Increase in clarity: So when I say P, or P-logic, P-Law, and P-Testimony provide

Increase in clarity:

So when I say P, or P-logic, P-Law, and P-Testimony provide a universally commensurable paradigm across all fields of human knowledge I mean it. That is what the Table of Grammars codifies. P-logic and P-law provide a universally commensurable language: a SYSTEM OF MEASUREMENT for human testimony (speech) just as mathematics and physics provide a system of measurement for the phsyical world that can’t recall, forcast, or act. And so P-Logic and P-Law consist of what SURVIVES the application of P-logic and P-Law. So of course we will draw from nearly every field. And since economics provides the primary langauge of psychological, and social science, we will use economic langauge rather than the pseudoscences including the pseudoscience of what we generally refer to as philosophy. So yes, it requires quite a bit of knowledge OR a certain kind of mind, to learn this particular VOCABULART, LOGIC, AND LAW. In fact, it’s closest to combining math, physics, programming, economics, and law, and at a minium a knowledge of evolutionary game theory like Axelrod’s evolution of cooperation. So yes. It’ fking hard, and no, if you can’t get into law school, economic school, engineering school, or computer science school, you are not going to have an easy time of something like P-law. It requires too much general knowledge.

Now conversely if you want to understand the FINDINGS of p-logic and p-law and p-testimony, or the explanation for european civilizational superiority then that’s something we can provide you with. And if you want to learn to argue a few significant points, then that we can do too. But no, getting really good at P is like getting really good at math or physics, and far harder than philosophy or logic, chemistry or biology.