Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • “Q: CURT WHY THE EMPHASIS ON TRIFUNCTIONALISM?” (bookmark)(core) Well, nature ha

    “Q: CURT WHY THE EMPHASIS ON TRIFUNCTIONALISM?”
    (bookmark)(core)

    Well, nature has a hard problem beginning in the quantum background, and it solves it with velocity(spin) resulting in positive, negative, and equilibriuim. There is nothing in the unverse that violates this model – there can’t be. Everything in the universe is constructed from it.
    So we see this same rule throughout material, all life, and all of mankind, and most imporantly it the three possible means of human coercion: Physical, Social, and Reciprocal.
    Then we see it as large scale in organizing principles of state, religion, and contract(law). And we see it incomparative civilization as means of competition between races expressed in the various possible path dependences between state, religion, contract(law) institutions. And finally we see it in logic as undecidable, possibly true, and definitely false, and in all language that follows the same rules.

    There are only twenty something rules like this.
    And all of existence is explained by them.
    That is why, we make such an emphasis on trifuctionalism, as well as continuous recursive disambiguation, which is the means by which the universe defeats entropy (pressure spatial expansion) with negative entropy (concentration in mass), and the P-Method of disambiguation by enumeration, serialization, disambiguation, operationalization, of all terms into a system of ordinal measurement, within those rules.

    It might seem a lot at the beginning, but it’s the universe’s programming language. Not math. Why? Mathematical reducibility is smaller than computational reducibility. 😉

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 21:34:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635031469289529345

  • Well, I think globalism is just fine. I think telling people democracy is a good

    Well, I think globalism is just fine. I think telling people democracy is a good, rather than the rule of law by the natural law of self-determination, sovereignty, and reciprocity is good, and that, democracy might maybe result as a luxury once we succeed at it.
    Rule of Law=responsibility.
    Liberalism like socialism and communism is just irresponsibility.
    The whole problem of modernity is maximizing individual responsibility.
    And that requires eliminating personal as well as public ‘corruption’.

    Reply addressees: @BillCor26578964 @eranAbamie

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 17:15:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634966469443190786

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634965735410917377

  • Technically speaking, all religions use narrative and suspension of disbelieve t

    Technically speaking, all religions use narrative and suspension of disbelieve to coerce by suggestion, so there is nothing new about ‘subliminal messaging’ in religion. In fact, that’s the purpose of religion. That’s why it works on children.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 19:01:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634630732248170496

    Reply addressees: @VictorV67837837

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634630405209968642

  • Yeah. That’s the real deal. RU Propaganda serves the intersts of magical thinker

    Yeah. That’s the real deal.
    RU Propaganda serves the intersts of magical thinkers.
    Magical thinking used to be a primarily female trait.
    And we know why magical thinking spread in russia – suppression of religiosity under the soviet communists.
    But for some reasons it’s spread… https://twitter.com/VivianActivist/status/1634622602470895616

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 18:49:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634627561635422208

  • “Q: WHY DIFFERENT GROUPS VARY IN ETHICAL AND MORAL VARIATION FROM NATURAL LAW?”

    “Q: WHY DIFFERENT GROUPS VARY IN ETHICAL AND MORAL VARIATION FROM NATURAL LAW?”

    Of course the do:
    1) Civilizational, national, ethnic, cultural, class, sex, and individual biological and circumstantial differences result in different moral DEMANDS.
    2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZtBMEXKcII…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 18:20:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634620359465893897

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634596624117780482

  • CORRECT ANSWER When the internet was limited to scientists and engineers it bene

    CORRECT ANSWER
    When the internet was limited to scientists and engineers it benefitted all of us.
    Like everything in the world: mass markets, like mass democracy seek the bottom of the stimulation pyramid.
    Why? Because “Brains seek stimulation by novelty by the means comprehensible.”
    So, put basal stimuli in children’s hands and that’s what you get.
    Put mass communication in the hands of nitwits and they’ll gossip about ‘simple folks talk about people, less simple folks talk about events, and not simple folks talk about ideas and are bad at it, and very not simple folks falsify ideas and invent new ones, some of which aren’t bad.
    It’s not complicated.

    Reply addressees: @pmarca

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 20:57:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634297535471779840

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634118284827312129

  • CORRECT ANSWER When the internet was limited to scientists and engineers it bene

    CORRECT ANSWER
    When the internet was limited to scientists and engineers it benefitted all of us.
    Like everything in the world: mass markets, like mass democracy seek the bottom of the stimulation pyramid.
    Why? Because “Brains seek stimulation by novelty by the means comprehensible.”
    So, put basal stimuli in children’s hands and that’s what you get.
    Put mass communication in the hands of nitwits and they’ll gossip about ‘simple folks talk about people, less simple folks talk about events, and not simple folks talk about ideas and are bad at it, and very not simple folks falsify ideas and invent new ones, some of which aren’t bad.
    It’s not complicated.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 20:57:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634297535597535238

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634118284827312129

  • Well, that’s simply not true. Compare Jewish and Anglo ethics. And Jewish and An

    Well, that’s simply not true. Compare Jewish and Anglo ethics. And Jewish and Anglo industries. And Jewish and Anglo wealth origins. And Jewish and Anglo innovation. And Jewish and Anglo Governments. And Jewish and Anglo truthfulness, and Trustworthiness. Jewish and anglo philosophy. Jewish and anglo law. And then Jewish (cosmopolitan heterogenous low trust authoritarian feminine) and anglo (total market, homogeneous, high trust, reciprocal, masculine) group strategies.

    That comparison among others is telling.
    We live in an era where verbal acuity is more rewarded than at any time in history. Where finanicalism and baiting into hazard are most licensed in history. And where suppression of sedition is least practiced in history. This age is a luxury of Christian ethics and the hole in law created by European trifunctionalism’s tolerance of political competition. And combined with the introduction of women in to workforce and polity at the same time as Jewish (feminine competitive and conflict strategy)

    We have simply failed to outlaw the female means of anti-social, anti-political, anti-cultural sedition and treason as thoroughly as we have outlawed the masculine versions. But the ‘feminine experiemnt’ is coming to an end, and we have learned how to reform our laws to eliminate feminine seditino and warfare as we have masculine.

    So, what’s happening at the moment is the great Jewish DISPLACEMENT from the academy and government, is following the great white displacement – because Jews opened the door to Jewish feminine verbal CREDENTIALISM over anglo masculine existential DEMONSTRATED COMPETENCY in military and industry. And that only occurred because of anglo Christian moral conviction, and especially anglo aristocratic tradition of aristocratic egalitarianism. (rotation)

    As far as I know, there are only two of us in the world who understand these subjects at extraordinary depth. I’m probably a bit better at explaining it.

    But you know, there is a reason Jews have failed at large-scale organizational construction, military construction, state construction, artistic, and mechanical, engineering, and technical innovation. And only began contributing to science when the franchise was opened. Yet Jews immediately began to undermine by producing the entire corpus of behavioral social and economic and legal pseudoscience that are the source of 19th and 20th conflicts both domestic and foreign.

    So perhaps we would like to see something positive other than Einstien (who along with Bohr re-platonized mathematics and so he harmed as much as he helped.)

    Anglos invented the modern state, rule of law by the natural law, and the agrarian, transportation, commercial, financial, scientific, industrial, and technological revolution within decades of the printing press and literacy. Jews contribute nothing to mankind despite literacy (other than subculture as organized crime syndicate by baiting into hazard).

    Our core competency is civilization by trust formation.
    Can you make the same claim?

    We all know better.
    But then the evolutionary conflict between Masculine systematizing over time and truth before face, and feminine empathizing in time and face before truth continues.

    We don’t have a problem overcoming our sins.
    Why do you? Feminine intolerance for self-reflection and subsequent adaptation?

    Genetics in everything.

    -Cheers

    Reply addressees: @DiscntTomCruise

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 18:18:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634257355339603982

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632887691749605377

  • Well, that’s simply not true. Compare Jewish and Anglo ethics. And Jewish and An

    Well, that’s simply not true. Compare Jewish and Anglo ethics. And Jewish and Anglo industries. And Jewish and Anglo wealth origins. And Jewish and Anglo innovation. And Jewish and Anglo Governments. And Jewish and Anglo truthfulness, and Trustworthiness. Jewish and anglo philosophy. Jewish and anglo law. And then Jewish (cosmopolitan heterogenous low trust authoritarian feminine) and anglo (total market, homogeneous, high trust, reciprocal, masculine) group strategies.

    That comparison among others is telling.
    We live in an era where verbal acuity is more rewarded than at any time in history. Where finanicalism and baiting into hazard are most licensed in history. And where suppression of sedition is least practiced in history. This age is a luxury of Christian ethics and the hole in law created by European trifunctionalism’s tolerance of political competition. And combined with the introduction of women in to workforce and polity at the same time as Jewish (feminine competitive and conflict strategy)

    We have simply failed to outlaw the female means of anti-social, anti-political, anti-cultural sedition and treason as thoroughly as we have outlawed the masculine versions. But the ‘feminine experiemnt’ is coming to an end, and we have learned how to reform our laws to eliminate feminine seditino and warfare as we have masculine.

    So, what’s happening at the moment is the great Jewish DISPLACEMENT from the academy and government, is following the great white displacement – because Jews opened the door to Jewish feminine verbal CREDENTIALISM over anglo masculine existential DEMONSTRATED COMPETENCY in military and industry. And that only occurred because of anglo Christian moral conviction, and especially anglo aristocratic tradition of aristocratic egalitarianism. (rotation)

    As far as I know, there are only two of us in the world who understand these subjects at extraordinary depth. I’m probably a bit better at explaining it.

    But you know, there is a reason Jews have failed at large-scale organizational construction, military construction, state construction, artistic, and mechanical, engineering, and technical innovation. And only began contributing to science when the franchise was opened. Yet Jews immediately began to undermine by producing the entire corpus of behavioral social and economic and legal pseudoscience that are the source of 19th and 20th conflicts both domestic and foreign.

    So perhaps we would like to see something positive other than Einstien (who along with Bohr re-platonized mathematics and so he harmed as much as he helped.)

    Anglos invented the modern state, rule of law by the natural law, and the agrarian, transportation, commercial, financial, scientific, industrial, and technological revolution within decades of the printing press and literacy. Jews contribute nothing to mankind despite literacy (other than subculture as organized crime syndicate by baiting into hazard).

    Our core competency is civilization by trust formation.
    Can you make the same claim?

    We all know better.
    But then the evolutionary conflict between Masculine systematizing over time and truth before face, and feminine empathizing in time and face before truth continues.

    We don’t have a problem overcoming our sins.
    Why do you? Feminine intolerance for self-reflection and subsequent adaptation?

    Genetics in everything.

    -Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 18:18:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634257355759034375

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632887691749605377

  • The Libertarian and Conservative views(wants) government as an INSURER, while th

    The Libertarian and Conservative views(wants) government as an INSURER, while the Progressive views(wants) government as a manager, or god help us, a provider.
    WHY? because a conservative takes responsibility and a progressive evades responsibility.
    WHY? Because the male seeks agency and responsibility in the pursuit of status, and the female seeks dependence and irresponsibility in the pursuit of status.
    WHY? children demand from women, women demand from men, men provide and die younger. 😉
    Or at least, that worked until the sixties. 😉

    Reply addressees: @BobMurphyEcon

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 03:09:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634028755206242306

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634022695837761537