Form: Definition

  • Definition: Mindfulness

    “CURT, PLEASE DEFINE MINDFULNESS?”

    —“What do you mean when you use the word “mindfulness”?”— Andrew Cordeaux @AndrewCordeaux

    1) I mean the physical, cognitive and emotional discipline to control the subject of attention on the present intent, insulated from distractions whether personal, environmental, or interpersonal. 2) But with preference for the stoic method (self authoring, virtues of action), the epicurean objective (within one’s control), testimonial (scientific) knowledge, the play (ritual), and team sport, festival, and feast (celebration). 3) The buddhist method, originally practical and insular evolved into semi-mystical, and survived the attack by monotheistic abrahamism, where the western schools that were practical and action oriented, were destroyed by design by the Abrahamic conquest and dark age. 4) East asian ritual, and Hindu ‘way of life’ survived as well. Each of these methods of physical, mental and emotional discipline reflects local demand given local degree of agency during the period of transformation. (although buddhism was imposed on japan unfortunately). 5) So I use ‘mindfulness’ in the sense that all groups sought to meet demands for some technique of achieving mindfulness of their eras by slightly different means. Since buddhism developed the most direct analysis of the objective, the terminology evolved into a universal. 6) But as in all things, the stoic method, epicurean objective, and scientific(empirical) paradigm, and pursuit of agency(dominance) rather than withdrawal (submission), reflect the european rather than african, semitic, hindu, east asian metaphysics: realism, naturalism, agency.

  • “in-group vs out-group to morality?”

    —“Can you relate in-group vs out-group to morality = reciprocity ?”—Scott Claremont

    Morality = Rules of cooperation INGROUP VS OUTGROUP 1. Ingroup, 2. outgroup … a. outgroup trade, … b. outgroup boycott, … c. outgroup competitor, … d. outgroup parasite … e. outgroup predator Ingroup by definition = cooperation (moral) Ingroup always requires reciprocity. Ingroup oten requires investment (risk) Ingroup often requires insurance Ingroup may require subsidy. Outgroup by definition only requires utility. Outgroup may or may not require reciprocity Outgroup does not require investment (risk) Outgroup does not demand insurance Outgroup does not require subsidy. Outgroup non-cooperation is disutilitarian Outgroup non-cooperation does not require reciprocity Outgroup non-cooperation does not require investment Outgroup non-cooperation does not require insurance Outgroup non-cooperation does not require subsidy Outgroup enemy is harmful Outgroup enemy requires irreciprocity Outgroup enemy requires costs to impose costs Outgroup enemy requires destruction of their insurance Outgroup enemy requires destruction of their subsidies Lesson: you can’t use one rule for scale. Humans are monkeys that want to imitate or follow a single pre-cognitive intuitions rather than think (remember or reason). But spectra require disambiguation and thought. There are no points(ideal types) only lines (spectra).

  • “in-group vs out-group to morality?”

    —“Can you relate in-group vs out-group to morality = reciprocity ?”—Scott Claremont

    Morality = Rules of cooperation INGROUP VS OUTGROUP 1. Ingroup, 2. outgroup … a. outgroup trade, … b. outgroup boycott, … c. outgroup competitor, … d. outgroup parasite … e. outgroup predator Ingroup by definition = cooperation (moral) Ingroup always requires reciprocity. Ingroup oten requires investment (risk) Ingroup often requires insurance Ingroup may require subsidy. Outgroup by definition only requires utility. Outgroup may or may not require reciprocity Outgroup does not require investment (risk) Outgroup does not demand insurance Outgroup does not require subsidy. Outgroup non-cooperation is disutilitarian Outgroup non-cooperation does not require reciprocity Outgroup non-cooperation does not require investment Outgroup non-cooperation does not require insurance Outgroup non-cooperation does not require subsidy Outgroup enemy is harmful Outgroup enemy requires irreciprocity Outgroup enemy requires costs to impose costs Outgroup enemy requires destruction of their insurance Outgroup enemy requires destruction of their subsidies Lesson: you can’t use one rule for scale. Humans are monkeys that want to imitate or follow a single pre-cognitive intuitions rather than think (remember or reason). But spectra require disambiguation and thought. There are no points(ideal types) only lines (spectra).

  • P: We Operationalize the Series Not the Elements

    P: We Operationalize the Series Not the Elements https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/03/p-we-operationalize-the-series-not-the-elements/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 20:14:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179852143274188800

  • Sovereigntarianism

    [C]apitalism creates an economic market producing a war of all against all. Socialism creates a political market producing a war of all against all. Rule of law by Reciprocity, Reciprocal insurance of Sovereignty, and paying the high cost of Heroism and Excellence, Truth and Duty, and Paternalism and Charity, create the optimum polity without the extremes of capitalism or socialism at the cost of total suppression of the irreciprocal and false, under that rule of law by reciprocity and reciprocal insurance. Reciprocal insurance of SovereigntyRule of Law by ReciprocityHeroism and Excellence (Beauty)Truth and DutyPaternalism and Charity We create commons, accumulate capital, and its multipliers. The enemy consumes like locusts and creates only temporary economic velocity. These are very expensive commons because they require we trust one another to invest in a commons that will not be consumed – because every man is a father, sheriff, warrior, and if necessary, judge of the commons and will defend it. We must separate and return to speciation, or the consumption of accumulated material, institutional, informational, genetic, and planetary capital will be consumed by the enemy.

  • Sovereigntarianism

    [C]apitalism creates an economic market producing a war of all against all. Socialism creates a political market producing a war of all against all. Rule of law by Reciprocity, Reciprocal insurance of Sovereignty, and paying the high cost of Heroism and Excellence, Truth and Duty, and Paternalism and Charity, create the optimum polity without the extremes of capitalism or socialism at the cost of total suppression of the irreciprocal and false, under that rule of law by reciprocity and reciprocal insurance. Reciprocal insurance of SovereigntyRule of Law by ReciprocityHeroism and Excellence (Beauty)Truth and DutyPaternalism and Charity We create commons, accumulate capital, and its multipliers. The enemy consumes like locusts and creates only temporary economic velocity. These are very expensive commons because they require we trust one another to invest in a commons that will not be consumed – because every man is a father, sheriff, warrior, and if necessary, judge of the commons and will defend it. We must separate and return to speciation, or the consumption of accumulated material, institutional, informational, genetic, and planetary capital will be consumed by the enemy.

  • EXCHANGE OF KIN AS SECURITY —“Uncle Curt, what was it called when Kings would

    EXCHANGE OF KIN AS SECURITY

    —“Uncle Curt, what was it called when Kings would exchange Princes for a required amount of time, and keep as their ward the exchanged Prince? As this was keep… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=477334052863490&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 14:13:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179761292070002689

  • It’s just a degree of precision:Analogy (wisdom) for broad, Virtues for less bro

    It’s just a degree of precision:Analogy (wisdom) for broad, Virtues for less broad, General Rules for narrower, Law for narrower, science for narrower, and math for narrowest. This range allows us graceful increase and decrease in precision – or dishonestly, to obscure precision.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 11:31:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179720554208739330

    Reply addressees: @undercoverhere1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179719922726969349


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @undercoverhere1 Wisdom literature is awesome. Fairy Tales, Myths, Legends, all use unknown forces to educate us. That’s just different from using wisdom (advice) as truth (decidability). One cannot deduce in argument from such premises. But one can seek counsel, and give counsel with wisdom.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179719922726969349


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @undercoverhere1 Wisdom literature is awesome. Fairy Tales, Myths, Legends, all use unknown forces to educate us. That’s just different from using wisdom (advice) as truth (decidability). One cannot deduce in argument from such premises. But one can seek counsel, and give counsel with wisdom.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179719922726969349

  • WHAT DO PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT In the political context, when

    WHAT DO PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT

    In the political context, when people are expressing in their government, it only refers to three factors (a) the framing of the debate by… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=476671226263106&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 13:55:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179394512432578561

  • WHAT DO PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT by Micah Pezdirtz 1) Confidence

    WHAT DO PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT

    by Micah Pezdirtz

    1) Confidence in transparency (warranted or not)

    2) Consent to policy as comprehended

    3) Satisfaction with perceived outcome.

    (CD: That is constitutional quality. I have to put that in there somewhere. Well done.)

    === in response to ===

    In the political context, when people are expressing in their government, it only refers to three factors (a) the framing of the debate by the media, academy, state complex, (b) the orderliness or at least comprehensibility of the patterns of speech and (c) the current levels of anxiety for the future.

    In other words, the academy, state, media, create demand by generation of conflict, just as diversity of race, ethnicity, and class generates conflict, just as ideological competition creates conflict. The state generates conflcit for ATTENTION which gets them POWER.

    Trust is a synonym for predictability over time.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 09:55:00 UTC