We have all borrowed from one another for all of history. And those isolated areas that could not borrow from others not only didn’t improve, but in many cases (New Zealand, Australia) regressed. (I am still studying the empires of west Africa and it’s possibly been a problem there also.) However, borrowing isn’t always voluntary, and borrowing isn’t always good. Islam has been a destructive force everywhere it’s been adopted – although to different degrees, judaism (membership), christianity (resistance), islam (rule) were spread by coercion rather than choice. So we can import good things (metallurgy, engineering, farming practices), or we can import bad things (lower trust, political competition, underclasses) or we can import really bad things (means of deception, means of propagandizing, means of coercion, means of rule).
Form: Argument
-
—“Can a country lose its cultural heritage if the country borrows from other cultures, which become a part of their culture as well?”—
We have all borrowed from one another for all of history. And those isolated areas that could not borrow from others not only didn’t improve, but in many cases (New Zealand, Australia) regressed. (I am still studying the empires of west Africa and it’s possibly been a problem there also.) However, borrowing isn’t always voluntary, and borrowing isn’t always good. Islam has been a destructive force everywhere it’s been adopted – although to different degrees, judaism (membership), christianity (resistance), islam (rule) were spread by coercion rather than choice. So we can import good things (metallurgy, engineering, farming practices), or we can import bad things (lower trust, political competition, underclasses) or we can import really bad things (means of deception, means of propagandizing, means of coercion, means of rule).
-
NO, LABOR IS DEAD WEIGHT NOT VALUABLE Thats nonsense, since all the money in the
NO, LABOR IS DEAD WEIGHT NOT VALUABLE
Thats nonsense, since all the money in the world will eventually find someone to do the work.
Empirically, we pay people in proportion to how many people (or what materials) that they organize. This is irrefutable. So the market calculates labor as nearly valueless. And differences in compensation between states a reflection of stages of development (choices of labor.)
In other words, we pay people according to their vaue and their value is in ordganizing people and things to produce stuff that others will pay for having organized people and things.
Labor flees to cheap countries with unskilled people for precisely the reason that it is of no value.
Marx died knowing he was wrong. He’d read Menger and understood he’d failed. He just couldn’t tell Engels or he’d starve. We know that because we can see his notes and when he stopped writing. He stopped writing when he understood his entire edifice was built on falsehoods.
The dirty secret of history is that those civilizations that produced the most eugenic agrarianism created the highest standards of living. Labor is not only valueless it’s dead weight. If you cannot organize people and things you are not valuable.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 21:55:00 UTC
-
1 – False dichotomy. a) Aryanism (since the time of the Yamna) has always been e
1 – False dichotomy. a) Aryanism (since the time of the Yamna) has always been expansionary and to some degree, messianic. b) the principle purpose of expanding trade was not originally enrichment so much as creating trade interdependence in order to limit war.
2 – c) the scholistics were horrified by the new world slaughter, and d) the church was exceptionally interested in education and conversion. 3) so it is more accurate to say that colonialism was a continuation of “Heroism, Rule for Profit”, just as was practiced by China.
3 -The dirty secret of western civilization is that while we invented Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Natural Law,and Market Politics that gave us reason and science, we started out as cattle raiders, pirates, and conquerors, and all the ‘goods’ that we gave the world were a byproduct.
4 – While the french, spanish and british were exploitative the english, left behind a great work unfinished because of the russian vs german competition over the Intermarium.That said,had england completed her mission it would have been the greatest achievement in human history.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 14:08:00 UTC
-
Anywhere where men are armed, and there is no alcohol, is safe. The safest place
Anywhere where men are armed, and there is no alcohol, is safe. The safest place in the world are Military bases, Police conventions, country fairs, hunting clubs, and gun shows. Always will be.Hence why “Esquire” allowed you to carry a weapon: all men of character are sheriffs.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-03 23:34:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981313952390017025
Reply addressees: @LebellNY @NRA @GOP
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981308621374963713
IN REPLY TO:
@BKLYNYer
Go to following places & possible get killed by random shooter:
School
Work
Movie Theater
Church
Concert
Night Club
Baseball Field at a Park
Mall
List keeps growing @nra @gop can u see ur hands through the blood on them? Where can AMERICANS go SAFELY? I’ll wait. YouTube HQOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981308621374963713
-
Its actually isolated to children of liberals, with mental disorders, and most o
Its actually isolated to children of liberals, with mental disorders, and most often include the use of anti-depressants. (really) In fact, I’m pretty sure the phenomenon is the result of single motherhood, suppression of physical action and dominance play, and school alienation.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-03 23:30:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981312949871628288
Reply addressees: @pakiahkoi
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981311174376484865
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981311174376484865
-
The Result is Eugenic Reproduction
CONSERVATISM = ARISTOCRACY = MERITOCRACY = EMPIRICISM. AND MARKETS ARE EMPIRICAL – AND THE RESULT IS EUGENIC REPRODUCTION 1. A conservative questions the overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus. 2. Conservatism demands human agency over animal impulse. familial, stoic, pragmatic, and empirical. In other words risk averse to capital. 3. A Conservative requires ‘empirical’ results – and where empirical fails, the ‘traditional’ is adequate, since traditional survived empirical tests in competition in reality. 4. A Conservative accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital – attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited. 2. As a means of questioning, a conservative requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat). 5. Conservatism is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly ‘noble’ families. 6. Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families. 7. In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke,smith,hume,adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility. The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science. As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because eugenics are antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008. 1 – Soveriengty requires reciprocity 2 – Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary. 3 – Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism. 4 – Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production. 5 – Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse. 6 – But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.** DOMESTICATION Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics. CONSERVATIVES Most conservatives do not write philosophy, they run businesses, or write history, economics, science, and law. (I write because I was successful enough in multiple businesses to spend my time writing full time.) Conservatives also are actively suppressed in academy and media. This has been true since the end of the war and the rise of the Frankfurt School, and the Postmodern school, both of which were necessary after the failure of marxist pseudoscience. (a pseudoscience marx died knowing, since he stopped writing as soon as he read the Mengerians, and kept silent only to keep the checks coming in from Engels.) Cheers Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.
-
The Result is Eugenic Reproduction
CONSERVATISM = ARISTOCRACY = MERITOCRACY = EMPIRICISM. AND MARKETS ARE EMPIRICAL – AND THE RESULT IS EUGENIC REPRODUCTION 1. A conservative questions the overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus. 2. Conservatism demands human agency over animal impulse. familial, stoic, pragmatic, and empirical. In other words risk averse to capital. 3. A Conservative requires ‘empirical’ results – and where empirical fails, the ‘traditional’ is adequate, since traditional survived empirical tests in competition in reality. 4. A Conservative accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital – attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited. 2. As a means of questioning, a conservative requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat). 5. Conservatism is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly ‘noble’ families. 6. Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families. 7. In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke,smith,hume,adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility. The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science. As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because eugenics are antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008. 1 – Soveriengty requires reciprocity 2 – Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary. 3 – Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism. 4 – Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production. 5 – Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse. 6 – But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.** DOMESTICATION Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics. CONSERVATIVES Most conservatives do not write philosophy, they run businesses, or write history, economics, science, and law. (I write because I was successful enough in multiple businesses to spend my time writing full time.) Conservatives also are actively suppressed in academy and media. This has been true since the end of the war and the rise of the Frankfurt School, and the Postmodern school, both of which were necessary after the failure of marxist pseudoscience. (a pseudoscience marx died knowing, since he stopped writing as soon as he read the Mengerians, and kept silent only to keep the checks coming in from Engels.) Cheers Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.
-
Animal Rights
1 – When we use the term ‘right’ like many terms, we conflate it with moral, legal, just, and a host of other terms that are reducible to “I just want it this way”. 2 – For a right to exist, two or more parties must enter into a contract of some sort whether private (written or verbal), commercial (written), social (norms), or political (laws). A contract consists of an exchange of rights and obligations, and both parties must benefit from it. 3 – That contract must be ‘insured’ (enforced) by a third party. In most cases a headman, a leader, or a judge in a government. 4 – When a breach occurs, one must appeal to the third party, to enforce the rights and obligations under the contract. This is where the term ‘right’ comes from. One enforces a right under contract. 5 – In any contract we must have some set of reciprocal rights and obligations, or it is not rational that the contract was voluntary rather than coerced. 6 – In order to enter into a contract one must be able to understand, consent to it, and perform it. 7 – Animals, children, the elderly, the infirmed, and the incompetent – and aliens if there are any for that matter – cannot necessarily enter into a contract voluntarily, nor perform it, nor be rationally held liable for performance under it. 8 – In fact, some primitive peoples could not, and some still cannot do so. Many if not all people, especially those people with IQ’s in the average range (2/3 of europeans) between 90-110, and almost anyone above 110, can do so. Animals cannot conceive of such things. 9) – Animals – especially complex mammals – are valuable to us. So we extend protections to those animals to prevent people from destroying that value. 10 – We are no longer in a position were we are economically dependent upon preying upon animals for our survival. 11 – We are no longer ignorant of the emotional indifference between ourselves and at least complex animals. 12 – But – and this is the real reason – we are no longer in a position where we desire to, need to, and in many cases, can afford to, tolerate people who treat animals badly. For the simple reason that we do not want such people among us: they have many other nasty habits. And because we have worked hard to extirpate hatred and abuse from the human heart, and we do not want bad behavior imitated. In other words, punishing animal cruelty tends to expose psychopaths in particular. 13 – So animals cannot have rights, but we can extend them protections, as insurers, just as we do other incompetents, not only to rid ourselves of people who behave badly, and not only to continue to train one another to remove hatred and abuse from the human heart, and not only because they are an asset we want to preserve and enhance, and not only because happy animals make the world a better place for us, but because at this point in our development, at least under western conditions, we no longer have the economic need to do otherwise. 14 – However, we must also understand that there is a not insignificant portion of the population – particularly female – that is no longer reproducing or caring for children, and is biochemically directing those energies to animals in lieu of that outlet. Moreover, there is a not insignificant portion of the populace that feels powerless and lacking status, and finds defense of animals or nature as a means of obtaining control (meaning.). There is a not insignificant portion of the populace that is not otherwise productive, is not competent and competition, and seeks meaning through political order instead of economic competition. And there is a not insignificant portion of the populace that finds group participation in rallying politically a means of status seeking and membership seeking. And those are just another set of psychological problems we have not solved in modernity, now that women have control of their reproduction, and legal, and economic independence from their biology. 15 – In other words, we can establish (institutionalize) common property rights (animals are members of the commons) over animals for whatever reason we choose to, and therefore insure them for present and future. We do the same to territory and to arts, and to many things: “You can use this productively but you may not cause negative externality”. Or, You may enjoy its beauty but not destroy it. These are just means of establishing limited property rights over anything we choose to limit property rights. In fact, we rarely grant rights to destroy scarce or valued assets for other than the purpose of consumption or transformation. 16 – But it is impossible for animals to possess rights. It is only possible for us to grant them protections. The fact that the law is ‘imprecise’ in the use of this language is simply yet another problem of vocabulary lagging behind our rate of development.Apr 02, 2018 3:27pm -
Animal Rights
1 – When we use the term ‘right’ like many terms, we conflate it with moral, legal, just, and a host of other terms that are reducible to “I just want it this way”. 2 – For a right to exist, two or more parties must enter into a contract of some sort whether private (written or verbal), commercial (written), social (norms), or political (laws). A contract consists of an exchange of rights and obligations, and both parties must benefit from it. 3 – That contract must be ‘insured’ (enforced) by a third party. In most cases a headman, a leader, or a judge in a government. 4 – When a breach occurs, one must appeal to the third party, to enforce the rights and obligations under the contract. This is where the term ‘right’ comes from. One enforces a right under contract. 5 – In any contract we must have some set of reciprocal rights and obligations, or it is not rational that the contract was voluntary rather than coerced. 6 – In order to enter into a contract one must be able to understand, consent to it, and perform it. 7 – Animals, children, the elderly, the infirmed, and the incompetent – and aliens if there are any for that matter – cannot necessarily enter into a contract voluntarily, nor perform it, nor be rationally held liable for performance under it. 8 – In fact, some primitive peoples could not, and some still cannot do so. Many if not all people, especially those people with IQ’s in the average range (2/3 of europeans) between 90-110, and almost anyone above 110, can do so. Animals cannot conceive of such things. 9) – Animals – especially complex mammals – are valuable to us. So we extend protections to those animals to prevent people from destroying that value. 10 – We are no longer in a position were we are economically dependent upon preying upon animals for our survival. 11 – We are no longer ignorant of the emotional indifference between ourselves and at least complex animals. 12 – But – and this is the real reason – we are no longer in a position where we desire to, need to, and in many cases, can afford to, tolerate people who treat animals badly. For the simple reason that we do not want such people among us: they have many other nasty habits. And because we have worked hard to extirpate hatred and abuse from the human heart, and we do not want bad behavior imitated. In other words, punishing animal cruelty tends to expose psychopaths in particular. 13 – So animals cannot have rights, but we can extend them protections, as insurers, just as we do other incompetents, not only to rid ourselves of people who behave badly, and not only to continue to train one another to remove hatred and abuse from the human heart, and not only because they are an asset we want to preserve and enhance, and not only because happy animals make the world a better place for us, but because at this point in our development, at least under western conditions, we no longer have the economic need to do otherwise. 14 – However, we must also understand that there is a not insignificant portion of the population – particularly female – that is no longer reproducing or caring for children, and is biochemically directing those energies to animals in lieu of that outlet. Moreover, there is a not insignificant portion of the populace that feels powerless and lacking status, and finds defense of animals or nature as a means of obtaining control (meaning.). There is a not insignificant portion of the populace that is not otherwise productive, is not competent and competition, and seeks meaning through political order instead of economic competition. And there is a not insignificant portion of the populace that finds group participation in rallying politically a means of status seeking and membership seeking. And those are just another set of psychological problems we have not solved in modernity, now that women have control of their reproduction, and legal, and economic independence from their biology. 15 – In other words, we can establish (institutionalize) common property rights (animals are members of the commons) over animals for whatever reason we choose to, and therefore insure them for present and future. We do the same to territory and to arts, and to many things: “You can use this productively but you may not cause negative externality”. Or, You may enjoy its beauty but not destroy it. These are just means of establishing limited property rights over anything we choose to limit property rights. In fact, we rarely grant rights to destroy scarce or valued assets for other than the purpose of consumption or transformation. 16 – But it is impossible for animals to possess rights. It is only possible for us to grant them protections. The fact that the law is ‘imprecise’ in the use of this language is simply yet another problem of vocabulary lagging behind our rate of development.Apr 02, 2018 3:27pm