(I wish more people would simply ask questions, rather than try to debate me – very, very few people can participate in non-trivial debate – but then I don’t want to suppress, and instead I want to celebrate, the male desire to learn through competition. The problem with learning through competition is understanding that you’re testing yourself, not the other. I run my classroom so to speak as a great game of king of the hill, because I understand that competition and heroism is how men are willing to ‘invest’ in their education, the same way that women are willing to invest by obedience and conformity. Men need a game – a proxy for war – to have the incentive to learn. This is why mixed-gender education is literally causing brain damage to men.)
Form: Aphorism
-
The Intellectually Honest Skeptic Asks, the Intellectually Dishonest Overconfident Demands.
(I wish more people would simply ask questions, rather than try to debate me – very, very few people can participate in non-trivial debate – but then I don’t want to suppress, and instead I want to celebrate, the male desire to learn through competition. The problem with learning through competition is understanding that you’re testing yourself, not the other. I run my classroom so to speak as a great game of king of the hill, because I understand that competition and heroism is how men are willing to ‘invest’ in their education, the same way that women are willing to invest by obedience and conformity. Men need a game – a proxy for war – to have the incentive to learn. This is why mixed-gender education is literally causing brain damage to men.)
-
—“Natural Law Fundamentalism”–
Well, don’t be an idiot. Of COURSE that’s what I’m doing. The most intolerant wins. And Truth is the most intolerant of all.
-
—“Natural Law Fundamentalism”–
Well, don’t be an idiot. Of COURSE that’s what I’m doing. The most intolerant wins. And Truth is the most intolerant of all.
-
Mankind Does Not Need Many Judges, It Needs a Plan, Generals, and Soldiers.
The number of people alive at anyone time that can transcend the animal is very small. The number who cannot but will follow those who can if it is in their interests is large. The number who will follow those *assuming they will apply the violence to restore the production of agency via truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, and markets in everything, is far and above enough. We convince those that are capable of agency, we provide strategy for those who follow those with it, and provide material incentive to those neither able nor understanding, but whose interests we serve. And we bend the rest to our will or we end the need to. Mankind does not need many judges, it needs a plan, generals, and soldiers. The masses just follow the order the strong institute, and it is very hard to argue with the imposition of natural law by the ongoing suppression of free riding, parasitism and predation, by deceit, fraud, theft, and violence. May 13, 2018 7:00pm
-
Mankind Does Not Need Many Judges, It Needs a Plan, Generals, and Soldiers.
The number of people alive at anyone time that can transcend the animal is very small. The number who cannot but will follow those who can if it is in their interests is large. The number who will follow those *assuming they will apply the violence to restore the production of agency via truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, and markets in everything, is far and above enough. We convince those that are capable of agency, we provide strategy for those who follow those with it, and provide material incentive to those neither able nor understanding, but whose interests we serve. And we bend the rest to our will or we end the need to. Mankind does not need many judges, it needs a plan, generals, and soldiers. The masses just follow the order the strong institute, and it is very hard to argue with the imposition of natural law by the ongoing suppression of free riding, parasitism and predation, by deceit, fraud, theft, and violence. May 13, 2018 7:00pm
-
In any dispute between to testimonies regarding the same phenomenon, we have two
In any dispute between to testimonies regarding the same phenomenon, we have two tests of decidability:
1- Rationality (incentives)
2 – Parsimony (occam’s razor)
If the incentive exist to fictionalize, and if fictionalism is defeated by parsimony, then the person is in fact lying.
The only time to use a god is via positiva (poetic meaning and communication) but it cannot be used via negativa (truth or argument).
The reason gods were necessary is intergenerational transfer. if gods were mortal they could not explain the long standing.
A god is just a unit of measure of the intertemporal.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 10:41:00 UTC
-
THE INTELLECTUALLY HONEST SKEPTIC ASKS, THE INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST OVERCONFIDE
THE INTELLECTUALLY HONEST SKEPTIC ASKS, THE INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST OVERCONFIDENT DEMANDS.
(I wish more people would simply ask questions, rather than try to debate me – very, very few people can participate in non-trivial debate – but then I don’t want to suppress, and instead I want to celebrate, the male desire to learn through competition. The problem with learning through competition is understanding that you’re testing yourself, not the other. I run my classroom so to speak as a great game of king of the hill, because I understand that competition and heroism is how men are willing to ‘invest’ in their education, the same way that women are willing to invest by obedience and conformity. Men need a game – a proxy for war – to have the incentive to learn. This is why mixed-gender education is literally causing brain damage to men.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 09:52:00 UTC
-
All justificationism is false. We can perform deductions (necessary), inductions
All justificationism is false. We can perform deductions (necessary), inductions (contingent), abductions (free associations), but in the end deduction or induction, or abduction only provide us with an hypothesis that must survive falsification.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-11 20:35:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995039823869239298
Reply addressees: @Noblesm85
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994979373349527552
IN REPLY TO:
@Noblesm85
@curtdoolittle You: We don’t need to make a statement about the physical universe because our actions aren’t contingent upon our understanding; even though I’m going to pretend that my actions actually gives me a piece of evolutionary knowledge- which I made no hypothesis on.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994979373349527552
-
Recipes for action (operations), vs search algorithms for finding opportunities.
Recipes for action (operations), vs search algorithms for finding opportunities.
You probably can’t invert from justification to falsification and permanent uncertainty.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-11 20:33:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995039174335062016
Reply addressees: @Noblesm85
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994979373349527552
IN REPLY TO:
@Noblesm85
@curtdoolittle You: We don’t need to make a statement about the physical universe because our actions aren’t contingent upon our understanding; even though I’m going to pretend that my actions actually gives me a piece of evolutionary knowledge- which I made no hypothesis on.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994979373349527552