Moral men do not want to rule. That is precisely why we must rule.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-17 20:46:00 UTC
Moral men do not want to rule. That is precisely why we must rule.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-17 20:46:00 UTC
You are only ruled by others because you refuse to rule. Do you understand?
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-17 18:39:00 UTC
Every forced transfer is a loss at the expense of an opportunity for a productive reciprocal exchange. The exchange the wealthy desire is respect for property of all kinds, leading to stoicism in the individual, since it is only stoicism that both requires action and prevents all imposition of costs upon *everything*: display (sound, sight, appearance, movement), word, and deed.
The underclass wants redistribution AND discounts on consumption without paying the cost of respect for the property that makes it possible: physical, behavioral, informational, institutional, territorial, environmental.
The underclass lacks agency which is the reason for their low GMV (genetic market value: reproductive, social, economic, informational, political, and military).
If we train one another in stoicism we can implement redistribution.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-17 14:15:00 UTC
Every forced transfer is a loss at the expense of an opportunity for a productive reciprocal exchange. The exchange the wealthy desire is respect for property of all kinds, leading to stoicism in the individual, since it is only stoicism that both requires action and prevents all imposition of costs upon *everything*: display (sound, sight, appearance, movement), word, and deed. The underclass wants redistribution AND discounts on consumption without paying the cost of respect for the property that makes it possible: physical, behavioral, informational, institutional, territorial, environmental. The underclass lacks agency which is the reason for their low GMV (genetic market value: reproductive, social, economic, informational, political, and military). If we train one another in stoicism we can implement redistribution.
THERE IS ONLY ONE LAW, AND NO OTHER
There is no reason for a basis of law other than reciprocity except to create a law of non-reciprocity (free riding, fraud, theft, harm, and to export risk upon others by taking actions that one cannot pay the restitution for if one fails.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-16 17:17:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/996801703734325248
THERE IS ONLY ONE LAW, AND NO OTHER
There is no reason for a basis of law other than reciprocity except to create a law of non-reciprocity (free riding, fraud, theft, harm, and to export risk upon others by taking actions that one cannot pay the restitution for if one fails.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-16 13:16:00 UTC
If your goal is to improve an idiot – it’s hopeless. if your goal is to reduce the spread of idiocy – it’s not hopeless but nearly. If your goal is to improve your ability to communicate your ideas, argue your ideas, and argue against ignorance, error, bias and deceit – then that’s something else. The chief value of public discourse is not conversion – it’s self improvement.
If your goal is to improve an idiot – it’s hopeless. if your goal is to reduce the spread of idiocy – it’s not hopeless but nearly. If your goal is to improve your ability to communicate your ideas, argue your ideas, and argue against ignorance, error, bias and deceit – then that’s something else. The chief value of public discourse is not conversion – it’s self improvement.
THE PURPOSE OF PUBLIC DEBATE?
If your goal is to improve an idiot – it’s hopeless.
if your goal is to reduce the spread of idiocy – it’s not hopeless but nearly.
If your goal is to improve your ability to communicate your ideas, argue your ideas, and argue against ignorance, error, bias and deceit – then that’s something else.
The chief value of public discourse is not conversion – it’s self improvement.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-15 20:27:00 UTC
Once you understand (((they))) are all cognitively female, everything else they do makes perfect sense. Really. Like I said, the competitive differences between human groups are reducible to a very small number of traits that express gender differences during development. Our free will is limited by these differences. We know not what we do. We just do.