Form: Definition

  • “Please Define Mindfulness?”

    —“What do you mean when you use the word “mindfulness”?”— Andrew Cordeaux @AndrewCordeaux

    1) I mean the physical, cognitive and emotional discipline to control the subject of attention on the present intent, insulated from distractions whether personal, environmental, or interpersonal. 2) But with preference for the stoic method (self authoring, virtues of action), the epicurean objective (within one’s control), testimonial (scientific) knowledge, the play (ritual), and team sport, festival, and feast (celebration). 3) The buddhist method, originally practical and insular evolved into semi-mystical, and survived the attack by monotheistic abrahamism, where the western schools that were practical and action oriented, were destroyed by design by the Abrahamic conquest and dark age. 4) East asian ritual, and Hindu ‘way of life’ survived as well. Each of these methods of physical, mental and emotional discipline reflects local demand given local degree of agency during the period of transformation. (although buddhism was imposed on japan unfortunately). 5) So I use ‘mindfulness’ in the sense that all groups sought to meet demands for some technique of achieving mindfulness of their eras by slightly different means. Since buddhism developed the most direct analysis of the objective, the terminology evolved into a universal. 6) But as in all things, the stoic method, epicurean objective, and scientific(empirical) paradigm, and pursuit of agency(dominance) rather than withdrawal (submission), reflect the european rather than african, semitic, hindu, east asian metaphysics: realism, naturalism, agency.

  • “CURT, PLEASE DEFINE MINDFULNESS?” —“What do you mean when you use the word “m

    “CURT, PLEASE DEFINE MINDFULNESS?”

    —“What do you mean when you use the word “mindfulness”?”— Andrew Cordeaux @AndrewCordeaux

    1) I mean the physical, cognitive and emotional discipline… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=472229170040645&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-25 11:49:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176826175232139264

  • “CURT, PLEASE DEFINE MINDFULNESS?” —“What do you mean when you use the word “m

    “CURT, PLEASE DEFINE MINDFULNESS?”

    —“What do you mean when you use the word “mindfulness”?”— Andrew Cordeaux @AndrewCordeaux

    1) I mean the physical, cognitive and emotional discipline to control the subject of attention on the present intent, insulated from distractions whether personal, environmental, or interpersonal.

    2) But with preference for the stoic method (self authoring, virtues of action), the epicurean objective (within one’s control), testimonial (scientific) knowledge, the play (ritual), and team sport, festival, and feast (celebration).

    3) The buddhist method, originally practical and insular evolved into semi-mystical, and survived the attack by monotheistic abrahamism, where the western schools that were practical and action oriented, were destroyed by design by the Abrahamic conquest and dark age.

    4) East asian ritual, and Hindu ‘way of life’ survived as well. Each of these methods of physical, mental and emotional discipline reflects local demand given local degree of agency during the period of transformation. (although buddhism was imposed on japan unfortunately).

    5) So I use ‘mindfulness’ in the sense that all groups sought to meet demands for some technique of achieving mindfulness of their eras by slightly different means. Since buddhism developed the most direct analysis of the objective, the terminology evolved into a universal.

    6) But as in all things, the stoic method, epicurean objective, and scientific(empirical) paradigm, and pursuit of agency(dominance) rather than withdrawal (submission), reflect the european rather than african, semitic, hindu, east asian metaphysics: realism, naturalism, agency.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-25 07:53:00 UTC

  • “CURT, PLEASE DEFINE MINDFULNESS?” —“What do you mean when you use the word “m

    “CURT, PLEASE DEFINE MINDFULNESS?”

    —“What do you mean when you use the word “mindfulness”?”— Andrew Cordeaux @AndrewCordeaux

    1) I mean the physical, cognitive and emotional discipline to control the subject of attention on the present intent, insulated from distractions whether personal, environmental, or interpersonal.

    2) But with preference for the stoic method (self authoring, virtues of action), the epicurean objective (within one’s control), testimonial (scientific) knowledge, the play (ritual), and team sport, festival, and feast (celebration).

    3) The buddhist method, originally practical and insular evolved into semi-mystical, and survived the attack by monotheistic abrahamism, where the western schools that were practical and action oriented, were destroyed by design by the Abrahamic conquest and dark age.

    4) East asian ritual, and Hindu ‘way of life’ survived as well. Each of these methods of physical, mental and emotional discipline reflects local demand given local degree of agency during the period of transformation. (although buddhism was imposed on japan unfortunately).

    5) So I use ‘mindfulness’ in the sense that all groups sought to meet demands for some technique of achieving mindfulness of their eras by slightly different means. Since buddhism developed the most direct analysis of the objective, the terminology evolved into a universal.

    6) But as in all things, the stoic method, epicurean objective, and scientific(empirical) paradigm, and pursuit of agency(dominance) rather than withdrawal (submission), reflect the european rather than african, semitic, hindu, east asian metaphysics: realism, naturalism, agency.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-25 07:49:00 UTC

  • Tsar (/zɑːr, sɑːr/ or /tsɑːr/; Old Church Slavonic: ц︢рь [usually written thus w

    Tsar (/zɑːr, sɑːr/ or /tsɑːr/; Old Church Slavonic: ц︢рь [usually written thus with a title] or цар, царь), also spelled csar, or tzar or czar, is a title used to designate East and South… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=471878056742423&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-24 20:22:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176592647110242305

  • Supernaturalism A category of animism, under which phenomena are attributed to u

    Supernaturalism

    A category of animism, under which phenomena are attributed to utility(disutility), benefit(harm), or intent(will), rather than natural (equilibrating) necessity by that which is not subject to the constraints of realism (physical existence) and naturalism (deterministic processes), and empiricism (observation and measurement), and therefore testimony (truthful speech).

    I could work on it a bit but I think that’s both sides of it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-24 16:35:00 UTC

  • Tsar (/zɑːr, sɑːr/ or /tsɑːr/; Old Church Slavonic: ц︢рь [usually written thus w

    Tsar (/zɑːr, sɑːr/ or /tsɑːr/; Old Church Slavonic: ц︢рь [usually written thus with a title] or цар, царь), also spelled csar, or tzar or czar, is a title used to designate East and South Slavic monarchs or supreme rulers of Eastern Europe, originally Bulgarian monarchs from 10th century onwards.

    As a system of government in the Tsardom of Russia and the Russian Empire, it is known as Tsarist autocracy, or Tsarism.

    The term is derived from the Latin word Caesar, which was intended to mean “Emperor” in the European medieval sense of the term—a ruler with the same rank as a Roman emperor, holding it by the approval of another emperor or a supreme ecclesiastical official (the Pope or the Ecumenical Patriarch)—but was usually considered by western Europeans to be equivalent to king, or to be somewhat in between a royal and imperial rank.

    Tsarist autocracy[a] (Russian: царское самодержавие, transcr. tsarskoye samoderzhaviye) is a form of autocracy (later absolute monarchy) specific to the Grand Duchy of Moscow, which later became Tsardom of Russia and the Russian Empire.[b] In it, all power and wealth is controlled (and distributed) by the Tsar. They had more power than constitutional monarchs, who are usually vested by law and counterbalanced by a legislative authority; they even had more authority on religious issues compared to Western monarchs. In Russia, it originated during the time of Ivan III (1440−1505), and was abolished after the Russian Revolution of 1917.

    West Europeans have had Kings, and Constitutional Monarchies but they were limited by traditional (customary) law.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-24 16:21:00 UTC

  • Morality = Reciprocity. And it has to be. Moral norms are members of a portfolio

    Morality = Reciprocity. And it has to be. Moral norms are members of a portfolio (network) that may be reciprocal or not. Moral intuitions vary by the individual’s reproductive balance of reciprocity vs proportionality in the given set of moral norms. So whenever speaking of ‘morality’ which thing are you talking about? Ideal knowable (reciprocity). Ideal unknowable (anything not immoral and therefore irreciprocal is moral. What we mean is, what’s good? Not what’s moral?) Moral Norm (evolved market for prohibitions), Moral intuition (your bias given your reproductive and survival demands) – in other words, your tolerance for proportionality.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 22:54:00 UTC

  • Democracy CAN only function as (a) a means of overthrowing a failed government (

    Democracy CAN only function as (a) a means of overthrowing a failed government (b) a means of jurying a proposition by a government by a house of each class, (c) a means of selecting priorities from a set of common interests. But in conflict we can only trade w/o ir-reciprocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-19 16:46:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174726475246952448

    Reply addressees: @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174725413685354501


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke So by your reasoning – only violence remains.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174725413685354501


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke So by your reasoning – only violence remains.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174725413685354501

  • Another nit. A right is something the state via the court will enforce – a ‘righ

    Another nit. A right is something the state via the court will enforce – a ‘right to judgement’. It has nothing to do with ‘rights’ per say, in colloquial prose – and can include unethical, immoral, involuntary, irreciprocal violations of any and every sort (and does).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 14:46:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174333884907040768

    Reply addressees: @danstrawhun @primalpoly

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174331668804571136


    IN REPLY TO:

    @dstrwhn

    @curtdoolittle @gmiller “The Constitution does not speak of freedom of contract…. Freedom of contract is a qualified and not an absolute right. There is no absolute freedom to do as one wills or to contract as one chooses.”

    W. Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937)

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174331668804571136