Whenever political decidability is no longer empirical it must of necessity rely on ideology, because empiricism tests reciprocity(equilibrium), and ideology tests extremes(disequilibrium). Ergo, either one lives by rule of law, markets, empiricism, and equilibrium, or one lives by rule by discretion, bureaucracy, ideology, and disequilibrium. At present our compromise solution is discretion from the use of proceeds of cooperation (taxation), and rule of law (non discretion) for all activity. But without nationalism we cannot test nor preserve reciprocity between groups with heterogeneous demands due to heterogeneous distributions. Apr 18, 2018 7:50am
Form: Aphorism
-
The Law of Policy
Whenever political decidability is no longer empirical it must of necessity rely on ideology, because empiricism tests reciprocity(equilibrium), and ideology tests extremes(disequilibrium). Ergo, either one lives by rule of law, markets, empiricism, and equilibrium, or one lives by rule by discretion, bureaucracy, ideology, and disequilibrium. At present our compromise solution is discretion from the use of proceeds of cooperation (taxation), and rule of law (non discretion) for all activity. But without nationalism we cannot test nor preserve reciprocity between groups with heterogeneous demands due to heterogeneous distributions. Apr 18, 2018 7:50am
-
The Limit to The Value of Cooperation
Cooperation is only valuable until it’s not. Parasitism is not valuable. Predation is not valuable. It’s time to divorce. Revolt and Separate. The future belongs to genetic distributions – with the temporary wealth created by the discovery of hydrocarbons masking our differences.
-
The Limit to The Value of Cooperation
Cooperation is only valuable until it’s not. Parasitism is not valuable. Predation is not valuable. It’s time to divorce. Revolt and Separate. The future belongs to genetic distributions – with the temporary wealth created by the discovery of hydrocarbons masking our differences.
-
The Cost of Running Civilizational Tests
Ancient (primitive) peoples could not afford to perform experiments that tested the theories (promises, testimony) of the priesthoods. And some of those theories were untestable. We have run those tests today. Even though we could not afford them. And the result was the dark ages, and the continental enlightenment/marxist/postmodernist attempt to return to them. Apr 18, 2018 12:26pm
-
The Cost of Running Civilizational Tests
Ancient (primitive) peoples could not afford to perform experiments that tested the theories (promises, testimony) of the priesthoods. And some of those theories were untestable. We have run those tests today. Even though we could not afford them. And the result was the dark ages, and the continental enlightenment/marxist/postmodernist attempt to return to them. Apr 18, 2018 12:26pm
-
Verisimilitude and Convergence on The Truth
If you conduct your research with the scientific method, then you will simply attempt to falsify everything until no matter what you do you start producing increasingly similar answers. When you cannot find a way to come to a dissimilar answer then you have either converged on the truth, or some approximation of it given the knowledge, logic, and tools available to us at the time
-
Verisimilitude and Convergence on The Truth
If you conduct your research with the scientific method, then you will simply attempt to falsify everything until no matter what you do you start producing increasingly similar answers. When you cannot find a way to come to a dissimilar answer then you have either converged on the truth, or some approximation of it given the knowledge, logic, and tools available to us at the time
-
Group Genetic Indifference at Scale
Our group genetic differences are indifferent at scale as long as our distributions of the classes are indifferent at scale. The problem facing all groups is the size of their underclasses: THEY ARE NEVER SMALL ENOUGH.
-
Group Genetic Indifference at Scale
Our group genetic differences are indifferent at scale as long as our distributions of the classes are indifferent at scale. The problem facing all groups is the size of their underclasses: THEY ARE NEVER SMALL ENOUGH.