In the battles of sophisms between sophists the articulate wins. that’s the problem: we want truth to win.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-09 14:43:00 UTC
In the battles of sophisms between sophists the articulate wins. that’s the problem: we want truth to win.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-09 14:43:00 UTC
You can use sophism to state a truth or sophism to state a falsehood. By using sophism to state a truth you have done nothing to insure that truth against defeat by sophisms that are false.
(yes, I mean you, jordan peterson, et al.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-09 14:42:00 UTC
The vast majority of Women try to reduce or eliminate social threats, so they conform to whatever power they perceive. It’s not rational from a male perspective because if there is an external threat women will rapidly and easily undermine the men (their host).
The vast majority of Women try to reduce or eliminate social threats, so they conform to whatever power they perceive. It’s not rational from a male perspective because if there is an external threat women will rapidly and easily undermine the men (their host).
Truth has no mercy. It slaughters our most cherished lies. Without mercy.
And without those lies we have no choice but truth and markets.
And no means of circumventing exchanges.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-09 12:10:00 UTC
The left will continue to double down.
The right will say ‘enough’.
It’s not complicated.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 22:18:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993978369120358402
Well, moral LAW is objective (Logical and Scientific), moral NORMS are evolved, and moral PREFERENCES are expression of personal reproductive strategy. The problem is everyone assumes it works the other way ’round.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 22:16:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993978073547714561
THE MATTER OF TROY (GREECE)
Homer. Enuff Said.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 21:30:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993966495154700290
The left will continue to double down.
The right will say ‘enough’.
It’s not complicated.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 18:17:00 UTC
I don’t try to be smarter than people in history unless they do things for deceptive, emotional, or ideological reasons. We all make calculations given sparse information in real time and under stress, and we all get some of them wrong. Study Napoleon for a perfect autistic (infovore seizing opportunities), and study hannibal for the opposite (slow construction of a strategy), and study Rommel and Alexander for mastering tactical maneuver with professional forces, and study islam for ‘raid them to death and destroy their whole civilization by daily small sieges’.