THE “SCIENCE” OF SCOTT ADAMS’ HYPERBOLE Scott Adams’ (@ScottAdamsSays ) hyperbol

THE “SCIENCE” OF SCOTT ADAMS’ HYPERBOLE
Scott Adams’ (@ScottAdamsSays ) hyperbole on the race question was obvious to anyone who uses hyperbole to illustrate a point that requires the combination of scaling, time, and inverse logic.

The problem is, that inverse (negative) logic is the first capacity humans lose as IQ declines below 105. And it’s ‘gone’ by around 90. The same for ‘auto-scaling’ using hyperbole: “what if everyone did this all the time over time.” And that declines to literal interpretation by the same scale. Masculine cognitive bias provides a scale advantage, and Feminine cognitive bias (empathizing) provides a scale disadvantage. (FWIW: our current AI’s still can’t do inverse logic. Not possible.)

Feminine and Leftists are ‘simple’, ’empathizing’, and ‘literal’. Meaning short-term experiential thinking. And Masculine and Conservatives use hyperbole for long-term systemic thinking.

Men can at least vaguely understand leftist (feminine) men and women, but leftist (feminine) men and women cannot understand conservatives.

It’s not complicated. It’s pretty well covered in the scientific literature. Even the difference between how men do math as models and women do math as pictures. This is the origin of our cognitive emotional ethical and moral differences: sex.

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute