Form: Argument

  • It’s not wrong that fundamentalism teaches you to lie. And Theology teaches you

    It’s not wrong that fundamentalism teaches you to lie. And Theology teaches you to lie. If you were to take the jefferson bible (just the words of jesus without any of the magical nonsense), you would have a decent philosopher. If you combine that with ancestor-nature worship (debt), and the greco-roman way, you’re in good shape. But the number of imbeciles that claim theology is truth rather than wisdom is insufferable and the cause of most human suffering. why? Abrahamism like Marxism-to-woke use the same techniques: feminine storytelling, baiting into hazard, by the false promise of freedom from the four laws of nature: the physical, behavioral, and evolutionary, and the laws of logic and testimony that we use to describe them.

    Reply addressees: @ouroborosKXM


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-27 19:13:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717982883023843328

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717971474923810825

  • WHY DON’T WE TOLERATE ARGUMENT FROM THEOLOGY? Bob, You will find that while most

    WHY DON’T WE TOLERATE ARGUMENT FROM THEOLOGY?
    Bob,
    You will find that while most of us practice Christian values, and some of us participate in Christian religion, (we have members and followers of pagan, christian, catholic, orthodox, jewish, muslim, hindu, chinese and various other east asian religions) from absolutely secular to quite devoted, that we do not tolerate theological arguments as truth claims – instead only as examples of correspondence between the truth and the wisdom captured in various religions.
    We work in the sciences of cooperation, morality, ethics, testimony, epistemology, and apply that to the natural law – the rules necessary for the harmony of all those sciences. Every religion has at least some consistency with Natural Law or it would not survive.
    But if we are to appeal to God, and to the laws of god, we find the evidence of his hand in the universe, not in those of ancient peoples lacking our knowledge of the universe at all scales.
    And certainly not when they appeal to sophistry, magic, pseudosciencde, or the supernatural which are simply admissions of one’s failure to discover and understand the laws of the universe – which must be, if there is a god, god’s laws.
    If there is a god, then the natural law, as we explain it, as the sum total of the sciences we have discovered – is his command.

    Reply addressees: @BOB37702515 @JackOfAwlTrades


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-26 16:05:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717573125829713920

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717522841258598871

  • No. I understand sex differences in cognition and the expression of sex differen

    No. I understand sex differences in cognition and the expression of sex differences in cognition in means of evasion, deception, lying, argument, description or testimony. To say you argue using the feminine methodology is simply a fact. To say that you do so because you are female, feminine in disposition, feminine indoctrination, or absence of male example is a matter yet to be determined. That does not change that you’re using the feminine method of evading agument, denial, deception, and lying. It’s just what you’re doing. It’s possible you can’t help yourself because it’s feminine instinct, or it’s possible you don’t know any better. I don’t know yet.

    Reply addressees: @ovinepolitickII @jennyeudoxie @Reem_AlHarmi @mbeisen @ZaidJilani @eLife @TheOnion


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-26 01:17:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717349645947371520

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717338446543331523

  • There is a minority of the population capable of believing in the supernatural a

    There is a minority of the population capable of believing in the supernatural and they are primarily women, and the men who seek the women’s approval by doing the same. At present the trend is toward under 1/4 and I suspect the natural percentage of people who require magical…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 17:25:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717230902592274874

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717227966542004427

  • MIGHT, RIGHT, AND RIGHTS (re: counter kinsella) Might does, always and everywher

    MIGHT, RIGHT, AND RIGHTS
    (re: counter kinsella)
    Might does, always and everywhere make RIGHTS – as in the right to appeal to an insurer for the enforcement of a contractual right, constitutional right, or natural right under natural law.
    Whether might makes right – as in right or wrong, moral or immoral – or not is a question of whether might is involved but whether the actions and consequences are right or wrong, moral or immoral.
    In this sense, might can make right or not, and is required to make rights, obligations, and inalienations: all of them.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-24 23:01:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716953200266293248

  • We have (I have, our organization has) done the work to equally constrain female

    We have (I have, our organization has) done the work to equally constrain female antisocial behavior as we have male antisocial behavior. It’s law. It will work. And it applies to all whether male or female. The problem we face is that women have less control over their impulses than do men. So women need social proof and social reinforcement to ensure that women follow the ‘good women’ rather than the ‘mean girls’ so to speak.

    Reply addressees: @boxkicker2191 @BOB37702515


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-24 15:14:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716835537342832640

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716833032848527786

  • Let me restate that in simple terms: –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff

    Let me restate that in simple terms:

    –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff you have to fight for, against more people who want your stuff, but won’t pay the material, behavioral, or knowledge costs of it.”– Paraphrase of Dr Brad.

    Who has the most physical, behavioral, and knowledge stuff?
    Well? Who wants a ‘piece of it’ without paying the cost of integrating into the physical behavioral and knowledge costs of it?
    And even among those within it – who seeks to evade the physical, behavioral, and knowledge costs of paying for it?

    You know the answer.
    It’s not multiculturalism you see.
    It’s just looting and pillaging really.
    And its starting to look a lot more like r**ping, looting, pillaging of biological, physical, behavioral, and informational capital.

    How do we know? We can measure it. We have:
    We’re being raided by enemies conducting r**ping, looting, pillaging, and otherwise destroying our milennia of accumulated physcal, behavioral, and ifnormational capital.

    Just because someone wars against you slowly doesn’t mean they aren’t waring against you completely.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 19:21:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716172919561224192

  • Let me restate that in simple terms: –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff

    Let me restate that in simple terms:

    –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff you have to fight for, against more people who want your stuff, but won’t pay the material, behavioral, or knowledge costs of it.”–

    Who has the most physical, behavioral, and knowledge stuff?
    Well? Who wants a ‘piece of it’ without paying the cost of integrating into the physical behavioral and knowledge costs of it?
    And even among those within it – who seeks to evade the physical, behavioral, and knowledge costs of paying for it?

    You know the answer.
    It’s not multiculturalism you see.
    It’s just looting and pillaging really.
    And its starting to look a lot more like r**ping, looting, pillaging of biological, physical, behavioral, and informational capital.

    How do we know? We can measure it. We have:
    We’re being raided by enemies conducting r**ping, looting, pillaging, and otherwise destroying our milennia of accumulated physcal, behavioral, and ifnormational capital.

    Just because someone wars against you slowly doesn’t mean they aren’t waring against you completely.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 19:21:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716159194401742848

  • Let me restate that in simple terms: –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff

    Let me restate that in simple terms:

    –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff you have to fight for, against more people who want your stuff, but won’t pay the material, behavioral, or knowledge costs of paying for it.”–

    Who has the most physical, behavioral, and knowledge stuff?
    Well? Who wants a ‘piece of it’ without paying the cost of integrating into the physical behavioral and knowledge costs of it?
    And even among those within it – who seeks to evade the physical, behavioral, and knowledge costs of paying for it?

    You know the answer.
    It’s not multiculturalism you see.
    It’s just looting and pillaging really.
    And its starting to look a lot more like r**ping, looting, pillaging of biological, physical, behavioral, and informational capital.

    How do we know? We can measure it. We have:
    We’re being raided by enemies conducting r**ping, looting, pillaging, and otherwise destroying our milennia of accumulated physcal, behavioral, and ifnormational capital.

    Just because someone wars against you slowly doesn’t mean they aren’t waring against you completely.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 19:21:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716159056908349440

  • Let me restate that in simple terms: –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff

    Let me restate that in simple terms:

    –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff you have to fight for, against more people who want your stuff, but won’t pay the material, behavioral, or knowledge costs of doing so.”–

    Who has the most physical, behavioral, and knowledge stuff?
    Well? Who wants a ‘piece of it’ without paying the cost of integrating into the physical behavioral and knowledge costs of it?
    And even among those within it – who seeks to evade the physical, behavioral, and knowledge costs of paying for it?

    You know the answer.
    It’s not multiculturalism you see.
    It’s just looting and pillaging really.
    And its starting to look a lot more like r**ping, looting, pillaging of biological, physical, behavioral, and informational capital.

    How do we know? We can measure it. We have:
    We’re being raided by enemies conducting r**ping, looting, pillaging, and otherwise destroying our milennia of accumulated physcal, behavioral, and ifnormational capital.

    Just because someone wars against you slowly doesn’t mean they aren’t waring against you completely.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 18:23:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716158354219798528