CORPORATISM AS A VEHICLE FOR UNDERSTANDING ALL POLITICAL HISTORY
I want to disambiguate corporatism into a spectrum so that the criticisms is decidable by definition rather than by… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=485019662094929&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 13:43:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184102610695081984
CONSIOUSNESS
Consciousness: awareness of change in state of self (non-body), of spatial model of self (body), of space around self, of objects in the space around self, of place and location, of others, as the spatial movement of others, and the model in the mind of others. This is the sixth sense (biologically it is, this is how the mind constructs experience – just like a 3d video game.).
We can imitate (act masculine bias), sympathize (incentives), empathize (feelings – feminine bias).
We divide the the world into locations, boundaries, objects, places within the location (space), direction of movement, head direction, speed, and distance.
We do this all predictively with about two seconds to compose a context, and updated about every tenth of a second.
So we are continually predicting everything including the actions (imitation), thoughts (sympathy) and feelings (empathy) of others.
The male brain is specialized from back to front (speed) indepdendent of empathy, and the female brain is specialized laterally (context) independent of speed. All of us vary from masculine to feminine brain structures. This difference is large, and I think it’s on the scale of 1.5SD. Empathizing is time consuming. And it biases you to consensus, just as systematizing is consuming but biases you to truth. This is why women are better at telling you what an individual thinks or feels, and men are better at predicting the behavior of groups. (about .2-.6SD) averaged, with wide variation in individuals.
So the female mind process vastly more information and communicates vastly more information between individuals and the male mind is far more concerned with groups and urgencies.
In otther words, ancient stereotypes are correct. Like all stereotypes – they are the most accurate measure in the social sciences.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-14 21:35:00 UTC
FAITH
Faith is a fairly easy thing to explain. In other words we know what causes the feeling we call ‘spirituality’ and why it’s so influential to some and not at all to others. But we can’t introspect into it. So you can’t introspect into how you raise your arm. And you can’t introspect into the feeling you get from faith, but that doesn’t mean we cant explain how you raise your arm (I certainly can) or that we can’t explain the feeling of faith (I certainly can). It’s that the ‘magic’ is due to our inability to introspectively analyze it. There are some tricks we can use (visual illusions) to experiment with vision. There are similar tricks for spirituality. The feeling is not complicated. The free association we can conduct in that state is not complicated. And mastering the ability to freely associate emotionally by repetitive practice is not complicated. So whether you specialize in pre-rational emotion, pre-rational intuition, physical performance, or rational thought, or rational calculation, is just a matter of your ability and interest. And your developmental arc since that series is simply the developmental hierarchy. And just as there are many fragile points in your sexual development there are many fragile points in your social development there are also many fragile points in your cognitive development, and some of us are biased to the sensory, to the motor, to the social, to the verbal rational, and some to the calculative spatial.
It’s not that faith isn’t an excellent way of developing mindfulness by supplying your own sedation. It’s not that the buddhist meditation and philosophy isn’t. Or the stoic. It’s that there are consequences (costs) for each of those methods and only the stoic produces your adaptation rather than avoidance.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-14 21:29:00 UTC
DISAMIBIGUATION
… Confidence (Real, Self, High ) – I have confidence in …
… … Belief (ideal, Consensus, Medium) – I believe …
… … … Faith (supernatural, Authority, Low) – I have faith in …
… … … … Conviction (Ideal, Self, Medium,) – My conviction…
Confidence in evidence
Belief in reason
Faith in intuition
Conviction in decision.
I avoid the words belief and faith.
I use:
… ‘as far as I know’
… ‘i can’t falsify’
or
… ‘it’s not decidable’
… ‘it’s a preference or a good not a truth’
I should also use:
… ‘i have confidence in’
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-14 09:21:00 UTC
DISAMBIGUATING EQUALITY
by Bill Joslin
“Equality” is a term that’s been repeatedly … gang-r@ped.
CONTEXT ONE: BOOLEAN ASSESSMENT OF CATEGORICAL MEMBERSHIP.
All players on the ice exist equally as “HOCKEY PLAYERS” bound by the same rules (membership). However, not all hockey players play hockey equally (qualitative assessment).
CONTEXT TWO: ISONOMY
State application of power will be applied to all by the same criteria (equality before the law)
CONNECTION BETWEEN THESE TWO CONTEXTS:
isonomy presumes that all who fall under the law exist, at the very minimum, as agents and thus, as agents, fall under the law.
“Created Equally” was a notion by Americans adopted from their French influencers… the French ruin everything.
—
Definitions:
… Isonomy: “equality before the law”
… nomocracy: “rule of law”
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 17:25:00 UTC
THE THREE METHODS OF COERCION
1 – Force (masculine) – By Law or Military
2 – Payment (libertarian) – By Trade – or Payment
3 – Undermining (feminine) – By Gossip or Religion
That’s what you’ve got to work with. That’s it.
1. The Russians and Chinese use force: Command
2. The West uses Libertarian: sovereignty and reciprocity
3. The Semites use undermining: Priesthoods
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-10 09:06:00 UTC
1. ماذا تقصد بالحرف P؟
“P” = اختصار لـ “Propertarianism”. السليمانية = سيادة القانون من خلال السيادة الفردية (المساواة أمام القانون) ، المعاملة بالمثل (التجارة التطوعية فقط) ، والهيئات القضائية (لا يوجد رجل فوق القانون). ينتج عن ذلك تسلسل هرمي طبيعي نسميه “الجدارة”. الرجال لا يحبون التسلسلات الهرمية الطبيعية. إنهم يريدون الفوز بمركز والاحتفاظ به على حساب الآخر. لكن كل الرجال أكثر سعادة في التسلسلات الهرمية الطبيعية من جميع التسلسلات الهرمية غير الطبيعية الأخرى. ؛)
ENGLISH
1. What do you mean by the letter P?
“P” = Abbreviation for “Propertarianism”. Propertarianism = Rule of Law by Individual Sovereignty (equality before the law), Reciprocity(voluntary trade only), and juries (no man is above the law). This produces a natural hierarchy we call “meritocracy”. Men do not like natural hierarchies. They want to win a position and hold it at other’s expense. But all men are happier in natural hierarchies than all other unnatural hierarchies. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-08 18:06:00 UTC
MASCULINE GSRRM VERSUS FEMALE GSRRM
(important)(canon)
The Stupid Male Trick – Male GSRRM – I don’t understand, you’re wrong.
The Stupid Female Trick – Female GSRRM – I disapprove, you’re bad.
The male method: Cast an accusation and cause the author to defend himself, rather than allow the falsehood to spread.
The female method is to substitute disapproval for truth. The masculine method is to force the author to educate the critic on his terms rather than do the work, or rather than admit his ignorance or status simply asking the question.
Either you can ask a question if you have little knowledge, you can make a criticism on the terms implied if you have more, or you can explain what you disagree with and ask why you err.
If I criticize thinkers it’s after understanding their work. In most cases thinkers have only one or two fundamental insights that all their additional prose explains the application of it to a host of contexts.
Most critics on the other hand have no ideas, only a field of ignorance error bias, and deceit.
This is the difference between producers and rent seekers.
Some of us produce ideas.
The rest consume, or rent seek.
Male posers are rent seekers.
I have no critics that I know of that are not mere rent-seekers.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 19:27:00 UTC
1 Year AgoEric Danelaw updated his status.Oct 7, 2018, 1:00 PMSOCIETY, POLITY, ECONOMY: ASPECTS OF ORDER
We use the term Society when referring to norms, traditions, values, and metaphysical assumptions of subjective perception; and Polity when referring to formal institutions of objective perception; and Market when referring to the economics of cooperation. The fact that people do so out of habit without understanding the pattern they refer to, or conflate them for the purposes of suggestion, misrepresentation, or fraud, is merely lack of education in vocabulary and grammar.Updated Oct 7, 2019, 11:25 AM
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 11:25:00 UTC
Transparent Lies – Signal Conformity
White Lies – provide comfort to the psyche
Grey Lies – protect from consequences of accident, impropriety, or folly
Black Lies – Pursue gains by means of deceit
Evil Lies – Pursue harm for the sake of harm.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 17:08:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180530197340282880
Reply addressees: @Gyeff @MartianHoplite
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180523699197349889
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180523699197349889