Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • The point here is that slavery was just the most recent violation the north impo

    The point here is that slavery was just the most recent violation the north imposed at the time. And the reason of course was control of westward expansion that woud have put Atlanta in control of the continent outside of the northeast.
    I’m not defending slavery, but the myth that slavery was the reason rather than the last straw. When in fact, slavery would be increasingly economically unviable over the folowing 30 years leading to it’s gradual end, it was a minority of slave owners but a substantial part of the southern economy, and instead an attack on the economy and strategic organization of the south to prevent it’s control of westward expansion.
    My point is that we are very close to finding a ‘slavery’ issue at the moment, and this time it’s for the same reason: monopoly control over what is a set of nations.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 13:51:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642887463482933250

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642600764106317829

  • The point here is that slavery was just the most recent violation the north impo

    The point here is that slavery was just the most recent violation the north imposed at the time. And the reason of course was control of westward expansion that woud have put Atlanta in control of the continent outside of the northeast.
    I’m not defending slavery, but the myth that slavery was the reason rather than the last straw. When in fact, slavery would be increasingly economically unviable over the folowing 30 years leading to it’s gradual end, it was a minority of slave owners but a substantial part of the southern economy, and instead an attack on the economy and strategic organization of the south to prevent it’s control of westward expansion.
    My point is that we are very close to finding a ‘slavery’ issue at the moment, and this time it’s for the same reason: monopoly control over what is a set of nations.

    Reply addressees: @jjfThompson

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 13:51:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642887463336046594

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642600764106317829

  • 1) It’s not a high crime, and violates the principle of innocence of post-presid

    1) It’s not a high crime, and violates the principle of innocence of post-presidential service.
    2) It’s selective prosecution, for political ends.
    3) It’s another example of using the state for political ends.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-01 00:19:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641958303612764161

    Reply addressees: @bestistleftist4 @kavadajj @JJ_McCullough

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641948913535008770

  • The correct answer is that diversity is a bad. We can be genetically diverse if

    The correct answer is that diversity is a bad.
    We can be genetically diverse if we are culturally homogenous (full integration)
    We can be culturally divers ANd genetically diverse if we can create our own polities.
    But the postwar pseudoscientific attack on sex, class, cultural, and race differences was another utopian fallacy.
    There are vast differences between the sexes, classes, cultures, and races that MUST be expressed as differences in demand for different behavior.
    Whiteness (truth before face, commons before self, maximization of personal rsponsibility, testifiable truth ( science), rule of law, democracy ) is an extremely costly behavior – the most costly culture on earth – that is only possible for a high trust homogenous polity. We are failing at integrating people ‘outside the range’ who are unable to integrate into that culture. So we are turning the west in the ‘The same sh—holes that people came from’. And no this isn’t an opinion. It’s a measureable change in every aspect of personal, public, economic, and political life.

    Why didn’t india, central asia, the middle east or sub-saharan africa create high trust modern societies? Why did only japan and western europe do so? These are the two least ethnically diverse groups in the world, either explicitly or virtually on peninsulas, coasts, and islands, and with navies – and navies provide high return on capital, drive trade, and innovation, but require TRUST.

    Athens Navy, Rome Marines, Britain Navy, America Marines…
    Sparta Army, Germany Army, China Army, Muslim armies…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 16:46:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641844371027787778

  • The correct answer is that diversity is a bad. We can be genetically diverse if

    The correct answer is that diversity is a bad.
    We can be genetically diverse if we are culturally homogenous (full integration)
    We can be culturally divers ANd genetically diverse if we can create our own polities.
    But the postwar pseudoscientific attack on sex, class, cultural, and race differences was another utopian fallacy.
    There are vast differences between the sexes, classes, cultures, and races that MUST be expressed as differences in demand for different behavior.
    Whiteness (truth before face, commons before self, maximization of personal rsponsibility, testifiable truth ( science), rule of law, democracy ) is an extremely costly behavior – the most costly culture on earth – that is only possible for a high trust homogenous polity. We are failing at integrating people ‘outside the range’ who are unable to integrate into that culture. So we are turning the west in the ‘The same sh—holes that people came from’. And no this isn’t an opinion. It’s a measureable change in every aspect of personal, public, economic, and political life.

    Why didn’t india, central asia, the middle east or sub-saharan africa create high trust modern societies? Why did only japan and western europe do so? These are the two least ethnically diverse groups in the world, either explicitly or virtually on peninsulas, coasts, and islands, and with navies – and navies provide high return on capital, drive trade, and innovation, but require TRUST.

    Athens Navy, Rome Marines, Britain Navy, America Marines…
    Sparta Army, Germany Army, China Army, Muslim armies…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 16:46:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641844371254280204

  • The correct answer is that diversity is a bad. We can be genetically diverse if

    The correct answer is that diversity is a bad.
    We can be genetically diverse if we are culturally homogenous (full integration)
    We can be culturally divers ANd genetically diverse if we can create our own polities.
    But the postwar pseudoscientific attack on sex, class, cultural, and race differences was another utopian fallacy.
    There are vast differences between the sexes, classes, cultures, and races that MUST be expressed as differences in demand for different behavior.
    WHiteness (truth before face, science, rule of law, democracy ) is an extremely costly behavior – the most costly culture on earth – that is only possible for a high trust homogenous polity. We are failing at integrating people ‘outside the range’ who are able to integrate into that culture. so we are turning the west in the ‘the same sh—holes that people came from’. And no this isn’t an opinion. it’s a measureable change in every aspect of personal, public, economic, and political life.

    Why didn’t india, central asia, the middle east or sub-saharan africa create high trust modern societies? Why did only japan and western europe do so? These are the two least ethnically diverse groups in the world with navies – and navies provide high return on capital, drive trade, and innovation.

    Athens navy, Rome Marines, Britain Navy, America Marines…
    Sparta Army, Germany Army, China Army, Muslim armies…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 16:46:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641842180615553025

  • Our Declaration and Constitution, provide authority to change a government that

    Our Declaration and Constitution, provide authority to change a government that is pursuing interests of its own, or those contrary to the interests of the people as provided by that constitution of natural law – BACK to that government of natural law that the constitution created.

    All we need to do is show up.
    The fact that we don’t show up is on us – not on the elites.

    The sovereignty of the people means ‘us’. Not our government, not our representatives, but every able-bodied man (and any women along for the ride).

    Blame the person in the mirror.
    We know what to demand.
    We know how to demand it.
    Our Constitution provides for it.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-30 18:43:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641511460550369283

  • Our Declaration and Constitution, provide authority to change a government that

    Our Declaration and Constitution, provide authority to change a government that is pursuing interests of its own, or those contrary to the interests of the people as provided by that constitution of natural law – BACK to that government of natural law that the constitution created.

    All we need to do is show up.
    The fact that we don’t show up is on us – not on the elites.

    The sovereignty of the people means ‘us’. Not our government, not our representatives, but every able-bodied man (and any women along for the ride).

    Blame the person in the mirror.
    We know what to demand.
    We know how to demand it.
    Our Constitution provides for it.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-30 18:43:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641511460634255374

  • That GPT can pass tests does not tell us what you think it does. Tests are a bad

    That GPT can pass tests does not tell us what you think it does. Tests are a bad HUMAN behavioral predictor. Why would they be a good machine behavioral predictor? All these results mean is that GPT is an exceptional fuzzy search engine. In order to produce competence it must be able to answer novel questions AND invent or suggest new ideas. When we see that then we have something interesting.

    Reply addressees: @DataChaz

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 15:14:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641096393816256513

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636130418851233792

  • A thing is not defined by what you claim it consists of but what it demonstrably

    A thing is not defined by what you claim it consists of but what it demonstrably consists of. WOKE as a movement is just the race-marxist movement. And we know that because like abrahamic religions, the marxist sequence, including race-marxism, use the same techniques to seek the same ends: social construction of a criticism claiming intent and psychology when it’s a physical attribute of the existential universe. (tho that’s probably over your head)

    Reply addressees: @DiogenesLamp0 @moreywrites @bethanyshondark

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 14:03:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641078741311844353

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637253559308759040