Form: Aphorism

  • We Get What We Measure – Particularly In Economics

    We get what we measure. When we start over in economics by measuring the full suite of capital instead of how fast we burn it down, then economics will be a science rather than an excuse by which to substitute consumption for morality in the production of policy. 😉

  • Gene Machines First

    I think the first difference between my thought and traditional thought, is that i treat us as gene machines first, and our rational and verbal minds as negotiators on behalf of those genes – totally unaware that what we consider good and true are merely instructions from those genes telling us what success conditions are.

  • Gene Machines First

    I think the first difference between my thought and traditional thought, is that i treat us as gene machines first, and our rational and verbal minds as negotiators on behalf of those genes – totally unaware that what we consider good and true are merely instructions from those genes telling us what success conditions are.

  • PAY THE COST OF YOUR OWN (a) domestication (b) dysgenia. We’re not paying for yo

    PAY THE COST OF YOUR OWN

    (a) domestication

    (b) dysgenia.

    We’re not paying for you.

    Our experiment in inclusion failed.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-17 13:15:00 UTC

  • The only people that matter, are the people who fight. That’s why

    The only people that matter, are the people who fight. That’s why.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 21:36:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/985633080634494978

  • NRx provides the correct diagnosis but an impossible and undesirable cure. All b

    NRx provides the correct diagnosis but an impossible and undesirable cure. All but entrepreneurs seek to circumvent property, ownership, and meritocracy, and more and fewer and fewer people participate in risk. We hold back the tide. The tide is just awfully big now.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 21:36:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/985632880314540032

    Reply addressees: @Outsideness

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/985578461220630528


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Outsideness

    Awkward NRx insight: Fascist lunacy is far better tailored to popular acceptance than NRx. …

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/985578461220630528

  • Demographic Capital

    Intellectual capital is over. The globalist era is ending. The only competitive advantages any population has are (a) demographic (b) normative and institutional, and (c) territorial. That’s it. We cannot compete with the numbers. We don’t have them. We gave those numbers away. So the only thing we can do is protect our assets (a) demographic, (b) normative and institutional, and (c) territorial.

  • Demographic Capital

    Intellectual capital is over. The globalist era is ending. The only competitive advantages any population has are (a) demographic (b) normative and institutional, and (c) territorial. That’s it. We cannot compete with the numbers. We don’t have them. We gave those numbers away. So the only thing we can do is protect our assets (a) demographic, (b) normative and institutional, and (c) territorial.

  • In Times of Irregularity

    Everything is easy, and is wit common, in times of regularity. It is those few of us who see the outcome and the great changes that result from those regularities that leave marks on history – not the imbecile who extrapolates trends without warranty then reappears with new pretenses like next season’s fashion designer. There is good reason to follow trend if you are unable to do otherwise, and every reason to act counter to trend if you are able. Contrarianism merely identifies outcomes. But betting on those outcomes is the difference between contrarian signaling and contrarian investment.

  • In Times of Irregularity

    Everything is easy, and is wit common, in times of regularity. It is those few of us who see the outcome and the great changes that result from those regularities that leave marks on history – not the imbecile who extrapolates trends without warranty then reappears with new pretenses like next season’s fashion designer. There is good reason to follow trend if you are unable to do otherwise, and every reason to act counter to trend if you are able. Contrarianism merely identifies outcomes. But betting on those outcomes is the difference between contrarian signaling and contrarian investment.