Form: Definition

  • WAR CRIME War crimes exist only under (a) Westphalian state responsibility for a

    WAR CRIME

    War crimes exist only under (a) Westphalian state responsibility for actions of all citizens and their agents – a monopoly on violence. (b) Soldiers under direction of the state.

    War crimes were necessary under state run warfare in order to i) license states’ wars of aggression, ii) with conscripted soldiers, and iii) protecting the populace from harm, iiv) while preventing escalation that will prohibit the population from tolerating cessation and settlement.

    In other words the purpose of war crimes is to facilitate the cooperation of the population with the state in the conduct of the state’s war.

    Otherwise, war is war and there are no limits on behavior, and all else is pretense and deceit.

    Islam broke the Westphalian peace with islamic terrorism

    Russia broke the postwar consensus by seizing Ukraine.

    We are in fourth generation warfare: the end of the european domestication of warfare.

    The state no longer has or can have control over the monopoly of violence.

    The non-state actors are more effective at fourth generation warfare in urban environments than are states and armor in the fields.

    TOTAL WAR

    Total war is warfare that includes any and all civilian-associated resources and infrastructure as legitimate military targets, mobilizes all of the resources of society to fight the war, and gives priority to warfare over non-combatant needs. The Oxford Living Dictionaries defines “total war” as “A war that is unrestricted in terms of the weapons used, the territory or combatants involved, or the objectives pursued, especially one in which the laws of war are disregarded.”

    Fourth-generation Warfare (Premodern Warfare)

    Fourth-generation warfare (4GW) is conflict characterized by a blurring of the lines between war and politics, combatants and civilians. The term was first used in 1980 by a team of United States analysts, including William S. Lind, to describe warfare’s return to a decentralized form. In terms of generational modern warfare, the fourth generation signifies the nation states’ loss of their near-monopoly on combat forces, returning to modes of conflict common in pre-modern times.

    The treaties of Westphalia brought to an end a calamitous period of European history which caused the deaths of approximately eight million people. Scholars have identified Westphalia as the beginning of the modern international system, based on the concept of Westphalian sovereignty, though this interpretation has been challenged.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 16:08:00 UTC

  • Operationalism: Testimony using a sequence of intuitionistically(incentives), lo

    Operationalism: Testimony using a sequence of intuitionistically(incentives), logically(speech), and physically testable actions.

    Operational constraints: Realism( Material, Persistent), Naturalism(physical rules of the material universe), Operationalism(description as human actions), Empiricism(observations of results reduced to analogy of experience by physical or logical means), rational choice, reciprocity.

    Science: the production of testimony by under operationalism

    Philosophy: “it’s sorta like that but I can’t explain how”: Analogies. Excuse making. Making stuff up.

    Sigh.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 13:52:00 UTC

  • RECIPROCITY AND IRRECIPROCITY Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary

    RECIPROCITY AND IRRECIPROCITY

    Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, of demonstated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warranted, within the limits of restitutability.

    Irreciprocity: Failing any one of the criteria for Reciprocity.

    MORAL(ETHICAL) SPECTRUM

    … … … … Evil – interpersonal, extrapersonal, irreciprocity without gain (harm for harm’s sake)

    … … … Immoral – extrapersonal irreciprocity at gain

    … … Unethical – interpersonal irreciprocity at gain

    … Criminal – direct irreciprocity at gain

    Amoral – no affect on others at gain.

    … Recirpocal – direct reciprocity at gain

    … … Ethical – interpersonal reciprocity at gain

    … … … Moral – extrapersonal reciprocity at gain

    … … … … Good – interpersonal, extrapersonal, reciprocity without gain (investment, for investment’s sake)

    The constant relation in the spectrum is reciprocity by distance self, direct, indirect


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 09:39:00 UTC

  • One more time. Three means of human coercion or more gently, weapons of influenc

    One more time. Three means of human coercion or more gently, weapons of influence.

    The Physical:

    Body and Movement

    Using Force or Violence

    The fear of harm or promise of defense.

    By the Dominant or Established Male

    The Material:

    Resources and Opportunity

    Using Bribe or Trade

    The fear of loss of gains, or promise of gains

    By the Brother, Ally, or Ascendant Male

    The Social:

    Cooperation and Insurance

    Using Undermining or Advocacy

    The fear of ostracization or promise of inclusion

    By the female and especially dominant female

    Personality:

    Big5/6 Personality Traits with 10/12 Personality facets.

    Where One Traits differs Dominance Expression.

    Where all Facets differ by Gender Bias.

    Where all personalities cluster by three types:

    Dominant or Established Male.

    Ascendant Male.

    Female.

    Gender:

    Where sex is genetically determined and either male or female.

    Where the brain evolves a dominant lateral, female, associative (wide association in the present) and longitudinal male a narrow, association over time and space).

    Where the resulting brain structure favors temporal interpersonal emotion in the female necessary for child rearing, and intertemporal political analytic in the male necessary for holding territory, resources, females, and children from capture by competing males.

    Where sexual preference is for the opposite sex, either male, female, but a small percentage of the population is subject to developmental defect in utero and can express almost any gender distribution.

    Conflict:

    Where developmental defect can cause failure to produce sufficient agency for self control.

    Where genders demonstrate differences in self control by antisocial, disruptive or hostile behavior.

    Where females demonstrate sexual, psychological(interpersonal), social(group), antisocial behavior, by continuous undermining and manipulation.

    Where males demonstrate sexual and physical antisocial behavior by continuous harm to self, others, and property.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 14:19:00 UTC

  • DEMARCATION SHOULD BE Sheriffs are elected. Sheriffs are responsible for civil l

    DEMARCATION SHOULD BE

    Sheriffs are elected.

    Sheriffs are responsible for civil law

    Sheriffs are responsible for territories,

    Police are employees.

    Police for criminal law.

    Police are responsible for cities.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 14:36:00 UTC

  • DEFINING PROPERTARIANISM – FOR NEWBIES Propertarianism consists of: 1 – The comp

    DEFINING PROPERTARIANISM – FOR NEWBIES

    Propertarianism consists of:

    1 – The completion of the scientific method and all that it entails – which is a lot and why P is such a big program: it touches everything and it converts almost all psychological, social, and political speech to economic expressions – which is counter-intuitive because it’s scientific where our current psychological social, moral, and political speech is only normative or in the case of psychology sociology and politics, both pseudoscientific and sophomoric.

    We call this Testimonialism

    2 – The explanation for western success in ancient and modern worlds (adaptive velocity because of our individual sovereignty and resulting traditional law of property/tort.)

    We call this Western Group Evolutionary Strategy.

    3 – The explanation of the different systems of argument used in the different civilizations, and in particular the abrahamic means of deceit used in the ancient world (judaism, Christianity, islam) and in the modern world (marxism, feminism, postmodernism, denialism/political correctness).

    We call this The Grammars.

    4 – A constitution, body of law, and attendant policies that restore the american, english, anglo saxon, germanic, western indo-european, constitution (contract among sovereigns) and hardens it from future undermining, by creating a legal means for the prosecution of crimes of undermining, including religious (jewish islamic), pseudoscientific, and sophomoric (marx, freud, boas, adorno, derrida, friedan, and marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism/political correctness), as well as the financing of undermining by prohibiting rent-seeking, privatization of commons, and socialization of losses).

    We call this a new or updated constitution.

    5 – A set of policies under that constitution that form the most substantial political, social, economic, and financial reform since the roman era – restoring the civil society.

    We call these the reforms: the policies under the constitution

    6 – A set of Restitutions and Punishments that serve to return wealth to the american people, punish those who have engaged in undermining our people, and prevent repeats of undermining our people – or other peoples – in the future.

    We all these the Restitutions

    EXPLANATION OF HOW PROPERTARIANISM DOES ALL THAT

    We create both the Positive Market for goods, services, and information in competition with and the Negative Market for Suppression, restitution, punishment, and prevention, of falsehood and ir-reciprocity by the Natural Common Law of Tort that evolves scientifically through demonstrated resolution of disputes in real world conflicts. So we create a market where people have the ultimate sovereignty (monopoly of control), liberty (choose your own destiny), and freedom (free of coercion) in a competition between market cooperation (the markets) and markets for conflict resolution (courts), as long as you do so by truthful and reciprocal means.

    We had these rights through most of our history but they have been stolen from us over the past century – on purpose, to destroy our civilization.

    But how can we (restore) our use of the law for the purpose of suppressing crimes against our people?

    This is how:

    Do you know what a formal logic is? It’s grammar of the logic of inference using sets and binary truth or falsehood.

    Do you know what programming is? It’s a grammar of operational logic using binary truth or falsehood.

    Do you know what law is? It’s a formal operational rational grammar of conflict resolution, using ternary falsehood, truth candidacy, and undecidability.

    Do you know what tort law is? it’s a formal rational operational grammar of conflict resolution over demonstrated interests that we enumerate as property, using ternary logic of falsehood, truth candidacy, undecidability.

    Propertarianism is a formal (strict), operational(sequential action), grammar (vocabulary, grammar, syntax, logic), of Tort (demonstrated interests), and as a consequence a value neutral universal language (vocabulary, grammar, syntax, logic) across all disciplines (physical science, language-metaphysics, psychology, sociology, politics, ethics, law, group strategy), that allows us to falsify (test) every possible dimension of human action, intuition, cognition, and speech, for both testimonial possibility (truth) and reciprocity(ethics, morality, trespass, tort), and as a consequence allows us to create uninterpretable (strictly constructed) constitutions, and their enumerated rights and responsibilities, the most influential of which is the conversion of free speech to free truthful and reciprocal speech, in public, to the public, on matters public (commerce, economics, commons, politics, group strategy) by extending the involuntary warranty of due diligence and involuntary liability for the truthfulness and reciprocity of commercial speech to that of political speech.

    As such it allows us to outlaw hostile religions, and pseudo-religions especially the pseudoscientific and sophomoric restatements of supernatural judaism , christianity, and islam, in pseudoscientific and sophomoric and ir-reciprocal marxism, socialism, feminism, and postmodernism.

    Propertarianism is equivalent in scope to the revolutions of Aristotelian reason (Realism, Naturalism, Reason), the Empirical Revolution(Realism, Naturalism, Empiricism), in that it completes the scientific method by extending it from the physical to the psychological and social sciences, including that of law, politics, and group strategy.

    In other words, “Propertarianism consists of the completion of the Scientific Method; its application to the totality of human knowledge; producing a universally commensurable language of all thought; its embodiment in the common law of tort; resulting in a logical and scientific constitution; permitting the criminalization of ir-reciprocal and un-testifiable speech, and as a consequence the eradication of superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit from the commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational commons.”

    REASONS FOR DISPROPORTIONATE WESTERN SUCCESS

    When we explain the reason for western success we discover:

    “Heroism and Excellence; Truth and Duty; Oath and Warranty; Sovereignty and Reciprocity; Law and Jury; And Voluntary Markets in Every Aspect of Life: Association, Cooperation, Production, Reproduction, Commons, Polities and War; The direction of surpluses to the production of commons and the returns therefrom; at the cost of suppression of the reproduction of the unproductive underclasses; and the Direction of Dominance Expression to the Production of Commons by a Distributed Dictatorship of Individually Sovereign People and the Reciprocal Warranty of Denial of Power To Any and All.”

    Largely it’s just that we tell the truth – and no one else does.

    Propertarianism is (a) the completion of the Aristotelian program (b) the completion of the scientific method (c ) the logic and science of the social sciences, and (d) the Natural Law of Reciprocity under which all display word and deed is expressible and commensurable. (e) and the means of institutionalizing in a “Market for the Suppression of Fraud” the suppression of the greatest crime against humanity: the big lies that are responsible for the last dark age and the new one that the enemy has sought to bring about.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-15 18:22:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/86671206_208421863889308_69035903039

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/86671206_208421863889308_69035903039

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/86671206_208421863889308_6903590303987400704_o_208421860555975.jpg “CAPITISCUMULUSISM”

    capitis-‘cumulus-ism (CAP-ih-tis CYOOM-yoo-loose ihzim

    A political ideology that emphasizes the accumulation of piles of human skulls. Frequently practiced in pre colonial Meso-American civilizations, Cambodian, and American revolutionary movements. See also “Shrunken Head Economies” and “Shrunken Head Money Substitutes”.”CAPITISCUMULUSISM”

    capitis-‘cumulus-ism (CAP-ih-tis CYOOM-yoo-loose ihzim

    A political ideology that emphasizes the accumulation of piles of human skulls. Frequently practiced in pre colonial Meso-American civilizations, Cambodian, and American revolutionary movements. See also “Shrunken Head Economies” and “Shrunken Head Money Substitutes”.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-15 17:35:00 UTC

  • It’s Propertarianism, Sovereigntarianism, or The Natural Law of the European Peo

    It’s Propertarianism, Sovereigntarianism, or The Natural Law of the European People.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 20:28:00 UTC

  • Categories of Religion

    Categories of Religion

    Feb 13, 2020, 11:55 AM By: Luke Weinhagen, via Brandon Hayes (Core) (expanded) (added “Internecitic Religion”) [E]xamining the effects of belief systems from the frame of symbiosis – Mutualitic Religion – benefit to practitioners and benefit to non-practitioners Commensalitic Religion – benefit to practitioners with no cost to non-practitioner Neutralitic Religion – no benefit to the practitioner and no cost to the non-practitioner Amensalitic Religion – no benefit to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner Parasitic Religion – benefit to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner Internecitic Religion – harm to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner’

    85130731_10218928802823757_6094154075824193536_o.jpg
    85046746_206469310751230_4465482015956795392_o.jpg
  • Categories of Religion

    Categories of Religion

    Feb 13, 2020, 11:55 AM By: Luke Weinhagen, via Brandon Hayes (Core) (expanded) (added “Internecitic Religion”) [E]xamining the effects of belief systems from the frame of symbiosis – Mutualitic Religion – benefit to practitioners and benefit to non-practitioners Commensalitic Religion – benefit to practitioners with no cost to non-practitioner Neutralitic Religion – no benefit to the practitioner and no cost to the non-practitioner Amensalitic Religion – no benefit to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner Parasitic Religion – benefit to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner Internecitic Religion – harm to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner’

    85130731_10218928802823757_6094154075824193536_o.jpg
    85046746_206469310751230_4465482015956795392_o.jpg