The Pretense of Wisdom in the Tempo of Syllables, and the power of suggestion by loading and framing inarticulate and untestable prose. “Woo Woo” for the post-theological era. Science requires knowledge. “Woo” takes advantage of ignorance. Leftist or right lies are indifferent.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
The difference between this article and some bit of occult nonsense by Evola is simply the flavor of sophism. No one disputes that language makes possible a multitude of paradigmatic lies of coercion, but it makes only one most parsimonious paradigmatic truth of decidability.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
All I see is a series of publications using hand waving as an attempt to provide a pseudoscientific defense of Derrida, in that ‘well’ everything evolved from language therefore we can evolve anything with language. In other words, postmodernism.
GA tells us nothing that we don’t already know. So, what is it that GA brings to the table? What can we deduce from it? What application can we put it to? What purpose does this theory solve?
I understand language as consisting of continuous recursive production of transactional measurements and linguistic competition for demonstrated results as improving measurements (truth) and biasing measurements (frauds and deceits). Whether a cliff or a climb is irrelevant.
The central problem is one of computational costs in that production versus time and energy costs of that production. In other words, language tends to be pragmatically adjusted for precision over time, given the context.
So what? That means we can tell truth and lie. It means that competitive ability highly reflects linguistic precision. It means that competitive ability provides competitive advantage. Because otherwise physical marginal indifference provides too little competitive advantage.
So what does postmodern literary drivel bring to an otherwise well understood table?
What I hear is that ‘its a useful means of manipulating people by deceit.’
People lacking knowledge, power, achievement, and capital like the priests of the middle east attempting to destroy the empire with christianity judaism and islam. Lies are a competitive strategy. The entire abrahamic artifice is based upon the competitive utility of lying.
LIES OF RIGHT ABSOLUTISTS AND LEFT ABSOLUTISTS ARE STILL JUST LIES – AN ADMISSION OF FAILURE.
The difference between this article and some bit of occult nonsense by Evola is simply the flavor of sophism. No one disputes that language makes possible a multitude of paradigmatic lies of coercion, but it makes only one most parsimonious paradigmatic truth of decidability.
The Pretense of Wisdom in the Tempo of Syllables, and the power of suggestion by loading and framing inarticulate and untestable prose. “Woo Woo” for the post-theological era. Science requires knowledge. “Woo” takes advantage of ignorance. Leftist or right lies are indifferent.
No one disputes the relationship between consciousness and language – only the degree. It still does not justify that the history of man is a long filter of anthropocentric perception and intuition as we gradually eliminate ignorance, error, bias and deceit – despite the priests.
Termination of lies and liars regardless of herd or pack is in the interest of both herd and pack.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49608047_10156900072117264_6902927856821600256_o_10156900072112264.jpg PROPAGANDA AND MY RESPONSE TO IT.
(heated topic warning)
Some clown spreading propaganda….James SantagataOf course, in this course, Palestinians (or Arabs for that matter) are not classified as Semites, the Jewish guys are no longer white since it has a lower ROI in this use case.Jan 6, 2019, 8:53 PMGreg Woodburythere are a few valid ways to define “semite” but jewish is not one of them lolJan 6, 2019, 9:04 PMAlex MacleodThe origin of anti-semitism is semitism; so how might anti-semitism be eliminated?Jan 6, 2019, 9:05 PMGreg WoodburypagangJan 6, 2019, 9:06 PMGregory GichevMake shareable pl0xJan 6, 2019, 10:14 PMDustin HutchinsonCrushed.Jan 6, 2019, 10:34 PMDustin HutchinsonShut it down, the goyim know!Jan 6, 2019, 10:34 PMDigue Dougwhat a patronising shitJan 7, 2019, 1:54 AMNoah J RevoyThey have spent trillions of dollars trying to get us to love them and hate ourselves. It’s a mental virus designed to weaken us enough that we can be controlled. Curt, myself and others are providing the antidote. The antidote is truth.Jan 7, 2019, 6:10 AMJames SantagataJan 7, 2019, 7:51 AMEric McGowanSo good!Jan 7, 2019, 10:23 AMPROPAGANDA AND MY RESPONSE TO IT.
Murray just wanted to repeat the tribalism and conflict of the levant, and the separatism of the Pale, and the low trust society to the west. Rothbardianism is just Marxism for common property. Nothing more.
The State is that organization in society which attempts to maintain a monopoly of the use of force and violence;it is the only organization in society that obtains its revenue not by voluntary contribution or payment for services rendered but by coercion. https://t.co/vPXDMWp0KG
He hustles IQ to prevent lower class and supernaturalist immigration into western countries having well understood the high cost we paid to domesticate (cull) our own populations, and why that was a principle cause of our rate of success.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49151040_10156888891502264_2156306837970878464_o_10156888891492264.jpg Guy blocked me for the truth while defending molly. ;)Noel FritschI’m struck by the fact that Abrahamists actually agree with Molly here. They use the IQ game to their advantage well, and also gaslight against it using masscomms.
Why?
And why would we join them?
Is the thought “if you can’t beat em, join ’em?Jan 1, 2019, 1:59 PMMartin ŠtěpánHe was defending Nassim. Blocked me too.Jan 1, 2019, 2:10 PMChris CantrellI see it in the real world all the time. People choosing to wrong in order to be nice. It does nothing but promote and support weakness.Jan 1, 2019, 2:10 PMBrendan HegartyI’ve noticed this guy has this indian problem of defaulting to Gurus even though he’s quite intelligent. This seems to be a very indian problem.Jan 1, 2019, 2:11 PMBrendan HegartyThey default to virtue epistemology way too much.Jan 1, 2019, 2:12 PMBill JoslinAnd other costsJan 1, 2019, 3:18 PMGöran DahlWait till you tell them that the Aryans were White, then they’ll run to their Guru faster than you can say arithmeticsJan 1, 2019, 3:21 PMKari Anne DorstadWow welcome to the club ! What a man , he knows how to push the block button ! WowJan 1, 2019, 4:20 PMTom RamboPeak soy faceJan 1, 2019, 4:21 PMJoe Redtreemolly fans are a cult. or at least cult-ish. he used to have an irl cult where he told people to cut themselves off from their families. he talks about reason and philosophy, but the whole thing is toxic just under the surface, with all sorts of perverted social pressures in his cult of personality.
though he would probably tell me that’s not an argument.Jan 1, 2019, 7:29 PMSingular SpeechKari Anne Dorstad Just following his leader, who does the same all the time.
Still like most of what Nassim has to say, even though I still lack the knowledge to properly evaluate what he has to say in this case.Jan 1, 2019, 7:36 PMSingular SpeechNassim does that and his cult follows, and the same goes for Molyneux.
Doesn’t matter as far as the content goes, but, he lets it very clear that he is an asshole (online at least).Jan 1, 2019, 7:38 PMJim GingerichJust call Taleb an Arab and tell him butter is superior to olive oil. Instant block.Jan 2, 2019, 10:28 AMCurt Doolittlewell i do the asshole thing when necessary too, and to some degree it’s defensive. although I’m probably not an asshole in real life like he is.Jan 2, 2019, 11:07 AMJosh NorrisJoe Redtree To be fair, it isn’t an argumentJan 2, 2019, 11:20 AMJoe RedtreeJosh Norris neither is blocking people, or refusing to debate certain people.Jan 2, 2019, 11:45 AMGuy blocked me for the truth while defending molly. 😉
Nassim: So I just unfortunately realized that your FatTony et all, sensibilities is just Semitic hatred of high trust peoples who produce their extraordinary wealth by the production of COMMONS. And this insight, if widely understood will destroy your reputation even further.
I can understand someone saying “listen, I love strangers but I am more comfortable w/my nationality, shared values” (homophily) or “neighbors get along better than rommates” (fractal localism). But making “others” genetically “inferior” using IQ “science” is quite sinister.
(From Twitter: putting an end to Nassim Taleb’s insight, edited a bit for clarity)
WARNING: this is part of an ongoing debate on twitter between Molyneux and Taleb on intelligence and it is a controversial topic for Facebook. Unfortunately, this is a debate that must occur because is of profound importance for humanity – our values are not always survivable. Hence I’m sharing only with ‘Friends’.
Nassim (all), IQ describes a curve. East and west are superior for having culled underclass reproduction, while center have failed to cull underclass reproduction.
So, to reverse your statement: “I can understand loving one’s people, and apologizing for one’s people, but denying the science is quite sinister.”
Other ‘peoples’ are ‘inferior’ (meaning poorer) socially, economically, politically, and militarily because of Pareto problem created by the size of their lower classes in relation to their upper classes. Hence continuous middle eastern failure under underclass religion and rule. Despite the wealth of possessing the optimum trade routes, the middle east was unable to fix this problem.
Stephan is Correct. IQ (meaning, the relative size of genetic classes as measured by rate of learning), is the MOST important factor in group wealth. PERIOD. This is because trust and trustworthiness increase in concert with cognitive ability.
Nassim: Your ‘admiration’ for a certain class of individuals is unscientific as well: they and their behavior are why no large corporations, and only smaller (inefficient) organizations. Our ‘clerical’ education and society, is why we HAVE large (efficient) corporations. In other words YOU ARE DESPERATELY WRONG. Relative wealth = demographics.
Nassim, so if you hadn’t taken up this particular issue it wouldn’t have made me pay attention to, and understood, the catastrophic error in your conflation of individual speculators and the political orders in which wealth potential of such people is possible. YOU ARE WRONG.
Nassim: The west, despite beginning with Aryanism (sovereignty and tort law), and Aristotelianism (empiricism), SURVIVED the first wave of Semiticism (Abrahamism) because of genetic reserves. Every other civilization that has tolerated Semiticism has been destroyed by the continuous expansion of the underclasses.We are in the process of not-surviving the second wave of Semiticism.
Nassim: So I just unfortunately realized that your FatTony et all, sensibility is just Semitic hatred of high trust peoples who produce their extraordinary wealth by the production of COMMONS. And this insight, if widely understood will destroy your reputation even further.
You think that our high-trust people, are ‘suckers’ when it is precisely that social order and those values that allow us to produce the commons that make high returns possible, while those historical peoples you (out of racial bias) favor, were NEVER ABLE TO, because of ‘petty profiting’ that you favor.
