Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • Y’all talk about ‘woke’ or the entire neoMarxist-Postmodern-Feminist-Woke sequen

    Y’all talk about ‘woke’ or the entire neoMarxist-Postmodern-Feminist-Woke sequence of decisions as if they are an ‘us’ problem. They aren’t. They’re a white female problem. Look at the numbers. What’s wrong with white women that they are so susceptible to false promises of freedom from laws of the universe, by the approval obtained by social construction of falsehoods and magical thinking?

    What’s wrong with white women? And why were so many Jewish intellectuals so successful at seducing white women into the pseudoscience, sophistry, denial, magical thinking, and social construction of falsehoods?

    Woke is a problem with white women.
    But what’s wrong with white women?
    What isn’t wrong with women from other cultures and races?

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 19:57:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640080641550106624

  • Y’all talk about ‘woke’ or the entire neoMarxist-Postmodern-Feminist-Woke sequen

    Y’all talk about ‘woke’ or the entire neoMarxist-Postmodern-Feminist-Woke sequence of decisions as if they are an ‘us’ problem. They aren’t. They’re a white female problem. Look at the numbers. What’s wrong with white women that they are so susceptible to false promises of freedom from laws of the universe, by the approval obtained by social construction of falsehoods and magical thinking?

    What’s wrong with white women? And why were so many Jewish intellectuals so successful at seducing white women into the pseudoscience, sophistry, denial, magical thinking, and social construction of falsehoods?

    Woke is a problem with white women.
    But what’s wrong with white women?
    What isn’t wrong with women from other cultures and races?

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 19:57:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640080641680179200

  • BASIC LAW OF RADICALISM: 1. Stagnation and decline generate demand for innovatio

    BASIC LAW OF RADICALISM:
    1. Stagnation and decline generate demand for innovation.
    2. Institutionalization generates demand for radicalization.
    3. Path dependence of the three coercive institutions necessary for all polities determines the rate and resistance of stagnation:
    Low: Law -> State -> Weak Religion (Europe: Peers)
    Medium: Strong State -> Weak Law -> Weak Religion (China:Conquerors)
    Medium High: Weak Religion -> State -> Law (Medieval Europe)
    High: Strong Religion -> Weak Law -> Weak State (India)
    Highest: Strong Religion -> State Failure -> Law Failure.

    Ergo: Civilizations evolve at the rate tolerable by their institutions and produce radicalism in proportion to the potential of the stagnation of their institutions.

    WORSE: Yeah, well, this turns out to largely be an IQ thing too. Sorry. As always. IQ=adaptation, and absence of it resistance to adaptation.

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 19:28:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640073180617273344

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639723708309983233

  • BASIC LAW OF RADICALISM: 1. Stagnation and decline generate demand for innovatio

    BASIC LAW OF RADICALISM:
    1. Stagnation and decline generate demand for innovation.
    2. Institutionalization generates demand for radicalization.
    3. Path dependence of the three coercive institutions necessary for all polities determines the rate and resistance of stagnation:
    Low: Law -> State -> Weak Religion (Europe: Peers)
    Medium: Strong State -> Weak Law -> Weak Religion (China:Conquerors)
    Medium High: Weak Religion -> State -> Law (Medieval Europe)
    High: Strong Religion -> Weak Law -> Weak State (India)
    Highest: Strong Religion -> State Failure -> Law Failure.

    Ergo: Civilizations evolve at the rate tolerable by their institutions and produce radicalism in proportion to the potential of the stagnation of their institutions.

    WORSE: Yeah, well, this turns out to largely be an IQ thing too. Sorry. As always. IQ=adaptation, and absence of it resistance to adaptation.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 19:28:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640073180751491072

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639723708309983233

  • This is the reason ‘free mobility of labor’ is cancer. It forces the report of t

    This is the reason ‘free mobility of labor’ is cancer.
    It forces the report of talent and the import of immigrants that burden the people and polity and economy over time.
    The only value of federation is:
    1) Discounts on Defense by concentrating of defense.
    2) Mutual Insurance from random Acts of Nature
    3) Benefits of trade negotiation, and decrease in the friction of trading goods, standards of weights and measures.
    4) Utility in the clearing of currencies.
    5) The utility of political competition (research, development, experimentation by experimenting small and failing small).
    There is a NEGATIVE utility to the mobility of labor.
    So, move capital to people not people to capital.
    It’s not complicated.
    It’s just criminal to do otherwise.

    Reply addressees: @D__2__3

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 19:19:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640071038720417793

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639939615955009536

  • This is the reason ‘free mobility of labor’ is cancer. It forces the report of t

    This is the reason ‘free mobility of labor’ is cancer.
    It forces the report of talent and the import of immigrants that burden the people and polity and economy over time.
    The only value of federation is:
    1) Discounts on Defense by concentrating of defense.
    2) Mutual Insurance from random Acts of Nature
    3) Benefits of trade negotiation, and decrease in the friction of trading goods, standards of weights and measures.
    4) Utility in the clearing of currencies.
    5) The utility of political competition (research, development, experimentation by experimenting small and failing small).
    There is a NEGATIVE utility to the mobility of labor.
    So, move capital to people not people to capital.
    It’s not complicated.
    It’s just criminal to do otherwise.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 19:19:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640071038846238724

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639939615955009536

  • The bronze age collapse was caused by the invention of the indo-europeans and th

    The bronze age collapse was caused by the invention of the indo-europeans and their cognitive, technological and cultural superiority vs the ancient agrarians who had stagnated. Just as the Mediterranean age did the same. Just as the Atlantic and steel age did the same. What we learned was that the river valleys first, and the silk road second, were the only reason for ME wealth despite their primitivism., Once those territorial assets were made irrelevant by the age of sail, of empiricism, of the commercial, financial, industrial, and scientific revolutions, the igorance and failure of those civilizations, and their decline beginning in 800 because of the semitic destruction of the ancient civilizations, was made obvious to all. And they still resist modernity. The internet is achieving through knowledge and information what our failure to conquer and domesticated them in the bronze, iron, medieval, and modern ages failed to.

    Reply addressees: @enigma3078 @TabbyTeamster

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 16:25:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638940086623412225

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638938942169858056

  • The bronze age collapse was caused by the invention of the indo-europeans and th

    The bronze age collapse was caused by the invention of the indo-europeans and their cognitive, technological and cultural superiority vs the ancient agrarians who had stagnated. Just as the Mediterranean age did the same. Just as the Atlantic and steel age did the same. What we learned was that the river valleys first, and the silk road second, were the only reason for ME wealth despite their primitivism., Once those territorial assets were made irrelevant by the age of sail, of empiricism, of the commercial, financial, industrial, and scientific revolutions, the igorance and failure of those civilizations, and their decline beginning in 800 because of the semitic destruction of the ancient civilizations, was made obvious to all. And they still resist modernity. The internet is achieving through knowledge and information what our failure to conquer and domesticated them in the bronze, iron, medieval, and modern ages failed to.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 16:25:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638940086719987712

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638938942169858056

  • ARE YOU FIT TO HAVE AN OPINION? Having spent since the early 90’s on solving the

    ARE YOU FIT TO HAVE AN OPINION?
    Having spent since the early 90’s on solving the problem of modernity that’s currently peaking in peak-woke and the coming civil war to decide that conflict, I’ve had to come to terms with the fact that there are those of us who can face these crises with love, humor, and hard work, for the common good, and those who do it with hate, anger, whining, and tantrums because they want that solution their way. I just can’t work with all that negative emotion and sperging and whining. If we know how to solve the problem for the benefit of most if not all, then Victory is simple. Just show up. All the whining is just wanting others to show up for you – cause you’re unworthy and unfit to do so. And so unworthy and unfit for an opinion.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 14:05:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638904837763997696

  • ARE YOU FIT TO HAVE AN OPINION? Having spent since the early 90’s on solving the

    ARE YOU FIT TO HAVE AN OPINION?
    Having spent since the early 90’s on solving the problem of modernity that’s currently peaking in peak-woke and the coming civil war to decide that conflict, I’ve had to come to terms with the fact that there are those of us who can face these crises with love, humor, and hard work, for the common good, and those who do it with hate, anger, whining, and tantrums because they want that solution their way. I just can’t work with all that negative emotion and sperging and whining. If we know how to solve the problem for the benefit of most if not all, then Victory is simple. Just show up. All the whining is just wanting others to show up for you – cause you’re unworthy and unfit to do so. And so unworthy and unfit for an opinion.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 14:05:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638904837646557184