Form: Argument

  • Abrahamism (fundamentalism) teaches people to lie and deny. Whther jewish, chris

    Abrahamism (fundamentalism) teaches people to lie and deny. Whther jewish, christian, or muslim – it’s social construction by mass production of lying.

    The european demand for truth begins on the steppe and is finally documented in greece. It predates christianity by millennia.

    That said, we germanicized christianity so that the demand for truth in matters of reality (caesar) are still expressed even if demand for faith remains in matters of religion (god).

    Reply addressees: @smugalongsmugly @radiofreenw


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-12 15:07:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734590750094946304

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734387323792707993

  • There cannot be aggression bretween rule of law of the natural law where all nat

    There cannot be aggression bretween rule of law of the natural law where all nations are sovereign as long as they exchange sovereignty with all others. Russia does not recognize the sovereignty of others.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 22:08:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734334401582858623

    Reply addressees: @BarbWired20 @catturd2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734334162260402233

  • Q: Curt: Isn’t classical liberalism anti-scientific?) Classical Liberalism, an e

    Q: Curt: Isn’t classical liberalism anti-scientific?)

    Classical Liberalism, an evolution of anglo saxon culture and norman administration, was invented by enland and implemented by the USA with its written constitution and is the most scientific government ever produced by man. (markets calculate, all american is common constitution and law under that constitutino at least prior to the 1960s is therefore scientific). Instead, if you mean Christian optimism has been anti-scientific because of the failures of the limits of that system then that would be true.

    But classical liberals were as likely to be in the skeptical class (hobbs, hamilton, ) as they were in the optimistic class (locke, jefferson). They weren’t of a single mind. At the time of the ascent of the british empire and the american continent the optimism was perhaps warranted as it allowed maximization of the then-set of opportunities.

    We have of course exhausted those opportunities, and found that the inclusion of the feminine (jews, muslims, women) in to the economy and polity, as well as, possibly, the lower classes and immigrants, that these people resist the western germanic anglo american demand for individual responsibility for private and common. Women will avoid responsibilty at all costs, even responsibilty for truth before face. This is enabling of all the rent seekers and parasites that are antithetical to western civilization.

    Americans, especially the anglos, were seeking to leave behind ‘the parsitism and corruption of the aristocracy, the church, and the peasantry. And the new england colonies were for all intents and purposes eugenicists. Which is why the progressive movement and eugenics movement evolved out of the north.

    That’s despite that the south is the reserve of aristocratic character and perhaps, just as the USA is the most western of western civilization, the south was the most anglo-saxon of the americans and most western of the western nations.

    Which is interesting given that today the south is the reserve of western civilization, reserve of rule of law of natura law, and the reserve of christianity. Meanwhile the north – in no small part to catholic displacement of protestants, but retention of protestant academic institutions and laws, and has become, especially after the jewish migration post war into NY and the NE, the center of irresponsibility (leftism), and california (due to migratory patterns) the geography where leftism was most easily advanced, im posed, and now destroys western civilization despite the geographic utility of the california coast.

    Cheers.

    Reply addressees: @OooBardam


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 16:41:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734252176896126978

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734216542617776514

  • Dead argument. Ratios between races remain the same as all boats float proportio

    Dead argument. Ratios between races remain the same as all boats float proportionally upward under education and food. The Flynn effect was eliminated rather rapidly, and is now reversing due to asymmetric (dysgenic) reproduction. So while it WAS the case at a tiny margin, it’s not the case in general. So no. The problem is neotenic evolution required isolation and speciation events. There were only four of them. This gave rise to the four (five) primary races, and their resulty hybridization due to human sexual plasticity (hyper adaptivity). It’s not clear we can exceed 115 avg without intervention. But it’s also not possible to raise African or South Eurasian IQ without vast eugenics (suppression of reproduction of those under say, 85, which would mean half the population or more in south eurasia and far more in africa.

    Reply addressees: @HaakonKaisen @TheJonMartin @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 00:51:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734012896764379136

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1733935748942831704

  • 1) We know (a) women seek dominance displays, and (b) within the limits of their

    1) We know (a) women seek dominance displays, and (b) within the limits of their consent.
    2) We know this behavior incorporates (a) submission response (b) stimulation by proto-fear that overloads her judgement – which is the ‘hard’ part of female interest.
    That said
    3) Sample size is too small (120), and sample selection predictable (non-random) for the findings that are stated in the paper.
    Summary: this is grad student work trying to get a publication, and should be ignored – just as nearly all social science and psychology research with N<1000 should be questioned.

    Reply addressees: @FuryForth @HoneyBadgerBite


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-09 17:57:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1733546361662894080

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1733537482069721169

  • Hoppe’s failing is in making a moral and ideal argument vs a necessary and opera

    Hoppe’s failing is in making a moral and ideal argument vs a necessary and operational one. Claiming on has a ‘moral right’ is meaningless. One either can organize enough people with enough force to produce a ‘moral right’ in fact, or one cannot do so. The question then is why were some European peoples in every age able to do so and why were all other peoples in every age not able to do so?
    The answer is that contrary to libertarian theory, the west is superior at the production of commons – whether commons of doing something or not doing something. Libertarianism is in no small part a marxism of common interests instead of marxism of private property.
    The solution of course is anglo rule of law of the natural law which (as hayek explained) favors the production of commons which are the competitive advantage no other peoples can produce.
    The question then is how to limit the production of those commons. And worse, why democratic participation should include anyone not responsible for the production and maintenance of those commons.

    Reply addressees: @CCrowley100


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-01 12:08:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1730559466200788992

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1730419967571394675

  • Why does RU policy seem inconsistent to western minds? Because the RU people are

    Why does RU policy seem inconsistent to western minds?
    Because the RU people are not sovereign – the government is. In Europe they have replaced the Church bureaucracy with a state bureaucracy- and are subjects not sovereigns. In the Anglosophere, the People are sovereign, and… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1729915459858829644


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-29 17:51:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1729920942673961050

  • Here; Let me lead you by the nose. 1) Jews are successful everywhere whehther eu

    Here;
    Let me lead you by the nose.
    1) Jews are successful everywhere whehther european admixture or not.
    2) Jewish intelligence is exceptional only in european admixture.
    3) Therefore what is the reason for jewish success? Cultural practice or genetic intelligence?
    That’s just…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-18 21:45:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1725993717931081821

    Reply addressees: @TyrantJoe67

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1725542297083805841


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Gypsies specialize in petty crimes and doing cheap labor. Jews operate at he other end of the spectrum with crimes of baiting into hazard. Anything that carries plausibile deniabiliy thereby limiting liability. ie: working with the state against he people, financial crimes, usury crimes, selling drugs, alcohol, prostitution, anything at all on credit (baiting short term relief for long term consequences) including sale into slavery. The west alone does not practice consumer protection against the jewish culture of criminality because our first premise is soveriegnty and the prohibition on authority and therefore our relative obsession with the exercise of free will. This is a hole easily plugged in our laws. (I’ve done the work)
    The more interesting question is why, when jewish strategy is simply the female. strategy, why we rebel against jewish antisocial-antipolitical-antieconomic behavior is so criminal seditious and treasonous, yet seem to be oblivious to the fact that women are the primary audience for and carrieres of their strategy under democratic voting.
    It’s just a fascinating question.
    If other civ’s don’t tolerate it, why do we?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1725542297083805841

  • I love women. I just have a moral obligation, responsibility, duty to humanity t

    I love women.
    I just have a moral obligation, responsibility, duty to humanity to prevent antisocial behavior regardless of sex class culture or race.
    And you don’t realize you’re demonstrating antisocial behavior or trying to lie by conflating truth and preference.
    This lack of understanding is easily repaird by resetoring our law to equally suppress male and female antisocial behavior – though admittedly it is more difficult to constrain female antisocial behavior given sex differences in self regulation of non-physical behaviors.

    Reply addressees: @ls_cc_askme


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-06 18:11:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721591182927491073

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721573452782436792

  • It’s not complicaed: Every possible means of ‘baiting into hazard’, including ga

    It’s not complicaed: Every possible means of ‘baiting into hazard’, including gambling, sex, and alcohol on credit, ‘allying with the state against the people”, tax collection, and slaving. The reason they were prohibited land is because they would issue ururious loans (+30%), and then seize the property. So it wasn’t just that they specialized in financialism, but that they used financialism to profit from baiting into hazard instead of profit from the facilitation of production. Worse, they sponsored immorality in every way possible.
    This is why fiat money was such an advantage but the failure of our governments to immitation the french, and sieze the ill-gotten gains, and loan from the treasury to prevent such abuse of the people.
    Do you think that’s not still occurring today?

    Reply addressees: @tim47386 @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-05 20:19:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721261043878363137

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721259075957088269