Form: Argument

  • Multicultural just means tribal. Westserners succeeded in overcoming tribalism b

    Multicultural just means tribal. Westserners succeeded in overcoming tribalism because it’s a liability that impedes trust and institutional formation enabling the benefits of cooperation at scale. Westerners overcame familism before tribalism. Becaues again, it’s a liability that prevents production of high trust commons. That’s why every tribal society is primitive. Multiculutralism is a bad thing. There is no extant evidence to the contrary – other than it’s enjoyable to have ‘quarters’ in international-trade cities so there is some transfer of ideas but not a transfer of culture or people.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-20 22:01:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715488356472119296

  • MONOGAMY Christ had nothing to do with it. Monogamy is a necessary institution f

    MONOGAMY
    Christ had nothing to do with it. Monogamy is a necessary institution for the production of agrarianism and its evolution into complex political organization. It’s necessary for the trust necessary for the formation of militial warriors (our ancestors). The greeks and the romans were monogamous. In germanic law that we do have there are only two things that bring you capital punishment: cowardice in battle, and adultery: “Tacitus notes that the Germanic tribes were strictly monogamous, and that adultery was severely punished.”

    Reply addressees: @Bit_Pascal


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-20 15:46:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715394127221714944

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715371289672855785

  • THE DECADENCE OF WEST VS MIDDLE EAST Kashmiri Salafi, I understand. 1. Though, w

    THE DECADENCE OF WEST VS MIDDLE EAST
    Kashmiri Salafi, I understand.

    1. Though, we have invented over 98% of everything in history. (yes really, see Human Accomplishment by Murray). You can mention a few. We cannot mention the many.

    2. We went through our religious modernization. You havent. And you may not be able to. You are just ‘behind’. But your population distribution (iq) is extremely problematic, and the authoritarian religion may be all that is possible for the majority of your population. This means Israelis will vastly out perform Arabs even more so than they do now. In Israel Ashkenazi IQ 103-105 with SD of 17, Mizrahi IQ 88-90, and ultra-Orthodox IQ 84. The Arab population is 83/84 throughout the middle east.

    3. Out of Wedlock Births (US)
    … Whites: 21.9% IQ 103, 16% eventually single motherhood.
    … Hispanics: 41.6%, IQ 94
    … American Indians: 59.3%, IQ 86
    … Non-Hispanic blacks: 69.3%, IQ 91 (about 20% white)
    So, among whites (at 21%) this number isn’t quite as severe, even if it’s increasing due to economics. The underlying problem is that married women are not having sufficient children thereby inflating the percentage of white out of wedlock births.

    Reason: There is a disutility of marriage for women capable of economic independence.
    In Norway, people eventually get married, but they are less concerned of the ‘formality’ than living together.
    Latin america is returning to matrilineal households.
    In other words marriage may be what people do when they are poor.

    4. We are going through the introduction of women into economcs and politics at the same time we are suffering from jewish-marxist sequence of sedition (colonization). The perversions are a part of this sedition. This means for the second time we are being culturally colonized by the Jews (christianity -> marxist sequence). Just as Europe is being colonized by Islam again. Jews and Progressives have largely succeeded through pushing immigration undermining our democratic systems. This is a disaster. But we will recover.
    FWIW: it’s true that it’s a meme in the west that ‘islam is right about women’. The difference is that we will overcome it … eventually. However, it is not clear that the two parent family will survive among the poor. Becuase it’s not clear it’s that useful. despite that childrn from two parent households outperform those from single parent dramatically. And that single motherhood amplifies mental illness and poverty.

    We are both dealing with decadence. You are highly sensitive to sexuality, family, and are, consequently, are low trust people. We are highly sensitive to liberty, education, achievement, and economics, because we are high trust people. The difference between us is trust and trustworthiness, and much of that is because of the vast IQ differences of our populations as much as our traditions.

    Time and evolution will do their work on both of us.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 11:04:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714598295379517440

  • WHAT ARE THE NECESSARY MISSIONS OF GOVT Think of it this way (a) defense of all

    WHAT ARE THE NECESSARY MISSIONS OF GOVT
    Think of it this way
    (a) defense of all capital of all forms
    (b) resolution of disputes of all forms
    (c) production of infrastructure that decreases the costs of real world time and space.
    (d) providing a market for the production of commons between the classes and reagions for commons other than those that decrease the real world costs of time and space.
    (e) collection of revenues for the payment of all of the above.

    Reply addressees: @shity_paradigm @bryanbrey @JeffSnider_AIP


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 00:17:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714435559794356224

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714425691180257669

  • Indirectly yes. 1. central banks and the treasury facilitate credit expansion. 2

    Indirectly yes.
    1. central banks and the treasury facilitate credit expansion.
    2. And the central banks do have some idea of the amount of money created through credit expansion.
    When I discuss these matters I just throw the entire bucket into the fed, because in the end, that’s who is both producing, recording, and most importantly insuring the new credit money.

    BELOW

    3. How Credit Expansion Operates
    4. Credit Expansion explained

    3. How Credit Expansion Operates. When banks expand credit by issuing new loans, they effectively increase the money supply. This is a fundamental concept in fractional-reserve banking, where banks are required to hold only a fraction of their deposits in reserve. The rest can be loaned out. When a bank makes a new loan, it credits the borrower’s account, thereby creating new money. This new money is a liability on the bank’s balance sheet but an asset for the borrower, who can spend it, thus increasing the active money supply.

    Here’s how it works in more detail:

    Fractional-Reserve System: Banks are required to hold a certain percentage (the reserve ratio) of their deposits in reserve. The rest can be loaned out.

    Loan Issuance: When a bank issues a loan, it credits the borrower’s account with the loan amount. This is new money that didn’t exist before.

    Money Multiplier Effect: The borrower spends the loan by transferring it to other accounts (e.g., buying a car, investing in a business, etc.). The recipients of that money may then deposit it into their own bank accounts, and the process continues, further expanding the money supply.

    Ledger & Accounting: Each loan and deposit is carefully recorded by the banks.

    Banks are generally required to report various statistics, including loan data, to the central bank. The specifics of what needs to be reported and how often can vary by jurisdiction. This data can be essential for the central bank’s monetary policy decisions. However, it’s worth noting that while the central bank can track the credit created by the banking system, this system is not perfect, and there is often a time lag between when credit is created and when it gets reported and analyzed.
    (which is why the fed is always ‘late’.)

    AND:

    4. Credit expansion refers to an increase in the availability of loans or the creation of new credit by financial institutions, typically banks. This usually occurs in response to a more accommodative monetary policy by a central bank, which lowers interest rates and eases reserve requirements. The fundamental aim is to stimulate economic activity by making borrowing cheaper and more accessible for both individuals and businesses.

    Here’s a step-by-step breakdown:

    Monetary Policy Shift: A central bank lowers interest rates and may also reduce reserve requirements for commercial banks. This action increases the amount of money that banks have at their disposal to lend.

    Increased Lending: Due to reduced interest rates and lower reserve requirements, commercial banks can now offer more loans and at more favorable terms. This incentivizes borrowing.

    Consumer Spending and Investment: As loans become cheaper and easier to obtain, consumers are more likely to borrow money for spending on goods, services, and investments. Businesses also take advantage of the lower borrowing costs to invest in expansion and development.

    Economic Stimulus: The increased borrowing and subsequent spending generally lead to higher economic activity. This is often measured in terms of growth in Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

    Potential Risks: While credit expansion can stimulate economic growth, it can also lead to higher levels of debt and can potentially inflate asset bubbles. If the rates of borrowing outstrip the rates of repayment or productive investment, the economy could become unstable.

    Inflationary Pressure: An increase in the money supply through credit expansion can also lead to inflation, as more money chases the same amount of goods and services.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 23:59:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714431051626328064

  • “(I don’t want to pay x) Taxes”— Well then you can leave. The truth is that it

    —“(I don’t want to pay x) Taxes”—
    Well then you can leave. The truth is that it is quite costly to produce order, rule of law, property rights, cooperative institutions at every scale, and to suppress human pervasive immorality at every sale while doing so. If you find it more costly to leave, then you are de facto saying that you prefer the current condition to the available alternatives – and of course are not able to create alternatives by yourself.

    Now, you could say that many of us are enduring economic challenges today, but that has nothing to do with fiat currency and everything to do with the 20th century and the mistakes and experiments in it, combined especially with the postwar strategy, failure to exit it, and immigration that vastly suppresses wages, combined with offshoring industsry that gutted the lower middle, working, and laboring classes.

    Rights obligations and inalienations under the natural law of individual sovereignty in display word and deed are not abitrary but necessary for competitive survival. The operating system for government is that law, a constitution to administer it, and the legislation, and regulation resulting from it.

    There is no insurer of those things other than men with weapons, delivering a just and lawful demand, under the natural and common law, for redress of grievances, carrying rope for the noose, or wood for the guillotine, and fuel for the fires. If you are not willing to insure all others as required for the reciprocal exchange of defense (insurance) of those natural, common, rights obligations and alienations, then you have no rights whatsoever than others grant you by doing so.

    This is not a philosophical statement. It is simply the science of human behavior in any condition where we are to possess the sovereignty in our demonstrated interests – reciprocal defense of that sovrereignty by force of arms, limiting us and the state to reciprocity in isplay workd and deed and markets for voluntary cooperation, mediated by the court, who suppresses all irreciprocity whether intentional or accidental.

    Cheers.

    Reply addressees: @Nate7383 @neoCamelist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 17:46:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714337217886220289

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714327725773611397

  • One of the first principles of economics, that is a given in physics, is a full

    One of the first principles of economics, that is a given in physics, is a full accounting (balance sheet) of causes and consequences. Not a selection bias. If zombie companies are destroying private wealth and others wish to make short term profits by financing their decline, or gambling on their recovery (which is what they do), then that is a private matter. People do so because it’s in their interest to maximize their personal returns as an organization vs the alternatives. Just as you may defer maintenance on yourself, relationships, assets, and home.

    However, when rents are extended to the public, and impose a cost on the commons, that’s a public matter.

    I am not sure why this is hard to comprehend but it is possible that I’ve been doing this so long that I’m not seeing what you’re intuiting.

    My suspicion is that you are accidentally dealing with an ideal or moral idea and not a concrete category – possibly because this is one of the cataegorical deceptions in libertarian thought, just like the categorical deception of ‘society’ in Marx’s work. This mistake is common for most people – because tehy do not realize they are merely justifying a moral presumption – though I havent detected this line of thinking in you before.

    It’s a Very Jewish > Christian-Theological > Philosophical-Moral > Rationalistic Justification > but not necessarily empirical > and certainly scientific, and therefore fully accounted.

    HIERARCHY OF ASSETS AND RIGHTS: Personal (life, body, actions) > Private (self or familial regulation, usus, fructus, mancipio, abusus) > Semi-Private (private regulation, usus, fructus, mancipio) > Semi-Plublic Commons (self regulating, usus + fructus) > Public Commons (usable, usus) > Public ‘sacred’ Commons (inviolable).

    Reply addressees: @William68332190 @neoCamelist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 17:36:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714334596081340416

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714329125886845358

  • Gary, (audience), I am a devoted follower of yours, a former resident, business

    Gary, (audience),
    I am a devoted follower of yours, a former resident, business owner, and legal activist in Ukraine, who loves that country and the people as and often more than my own.

    The USA and the UK are naval and air powers, and as such, very, very, very good at logistical warfare. If USA intel says it’s time to use a given weapon it’s because their strategy of exhausting RU in every dimension is working. UA command does know this. And this is why UA command preserves every soldier and citizen they can. Because winning the war by exhaustion means an end to this conflict that is more likely to be permanent and the consequences for RU more systemic.

    Now that the RU command is afraid, and responding with attempts at concentration of forces, and now that severing what remains of RU logistics is possible, it means Crimea is far closer to the possibility of being retaken. At which time the regime is lost.

    It is very hard to watch people suffer and die. But generals must often choose how to tolerate the least harm in the short term because they cannot eliminate a far larger harm in the long term. We have not seen better generals than we have seen in UA in a very long time.

    I haven’t seen UA make a single mistake. And while I would like to complain about certain EU countries for their self congratulatory magical thinking that the age of imperial conflict is over, and that the EU, by virtue signaling alone, had somehow risen above war, I can’t see much fault in the US/UK strategy and response or dedication to the UA people, government,and leadership.

    It’s time for ATACMS. If used now, before winter, it should help not only counter the RU attempt to resist UA gains, but help UA reach the coastline so that those same weapons can reach both the strait and Sevastopol.

    The RU govt is still counting on winning an enduring conflict, because of european stresses and american internal conflict becaue of the plight of the ‘center’ and the success of the Race Marxists in undermining the civilization from within. However, this is another mistake. There is zero chance that americans will do anything other than support UA through to the end.

    Americans do not grasp that the world wars were an attempt to end the age of agrarian empires and usher in the age of federations of industrial and technological nation states. Unfortunately, americans withdraw from war at the earliest opportunity (a European way of war for historical reasons) when instead both MacArthur and Patton were correct. And so we are paying a higher cost of not completing the end of the age of empires than we would have if we had completing bringing about its end.

    And nothing has done more for the world in history than the anglo american postwar peace, free trade, human rights, and the suppression of wars of expansion and aggression. Or what we call the Bretton Woods Agreement.

    Cheers all.

    Reply addressees: @Kasparov63 @MaxBoot


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 14:24:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714286300956880896

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714279121361199344

  • YES DUGIN’S A CRACKPOT – BUT HE HAS ONE POINT WORTH GRASPING: WOMEN ARE MAKING T

    YES DUGIN’S A CRACKPOT – BUT HE HAS ONE POINT WORTH GRASPING: WOMEN ARE MAKING THE WEST LOSE.
    Of course Dugin’s is a crackpot. However my point is that even a crackpot gets something right once in a while:
    I use every possible example I can, to explain that the world regjection of the west is primarily due to the introgression of women into economy and polity, and jewish elites providing the marxist sequence of justifications for female antisocial behavior: Neo-Marxism(cultural marxism), Postmodernism (truth marxism), Anti-Male Feminism (Female Marxism), Woke (Race Marxism), providing women a false pretense of victimhood imposed by white men, when it’s the laws of the universe, laws of nature, and laws of the genetic division of cognition, valuation, labor, and advocacy, between teh sexes, classes, civilizations, and races. And the capture of our education, our academy, our bureaucracy, and our government by jews and women advancing the female strategy of seditious undermining to getnerate conflict under the pretense of oppression, when in fact women are always and everywhere hyperconsumers, evading responsibilty for both private and common, and in the process forming the army that is destroying our civilization from within – the same way women destroyed the Roman civilizatoin from within using thhe false promises of christianity as a women’s and slaves’ revolt against aristocratic meritocratic western civilization. So jews, (muslims) and women are bringing in another dark age if we don’t stop the destruction they’ve brought about, and the world conflict they’ve brought about through the export of their natural immorality and deviancy to the rest of the world as a virtue rather than a crime.

    Reply addressees: @Nataraj4308


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 17:45:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713249621751783424

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713222944178995289

  • Can We Reform Women And Restore Our Civilization? Women aren’t consciousof their

    Can We Reform Women And Restore Our Civilization?

    Women aren’t consciousof their antisocial behavior as unethical, immoral, and criminial evasion of responsibility for the commons. I’ve done the work: we can clearly implement the law prohibiting their behaviors by either sex and in doing so train the entire population back ito a high trust society.

    The problem is, without this articulation of the cause, the behavior, and the limits on the behavior, and without the reinforcement of the law, women will not constrain one another to prosocial behavior,and will continue to manufacture false oppression narratives that they hide behind to excuse their antisocial behavior – which always and everywhere is nothing but the evasion of responsibility for the commons, which, in the end, is what citizenship consists of.

    If you can’t defend the commons, by taking responsibilty for defending the commons, including by display word and deed, despite the emotional, social, and physical risk, then you can’t have access to citizenship because that’s what citizenship means: responsibility.
    You can have juridical defense (negativa) but you can’t have political or legislative influence(positiva).

    Reply addressees: @Agkistrodon14


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 17:36:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713247362179629056

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713234637126836240