Curt Doolittle

Form: Critique

  • GENERATIVE GRAMMAR SOPHISTS ARE NEO ABRAHAMISTS (((yes))) 1) Generative Grammar

    GENERATIVE GRAMMAR SOPHISTS ARE NEO ABRAHAMISTS

    (((yes)))

    1) Generative Grammar refers to the theory that we are born with an innate capacity for producing speech, according to some rules or patterns, and that all languages evolve from this innate ability. (Ai would say serialization of information into streams of …

    2) … continuously disambiguating symbols (phonemes) is a limit of neural economy – particularly short term memory. Opponents to generative grammar don’t use AI examples, they use studies out outliers and their answer reflects the AI: that it is simply a product of ….

    3) … the limits of sense perception (Homunculus), and the limits of information processing ability – particularly integration.

    4) Generative Anthropology refers to the theory that the history of human culture is a genetic or “generative” development stemming from the development of language rather than language assists in the distribution of processing power calculation and falsifiability, and that …

    5) … all social language is merely an act of negotiating cooperation, fraud, and deceit in the furtherance of dividing labor, processing power, calculation, and FALSIFIABILITY OR UNFALSIFIABILITY. In other words, that language assists in the negotiating distributed …

    6) … computation, valuation, and action (or prohibiting, computation, valuation, and action) is not something open to dispute. Nor is the great leap forward provided by the singularity of development of language in the division of sense, perception, memory, and cognition.

    7) The technical debate is over whether there is an innate facility for language or it is simply a function of increased neural capacity and density given our rather rare capacity for complex movement whether limbs, fingers, lips, throat, or even control over our breathing.

    8) However, this has nothing to do with and is merely an EXCUSE for Gans’ writing and the scope of the GA writing available, and the GA Blog for example, consists of little more than the ‘astrology and numerology of speech’ and simply a revision of the sophism of abrahamic and ..

    10) … platonic, speech. While we find mythological speech in hinduism, and we find idealism in Sinic philosophy and religion, and we find pseudoscientific speech in buddhism, and Legal speech in Aristotelianism – if not all european folk language – we do not find them …

    11) … conflated into argument until semitic abrahamic speech, and the incorporation of semitic abrahamic speech into western discourse under the christian theologian attempts to reconcile european truth and semitic lie. Wisdom was not Argument employed as ‘truth’- just wisdom.

    12) so the question is, why is it that the anglos and scandinavians retain western truth, germans resist restoring it to german, french have abandoned it at least in parisian education, and the jews and muslims have done everything in their intellectual and cultural power…

    13) … to preserve sophism, despite the fact that jews contributed nothing to history other than sophisms, and that muslims have destroyed (culturally and genetically) every great people of the ancient world. And the reason is very simple: INTROSPECTION, SOPHISM, …

    14) … and CONFIRMATION and DECEIT are cheaper than investigation, falsification, and action in the real world. In other words, why lie EXCEPT to entice people into moral hazard? The answer is simple: there isn’t any reason except competence at coercion and deceit.

    Why Josh and Tom have trouble understanding this rather obvious dichotomy between truth/error/lies is INCENTIVE, is evidence of their justification of desirable, convenient, or utilitarian lying. End Abrahamic Supernaturalism, Sophism and Pseudoscience forever: NO MORE LIES.

    It’s one thing to use violence or shame against fraud and deceit, and quite another to use violence or deceit as a means of criticizing truth. Science is the universal language of truth,and operations its grammar of measurement. To restore the west,truth is enough. No More Lies.

    It’s bad enough we have left wing liars taking advantage of women and the underclass, but it’s hard to understand why there are those of you who want to take advantage of lost, underachieving young man and throw them in the degenerative maelstrom with the women and fools.

    —@TrueDilTom: Curt I see how you could think that given Chomsky’s “Generative Grammar”, but theyre different things. GA sees neuro-structural explanations of culture as having little room for non-instinctive abstraction to account for the arbitrariness of language. There is no science envy.”—

    Um. What science? There isn’t any science behind GA. It’s just Gans, who is a career postmodernist, doing exactly what I said he is. THERE ISN’T ANY SCIENCE. The structure of language is determined by analogies to experience (the homunculus) and the recursive depth of memory.

    There is nothing to understand. GA is just postmodern Social Construction of Reality with Chomsky added to convert a sophism into a pseudoscience. Josh has intellectual penis envy, which is why he pisses on others and pursues nonsense rather than producing intellectual works.

    The fact that we forecast a combination of real world and imaginary (fictional) models is simply our ability (or inability to resist) conflation of the imagined and the real. People need frames to calculate action. They can have a mixture of false, analogistic, and true frames.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-21 07:53:00 UTC

  • It’s bad enough we have left wing liars taking advantage of women and the underc

    It’s bad enough we have left wing liars taking advantage of women and the underclass, but it’s hard to understand why there are those of you who want to take advantage of lost, underachieving young man and throw them in the degenerative maelstrom with the women and fools.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-20 23:08:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075890809357123592

    Reply addressees: @TrueDilTom @justecar @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @Dick71224996

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075884973331116032

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075884973331116032

  • There is nothing to understand. GA is just postmodern Social Construction of Rea

    There is nothing to understand. GA is just postmodern Social Construction of Reality with Chomsky added to convert a sophism into a pseudoscience. Josh has intellectual penis envy, which is why he pisses on others and pursues nonsense rather than producing intellectual works.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-20 21:15:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075862308260335622

    Reply addressees: @justecar @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @TrueDilTom @Dick71224996

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075861461975601153

    IN REPLY TO:

    @justecar

    @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @TrueDilTom @Dick71224996 @curtdoolittle Your implication is people don’t understand GA – well I haven’t seen a concise explanation of it and how it offers a practical solution to the current situation.

    I’m new to both these sets of ideas so no dog in this fight, but you get very personal/insulting on this topic…

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075861461975601153

  • ORGANIZED TRUTH SUPPRESSION HERE ON FB It appears that Andrew Taylor (who I don’

    ORGANIZED TRUTH SUPPRESSION HERE ON FB

    It appears that Andrew Taylor (who I don’t know) and Claire Khaw – an asian-brit, of questionable mental ability and unquestionable mental instability, who is an apologist for authoritarian religion – particularly islam – are attempting to get me (us) shadow banned by inviting muslim fanatics to our pages, and creating multiple sock accounts, and then having them report us.

    This is why we are so careful with filtering friend requests and follows.

    We had the same problem with another woman who shall remain nameless.

    Anyway, that’s why some of you are seeing shadow ban activity.

    I don’t quite have my arms around the FB algorithm yet but it does seem to require numbers.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-20 11:04:00 UTC

  • Able? Able? You’re an addict acting like a clown spewing abrahamic critique in t

    Able? Able? You’re an addict acting like a clown spewing abrahamic critique in the competitive method of females because you can’t put forth an argument other than normative, justificationary, or ridicule.

    Abrahamism: false promise, baiting into moral hazard, advanced by “Pilpul” consisting of the heaping of undue praise, sophism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience, and defended by “Critique”, consisting of disapproval, moralizing, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, and reputation destruction – thereby advancing a falsehood on one hand, and attacking the person rather than argument on the other.

    What I do, is teach how to identify and defeat these arguments. What you don’t know is that Truth under threat of violence is the competitive strategy of males, and conformity under threat of reputation destruction the competitive strategy of females.

    Nor do you realize you are making TEXTBOOK ARGUMENTS using every one of the female techniques.

    The problem is, someone has to care about your approval, when you’re conducting your Pilpul and Critique in a forum of men for whom truth is far more important than approval, and who are training specifically to end the Abrahamic Deceits in their modern form: Marxism, Boasianism, Freudianism, Keynesianism (pseudoscience), Postmodernism and Libertarianism (sophism), and Feminism (false promise, denial).

    Truth is what differentiates the west from the rest. We survived christianity and the dark ages thanks to our sovereignty, heroism, truth, duty, and law, with the restoration of martial behavior under the viking conquest, and the restoration of greek thought, the replacement of the church’s mandated ignorance and superstition with literacy, and british contractualism and legalism, combined with greek thought, restoring our empiricism. All of these resulted in the agrarian revolution, world conquest, industrialization, and the creation of the modern world that has dragged the entire world out of semitic ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature.

    You’re just another drug user, defending his ‘high’, by reaching for any excuse you can find, like a woman defending her reputation despite sleeping with the enemy for money.

    We ought to shave your head and make you wear a dress.

    TRUTH IS TRUTH AND TRUTH IS ENOUGH.

    Satisfaction of demand for Religion(membership in the pack or herd) can be produced by Education(Stoicism), Therapy(buddhism), or Medication(Abrahamism).

    Cheers.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-20 07:36:00 UTC

  • THE TRUTH IS A HARSH RELIGION –“for a “scientist,” you have an awfully 7th-grad

    THE TRUTH IS A HARSH RELIGION

    –“for a “scientist,” you have an awfully 7th-grade level of religious understanding. just a quick scroll through your feed shows a total lack of discernment when it even comes to the most basic differences between monotheistic faiths, as if you can just say “muh abrahamism” and that somehow means anything as an umbrella term. don’t you think that, if you’re going to claim to be empirical and objective, you should at least take the time to understand what you’re talking about?”—Michael Witcoff

    (As if my campaign against abrahamic sophism is limited to the old world religions of judaism, christianity, and islam – and the new world religions of marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and anti-europeanism – as much as it is against the causes of demand for falsehoods, and our ability to provide an alternative due to lack of understanding and costs.)

    That isnt a criticism. it’s an excuse. religion consists of what existed before 7th grade education, and declines now that we have that education. There is a reason religiosity deceases with intelligence and knowledge. There is a reason religiosity increases with declines in intelligence. There is a reason religiosity increases with diversity and decreases with homogeneity. In other words, religion as you understand it, is symptomatic of ‘the bad’.

    Yet, there is a reason why we have demand for personal, interpersonal, civic, and political rituals and feasts. there are many ways of supplying that demand. That’s the evidence from around the world and throughout history.

    The fact that one can scientifically articulate the causes of tht demand and the range of methods of supplying it is no more mysterious than the study of any other human behavior.

    Sure, it was the hard problem of social science. But that was only because of the poor framing of the work in understanding it. Einstein, Menger and Darwin were revolutionary because of their understanding that the problem was framing. Once you understand the commonality between their discoveries was framing (and once you understand my work for that matter) it is rather easy to see that the problem of religion as behavioral therapy is rather obvious. And therefore the satisfaction of demand for that problem by more constructive means, and eliminating the need for therapy by eliminating its causes: alienation.

    Patients easily become addicted to their therapists. So your ‘criticism’ that I should ‘understand’ (sympathize) is nothing more than the appeal of the gambler, drunk or addict, for sympathy with the experience of gambling, drunkenness or addiction.

    I want to and others want to find a form of MEDICATION that is not harmful to the host.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-19 06:37:00 UTC

  • Usual nonsense from Claire “I don’t get it so it must be bad, and only Monotheis

    Usual nonsense from Claire “I don’t get it so it must be bad, and only Monotheistic Authoritarian, Christian if necessary, muslim if possible can provide a means of rule.” Answered in the comments and on FB. (Not that it is worth our time.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-18 16:48:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075070232258056192

    Reply addressees: @Theocracy4all

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075059589585010689

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075059589585010689

  • REGARDING CLAIRE KHAW’S CRITIQUE OF JOHN MARK by The Propertarian Institute Let’

    REGARDING CLAIRE KHAW’S CRITIQUE OF JOHN MARK

    by The Propertarian Institute

    Let’s understand Claire’s critique: Claire is a die-hard advocate for monotheistic religious, Christian if necessary, and Muslim if possible, Authoritarianism. Her argument is reducible to “I can’t understand it so it’s not good”, and here motive is “I can understand authoritarian religion so it is good.”

    That’s all she has to say – really. The rest is just (((critique))): meaning criticism of straw men, rather than proposal of a possible educational, social, economic, legal, and political order that can compete with the alternatives.

    Critique is always employed as a deceit. It’s just been Industrialized during the (((late 19th and entire 20th))) centuries due to the hostile attack on western civilization in the modern world using sophism, utopianism, and pseudoscience like judaism, christianity, and islam used sophism and supernaturalism to create a hostile attack on the great civilizations of the ancient world, through the natural vulnerability of women to such ideas, and the natural demand by the underclass of such ideas – despite those ideas being in conflict with anything other than dysgenia and decline. -Cheers

    Fool us once, shame one (((abrahamists))) of all religions. Fool us twice, shame on us for letting them.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-18 11:35:00 UTC

  • VS TALEB There isn’t any difference between taleb and I other than he prefers li

    VS TALEB

    There isn’t any difference between taleb and I other than he prefers literary philosophy, literature, reason, and math. He’s exhausted the math direction. He’s pretty much exhausted the literary direction, and he is very close to understanding that there is no positivist solution, and that only the law (warranty of due diligence) – which he calls skin in the game – is a possible method of testing whether individuals have sufficient agency AND honesty AND ethics to make choices.

    Otherwise I don’t know why we’re incompatible.

    Jeppeson hasn’t had an idea other than to retread derrida by adding in chomsky, and trying to create ‘social construction’ of authoritarianism (a religion of male authoritarian postmodernism) to compete with the left’s religion of feminine authoritarianism.)

    (I just deal with science, economics, law, education, and now that form of education we call religion.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-16 11:54:00 UTC

  • NO JORDAN PETERSON – NO MORE LIES No, Jordan, you’re just comfortable tolerating

    NO JORDAN PETERSON – NO MORE LIES

    No, Jordan, you’re just comfortable tolerating White Lies [1]. You are comfortable with white lies because white lies are how we provide solace to those who are suffering when we cannot ,or cannot afford to, or will not, take the actions necessary to end that suffering.

    Your work as a therapist could involve cognitive behavioral therapy. It does involve suggestion by the use of narration, thereby circumventing the trauma, analysis, and self criticism all of us make use of.

    But then you take this means of suggestion from the realm of interpersonal circumvention of trauma so that we might offer education by suggestion, and attempt to scale it to education.

    And this is where your white lies become ordinary lies, which you justify (obscure) with the lie of conflating the truth with the good and the preferable. There is no such thing as ‘darwinian truth’. There is only utility that satisfies a personal good, or a personal preference. We can weave a set of these utilities, like a story, into a justificationary network, that provides us with defense against our fears and insecurities – rather than training us out of fear and insecurity. But these are just another network of white lies.

    Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Buddhism are constructed of little other than these comforting white lies. Stoicism in the form of ritual self authoring(mindfulness) and ritual ancestor worship(Thanks), ritual community worship(thanks), and ritual nature worship(thanks) do nothing other than perform cognitive behavioral therapy that gives us confidence to act in a kaleidic universe the causal density of which is beyond our comprehension.

    So, Even today you maintain your market position with white lies. And you selectively argue with (a) scientific results, (b) clinical example, (c) historical example, and lastly (d) parables constructed of those white lies.

    And while in therapy, absent chemical assistance necessary to provide distance between cognition and trauma, fear, and insecurity, white lies allow us to operate by suggestion. Such lies do not scale.

    There are 1B dead between old world abrahamism( judaism, christianity, islam), and new world abrahamism (marxism, postmodernism, and feminism) and a thousand year dark age some of us are still trying to drag our civilization out of.

    And abrahamism consists of what appear to be white lies: False promise of the impossible, and destructive if successful, straw man criticism of the opposition, a vast network of lies in supernatural (religious), pseudoscientific (feminism, marxism, freudianism, boasianism, cantoriansim, messianism, keynesianism and mathematical platonism), sophist (postmodernism) prose, defended not by rational, operational, and scientific argument, but where argument is avoided by disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossip, undermining, and reputation destruction on the personal, social, political, and intellectual scales.

    So no. There is no ‘excuse’ (justification) for white lies outside of catastrophic loss, therapy, injury, sick bed, and death bed. There is only one truthful definition of truth: that which is decidable independent of individual comprehension, preference, or collective good.

    And worse, it is through the scale of white lies that we have endured and still endure, a dark age of ignorance, and the billion lives loss to the conflicts created by defense of lies and offence with lies.

    NO MORE LIES.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    [1] white lie[comfort] > grey lie[avoidance] > black lie[predation] > ‘Evil'(harm for harm’s sake)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-14 12:44:00 UTC