Form: Definition

  • Performative (Existential) Truth

    Performative Truth rather than the pretense of it, requires consistency of properties (identity) of reference, internal consistency (logical consistency), consistency of operational possibility (sequences in time), consistency of observed consequences (empiricism), rational choice by rational incentives, reciprocity (bi-directional rational choice), coherence (consistency with realism, naturalism, and operationalism), completeness by stated limits, and full accounting within them, are the minimum criteria for due diligence against falsehood by ignorance, error, bias, and deceit, under liability for having performed that due diligence.

    This is the analytic and complete inventory of the criteria we use in the judgment of the truth today – and have for centuries. It’s just that the scientific community is less demanding than the court, the philosophical community less so than the scientific, and the informal community lacking constraint at all. And the academic, public intellectual, commercial, economic, financial, and political communities abuse with reckless abandon. And with religions – whether supernatural or pseudoscientific (marxism – feminism et al) or sophistry (postmodernism et all) – specializing in lying.

  • Defining “White and Whiteness”

    Defining “White and Whiteness” https://t.co/ynr54U1qF6

  • Defining “White and Whiteness”

    WHITE
    “White” refers to:

    (a) descendants of the Indo European conquest of Europe,
    (b) who speak the indo-european language family,
    (c) who practice the indo european metaphysical and legal traditions, and
    (d) who during the dark ages, converted from indo european derived religion to its antithesis: the Semitic derived Christian religion.

    The outlier property is the metaphysical and legal tradition that is what causes european civilizational uniqueness and is the reason for european excellence in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds – with a thousand years of a superstitious dark age in between. It’s this uniqueness that demarcates ‘whites’ from other peoples more so than any other, and unfortunately, it is the least understood (until now, which is the focus of my work).

    “WHITENESS”

    “Whiteness” as used pejoratively is a group strategy. It is a group strategy of northern Europeans (protestants). That group strategy is extremely costly. While we may be aware of the high cost of truth before face, the high cost of market meritocracy, and the high cost of high trust norms, it’s unspoken cost is that it is aggressively eugenic. This aggressive eugenics is as much or more important than any other cultural trait. Only the Chinese and the Europeans were able to institutionalize eugenic reproduction via manorialism, which accounts for the elevated intelligence of East Asians and Western Europeans: the underclasses were dramatically reduced through natural cold weather farming, reproductive suppression, and criminal prosecution.

    The world other than Korea japan and china who are equally the products of eugenic evolution (human self-domestication) despises western civilization because it is expensive, it is counter-intuitive, and it is antithetical to them – but most importantly – because they cannot compete because they cannot repeat the eugenic processes themselves. Islam is perhaps the ultimate anti-civilization in history and is not a primitive group strategy. It produces de-civilization and dysgenia by justifying the avoidance of all adaptive costs. The same is true for the current war by the left against western civilization – they seek to eliminate the payment of eugenic costs.

    THE SPECTRUM

    1 – Most narrowly: Germanic Northern Europeans above the Hajnal Line (North Sea Civ), who were not under catholicism long enough to lose their ancestral legal and traditional habits – especially those who escaped the long term corruption of the church. The north sea group began separating from the rest of the world rapidly and the great divergence of the greeks was repeated in the north sea beginning in 1000 ad (not 1400).

    2 – Commonly: Christian European whether Germanic Scandinavian, Baltic, Slavic, or Finnic. (Continental Civ). This includes the three groups of Christianized european people: orthodox(greek), catholic(Latin), and protestant (Germanic)

    3 – Less Commonly: Many be extended to include the descendants of early Neolithic farmers of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, Sicily, and Sardinia because they are Christian and in the european territorial and cultural sphere of influence. (European Peninsular Civ)

    4 – Uncommonly: May be extended to include the Iranic people of the caucuses: Georgians, Armenians. (European Extant Civ thru the Urals )

    5 – Rarely: May be extended to include the south-central West Eurasians – the Iranic peoples – but generally not.

    6 – More rarely: May be extended to the Turkic peoples – but almost certainly not – because they don’t speak an IE language.

    7 – Not including outbred peoples of the Indian subcontinent (who are a mixture of negrito hunter-gatherer, middle eastern hunter-gatherer (Dravidian), and Indo european steppe herders.

    8 – Not including the Afro Asiatic Languages – Middle eastern Peoples.

    9 – Never including African or East Asian Peoples, or Siberian Peoples (Amerindians).

    10 – Never including admixture peoples (along the out-of-Africa route from Yemen, to India, to SE Asia, to Australia.

     

  • Defining “White and Whiteness”

    WHITE
    “White” refers to:

    (a) descendants of the Indo European conquest of Europe,
    (b) who speak the indo-european language family,
    (c) who practice the indo european metaphysical and legal traditions, and
    (d) who during the dark ages, converted from indo european derived religion to its antithesis: the Semitic derived Christian religion.

    The outlier property is the metaphysical and legal tradition that is what causes european civilizational uniqueness and is the reason for european excellence in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds – with a thousand years of a superstitious dark age in between. It’s this uniqueness that demarcates ‘whites’ from other peoples more so than any other, and unfortunately, it is the least understood (until now, which is the focus of my work).

    “WHITENESS”

    “Whiteness” as used pejoratively is a group strategy. It is a group strategy of northern Europeans (protestants). That group strategy is extremely costly. While we may be aware of the high cost of truth before face, the high cost of market meritocracy, and the high cost of high trust norms, it’s unspoken cost is that it is aggressively eugenic. This aggressive eugenics is as much or more important than any other cultural trait. Only the Chinese and the Europeans were able to institutionalize eugenic reproduction via manorialism, which accounts for the elevated intelligence of East Asians and Western Europeans: the underclasses were dramatically reduced through natural cold weather farming, reproductive suppression, and criminal prosecution.

    The world other than Korea japan and china who are equally the products of eugenic evolution (human self-domestication) despises western civilization because it is expensive, it is counter-intuitive, and it is antithetical to them – but most importantly – because they cannot compete because they cannot repeat the eugenic processes themselves. Islam is perhaps the ultimate anti-civilization in history and is not a primitive group strategy. It produces de-civilization and dysgenia by justifying the avoidance of all adaptive costs. The same is true for the current war by the left against western civilization – they seek to eliminate the payment of eugenic costs.

    THE SPECTRUM

    1 – Most narrowly: Germanic Northern Europeans above the Hajnal Line (North Sea Civ), who were not under catholicism long enough to lose their ancestral legal and traditional habits – especially those who escaped the long term corruption of the church. The north sea group began separating from the rest of the world rapidly and the great divergence of the greeks was repeated in the north sea beginning in 1000 ad (not 1400).

    2 – Commonly: Christian European whether Germanic Scandinavian, Baltic, Slavic, or Finnic. (Continental Civ). This includes the three groups of Christianized european people: orthodox(greek), catholic(Latin), and protestant (Germanic)

    3 – Less Commonly: Many be extended to include the descendants of early Neolithic farmers of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, Sicily, and Sardinia because they are Christian and in the european territorial and cultural sphere of influence. (European Peninsular Civ)

    4 – Uncommonly: May be extended to include the Iranic people of the caucuses: Georgians, Armenians. (European Extant Civ thru the Urals )

    5 – Rarely: May be extended to include the south-central West Eurasians – the Iranic peoples – but generally not.

    6 – More rarely: May be extended to the Turkic peoples – but almost certainly not – because they don’t speak an IE language.

    7 – Not including outbred peoples of the Indian subcontinent (who are a mixture of negrito hunter-gatherer, middle eastern hunter-gatherer (Dravidian), and Indo european steppe herders.

    8 – Not including the Afro Asiatic Languages – Middle eastern Peoples.

    9 – Never including African or East Asian Peoples, or Siberian Peoples (Amerindians).

    10 – Never including admixture peoples (along the out-of-Africa route from Yemen, to India, to SE Asia, to Australia.

     

  • Metaphysics = Paradigm. Paradigms may be consistent or not, coherent or not, act

    Metaphysics = Paradigm. Paradigms may be consistent or not, coherent or not, actionable or not, and correspondent or not. Only one is all of them. The rest are fictionalisms. East Asian vs Western is the canon example: verb vs noun

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

  • Metaphysics = Paradigm. Paradigms may be consistent or not, coherent or not, act

    Metaphysics = Paradigm. Paradigms may be consistent or not, coherent or not, actionable or not, and correspondent or not. Only one is all of them. The rest are fictionalisms. East Asian vs Western is the canon example: verb vs noun


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 03:38:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307162113371254786

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307139794053533698

  • Performative Truth rather than the pretense of it, requires consistency of prope

    Performative Truth rather than the pretense of it, requires consistency of properties (identity) of reference, internal consistency (logical consistency), consistency of operational possibility (sequences in time), consistency of observed consequences (empiricism), rational choice by rational incentives, reciprocity (bi-directional rational choice), coherence (consistency with realism, naturalism, and operationalism), completeness by stated limits, and full accounting within them, are the minimum criteria for due diligence against falsehood by ignorance, error, bias, and deceit, under liability for having performed that due diligence.

    This is the analytic and complete inventory of the criteria we use in the judgment of the truth today – and have for centuries. It’s just that the scientific community is less demanding than the court, the philosophical community less so than the scientific, and the informal community lacking constraint at all. And the academic, public intellectual, commercial, economic, financial, and political communities abuse with reckless abandon. And with religions – whether supernatural or pseudoscientific (marxism – feminism et al) or sophistry (postmodernism et all) – specializing in lying.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-18 20:24:00 UTC

  • Increase in clarity: So when I say P, or P-logic, P-Law, and P-Testimony provide

    Increase in clarity:

    So when I say P, or P-logic, P-Law, and P-Testimony provide a universally commensurable paradigm across all fields of human knowledge I mean it. That is what the Table of Grammars codifies. P-logic and P-law provide a universally commensurable language: a SYSTEM OF MEASUREMENT for human testimony (speech) just as mathematics and physics provide a system of measurement for the phsyical world that can’t recall, forcast, or act. And so P-Logic and P-Law consist of what SURVIVES the application of P-logic and P-Law. So of course we will draw from nearly every field. And since economics provides the primary langauge of psychological, and social science, we will use economic langauge rather than the pseudoscences including the pseudoscience of what we generally refer to as philosophy. So yes, it requires quite a bit of knowledge OR a certain kind of mind, to learn this particular VOCABULART, LOGIC, AND LAW. In fact, it’s closest to combining math, physics, programming, economics, and law, and at a minium a knowledge of evolutionary game theory like Axelrod’s evolution of cooperation. So yes. It’ fking hard, and no, if you can’t get into law school, economic school, engineering school, or computer science school, you are not going to have an easy time of something like P-law. It requires too much general knowledge.

    Now conversely if you want to understand the FINDINGS of p-logic and p-law and p-testimony, or the explanation for european civilizational superiority then that’s something we can provide you with. And if you want to learn to argue a few significant points, then that we can do too. But no, getting really good at P is like getting really good at math or physics, and far harder than philosophy or logic, chemistry or biology.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-17 14:40:00 UTC

  • The simple tests of female cognitive bias and absence of cognitive agency (possi

    The simple tests of female cognitive bias and absence of cognitive agency (possibility of truth): (a) NAXALT(inability to distinquish a curve, (b) desirability conflated with truth, (c) denial of evidence (d) Evasion by GSRRM, (e) posturing false value of cooperation (sex proxy).

    Reply addressees: @blackseraphim2 @Breshvic @BlancheKnox5 @bydavidcrow @KatrinaManson @kadhim @WhiteHouse

  • The simple tests of female cognitive bias and absence of cognitive agency (possi

    The simple tests of female cognitive bias and absence of cognitive agency (possibility of truth): (a) NAXALT(inability to distinquish a curve, (b) desirability conflated with truth, (c) denial of evidence (d) Evasion by GSRRM, (e) posturing false value of cooperation (sex proxy).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-17 12:41:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1306574096105435137

    Reply addressees: @blackseraphim2 @Breshvic @BlancheKnox5 @bydavidcrow @KatrinaManson @kadhim @WhiteHouse

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1306564710733676545