Form: Definition

  • Propertarianism: Our Definition of ‘Grammar’

    October 30th, 2018 11:12 AM PROPERTARIANISM: OUR DEFINITION OF ‘GRAMMAR’ (very important)

    –“Curt, How do you use grammar differently from the norm?”– A Friend.

    CURRENT: – Chomsky’s Grammar Facility (biological) of “Recursive Disambiguation” …. – Languages …. …. – Vocabulary …. …. …. – Semantics …. …. – Grammar …. …. …. – Phonology, Morphology, Syntax … This is the traditional undrestanding of grammar, even though the original term referred to a book containing the rules of the given language. PROPERTARIANISM “The Grammars” as I use them: – Chomsky’s Grammar Facility (biological) of “CONTINUOUS Recursive Disambiguation”. …. – The DIMENSIONAL Grammars (spectrum of dimensions allowed) …. …. – Languages …. …. …. – Vocabulary LIMITED by dimensional grammar. …. …. …. …. – Paradigm (network of constant relations) …. …. …. …. …. – Semantics LIMITED by dimensional grammar …. …. …. – TRANSACTIONAL Grammar …. …. …. …. – Phonology, Morphology, Syntax … etc. WHERE The DIMENSIONAL GRAMMARS Consist of no less than: – identity (property), logic (consistency) – arithmetic and accounting – mathematics, geometry, calculus, statistics – algorithm, computation, transaction, sentience, consciousness, reason, calculation – physics , chemistry, biology-ecology – contract, testimony, law – psychology, sociology, politics, economics – ordinary language (conversation) – narration, – story telling (plot) – myth, parable, (lesson) – fictionalisms (ideal-mental, magical-physical, supernatural-emotional) – Deceits (loading, framing, obscurantism … etc.) AND WHERE Each ‘grammar’ consist of the means of testing internal consistency (decidability) in the process of speech (continuous recursive disambiguation) while producing transactions (descriptions of changes in state). Cheers Curt Doolittle

  • Everything is simple

    October 30th, 2018 10:48 AM “JUSTIFY VS RATIONALIZE” (vocabulary) [W]e justify by rational (internally consistent) means using reason (our ability to compare and decide) due to our logical (biological) facility, which we try to study in that discipline we call ‘logic’, which is nothing more than the grammar of constant relations between terms (references). The thing is that ‘rational’ is a heavily conflated term. So for clarity I avoid rationalize (which is value neutral) and use justify (which is not). |LOGIC| Logical Facility > Reason(Comparison) > Rationalism (Internal Consistency) > Calculation (Transformation) > Computation (Construction). Everything is simple. – Vitruvianism makes metaphysics simple. – The grammars make ‘thinking’ (reason) simple. – Acquisitionism makes psychology simple. – Compatibilism makes sociology simple – Propertarianism makes ethics and law simple. – Group Competitive Strategy makes Government Simple. – All of the above make Aesthetics simple. Everything is simple. A continuous, consistent, grammar of comprehension from the physical to the social to the personal to the mental.

  • Halloween = Samhain (SAH-winn)

    October 30th, 2018 8:25 PM HALLOWEEN <- ALL HALLOWS EVE <- SAMHAIN (SAH’-winn) [S]amhain is believed to have Celtic pagan origins and there is evidence it has been an important date since ancient times. Some Neolithic passage tombs in Ireland are aligned with the sunrise around the time of Samhain. It is mentioned in some of the earliest Irish literature and many important events in Irish mythology happen or begin on Samhain. It was the time when cattle were brought back down from the summer pastures and when livestock were slaughtered for the winter. As at Bealtaine, special bonfires were lit. These were deemed to have protective and cleansing powers and there were rituals involving them. Like Bealtaine, Samhain was seen as a liminal time, when the boundary between this world and the Otherworld could more easily be crossed. This meant the Aos Sí, the ‘spirits’ or ‘fairies’, could more easily come into our world. Most scholars see the Aos Sí as remnants of the pagan gods and nature spirits. At Samhain, it was believed that the Aos Sí needed to be propitiated to ensure that the people and their livestock survived the winter. Offerings of food and drink were left outside for them. The souls of the dead were also thought to revisit their homes seeking hospitality. Feasts were had, at which the souls of dead kin were beckoned to attend and a place set at the table for them. Mumming and guising were part of the festival, and involved people going door-to-door in costume (or in disguise), often reciting verses in exchange for food. The costumes may have been a way of imitating, and disguising oneself from, the Aos Sí. Divination rituals and games were also a big part of the festival and often involved nuts and apples. In the late 19th century, Sir John Rhys and Sir James Frazer suggested that it was the “Celtic New Year”, and this view has been repeated by some other scholars.

  • “CURT, WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY COMMON LAW AND TORT LAW AND HOW ARE THEY RELATED.”—

    —“CURT, WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY COMMON LAW AND TORT LAW AND HOW ARE THEY RELATED.”—

    OK. Um I’m talking about the common law in the old sense as ‘the traditional law’ which consists of sovereignty and tort. In both UK and USA ‘common law’ often includes legislation that violates sovereignty and tort. In my work I make a clear distinction between the one law (reciprocity) common law (findings of the court), legislative law (improving or undermining the common law and the one law) and regulation (enforcement of legislative law whether it improves or undermines the common law and the one law)

    I refer to tort when I want to remind people that legislation and regulation do not necessarily (and often do not) preserve our natural, customary, traditional, rule of law by findings of law.

    The legislature’s original purpose was to choose whether the monarchy’s demand for the population to bear costs was acceptable to the regions,the warriors, the militia, and sometimes out of pragmatism) to the people.

    The ‘enlightenment’ took the power of commons choice out of the hands of the monarchy and put it into the republic (elected representatives, and the peerage (local governors)).

    The marxist and social democratic movement reversed our civilization by expanding the commons such that they violated our underlying natural law of reciprocity, in favor of the rest of humanity’s underclass demand for proportionality, and upon receiving proportionality, the political and underclass demand for equality of outcome.

    So, great question.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 12:19:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM: OUR DEFINITION OF ‘GRAMMAR’ (very important) –“Curt, How do yo

    PROPERTARIANISM: OUR DEFINITION OF ‘GRAMMAR’

    (very important)

    –“Curt, How do you use grammar differently from the norm?”– A Friend.

    CURRENT:

    – Chomsky’s Grammar Facility (biological) of “Recursive Disambiguation”

    …. – Languages

    …. …. – Vocabulary

    …. …. …. – Semantics

    …. …. – Grammar

    …. …. …. – Phonology, Morphology, Syntax …

    This is the traditional undrestanding of grammar, even though the original term referred to a book containing the rules of the given language.

    PROPERTARIANISM

    “The Grammars” as I use them:

    – Chomsky’s Grammar Facility (biological) of “CONTINUOUS Recursive Disambiguation”.

    …. – The DIMENSIONAL Grammars (spectrum of dimensions allowed)

    …. …. – Languages

    …. …. …. – Vocabulary LIMITED by dimensional grammar.

    …. …. …. …. – Paradigm (network of constant relations)

    …. …. …. …. …. – Semantics LIMITED by dimensional grammar

    …. …. …. – TRANSACTIONAL Grammar

    …. …. …. …. – Phonology, Morphology, Syntax … etc.

    WHERE

    The DIMENSIONAL GRAMMARS Consist of no less than:

    – identity (property), logic (consistency)

    – arithmetic and accounting

    – mathematics, geometry, calculus, statistics

    – algorithm, computation, transaction, sentience, consciousness, reason, calculation

    – physics , chemistry, biology-ecology

    – contract, testimony, law

    – psychology, sociology, politics, economics

    – ordinary language (conversation)

    – narration,

    – story telling (plot)

    – myth, parable, (lesson)

    – fictionalisms (ideal-mental, magical-physical, supernatural-emotional)

    – Deceits (loading, framing, obscurantism … etc.)

    AND WHERE

    Each ‘grammar’ consist of the means of testing internal consistency (decidability) in the process of speech (continuous recursive disambiguation) while producing transactions (descriptions of changes in state).

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 11:12:00 UTC

  • “JUSTIFY VS RATIONALIZE” (vocabulary) We justify by rational (internally consist

    “JUSTIFY VS RATIONALIZE”

    (vocabulary)

    We justify by rational (internally consistent) means using reason (our ability to compare and decide) due to our logical (biological) facility, which we try to study in that discipline we call ‘logic’, which is nothing more than the grammar of constant relations between terms (references). The thing is that ‘rational’ is a heavily conflated term. So for clarity I avoid rationalize (which is value neutral) and use justify (which is not).

    |LOGIC| Logical Facility > Reason(Comparison) > Rationalism (Internal Consistency) > Calculation (Transformation) > Computation (Construction).

    Everything is simple.

    – Vitruvianism makes metaphysics simple.

    – The grammars make ‘thinking’ (reason) simple.

    – Acquisitionism makes psychology simple.

    – Compatibilism makes sociology simple

    – Propertarianism makes ethics and law simple.

    – Group Competitive Strategy makes Government Simple.

    – All of the above make Aesthetics simple.

    Everything is simple. A continuous, consistent, grammar of comprehension from the physical to the social to the personal to the mental.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 10:48:00 UTC

  • Refers to the behavior of animals (zebras being the most common example) hiding

    Refers to the behavior of animals (zebras being the most common example) hiding within the herd (chaos).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 14:18:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056913226049433601

    Reply addressees: @readomain

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056912582781665282


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056912582781665282

  • MASCULINE VS FEMININE by Joel Harvey Order vs Chaos Justice vs Mercy Competition

    MASCULINE VS FEMININE

    by Joel Harvey

    Order vs Chaos

    Justice vs Mercy

    Competition vs Cooperation

    Masculine vs Feminine


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 10:14:00 UTC

  • MAN IS AMORAL: He knows the moral (what will buy him discounts on the returns of

    MAN IS AMORAL: He knows the moral (what will buy him discounts on the returns of cooperation) and immoral (what will cost him premiums on cooperation or punishment) but he is AMORAL(Rational) and simply CHOOSES WISELY. Nature/Nurture, Violent/Non-Violent, Moral/Immoral. Nonsense.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-27 20:18:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056278865641906176

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1054645599553941504


    IN REPLY TO:

    @DegenRolf

    “The evidence indicates that early humans, rather than being“killer apes”, lived as relatively peaceful hunter-gathers for some 15,000 generations, from the emergence of modern Homo sapiens up until the invention of agriculture.”
    https://t.co/YWUqaBWuGC https://t.co/MOE8AZGmqw

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1054645599553941504

  • —“Curt: Please Define ‘Post-Moral’?”–

    October 27th, 2018 8:42 AM —“CURT: PLEASE DEFINE ‘POST-MORAL’?”–

    —“Can you explain POST-MORAL to a newb?”— Scott Claremont

    [S]o just like we changed from theological(authoritarian) discourse on morals, to philosophical (rational) discourse on morals during the enlightenment, that we have changed from philosophical (rational) discourse on morals, to scientific (measurements) discourse on morals. |Explanation(Model)| traditional(norm) > religious (theology) > rational (moral) > scientific (reciprocity). It means (a) our language consists of reasoning by morality( intuition, habit, norm, tradition) rather than reasoning by reciprocity(measurement),(b) and where morality(intuition, habit, norm, tradition) vary not only between groups, but between individuals, reciprocity does not. (c) as such we can use the language of law (decidability), accounting (directly measurable), and economics ( indirectly measurable) to measure that which removes ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit from our discussion of ‘morality’, and describe human actions scientifically (universally) rather than normatively (colloquially).