of harm to others or other Territories. ) — End of Article VII — -
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF NEW EUROPEAN ZONE —“Curt, Can you please write a post
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF NEW EUROPEAN ZONE
—“Curt, Can you please write a post on the economic feasibility of banning imports outside of a New European zone? I want to see what the king of the hill process does to the proposal on page 67 of NZM”— Oliver
New European Zone? I assume that means Australia, NZ, USA, Canada, Europe, Eastern Europe, Russia, (But South America?, India?).
(Short version: easy for everyone except aussie/nz who pay the distance cost. But its easy to do, yes.)
I’m not going to go into world balances of trade between the parties. It would take me all day to write this post. And I’m going to state the obvious that other countries would retaliate. But if you look at the list at the end of this post you will rapidly see that the USA and canada can easily survive it. The outliers are NZ and Aussies who are for all intents and purposes, client states of asia.
Cutting out africa (minerals), the middle east(oil), and asia(manufacturing capacity) is entirely possible. and the result would largely be transfer of japanese and chinese manufacturing capacity to Germany and the USA, and the strategic transfer of the Japanese relationship to Asia, and an axis of japan and south korea that might perhaps ally with india.
It is hard to choose whether to exclude or include india and south america, both of which are european admixtures. Russia is also integrated with (northern) Kazakhstan and imports 1/10th of its oil. Russia India and China have large trade relationships. The west would have to subsidize russian military production by buying their equipment as a replacement for the asian and middle eastern markets. China wold be able to build her military technology by finding ready markets middle eastern, african, and asian realms.
Russia would roughly exchange its role as an asian trade power for the role of the middle east and asia in supplying oil and resources. And so it is russia that is the ‘power position’ in any such negotiation, and putting her in this position of power would tempt russian nature, but restore her to world power status which she desires.
However russia cannot compete as a world power with her population and economy; asia as an interest in reclaiming russian territory and resources. Her interest given her nature might be swiss neutrality. We would have to buy russian involvement which would require american military exit from europe and a general comfort on the part of eastern europeans that is hard to imagine.
THE ALTERNATIVE 1
Limit trade to raw materials and food, and autarky on goods produced by transformation of them. This is the optimum balance of providing world trade in territorial differences but ameliorating differences in degrees of development of human capital by eliminating wage arbitrage (differences in cost of living and purchasing power).
THE ALTERNATIVE 2
The Anglosphere Alternative (restoration of the british empire). is somewhat easier to pull off since we are already autarkic with only Australian and NZ the outliers.
Australia:
***China 32.2%,
***Japan 15.9%,
***South Korea 7.1%,
US 5.4%,
***India 4.2% (2015)
New Zealand:
***China: US$9.6 billion (24.9% of New Zealand’s total exports)
Australia: $5.7 billion (14.8%)
United States: $3.7 billion (9.6%)
***Japan: $2.4 billion (6.3%)
***South Korea: $1.2 billion (3.1%)
United Kingdom: $1 billion (2.7%)
***Singapore: $832.5 million (2.2%)
***Taiwan: $831.8 million (2.2%)
***Hong Kong: $761.5 million (2%)
***Malaysia: $702.5 million (1.8%)
***Indonesia: $675.8 million (1.8%)
***Thailand: $638.2 million (1.7%)
Netherlands: $586 million (1.5%)
Germany: $579 million (1.5%)
***United Arab Emirates: $533.8 million (1.4%)
Canada:
United States: US$337.8 billion (75.1% of total Canadian exports)
***China: $21.3 billion (4.7%)
United Kingdom: $12.6 billion (2.8%)
***Japan: $10 billion (2.2%)
Mexico: $6.3 billion (1.4%)
South Korea: $4.5 billion (1%)
Germany: $3.7 billion (0.8%)
Netherlands: $3.7 billion (0.8%)
***India: $3.2 billion (0.7%)
***Hong Kong: $3 billion (0.7%)
Belgium: $2.8 billion (0.6%)
France: $2.6 billion (0.6%)
Italy: $2.3 billion (0.5%)
Norway: $1.9 billion (0.4%)
***Brazil: $1.7 billion (0.4%)
America:
Canada: US$298.7 billion (18% of total US exports)
***Mexico: $265 billion (15.9%)
***China: $120.3 billion (7.2%)
***Japan: $75 billion (4.5%)
United Kingdom: $66.2 billion (4%)
Germany: $57.7 billion (3.5%)
***South Korea: $56.3 billion (3.4%)
Netherlands: $49.4 billion (3%)
***Brazil: $39.5 billion (2.4%)
Hong Kong: $37.5 billion (2.3%)
France: $37.4 billion (2.2%)
***Singapore: $33.1 billion (2%)
***India: $33.1 billion (2%)
Belgium: $31.4 billion (1.9%)
***Taiwan: $30.2 billion (1.8%)
UK:
United States: US$64.4 billion (13.3% of total UK exports)
Germany: $47 billion (9.7%)
Netherlands: $33.3 billion (6.9%)
France: $31.8 billion (6.6%)
Ireland: $28.3 billion (5.9%)
***China: $27.5 billion (5.7%)
Switzerland: $25.4 billion (5.2%)
Belgium: $19.1 billion (4%)
Italy: $14.1 billion (2.9%)
Spain: $13.9 billion (2.9%)
***Hong Kong: $10.3 billion (2.1%)
***United Arab Emirates: $10 billion (2.1%)
***Turkey: $9.5 billion (2%)
***Japan: $8.3 billion (1.7%)
***South Korea: $7.8 billion (1.6%)
Ireland:
United States: US$46 billion (27.9% of total Irish exports)
Belgium: $21.7 billion (13.2%)
United Kingdom: $18.7 billion (11.4%)
Germany: $12.2 billion (7.4%)
Netherlands: $9 billion (5.4%)
Switzerland: $7.7 billion (4.6%)
France: $6.2 billion (3.8%)
China: $5.4 billion (3.3%)
Japan: $4.6 billion (2.8%)
Italy: $4.3 billion (2.6%)
Spain: $3 billion (1.8%)
***Mexico: $1.7 billion (1%)
Canada: $1.6 billion (1%)
Poland: $1.4 billion (0.8%)
Sweden: $1.1 billion (0.7%)
LATIN BLOCK
France: (FRANCE IS, LIKE THE USA, AUTARKIC)
Germany: US$83.3 billion (14.7% of total French exports)
United States: $45.3 billion (8%)
Spain: $44.3 billion (7.8%)
Italy: $42.8 billion (7.5%)
Belgium: $40.4 billion (7.1%)
United Kingdom: $38.6 billion (6.8%)
***China: $24.5 billion (4.3%)
Netherlands: $20.9 billion (3.7%)
Switzerland: $18.9 billion (3.3%)
Poland: $11.7 billion (2.1%)
***Singapore: $9.7 billion (1.7%)
***Japan: $7.8 billion (1.4%)
***Hong Kong: $7.3 billion (1.3%)
***Turkey: $7.1 billion (1.2%)
***India: $6.5 billion (1.1%)
Spain
France: US$48.5 billion (15.1% of total Spanish exports)
Germany: $36.1 billion (11.3%)
Italy: $25.1 billion (7.8%)
Portugal: $22.6 billion (7.1%)
United Kingdom: $22 billion (6.9%)
United States: $14.1 billion (4.4%)
Netherlands: $10.8 billion (3.4%)
Belgium: $9.6 billion (3%)
Morocco: $9 billion (2.8%)
***China: $7.1 billion (2.2%)
Poland: $6.5 billion (2%)
Turkey: $6.5 billion (2%)
Mexico: $5.2 billion (1.6%)
Switzerland: $4.7 billion (1.5%)
Romania: $3.2 billion (1%)
Portugal
Spain: US$17.4 billion (25.3% of total Portuguese exports)
France: $8.7 billion (12.7%)
Germany: $7.9 billion (11.5%)
United Kingdom: $4.3 billion (6.3%)
United States: $3.4 billion (5%)
Italy: $2.9 billion (4.3%)
Netherlands: $2.6 billion (3.8%)
Angola: $1.8 billion (2.6%)
Belgium: $1.6 billion (2.3%)
Brazil: $957.5 million (1.4%)
Poland: $897.2 million (1.3%)
***Morocco: $819.4 million (1.2%)
China: $777.6 million (1.1%)
Sweden: $686.8 million (1%)
Switzerland: $681.6 million (1%)
ITALY:
Germany: US$62.9 billion (12.4% of total Italian exports)
France: $51.9 billion (10.3%)
United States: $45.8 billion (9%)
Spain: $26.1 billion (5.2%)
United Kingdom: $26 billion (5.1%)
Switzerland: $23.4 billion (4.6%)
***China: $15.3 billion (3%)
Belgium: $15.2 billion (3%)
Poland: $14.2 billion (2.8%)
Netherlands: $11.8 billion (2.3%)
***Turkey: $11.4 billion (2.3%)
Austria: $10.7 billion (2.1%)
Russia: $9 billion (1.8%)
Romania: $8.2 billion (1.6%)
***Japan: $7.4 billion (1.5%)
GERMAN BLOCK
Netherlands
Germany: US$146.8 billion (22.5% of total Dutch exports)
Belgium: $68.3 billion (10.5%)
United Kingdom: $56.6 billion (8.7%)
France: $55.3 billion (8.5%)
Italy: $25.7 billion (3.9%)
United States: $22.7 billion (3.5%)
Spain: $19.9 billion (3.1%)
Poland: $15.6 billion (2.4%)
Sweden: $14.7 billion (2.2%)
***China: $13.5 billion (2.1%)
Czech Republic: $11.2 billion (1.7%)
Austria: $8.6 billion (1.3%)
Switzerland: $7.9 billion (1.2%)
Denmark: $7.8 billion (1.2%)
***Turkey: $7.2 billion (1.1%)
Belglum
Germany: US$70.7 billion (16.5% of total Belgian exports)
France: $63.8 billion (14.9%)
Netherlands: $51.4 billion (12%)
United Kingdom: $36 billion (8.4%)
Italy: $20.9 billion (4.9%)
United States: $20.6 billion (4.8%)
Spain: $11.8 billion (2.8%)
Poland: $9.2 billion (2.1%)
***India: $8.9 billion (2.1%)
***China: $8.9 billion (2.1%)
Sweden: $7.5 billion (1.7%)
Switzerland: $7 billion (1.6%)
Luxembourg: $6.4 billion (1.5%)
***Turkey: $5.8 billion (1.4%)
Russia: $4.4 billion (1%)
Over three-quarters (77.1%) of Belgian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.
Germany:
United States: US$134 billion (8.6% of total German exports)
France: $124.4 billion (8%)
***China: $109.9 billion (7.1%)
Netherlands: $99.8 billion (6.4%)
United Kingdom: $96.8 billion (6.2%)
Italy: $82.6 billion (5.3%)
Austria: $75.2 billion (4.8%)
Poland: $74.7 billion (4.8%)
Switzerland: $64.3 billion (4.1%)
Spain: $52.4 billion (3.4%)
Belgium: $52.3 billion (3.4%)
Czech Republic: $51.8 billion (3.3%)
Sweden: $31.1 billion (2%)
Hungary: $31 billion (2%)
Russia: $30.6 billion (2%)
Austria
Germany: US$48.7 billion (29.0% of total Austrian exports)
United States: $10.3 billion (6.1%)
Italy: $10.2 billion (6.1%)
Switzerland: $8.5 billion (5.1%)
Slovakia: $8.1 billion (4.8%)
France: $7.9 billion (4.7%)
Czech Republic: $5.9 billion (3.5%)
Hungary: $5.5 billion (3.3%)
Poland: $5.2 billion (3.1%)
***China: $4.4 billion (2.6%)
United Kingdom: $4.4 billion (2.6%)
Slovenia: $3.2 billion (1.9%)
Netherlands: $2.9 billion (1.7%)
Romania: $2.7 billion (1.6%)
Spain: $2.7 billion (1.6%)
Over three-quarters (77.6%) of Austrian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.
Denmark:
Germany: US$15.6 billion (14.5% of total Danish exports)
Sweden: $11.3 billion (10.5%)
United Kingdom: $6.7 billion (6.2%)
Norway: $6.3 billion (5.9%)
United States: $4.7 billion (4.4%)
Netherlands: $4.6 billion (4.3%)
France: $3.3 billion (3.1%)
***China: $3.2 billion (2.9%)
Poland: $3 billion (2.8%)
Italy: $2.4 billion (2.2%)
Finland: $2 billion (1.9%)
Spain: $1.9 billion (1.8%)
Belgium: $1.7 billion (1.6%)
***Japan: $1.5 billion (1.4%)
Australia: $959.3 million (0.9%)
Sweden
Germany: US$16.4 billion (10.7% of total Swedish exports)
Norway: $15.5 billion (10.1%)
Finland: $10.5 billion (6.9%)
Denmark: $10.4 billion (6.8%)
United States: $10.1 billion (6.6%)
United Kingdom: $9.3 billion (6.1%)
Netherlands: $8.3 billion (5.4%)
***China: $6.8 billion (4.4%)
Belgium: $6.5 billion (4.3%)
France: $6.3 billion (4.1%)
Poland: $4.6 billion (3%)
Italy: $4 billion (2.6%)
Spain: $2.9 billion (1.9%)
***Japan: $2.2 billion (1.5%)
Russia: $2.1 billion (1.4%)
Norway:
United Kingdom: US$26.5 billion (21.6% of Norway’s total exports)
Germany: $19.7 billion (16%)
Netherlands: $13.1 billion (10.7%)
Sweden: $8.2 billion (6.7%)
France: $8.2 billion (6.7%)
Belgium: $6.4 billion (5.2%)
Denmark: $5.8 billion (4.7%)
United States: $5.7 billion (4.7%)
Poland: $2.8 billion (2.3%)
***China: $2.6 billion (2.1%)
Spain: $2.2 billion (1.8%)
Finland: $2 billion (1.6%)
Italy: $1.6 billion (1.3%)
***Japan: $1.4 billion (1.2%)
***South Korea: $1.4 billion (1.1%)
Finland:
Germany: US$9.3 billion (13.7% of total Finnish exports)
Sweden: $6.3 billion (9.3%)
Netherlands: $4.4 billion (6.5%)
United States: $4.4 billion (6.4%)
Russia: $3.7 billion (5.5%)
***China: $3.7 billion (5.4%)
United Kingdom: $2.8 billion (4.2%)
Belgium: $2.1 billion (3.1%)
France: $2 billion (3%)
Estonia: $1.9 billion (2.8%)
Norway: $1.6 billion (2.4%)
Poland: $1.6 billion (2.4%)
Italy: $1.5 billion (2.2%)
***Japan: $1.1 billion (1.7%)
Spain: $1.1 billion (1.6%)
Lithuania
Russia: US$4.7 billion (14% of total Lithuanian exports)
Latvia: $3.2 billion (9.7%)
Poland: $2.7 billion (8.2%)
Germany: $2.5 billion (7.4%)
United States: $1.7 billion (5.2%)
Estonia: $1.7 billion (5%)
Sweden: $1.6 billion (4.9%)
Belarus: $1.3 billion (3.8%)
United Kingdom: $1.3 billion (3.8%)
Netherlands: $1.1 billion (3.3%)
Ukraine: $1 billion (3.1%)
Norway: $933.8 million (2.8%)
France: $837 million (2.5%)
Denmark: $833.9 million (2.5%)
Italy: $727.3 million (2.2%)
INTERMARIUM BLOCK
Poland:
Germany: US$63.3 billion (27.4% of total Polish exports)
Czech Republic: $14.8 billion (6.4%)
United Kingdom: $14.7 billion (6.4%)
France: $12.9 billion (5.6%)
Italy: $11.3 billion (4.9%)
Netherlands: $10.1 billion (4.4%)
Russia: $7 billion (3%)
Sweden: $6.4 billion (2.8%)
Spain: $6.2 billion (2.7%)
United States: $6.2 billion (2.7%)
Hungary: $6.1 billion (2.6%)
Slovakia: $5.8 billion (2.5%)
Belgium: $5.1 billion (2.2%)
Ukraine: $4.8 billion (2.1%)
Austria: $4.4 billion (1.9%)
Ukraine
Russia: US$3.9 billion (9.1% of total Ukrainian exports)
Poland: $2.7 billion (6.3%)
***Turkey: $2.5 billion (5.8%)
Italy: $2.5 billion (5.7%)
***India: $2.2 billion (5.1%)
***China: $2.1 billion (4.9%)
***Egypt: $1.8 billion (4.2%)
Germany: $1.8 billion (4%)
Netherlands: $1.7 billion (3.9%)
Hungary: $1.3 billion (3.1%)
Spain: $1.3 billion (2.9%)
Belarus: $1.1 billion (2.6%)
Romania: $844.2 million (1.94%)
United States: $834 million (1.92%)
Czech Republic: $715.4 million (1.6%)
Almost two-thirds (63.1%) of Ukrainian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trading partners.
Slovakia
Germany: US$17.5 billion (20.7% of total Slovak exports)
Czech Republic: $9.8 billion (11.6%)
Poland: $6.5 billion (7.7%)
France: $5.3 billion (6.3%)
Italy: $5.1 billion (6.1%)
United Kingdom: $5.1 billion (6%)
Hungary: $5.1 billion (6%)
Austria: $5.1 billion (6%)
Spain: $2.5 billion (2.9%)
United States: $2.3 billion (2.7%)
Netherlands: $2.2 billion (2.6%)
Romania: $2.1 billion (2.5%)
Russia: $1.8 billion (2.1%)
China: $1.4 billion (1.6%)
Switzerland: $1.3 billion (1.6%)
Romania
Germany: US$16.2 billion (22.9% of total Romanian exports)
Italy: $7.9 billion (11.1%)
France: $4.8 billion (6.7%)
Hungary: $3.3 billion (4.7%)
United Kingdom: $2.9 billion (4.1%)
Bulgaria: $2.34 billion (3.3%)
Turkey: $2.33 billion (3.3%)
Poland: $2.2 billion (3.1%)
Spain: $2.1 billion (3%)
Czech Republic: $2 billion (2.9%)
Netherlands: $1.8 billion (2.6%)
Austria: $1.6 billion (2.3%)
Belgium: $1.4 billion (2%)
Russia: $1.25 billion (1.8%)
Slovakia: $1.21 billion (1.7%)
Czech Republic:
Germany: US$65.2 billion (32.2% of total Czechian exports)
Slovakia: $15.2 billion (7.5%)
Poland: $12.2 billion (6%)
France: $10.2 billion (5.1%)
United Kingdom: $9.5 billion (4.7%)
Austria: $9 billion (4.4%)
Italy: $7.8 billion (3.9%)
Netherlands: $7.5 billion (3.7%)
Spain: $6 billion (3%)
Hungary: $6 billion (3%)
Belgium: $4.3 billion (2.1%)
Russia: $4.1 billion (2%)
United States: $4.1 billion (2%)
Sweden: $3.5 billion (1.7%)
Romania: $3 billion (1.5%)
Over four-fifths (82.9%) of Czechian exports in 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.
RUSSIAN IMPERIAL BLOCK
Russia:
***China: US$56 billion (12.5% of total Russian exports)
Netherlands: $43.5 billion (9.7%)
Germany: $34.1 billion (7.6%)
Belarus: $21.8 billion (4.9%)
***Turkey: $21.3 billion (4.8%)
***South Korea: $17.8 billion (4%)
Poland: $16.5 billion (3.7%)
Italy: $16.4 billion (3.7%)
Kazakhstan: $12.9 billion (2.9%)
United States: $12.5 billion (2.8%)
***Japan: $12.5 billion (2.8%)
Finland: $11.4 billion (2.5%)
United Kingdom: $9.8 billion (2.2%)
Ukraine: $9.5 billion (2.1%)
Belgium: $9.2 billion (2%)
Belarus
Russia: US$12.9 billion (38.5% of total Belarusian exports)
Ukraine: $4.1 billion (12.1%)
United Kingdom: $3.1 billion (9.2%)
Germany: $1.4 billion (4.3%)
Netherlands: $1.4 billion (4.3%)
Poland: $1.3 billion (4%)
Lithuania: $1.2 billion (3.4%)
Kazakhstan: $780.1 million (2.3%)
Brazil: $585.1 million (1.7%)
Latvia: $471.9 million (1.4%)
China: $467.9 million (1.4%)
India: $299 million (0.9%)
United States: $274.3 million (0.8%)
Indonesia: $227.4 million (0.7%)
Azerbaijan: $223.8 million (0.7%)
Approaching nine-tenths (85.8%) of Belarusian exports in 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.
Georgia:
Russia: US$400.8 million (15.8% of Georgia’s total exports)
Bulgaria: $250 million (9.8%)
Turkey: $226.3 million (8.9%)
China: $181.3 million (7.1%)
Azerbaijan: $165.8 million (6.5%)
United States: $157.8 million (6.2%)
Ukraine: $119.1 million (4.7%)
Armenia: $105.6 million (4.2%)
Spain: $65.8 million (2.6%)
Switzerland: $62.5 million (2.5%)
Iran: $60.6 million (2.4%)
Uzbekistan: $58.7 million (2.3%)
Romania: $56.1 million (2.2%)
Germany: $47 million (1.9%)
France: $43.3 million (1.7%)
Almost four-fifths (78.8%) of Georgian exports during 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.
OLD EUROPE
Greece
Italy: US$4.1 billion (10.3% of total Greek exports)
Germany: $2.5 billion (6.4%)
Turkey: $2.4 billion (6.1%)
Cyprus: $2.2 billion (5.7%)
Bulgaria: $1.8 billion (4.5%)
Lebanon: $1.8 billion (4.5%)
United States: $1.6 billion (4.1%)
United Kingdom: $1.4 billion (3.6%)
Egypt: $1.4 billion (3.5%)
Spain: $1.3 billion (3.3%)
France: $1.2 billion (3%)
Romania: $1.1 billion (2.9%)
China: $1.1 billion (2.7%)
Macedonia: $939.7 million (2.4%)
Saudi Arabia: $850.4 million (2.2%)
Almost two-thirds (65.1%) of Greek exports in 2018 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.
Bulgaria
Germany: US$3.6 billion (13.6% of total Bulgarian exports)
Italy: $2.4 billion (9.2%)
Romania: $2.3 billion (8.8%)
Turkey: $2.1 billion (8%)
Greece: $1.8 billion (7%)
France: $1.2 billion (4.5%)
Spain: $733.1 million (2.8%)
Belgium: $715.1 million (2.7%)
Netherlands: $706.3 million (2.7%)
United Kingdom: $656.3 million (2.5%)
Poland: $648.2 million (2.5%)
Austria: $507.5 million (1.9%)
Serbia: $494.9 million (1.9%)
China: $481.2 million (1.8%)
Czech Republic: $445.3 million (1.7%)
Almost three-quarters (71.8%) of Bulgarian exports in 2017 were delivered to the above 15 trade partners.
(apologies to the rest)
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 13:05:00 UTC