Form: Definition

  • DEFINE SCIENCE AND SCIENTISM SCIENCE: As far as I know ; (a) that discipline we

    DEFINE SCIENCE AND SCIENTISM

    SCIENCE: As far as I know ;

    (a) that discipline we name science consist of performance of exhaustive due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit in one’s testimony of observation(specific fact) [sense], action(sequence of operations) [transformation], and proposition(general rule of declared precision) [speech].

    (b) That science evolved from the ancestral european common law of tort (sovereignty, reciprocity, duty of truthful testimony before the thang/jury/senate/people, resulting in markets rather than monopolies in all aspects of life.)

    (c) And that this is the reason that reason, empiricism, physical science, and the evolution of western science into the world standard of truthful speech were unique to western civilization.

    It is not an accident that Aristotle, Bacon/ locke/ smith/ hume/ adams/ Jefferson studied law and debated or wrote constitutions.

    The law applied to material(property) disputes under sovereignty; science applied to information(knowledge) disputes under sovereignty.

    Science consists in the positive application of the law to promissory (testimonial) speech.

    Science and law are the same discipline, the first in defense of the private interest, and the second to defense of the public interest (commons).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-03 20:11:00 UTC

  • You don’t understand. Operationally, Libertarianism CAN only mean “Maximum agenc

    You don’t understand. Operationally, Libertarianism CAN only mean “Maximum agency by universal standing under Rule of Law of sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, judge and jury, and markets in every aspect of life defended,by a militia giving oath to all of the above.”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 21:52:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1091454144240644097

  • You don’t understand. Operationally, Libertarianism CAN only mean “Maximum agenc

    —You don’t understand. Operationally, Libertarianism CAN only mean “Maximum agency by universal standing under Rule of Law of sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, judge and jury, and markets in every aspect of life defended,by a militia giving oath to all of the above.”— CD


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 16:52:00 UTC

  • “WHY CAN’T YOU SAY PROPERTARIANISM SIMPLY”– Right, so, I can…. Propertarianis

    —“WHY CAN’T YOU SAY PROPERTARIANISM SIMPLY”–

    Right, so, I can….

    Propertarianism consists of a collection of ideas, the most fundamental of which is the completion of the scientific method and its application to all fields, resulting in a universally commensurable, universally explicable, language of ethics, law, politics, economics, and group evolutionary (survival) strategies.

    Because of the combination of language and means of testing that language, we can produce a formal law that allows us to complete the jeffersonian project (constitutionalism), restore libel and slander, and extend the prosecution of fraud from commerce to financial, economic, legal, and political speech.

    With this extremely *intolerant* law we can restore our civilization to its historic group strategy of high trust and high velocity and high relative prosperity with rule of law under sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, the natural law, and markets in all aspects of life – and purge marxists, postmodernists, feminists from all walks of life as well as depoliticize, definancialize, decentralize, our commons, and restore the civil society.

    This will, implemented as formal logic of law, within a formal constitution written in that law, use the market incentive to prosecute these information-criminals and rapidly restore our way of life, including the restoration of the laboring, working, and middle classes.

    If you want me to teach you the technique of how to produce that law as ‘algorithmic law’ then you’re gonna need a class to do it.

    That’s because you cannot imagine the depth of the rabbit hole that this method results in, and how many ideas roll out of it, or how much you will change by undrestanding it.

    Otherwise that’s it.

    ;)

    Now, what you said about darwin was that organisms survived by adapting to local circumstances. What you didn’t say about Darwin is that (a) it’s undirected (b) it’s reproduction not survival, (c) local adaptation often leads to dead ends. (d) the only direction is increasing complexity. … and a hundred other meaningful things that stop people from misinterpreting it.

    So that’s the issue. I said above what I said, but god knows what kinda idiocy people will come up with when they read it.

    Hence “it’s complicated”. lol

    Cheers and thanks for being ‘demanding’ but intellectually honest.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-31 21:04:00 UTC

  • WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE? 1) I understand your meaning. 2) That statement is meanin

    WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE?

    1) I understand your meaning.

    2) That statement is meaningful.

    3) That statement is true.

    “…for the purpose of … “

    a) conveying an experience (allegorical)

    b) conveying a causal relation (contingency)

    c) conveying a premise for the purpose of deduction (consistency)

    Note how we conflate these.

    1 = a, 2 = b, 3 = c.

    Truthfulness requires the satisfaction of the market demand for meaning(disambiguation), contingency(opportunity), consistency (deduction).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-29 14:23:00 UTC

  • “What is(are) insurance commons?”–John Smith Protection from consequences of na

    –“What is(are) insurance commons?”–John Smith

    Protection from consequences of natural catastrophe, catastrophic crime, catastrophic disability, catastrophic illness, catastrophic poverty.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-26 23:47:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089308887679975424

  • WHAT DEMARCATES SCIENCE FROM NON-SCIENCE? Now what demarcates science (due dilig

    WHAT DEMARCATES SCIENCE FROM NON-SCIENCE?

    Now what demarcates science (due diligence) from non-science(failure of due diligence)?

    *Testifiability*

    Try to falsify that statement.

    ( Let me help you: you won’t. Science has simply been a branch of the law all along. )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-26 23:09:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089299339124584448

  • “What is(are) insurance commons?”–John Smith Protection from consequences of na

    –“What is(are) insurance commons?”–John Smith

    Protection from consequences of natural catastrophe, catastrophic crime, catastrophic disability, catastrophic illness, catastrophic poverty.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-26 18:47:00 UTC

  • WHAT DEMARCATES SCIENCE FROM NON-SCIENCE? Now what demarcates science (due dilig

    WHAT DEMARCATES SCIENCE FROM NON-SCIENCE?

    Now what demarcates science (due diligence) from non-science (failure of due diligence)?

    *Testifiability*

    Try to falsify that statement.

    ( Let me help you: you won’t. Science has simply been a branch of the law all along. )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-26 18:09:00 UTC

  • “Q: CURT: DEFINE MINDFULNESS?” —“Could you please explain what “mindfulness” m

    “Q: CURT: DEFINE MINDFULNESS?”

    —“Could you please explain what “mindfulness” means in practice?”—Richard Hall

    In current vernacular, in psychology, the personality trait ‘neuroticism’ refers to tendency for anxiety, fear, moodiness, worry, envy, frustration, jealousy, and loneliness.

    In the current vernacular in cognitive science, psychosis and solipsism and ‘sensitivity’ refer to the feminine bias of inability to insulate self from perception. (Opposite of the masculine bias: analytic, aspie, autistic.)

    Use of ritual, repetition, regularity, familiarity, training whether physical verbal mental or situational – which today we call ‘cognitive behavioral therapy’ trains the mind to retain context rather than be continuously interrupted by inputs – particularly social inputs.

    The origin of organize ritual religion is the use of social and individual, prayer (christianity), movement (islam/christianity), cognitive ritual (buddhism), ritual( east asian), and discrete roles and responsibilities (hindu), to provide mindfulness.

    Of the methods that are most beneficial and least harmful ita ppears that stoicism (self authoring) is the optimum method of achieving this through life planning, since it depends upop precisely zero falsehoods, and CBT is use only therapeutically.

    Ergo History (myth), Biography (heroes), Festival (feast/holiday), Education (church), Oath (Ritual), Stoicism (self authoring), and cognitive behavioral therapy (repair), constitute the non-false equivalent of religion (for simple people) for the modern world (those of us no longer simple).

    To do so this program requires relative homogeneity of a polity.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-25 14:48:00 UTC