Form: Aphorism

  • Propertarianism Isn’t Anti Anyone.

    Propertarianism doesn’t tell people they’re ‘bad’, only that they’re doing what they must. Propertarianism only tells us that the only solution to conflict is to pay the underclasses to protect markets by limiting or eliminate there reproduction and the profound costs they and their descendents place on others. It’s the cheapest investment with the highest returns we can make.

  • Propertarianism Isn’t Anti Anyone.

    Propertarianism doesn’t tell people they’re ‘bad’, only that they’re doing what they must. Propertarianism only tells us that the only solution to conflict is to pay the underclasses to protect markets by limiting or eliminate there reproduction and the profound costs they and their descendents place on others. It’s the cheapest investment with the highest returns we can make.

  • Language and Abilities

    ***Languages evolve to suit the ‘computational’ abilities of the demographics that they serve. And they further evolve to to suit the technical, economic, and political complexity that they serve. In most cases, the difference between languages has to do with the demands of their state of development.*** (Worth Repeating)

  • Language and Abilities

    ***Languages evolve to suit the ‘computational’ abilities of the demographics that they serve. And they further evolve to to suit the technical, economic, and political complexity that they serve. In most cases, the difference between languages has to do with the demands of their state of development.*** (Worth Repeating)

  • ***Languages evolve to suit the ‘computational’ abilities of the demographics th

    ***Languages evolve to suit the ‘computational’ abilities of the demographics that they serve. And they further evolve to to suit the technical, economic, and political complexity that they serve. In most cases, the difference between languages has to do with the demands of their state of development.***

    (Worth Repeating)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 13:46:00 UTC

  • THE LIMIT TO THE VALUE OF COOPERATION Cooperation is only valuable until it’s no

    THE LIMIT TO THE VALUE OF COOPERATION

    Cooperation is only valuable until it’s not. Parasitism is not valuable. Predation is not valuable. It’s time to divorce. Revolt and Separate. The future belongs to genetic distributions – with the temporary wealth created by the discovery of hydrocarbons masking our differences.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 10:15:00 UTC

  • We will either separate or terminate – and termination of whom by whom is a rand

    We will either separate or terminate – and termination of whom by whom is a random outcome. Ergo, as always, the optimum solution to conflict is boycott: nationalism.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 07:56:00 UTC

  • THE LAW OF POLICY Whenever political decidability is no longer empirical it must

    THE LAW OF POLICY

    Whenever political decidability is no longer empirical it must of necessity rely on ideology, because empiricism tests reciprocity(equilibrium), and ideology tests extremes(disequilibrium).

    Ergo, either one lives by rule of law, markets, empiricism, and equilibrium, or one lives by rule by discretion, bureaucracy, ideology, and disequilibrium.

    At present our compromise solution is discretion from the use of proceeds of cooperation (taxation), and rule of law (non discretion) for all activity.

    But without nationalism we cannot test nor preserve reciprocity between groups with heterogeneous demands due to heterogeneous distributions.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 07:50:00 UTC

  • Too much enamored with the internet world and digital (proxy) retribution. It’s

    Too much enamored with the internet world and digital (proxy) retribution. It’s damage to the physical plant that is costly – and changes behavior.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-17 14:21:00 UTC

  • We Get What We Measure – Particularly In Economics

    We get what we measure. When we start over in economics by measuring the full suite of capital instead of how fast we burn it down, then economics will be a science rather than an excuse by which to substitute consumption for morality in the production of policy. 😉