–“CURT: PLEASE DEFINE ‘DEFLATIONARY GRAMMAR’?”– Search and ye shall find: propertarianism.com/2018/03/16/11386/
Form: Definition
-
Do You Know The Difference?
Religion Vs Ideology Vs Philosophy Vs Logic Vs Mathematics Vs Science A RELIGION consists of any set of ideas of justification which require belief in, testimony to, or action according to, one or more falsehoods as a cost of inclusion and use. AN IDEOLOGY consist of any set of ideas that agitate, motivate, or inspire achievement of political ends under majoritarian (monopoly) democracy. An ideology need not be internally consistent externally correspondent, or existentially possible. It need only motivate individuals to act in furtherance of policy. A PHILOSOPHY consists of any set of internally consistent ideas of decidability which justify pursuit of personal preferences or group goods. A LOGIC consists of any deflationary grammar of decidability that assists in the falsification by competition of one or more constant relations between states. (Note that one proves nothing logically other than internal consistency, because all premises of external correspondence are forever contingent.) MATHEMATICS consists of a deflationary grammar of decidability consisting of competition between positional names under the preservation of ratios providing a single axis of decidability: position – but in N dimensions; thereby providing commensurability between any set of positional relations of any number of dimensions. A SCIENCE consists of any set of ideas that provide decidability independent of personal preference or group goods, by the systematic elimination of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit, by the use of measurement and record of actions â demonstrations versus words. NATURAL LAW of RECIPROCITY (Tort), was produced scientifically (empirically) by trial and error, through the resolution of disputes across personal preferences, group goods, norms, traditions, and intuitions, cumulating always and everywhere that decidability is provided by property, and property consists in the demonstrated investment of human action or inaction anything whether genetic, material, behavioral, or informational.
-
photos_and_videos/Intelligence_RfTc2eLlCA/45325325_10156753415792264_74183022126
photos_and_videos/Intelligence_RfTc2eLlCA/45325325_10156753415792264_7418302212691984384_n_10156753415782264.jpg HERITABILITY OF DIFFERENT TRAITS
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-03 16:13:00 UTC
-
Do You Know The Difference? Religion Vs Ideology Vs Philosophy Vs Logic Vs Mathe
Do You Know The Difference? Religion Vs Ideology Vs Philosophy Vs Logic Vs Mathematics Vs Science
(repost)
– A RELIGION consists of any set of ideas of justification which require belief in, testimony to, or action according to, one or more falsehoods as a cost of inclusion and use.
– AN IDEOLOGY consist of any set of ideas that agitate, motivate, or inspire achievement of political ends under majoritarian (monopoly) democracy. An ideology need not be internally consistent externally correspondent, or existentially possible. It need only motivate individuals to act in furtherance of policy.
– A PHILOSOPHY consists of any set of internally consistent ideas of decidability which justify pursuit of personal preferences or group goods.
– A LOGIC consists of any deflationary grammar of decidability that assists in the falsification by competition of one or more constant relations between states. (Note that one proves nothing logically other than internal consistency, because all premises of external correspondence are forever contingent.)
– MATHEMATICS consists of a deflationary grammar of decidability consisting purely of competition between positional names under the preservation of ratios providing a single axis of decidability: position, but in N dimensions, providing commensurability between any set of positional relations of any number of dimensions.
– A SCIENCE consists of any set of ideas that provide decidability independent of personal preference or group goods, by the systematic elimination of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit, by the use of measurement and record of actions – demonstrations versus words.
– NATURAL LAW of RECIPROCITY (Tort), was produced scientifically (empirically) by trial and error, through the resolution of disputes across personal preferences, group goods, norms, traditions, and intuitions, cumulating always and everywhere that decidability is provided by property, and property consists in the demonstrated investment of human action or inaction anything whether genetic, material, behavioral, or informational.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-03 13:40:00 UTC
-
“CURT: WHAT DOES YOUR |?????| >>> SYNTAX MEAN?” —“Can you help me understand t
“CURT: WHAT DOES YOUR |?????| >>> SYNTAX MEAN?”
—“Can you help me understand the syntax you use? What does the vertical bar ” | ” mean? And this ” > “?”— Eric Grose
Great Question:
| DIMENSION | start limit > step > step > step > end limit.
Where >, <, <-, and ->, state the direction. So you will see me use < < <, or > > >, or < < <- center -> > > depending upon the direction.
It’s a “Dimension” definition, meaning an ordered range of values that are permissible for use in a property of a Class (definition).
It defines the LIMITS (start and end) and COMPLETENESS (range of values), in PARSIMONIOUS FORM, thereby satisfying Testimonialism’s demand for both LIMITS and FULL ACCOUNTING for any warranty of due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit.
Given a Class (Table), consisting of (a) Properties(Attributes) and their Values (data), (b) Relations (references), and (c) Methods (internal operations), and (d) functions (external operations), a Dimension provides the range of values permissible for a property.
It’ is a geometric (linear, serialize) method of defining a dimension (table of values).
So we convert:
|TEACHING| Reading to > Lecturing > Socratic Teaching > Running a grad seminar > Running an MBA/Law course (case studies) > Running a Competitive Game > Military Training.
Into:
Define TEACHING: id: int, str: category.
Insert TEACHING:
| TEACHING |
1, Reading to
2, Lecturing
3, Socratic Teaching
4, Running a grad seminar
5, Running an MBA/Law course (case studies)
6, Running a Competitive Game
7, Military Training
(a tiny bit of the relational calculus)
WHY?
Because the grammars allow us to produce an N-Dimensional geometry of ‘meaning’. But that is not something I am going to put into this series of the work. It’s like putting equations in to it. So I’m using the Series instead.
OK?
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-03 09:56:00 UTC
-
Church (mass) consists of a History Lesson. An application of that lesson to the
Church (mass) consists of a History Lesson. An application of that lesson to the present. an Oath (our father, apostles creed), and a feast (communion). This differs precisely zero from every other public gathering. It is the Ritual of the Feast practiced by all humans.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 18:10:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058421096792424449
Reply addressees: @brenden_frost
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058413889090740225
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058413889090740225
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45232459_10156748797957264_578049427
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45232459_10156748797957264_5780494272054689792_o_10156748797947264.jpg AN EXAMPLE OF RECIPROCITY
by John Mark
A picture/example/illustration of reciprocity, the silver rule (or violation of it)…
CEO of a large corporation in America says “I want more profit. One very easy path to that is more warm bodies entering the USA – more people to buy our company’s product/service, and drives down price of labor too! Huge win! (For me and company shareholders.) I care not who they are, just bring in more people!!! If they are more badly behaved/criminal, if they destroy social cohesion, if they drive working class whites out of their neighborhoods, if they demonize white people…I care not. I am insulated from these problems by my wealth (gated community, private jet, homes around the world). So I will donate to politicians (buy them) who will keep the borders open.”
This CEO is doing unto others what he would *not* have done to himself. He is stealing property (Curt’s accurate expanded definition of property, which includes common property, all those things white working/middle class whites value and have invested in for generations in America). He is violating reciprocity, natural law.
;)Stephen Murrayso thats what Curt means by commons.Nov 1, 2018, 4:33 PMCurt Doolittlehttps://propertarianism.com/2017/03/23/definition-commons-with-links-to-the-core/Nov 1, 2018, 4:35 PMCurt Doolittlehttps://propertarianism.com/2013/01/15/the-complete-definition-of-property-excerpt-from-propertarianism/Nov 1, 2018, 4:35 PMNick DahlheimThe only property I want that CEO to own is a pike and a pyreNov 1, 2018, 4:42 PMLuke WeinhagenTwo fold violation –
1. Doing unto others (violating the silver rule)
2. Insulating (externalizing risks/costs)
He could be just doing 1 while exposing himself to the consequences and it would still be a violation of reciprocity.
By doing 2 as well he undermines natural law’s inherent capacity for corrections against violations (personal wealth gets destroyed, business fails, etc… natural consequences eliminating problem 1).Nov 1, 2018, 4:45 PMStephen Murrayneed I ask what the golden rule is?Nov 1, 2018, 4:53 PMCurt DoolittleI”m not gonna google that for you…. ;)Nov 1, 2018, 4:59 PMCurt Doolittle“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”Nov 1, 2018, 4:59 PMCurt Doolittle^the communist version.Nov 1, 2018, 5:00 PMStephen Murrayis that not the silver rule?Nov 1, 2018, 5:00 PMAndrew ClaytonThe golden rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
The silver rule: Give, and you can benefit. Take, and you will pay.Nov 1, 2018, 5:02 PMStephen MurraygreatNov 1, 2018, 5:03 PMSteve PenderIs it the pressure of quarterly earnings?Nov 1, 2018, 5:05 PMAndrew ClaytonCombined with a severed connection to social moresNov 1, 2018, 5:06 PMJennifer DeanIn a public company, for sure. I’ve seen a lot of that. They do things to generate short-term profit at the expense of longer-term or further reaching consequences.Nov 1, 2018, 5:07 PMYiannis KontinopoulosStephen Murray the silver rule is “Don’t do to them what they wouldn’t want to have done onto themselves”Nov 1, 2018, 5:07 PMJennifer DeanWally world is a treasure trove of examples of violation of reciprocity.Nov 1, 2018, 5:09 PMStephen ThomasAbolish the Government institution of “corporations”.
Solves a lot of parasitic behaviorNov 1, 2018, 5:38 PMCurt Doolittlewell, a corporation in the sense you mean it, is one that is granted limited liability by the insurer of last resort (the government).
A corporation in the sense that it is a contract for the production of commons is something else.
The qestion is, will corporations form without the insurer of last resort granting them limited liability? no I don’t think so. they didn’t at any useful scale.Nov 1, 2018, 5:52 PMCurt Doolittlethe problem isn’t the corporation its that you can’t sue them for impositon upon the commons.Nov 1, 2018, 5:53 PMStephen ThomasCorrect.
The idea of a corporation or incorporation is fine, wonderful even.Nov 1, 2018, 6:10 PMJohn MarkIf the law mandated the Golden Rule, it would produce Dysgenic Communism. If the law mandated the Silver Rule, it would produce Eugenic Propertarianism.Nov 1, 2018, 6:33 PMJohn MarkIn the current system, there is zero incentive for CEOs to give up profits to preserve societal (commons) wealth (of various forms). Each CEO (or any other corporate employee) knows that if he refuses to plunder the commons thus giving up profit opportunity, the board will replace him with someone who will plunder the commons for profit, and nothing will change. So, “it might as well be me that gets richer.”Nov 1, 2018, 6:42 PMJohn MarkGood distinction.Nov 1, 2018, 6:43 PMJohn MarkTook me a while to get that too when I first started following Curt.Nov 1, 2018, 6:45 PMAndrew StrachanI would love to know how these CEOs/shareholders/directors make their money because I’m all of the above and I pay tax through my nose! I live in a 3 bedroom house in the East of England and I drive a 30 year old car! I’m subject to the same tax laws as everyone else in this country! Maybe there’s some con that I’m not onto? But as far as I’m concerned the whole CEO, company director conspiracy theory is just that!, a conspiracy! 😏Nov 1, 2018, 8:24 PMMicah Pezdirtzbrings to mind the broken window fallacyNov 3, 2018, 5:51 PMNick DahlheimBigger CEOs up the food chain stuff their money in offshore tax havens while also flooding your country with Muslim shitholersNov 3, 2018, 6:09 PMAN EXAMPLE OF RECIPROCITY
by John Mark
A picture/example/illustration of reciprocity, the silver rule (or violation of it)…
CEO of a large corporation in America says “I want more profit. One very easy path to that is more warm bodies entering the USA – more people to buy our company’s product/service, and drives down price of labor too! Huge win! (For me and company shareholders.) I care not who they are, just bring in more people!!! If they are more badly behaved/criminal, if they destroy social cohesion, if they drive working class whites out of their neighborhoods, if they demonize white people…I care not. I am insulated from these problems by my wealth (gated community, private jet, homes around the world). So I will donate to politicians (buy them) who will keep the borders open.”
This CEO is doing unto others what he would *not* have done to himself. He is stealing property (Curt’s accurate expanded definition of property, which includes common property, all those things white working/middle class whites value and have invested in for generations in America). He is violating reciprocity, natural law.
😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-01 16:28:00 UTC
-
Propertarianism: Our Definition of ‘Grammar’
October 30th, 2018 11:12 AM PROPERTARIANISM: OUR DEFINITION OF ‘GRAMMAR’ (very important)
–“Curt, How do you use grammar differently from the norm?”– A Friend.
CURRENT: – Chomsky’s Grammar Facility (biological) of “Recursive Disambiguation” …. – Languages …. …. – Vocabulary …. …. …. – Semantics …. …. – Grammar …. …. …. – Phonology, Morphology, Syntax … This is the traditional undrestanding of grammar, even though the original term referred to a book containing the rules of the given language. PROPERTARIANISM “The Grammars” as I use them: – Chomsky’s Grammar Facility (biological) of “CONTINUOUS Recursive Disambiguation”. …. – The DIMENSIONAL Grammars (spectrum of dimensions allowed) …. …. – Languages …. …. …. – Vocabulary LIMITED by dimensional grammar. …. …. …. …. – Paradigm (network of constant relations) …. …. …. …. …. – Semantics LIMITED by dimensional grammar …. …. …. – TRANSACTIONAL Grammar …. …. …. …. – Phonology, Morphology, Syntax … etc. WHERE The DIMENSIONAL GRAMMARS Consist of no less than: – identity (property), logic (consistency) – arithmetic and accounting – mathematics, geometry, calculus, statistics – algorithm, computation, transaction, sentience, consciousness, reason, calculation – physics , chemistry, biology-ecology – contract, testimony, law – psychology, sociology, politics, economics – ordinary language (conversation) – narration, – story telling (plot) – myth, parable, (lesson) – fictionalisms (ideal-mental, magical-physical, supernatural-emotional) – Deceits (loading, framing, obscurantism … etc.) AND WHERE Each ‘grammar’ consist of the means of testing internal consistency (decidability) in the process of speech (continuous recursive disambiguation) while producing transactions (descriptions of changes in state). Cheers Curt Doolittle
-
Everything is simple
October 30th, 2018 10:48 AM “JUSTIFY VS RATIONALIZE” (vocabulary) [W]e justify by rational (internally consistent) means using reason (our ability to compare and decide) due to our logical (biological) facility, which we try to study in that discipline we call ‘logic’, which is nothing more than the grammar of constant relations between terms (references). The thing is that ‘rational’ is a heavily conflated term. So for clarity I avoid rationalize (which is value neutral) and use justify (which is not). |LOGIC| Logical Facility > Reason(Comparison) > Rationalism (Internal Consistency) > Calculation (Transformation) > Computation (Construction). Everything is simple. – Vitruvianism makes metaphysics simple. – The grammars make ‘thinking’ (reason) simple. – Acquisitionism makes psychology simple. – Compatibilism makes sociology simple – Propertarianism makes ethics and law simple. – Group Competitive Strategy makes Government Simple. – All of the above make Aesthetics simple. Everything is simple. A continuous, consistent, grammar of comprehension from the physical to the social to the personal to the mental.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
October 30th, 2018 10:19 AM WHY WILL PEOPLE WILL RESIST PROPERTARIANISM? (defense of investment in fraud) [P]ropertarianism: All words, phrases, sentences, paragraphs, and arguments consist of measurements accumulating in transactions. Most importantly, propertarian argument makes visible ALL pretense of knowledge – falsifying any claim made with pretense of knowledge. Reciprocity is a value independent test of decidability. With these two tools we can falsify all fraudulent speech (argument). That’s why people FEAR propertarianism. Propertarianism serves its purpose as a formal logic of social science from metaphysics, through epistemology through psychology, sociology, ethics, law, politics group evolutionary strategy and aesthetics. Propertarianism is ‘frightening’ to the ‘frauds’ precisely because it will restore the market for fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of imposition of costs by externality upon others. This will deny those who use false language to obtain status and therefore organize non-market action and restore all means of theft. Worse (for the frauds), it eliminates their ability to create false self image and false status signaling thereby ending the competition in the signal (status) economy by fraud. This is why people will resist propertarianism. Because it suppresses lies. Unlike abrahamism, marxism, postmodernism and feminism which enable lies – particularly when industrialized lying was made possible by media and the academy, which could then be used by the state to deceive in order to obtain POWER.