Form: Argument

  • IQ isn’t poorly correlated with income. Instead the correlation decreases as the

    IQ isn’t poorly correlated with income. Instead the correlation decreases as the population under that IQ decreases, and as the utility additional wealth decreases. In other words, making more money is increasingly difficult above the obvious threshold, and the utility of it decreases.
    Combined with IQ is a wealth substitute in that there is less value in wealth as IQ increases, becuase consumables decrease in utility, and risk approaches zero for smart people.
    Wealth doesn’t corrlate with IQ as much as expected because trait conscientiousness is more important for accumulating wealth across the entire distribution.
    More variables but IQ is a great example of the variation of incentives as IQ increases and decreases.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 22:51:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638312299973734400

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638299639731441668

  • IQ isn’t poorly correlated with income. Instead the correlation decreases as the

    IQ isn’t poorly correlated with income. Instead the correlation decreases as the population under that IQ decreases, and as the utility additional wealth decreases. In other words, making more money is increasingly difficult above the obvious threshold, and the utility of it decreases.
    Combined with IQ is a wealth substitute in that there is less value in wealth as IQ increases, becuase consumables decrease in utility, and risk approaches zero for smart people.
    Wealth doesn’t corrlate with IQ as much as expected because trait conscientiousness is more important for accumulating wealth across the entire distribution.
    More variables but IQ is a great example of the variation of incentives as IQ increases and decreases.

    Reply addressees: @ooooobelix


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 22:51:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638312299843796992

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638299639731441668

  • Q: CURT: “DO RELIGIONS NEED LIES? AND WHY DO WE NEED RELIGIONS?” The reason you

    Q: CURT: “DO RELIGIONS NEED LIES? AND WHY DO WE NEED RELIGIONS?”
    The reason you need lies is the instinctual demand for mindfulness provided by hunter-gatherer family clan tribe, socialization, regularity, and simplicity. Yet we the cost of anonymity and irrelevancy and loss of that dependency produces mindlessness we call alienation and anxiety and inability to cope with the reality of a universe, which is a vast irradiated wasteland, solar system, a sun, a geology, a climate, a fauna and the other humans that are all but hostile to our very existence, and try to eradicate us with disturbing regularity.
    The question man must solve, is how to provide that mindfulness by means that are not false, and not harmful to our continuous adaptation to these environments, and the environments we innovate with our science, technology, and knowledge – despite status (after food and shelter) being our primary instinct that influences all our behaviors.
    Stoicism, Confucianism, Shintoism, and Buddhism were the least false religions. Hinduism is an eccentric outlier that while brilliant and innovative eventually proved an impediment to the people. And The Abrahamic spectrum are the most false and most harmful religions that were a detriment to the people and all those they interacted with. At least until the marxist spectrum which are the most harmful cults since the mesoamerican cults of institutional murder.
    But there is something to be learned from these means of producing mindfulness. Perhaps the Chinese tea and Japanese craftsman rituals. Perhaps the stoic rituals – which are but what today we call cognitive behavioral therapy. The explicit pursuit of mindfulness through non-aggression in Buddhism – despite it’s abandonment of reality.
    We can, at least I can, at present describe requirements for a scientific non false religion for the political, social, and personal problems of alienation and neuroticism. At that point, like Hinduism, stoicism, or Confucianism, is such a thing a religion? Or is it an intergenerational set of narratives and values that provide mindfulness by teaching us a way of life that benefits all of us? I think the latter.
    So, to say we need religion is a half-truth. Humans need mindfulness. There are a spectrum of solutions to providing humans with mindfulness. We need only discover those that are not false, and do not produce direct harms, or indirect harms through negative externalities.
    Train the body (fitness), the mind (mindfulness), the habits (hygiene, dress, manners, ethics, morals, norms, natural law), the brain (the basics of the disciplines (means of ‘calculating’) from reason to physical, behavioral, evolutionary sciences), the individual (skills that are useful for contributing to self sufficiency). We need to train the whole person. Not take it for granted that idiosyncratic experience will provide the fitness in body, mind, habits, brain, and sills needed for self determination by self determined means in a condition of mindfulness and appreciation for not only this life, but our investment in one another’s fulfillment.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 15:40:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637841537110294535

  • Q: CURT: “DO RELIGIONS NEED LIES? AND WHY DO WE NEED RELIGIONS?” The reason you

    Q: CURT: “DO RELIGIONS NEED LIES? AND WHY DO WE NEED RELIGIONS?”
    The reason you need lies is the instinctual demand for mindfulness provided by hunter-gatherer family clan tribe, socialization, regularity, and simplicity. Yet we the cost of anonymity and irrelevancy and loss of that dependency produces mindlessness we call alienation and anxiety and inability to cope with the reality of a universe, which is a vast irradiated wasteland, solar system, a sun, a geology, a climate, a fauna and the other humans that are all but hostile to our very existence, and try to eradicate us with disturbing regularity.
    The question man must solve, is how to provide that mindfulness by means that are not false, and not harmful to our continuous adaptation to these environments, and the environments we innovate with our science, technology, and knowledge – despite status (after food and shelter) being our primary instinct that influences all our behaviors.
    Stoicism, Confucianism, Shintoism, and Buddhism were the least false religions. Hinduism is an eccentric outlier that while brilliant and innovative eventually proved an impediment to the people. And The Abrahamic spectrum are the most false and most harmful religions that were a detriment to the people and all those they interacted with. At least until the marxist spectrum which are the most harmful cults since the mesoamerican cults of institutional murder.
    But there is something to be learned from these means of producing mindfulness. Perhaps the Chinese tea and Japanese craftsman rituals. Perhaps the stoic rituals – which are but what today we call cognitive behavioral therapy. The explicit pursuit of mindfulness through non-aggression in Buddhism – despite it’s abandonment of reality.
    We can, at least I can, at present describe requirements for a scientific non false religion for the political, social, and personal problems of alienation and neuroticism. At that point, like Hinduism, stoicism, or Confucianism, is such a thing a religion? Or is it an intergenerational set of narratives and values that provide mindfulness by teaching us a way of life that benefits all of us? I think the latter.
    So, to say we need religion is a half-truth. Humans need mindfulness. There are a spectrum of solutions to providing humans with mindfulness. We need only discover those that are not false, and do not produce direct harms, or indirect harms through negative externalities.
    Train the body (fitness), the mind (mindfulness), the habits (hygiene, dress, manners, ethics, morals, norms, natural law), the brain (the basics of the disciplines (means of ‘calculating’) from reason to physical, behavioral, evolutionary sciences), the individual (skills that are useful for contributing to self sufficiency). We need to train the whole person. Not take it for granted that idiosyncratic experience will provide the fitness in body, mind, habits, brain, and sills needed for self determination by self determined means in a condition of mindfulness and appreciation for not only this life, but our investment in one another’s fulfillment.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 15:40:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637841536892239872

  • Simple test. Use google to see the history of word usage for woke. It’s a cliff

    Simple test.
    Use google to see the history of word usage for woke. It’s a cliff event under Obama.

    WHY?
    Obama was raised in a ‘hate white people’ church, and his family was an advocate of communism, and he never ran a business or political organization. He met with leading jewish economists, and the ADL/SPLC on timing of white replacement, armed the federal bureaucracy and gave them military equipment in preparation for a civil war. Used the IRS to pursue white and conservative individuals, groups, and businesses. Voted in ObamaCare over the will of the population. Allowed the strategic outsourcing of american business and industry. Allow Chinese spying and capture of technology. Let our men die in raids without rescuing them. Fired the generals who opposed him for doing it. FIlled the ranks with bureaucrats that the soldiers didn’t and don’t respect. Failed to maintain our strategic reserves of military ammunition and supplies. In fact, did nothing to preserve the postwar order creating the opportunity for Chinese and Russian aggression. All he did was pander to the population in speeches and otherwise had no legislative accomplishments. Johnson was destructive, carter was incompetent, Clinton at least moved to the center, but destroyed our military culture by turning it into a proto-woke social program instead. Biden copies trump’s international policy but facilities the woke domestic destruction of our institutions. And has weaponized the FBI against conservatives while giving free passes to the destruction of the radical left. So that’s just a SMALL part of what Obama did other than give nice speeches – the equivalent of fiddling while he set Rome on fire.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 21:33:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636118450803204097

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636113044165079049

  • Simple test. Use google to see the history of word usage for woke. It’s a cliff

    Simple test.
    Use google to see the history of word usage for woke. It’s a cliff event under Obama.

    WHY?
    Obama was raised in a ‘hate white people’ church, and his family was an advocate of communism, and he never ran a business or political organization. He met with leading jewish economists, and the ADL/SPLC on timing of white replacement, armed the federal bureaucracy and gave them military equipment in preparation for a civil war. Used the IRS to pursue white and conservative individuals, groups, and businesses. Voted in ObamaCare over the will of the population. Allowed the strategic outsourcing of american business and industry. Allow Chinese spying and capture of technology. Let our men die in raids without rescuing them. Fired the generals who opposed him for doing it. FIlled the ranks with bureaucrats that the soldiers didn’t and don’t respect. Failed to maintain our strategic reserves of military ammunition and supplies. In fact, did nothing to preserve the postwar order creating the opportunity for Chinese and Russian aggression. All he did was pander to the population in speeches and otherwise had no legislative accomplishments. Johnson was destructive, carter was incompetent, Clinton at least moved to the center, but destroyed our military culture by turning it into a proto-woke social program instead. Biden copies trump’s international policy but facilities the woke domestic destruction of our institutions. And has weaponized the FBI against conservatives while giving free passes to the destruction of the radical left. So that’s just a SMALL part of what Obama did other than give nice speeches – the equivalent of fiddling while he set Rome on fire.

    Reply addressees: @ethnojello @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 21:33:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636118450518085633

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636113044165079049

  • FEMININE > ABRAHAMIC > MARXIST SEQENCE > WOKE > LEFT > DEMOCRATIC PARTY > DONORS

    FEMININE > ABRAHAMIC > MARXIST SEQENCE > WOKE > LEFT > DEMOCRATIC PARTY > DONORS > ACTIVISTS.

    ROLLING ACCUSATIONS
    The Left alliances uses the technique of rolling accusations of unspecific, untestifiable, and often non-existent instuitions, thoughts words and deeds, that they can’t even articulate or apply to the individual, as a means of disapproval masquerading (lying, false accusation) under cover of free speech, without liability for defamation under the pretense, or even apology for past indiscretions.

    ENDING ROLLLING ACCUSATIONS AND MORE
    We can easily restore and expand defamation in spoken (slander), or published (libel), and remove the limit of demonstrated harm, instead returning to it simply needs to be untestifiable or false. And then we can expand it, as we have in commercial speech (fraud, libel), to public speech in the commons, to the commons, of matters common, and criminalize false accusation AND false promise in political speech.

    ALL LEFTISM IS ORGANIZED CRIME
    Since ALL lefitst claims are attempts to violate the natural, common, concurrent law, our natural righst obligations and inalienations under that law, and the capture of that law in our constitution and code, we would, rather quikcly outlaw no only the explicity political left, but the seditious left, and the means by which the left achieves funding of its war against our people and civilization by organized crime in entertainment, media, academy, finance, and state.

    ITS POSSIBLE
    Easy to do.
    You just need to ‘show up’ to make it happen.
    And the the market for the suppression of crimniality we call the courts, do their job.
    In ten years ‘its fixed’.
    That’s the amount of time legislation and regulation are required to spread through the pouplation and convert into norm and habit.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:31:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636072566849695744

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636017896370614273

  • FEMININE > ABRAHAMIC > MARXIST SEQENCE > WOKE > LEFT > DEMOCRATIC PARTY > DONORS

    FEMININE > ABRAHAMIC > MARXIST SEQENCE > WOKE > LEFT > DEMOCRATIC PARTY > DONORS > ACTIVISTS.

    ROLLING ACCUSATIONS
    The Left alliances uses the technique of rolling accusations of unspecific, untestifiable, and often non-existent instuitions, thoughts words and deeds, that they can’t even articulate or apply to the individual, as a means of disapproval masquerading (lying, false accusation) under cover of free speech, without liability for defamation under the pretense, or even apology for past indiscretions.

    ENDING ROLLLING ACCUSATIONS AND MORE
    We can easily restore and expand defamation in spoken (slander), or published (libel), and remove the limit of demonstrated harm, instead returning to it simply needs to be untestifiable or false. And then we can expand it, as we have in commercial speech (fraud, libel), to public speech in the commons, to the commons, of matters common, and criminalize false accusation AND false promise in political speech.

    ALL LEFTISM IS ORGANIZED CRIME
    Since ALL lefitst claims are attempts to violate the natural, common, concurrent law, our natural righst obligations and inalienations under that law, and the capture of that law in our constitution and code, we would, rather quikcly outlaw no only the explicity political left, but the seditious left, and the means by which the left achieves funding of its war against our people and civilization by organized crime in entertainment, media, academy, finance, and state.

    ITS POSSIBLE
    Easy to do.
    You just need to ‘show up’ to make it happen.
    And the the market for the suppression of crimniality we call the courts, do their job.
    In ten years ‘its fixed’.
    That’s the amount of time legislation and regulation are required to spread through the pouplation and convert into norm and habit.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:31:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636072567017553924

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636017896370614273

  • We are all a distribution of male systematizing-to-female empathizing. And as we

    We are all a distribution of male systematizing-to-female empathizing. And as we see in the voting, it’s about a third, third, and a third, with only white women defecting against their tribe and society in pretty substantial numbers. WIthout women voters we never would have had a leftist president (or had to explain that women vote for why they “like” a candidate rather than his policies without taking away the vote again.).

    Reply addressees: @SovereigntyKing @TheAutistocrat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:10:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636067416374476800

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636063753862103048

  • Do you want to govern them? Share the same commons as them? Live in the same com

    Do you want to govern them? Share the same commons as them? Live in the same community with them? Work with them?
    They don’t with us either.
    I don’t care if they’re happy so much as they go be happy together so we can be happy together. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 00:43:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635803977332969472

    Reply addressees: @Hater__Time

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635802690348277761