Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • Is It Ok For 13 Year Olds To Have Sex?

    In general, as the single most explanatory rule of behavior “Do only that which you can pay the restitution for if you fail.” Because while unstated, it is the rule by which both legal, moral, and normative blame is determined.

    They cannot pay and are not even cognizant of, the cost of restitution. And creating and bearing a child is perhaps the greatest crime moral crime, becasue it subjects family and indeed all of society, to moral hazard: they are forced to pay for your bad judgement, and the bad judgment of your parents and family, becasue they cannot morally correct your decision by killing the child. (Although that has been done frequently in history it is not done today.)

    When the family was the principle unit of economic production, when we lived in intergenerational households because of it, when children began contributing to the work of the household by age five, when child mortality was as much as 50%, death in childbirth common, and the vicissitudes of life unpredictable, pregnancy uncontrollable, children disposable, and women in particular had no control over their destinies we treated children very close to domesticated animals. And none of those conditions apply today – at least, for anyone who would ask the question, or read the post.

    For most of history 13–14 was the beginning of adulthood. Girls may be indeed mature enough to care for children by 16 and certainly 17 if they are under the care of an intergenerational household and began working in the household and caring for siblings from six or seven. Boys, if they are put to work by the same age, and have responsibility by 12 or 14, can be, like girls caretakers in an intergenerational household, especially if they have done any military service. But boys do not finish maturing until 22, just as girls are ending their optimum fertility (23). Our questionably effective education system has extended childhood development so much so that males are now mentally, emotionally, and socially mature only in their late twenties (if that). School is unquestionably effective through grade 5, but by grade 7 is only marginally effective. So we are effectively losing 5+ years of socialization, employment, and emotional development in order to keep children in school more than the entirely adequate 2–3 hours per day, if they participate in the work force in simple work after that (I started working holidays time at 7 years old. And by 10 and 11 worked holidays and whenever else I could. ) Under those conditions we could (as they do in eastern europe) have children earlier. Without those conditions, and perpetuating today’s environement, the single mother disaster will continue, and the boys that ‘check out of society and stay there’ will continue.

    So the answer to age of sex at 13 is “Not in this current world we live in.”

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-ok-for-13-year-olds-to-have-sex

  • Infinity nor infinities exist or can exist, so there is no opportunity to have i

    Infinity nor infinities exist or can exist, so there is no opportunity to have it both ways. Fantasies assist us in understanding but they do not ever come into existence such that we can make deductions of possibility from their existence.

    This particular fallacy, which does not have a name that I know of, is the basis of the other half of philosophical sophisms. (the first half of philosophical sophisms are made possible by incomplete sentences and incomplete grammar. Otherwise they could not be said.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-21 08:53:00 UTC

  • EVANGELICALS didn’t elect a godly man. They elected a strongman who would have n

    EVANGELICALS didn’t elect a godly man. They elected a strongman who would have no problem cleaning out the sewers. That’s God’s Work whether it’s done by a godly man or not. In fact, what better way for an ungodly man to atone than so great a God’s work?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 19:25:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976177855649501185

  • You know, I still don’t understand why we don’t give men like Tiger Woods, Derek

    You know, I still don’t understand why we don’t give men like Tiger Woods, Derek Jeter, George Clooney, Charlie Sheen, Donald Trump, and Jack Kennedy who ‘bag’ a lot of social climbers, their own walk of fame. I mean, theses guys are our heroes: Women jump at every opportunity.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 19:18:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976176050945384448

    Reply addressees: @4everNeverTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976156561398628354

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976156561398628354

  • You know, I still don’t understand why we don’t give men like Tiger Woods, Derek

    You know, I still don’t understand why we don’t give men like Tiger Woods, Derek Jeter, George Clooney, Charlie Sheen, Donald Trump, and Jack Kennedy who ‘bag’ a lot of social climbers, their own walk of fame. I mean, theses guys are our heroes: Women jump at every opportunity.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 19:17:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976175956317626368

    Reply addressees: @NewYorker @RonanFarrow

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976155643127189505

    IN REPLY TO:

    @NewYorker

    Revisit @RonanFarrow on the former Playboy model Karen McDougal’s story, which provides a detailed look at the way Donald Trump and his allies used clandestine hotel-room meetings, payoffs, and complex legal agreements to keep his affairs out of the press: https://t.co/sHCI6VfPPx https://t.co/ESZRKE3Vae

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976155643127189505

  • Why Does The Media Always Show Grieving Black People At A School Shooting Where All The Victims Are White?

    THE CORRECT, EVEN IF UNPLEASANT, ANSWER

    If you look at the ethnicity, gender, and academic degrees of media members at all levels (you can do this without much difficulty by picking any outlet and doing a trivial bit of research), you will find obvious, ethnic, gender, and degree similarities that are unavoidable.

    The attack on western civilization (nuclear family, empiricism, meritocracy, rule of law, markets in everything) has been going on for over a century. But between the postwar immigration of underclasses, and the 1965 immigration act designed specifically to undermine western civilization’s demonstrated falsification of the marxist program, and the 1965 and later invasion of the universities (sometimes at gunpoint) by the postmodernists and their pseudosciences, we have produced a vast number of ‘education, journalism, psychology, sociology, and literature’ degrees that are very little different from the majority of the clergy.

    This pseudoscientific, pseudorational, and philosophical denial of empiricism, truth, and reason, serves as a secular relgiion that replaced the church and pulpit with postmodern nonsense, instead of theological nonsense.

    We replaced the Military Industrial Complex and the Church with the Bureaucratic Complex and The Academy-Media Complex as the church.

    It’s pretty obvious that the academy which was originally created by the church (particularly Harvard and Yale in america) simply stepped in to replace the church’s supernatural theology, with the marxist-postmodernist secular theology, with the only difference being pseudoscience and pseudorealism this time versus supernaturalism.

    Data is data is data. Genders, Classes, and Groups pursue whatever group competitive strategy that they inherited from their parents and all that changes from generation to generation over the centuries is the vocabulary and excuses we make for pursuing those strategies.

    Western civ evolved not first but fastest because the nuclear family, empiricism, rule of law of reciprocity, and the resulting markets in all aspects of life, both forced continuous innovation, prohibited rents (other than the church, which made most capital in europe stagnant), allowed downward migration of middle classreproduction and produced the greatest eugenic evolution outside of the ashekanzi and chinese (who did so by bureaucratic market rather than commercial means).

    The evolutionary strategies of human females was to use disapproval, shaming, ridicule, and gossip to constrain alphas by organizing betas to resist them. This process continues today but in industrial form.

    There is nothing more sophisticated going on, than we did with our simian ancestors. It’s all hooting, hollering, gossip and shaming to control alphas. We just have industrialized the process from storyteller, to pulpit, to the written word, to the printed word, to the electronically transmitted word.

    But the apes still fling feces, while the aristocracy (paternal) creates technology, competition, markets, and law – dragging the same primitive instincts out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, starvation, child mortality, early death, disease, the vicissitudes of nature, and a universe that is by all accounts hostile to life.

    It’s really trivially simple – like all of science.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-media-always-show-grieving-black-people-at-a-school-shooting-where-all-the-victims-are-white

  • There is absolutely no evidence of integration anywhere on earth and never has b

    There is absolutely no evidence of integration anywhere on earth and never has been, even in the USA whites still associate by european ancestry. Islamists and jews never integrate anywhere. Why, if the Levant failed over and over again “Will this time be different?” IT WON’T

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 20:26:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975830849374621697

    Reply addressees: @TOQJoyce

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975743644140474370

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975743644140474370

  • Force (Punishment) and Wishful Thinking(NeoConservatism) are very different thin

    Force (Punishment) and Wishful Thinking(NeoConservatism) are very different things. The force wasn’t the problem. It was trying to implement a democracy which is suitable only for a homogenous, high trust, middle class polity on a fractured tribal low trust society.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 20:24:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975830420892913664

    Reply addressees: @pewresearch

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975705119516954628

    IN REPLY TO:

    @pewresearch

    Fifteen years after the U.S. invasion of Iraq in March 2003, 48% of Americans say the decision to use military force was wrong, while slightly fewer (43%) say it was the right decision. https://t.co/DuXnWf0wRo https://t.co/oJQ79GrziB

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975705119516954628

  • I have built multiple tech companies, and have aggressively hired women for midd

    I have built multiple tech companies, and have aggressively hired women for middle management, sales, and law (building consensus) and tried in exec. I always end with men in creative,tech, finance,executive. There is no difference in intelligence. The difference is in decisions.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 17:23:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975784940217487364

  • I Am Not An Atheist, I Just Have No Tolerance For Lies, Particularly Lies By Suggestion And Obscurantism That Produce Ignorance&

    1) i am not an atheist. I just have a scientific understanding of the gods. 2) Tracing the history of deception using the technique we call suggestion and obscurantism today, or Abrahamism (Pilpul) begins with scriptural religion which he started. 3) Zoroaster invented evil, as a means of dividing and ruling the iranians from the indians. He had no positive intentions. Monopoly is monopoly and the reason for monopoly is power that cannot be obtained by market means. 4) The short egyptian experiment was not monotheistic just primacy, as a means by which the ruler could eliminate the costly drag of the extensive clerical bureaucracy – which is why he moved the capital as well. 5) there is a reason for the success of far east and far west at the development of good government, reason, and the sciences, and why the people of the desert and steppe destroyed the four great civilizations of the ancient world, and dragged the center of the world into ignorance and poverty. And it begins with the first great lie. All technological history is traceable, in every field, including the field of deception. It begins with him. Zoroaster + Greek Idealism + Jewish Pilpul > Rabbinical judaism / christianity / Islam > the Abrahamic Dark Ages and 500M dead. it continued with Rousseau > Kant > Marx > Boaz >Freud this time with pseudosciences instead of pseudo-rationalism or theology (supernaturalism). Religion was invented by the east aryans as a way to explain their failure against the north and west aryans – their westward movement was not voluntary but necessary. (See Karen Armstrong). The monotheistic religions were developed to undermine the great empires (agrarians) via the pastoralists, women and slaves (the semitic poor). Judaism was limited, but they assisted in the development of christianity. Christianity spread by choice, and islam by the sword. finally the central asian people used gunpowder to develop the great gunpowder empires. The great civilizations were lost to history. Not the least of which was the damage done to india. And 500M people died of that slaughter. The byzantines and persians included. So in my reading of history, we all like the people who write our favorite fairy stories. But those who invented utopian moral fictionalism are the most evil people in history because they caused more death with their demand for monopoly than anything but the great plagues and malaria. Empirically speaking, the monotheists have been five times and murderous as the marxists. What was the price of a 1500 year dark age? We have had only one other: the bronze age collapse and it was only half that duration, and during that period writing was even lost to the greeks. The current era has seen the french revolt against science, the german revolt against science, the russian revolt against science, the jewish revolt against science, the chinese revolt against science, and now the muslim revolt against science. Yet we drag humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, chronic disease, the plagues, the vicissitudes of nature – and meanwhile they cling to their fairy stories and lies like children to a mother’s skirt. It is what it is. So, either we seek the truth regardless of our feelings of it, or we seek lies for the purpose of their feelings.