Curt Doolittle

Form: Definition

  • Consciousness isn’t complicated any longer – predicting actions in of the body.

    Consciousness isn’t complicated any longer – predicting actions in of the body. It’s having ENOUGH processing power to predict actions, the environment, others actions, others intents, yours, and recursively controlling that ability. Memory serves actions. Any memory will do.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-10 01:46:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1171238574731214850

    Reply addressees: @SteveStuWill @andersen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1095121714931937280

    IN REPLY TO:

    @SteveStuWill

    Fascinating, beautifully written piece about consciousness in other animals https://t.co/EEXpRa34VV HT @andersen

    “[N]ature may have more than one method of making a conscious brain.” https://t.co/MsmzOIjnCT

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1095121714931937280

  • Truth, Force, and Agency

    [T]ruth is half the battle (helps develop agency), force (using your agency) is the other half.

    —Alain DwightThe Three Acknowledgments of Agency: 1) I acknowledge that I can exercise some level of control over my thoughts, feelings and actions. 2) I acknowledge that I am responsible to control my thoughts, feelings and actions to the best of my ability (within my natural limits). 3) I acknowledge that I must put in work to develop the mental and physical fortitude necessary to exercise my Agency. The first is knowing the truth. The other two are about action. It’s Action that’s essential.

    —Noah J Revoy

  • Truth, Force, and Agency

    [T]ruth is half the battle (helps develop agency), force (using your agency) is the other half.

    —Alain DwightThe Three Acknowledgments of Agency: 1) I acknowledge that I can exercise some level of control over my thoughts, feelings and actions. 2) I acknowledge that I am responsible to control my thoughts, feelings and actions to the best of my ability (within my natural limits). 3) I acknowledge that I must put in work to develop the mental and physical fortitude necessary to exercise my Agency. The first is knowing the truth. The other two are about action. It’s Action that’s essential.

    —Noah J Revoy

  • The principle difference between wisdom literatures: history, science, philosoph

    The principle difference between wisdom literatures: history, science, philosophy, wisdom lit (china, india), theology(semitia, europa), and mysticism is in the dimensions of permissible content and operations on it. Philosophy is a derivation of law, and Science of Testimony.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:38:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167099217933996039

    Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167098504214437893

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz Syntax no. Grammar yes. Grammar meaning “Rules of continuous disambiguation limited to given constraints and the vocabulary likewise limited ot such given constraints.”
    In other words science, philosophy, theology (formal) vs opinion, justification, moralizing, psychologizing.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167098504214437893

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz Syntax no. Grammar yes. Grammar meaning “Rules of continuous disambiguation limited to given constraints and the vocabulary likewise limited ot such given constraints.”
    In other words science, philosophy, theology (formal) vs opinion, justification, moralizing, psychologizing.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167098504214437893

  • Syntax no. Grammar yes. Grammar meaning “Rules of continuous disambiguation limi

    Syntax no. Grammar yes. Grammar meaning “Rules of continuous disambiguation limited to given constraints and the vocabulary likewise limited ot such given constraints.”
    In other words science, philosophy, theology (formal) vs opinion, justification, moralizing, psychologizing.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:35:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167098504214437893

    Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167097779803447297

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167097779803447297

  • There is, empirically, a demarcation between philosopher/philosophizing the dema

    There is, empirically, a demarcation between philosopher/philosophizing the demarcation is a) the internal consistency (grammar of constant relations) that the speaker relies upon for his arguments and b) the publication of a work of at least one novel idea in that grammar.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:16:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167093627732078592

    Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167089384455208960

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167089384455208960

  • WHY? Because Meaningful can only refer to physically, emotionally, cognitively a

    WHY?

    Because Meaningful can only refer to physically, emotionally, cognitively actionable.

    It’s just like rational. All Actions are Rational. All that is Meaningful is Actionable. We aren’t capable of anything else.

    We cherry pick the scope of actions, rationality, and meaning to suit our attempts at persuasion.

    But when fully accounted, all actions include the physical, emotional, and cognitive, all that which is meaningful is actionable, and all actions are rational.

    The hard part is figuring out why someone made a rational action.

    A lot of the time it’s just frustration budgets: emotions.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-28 14:04:00 UTC

  • Disambiguation: Confidence vs Faith

    You have CONFIDENCE in the law, because of the EVIDENCE of the law. One has Faith in that which one has no evidence by which to produce confidence. Disambiguation is central to the method of propertarianism. We don’t let people lie by conflation of real, ideal, pseudoscientific, and supernatural.

  • Disambiguation: Confidence vs Faith

    You have CONFIDENCE in the law, because of the EVIDENCE of the law. One has Faith in that which one has no evidence by which to produce confidence. Disambiguation is central to the method of propertarianism. We don’t let people lie by conflation of real, ideal, pseudoscientific, and supernatural.

  • Deceits

    ( Deceits )