DARWIN VIA NEGATIVA
—“Natural selection works by Non-survival of the unfit, not survival of the fittest. The fittest merely reproduce more; the unfit become extinct.”– Brandon Vaughn
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-09 12:58:00 UTC
DARWIN VIA NEGATIVA
—“Natural selection works by Non-survival of the unfit, not survival of the fittest. The fittest merely reproduce more; the unfit become extinct.”– Brandon Vaughn
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-09 12:58:00 UTC
DEFINITION: NATURE
That which exists and changes state according to available operations imposed by the physical laws of the universe, independent of the mind or actions of man. In other words, existence free of imagination, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, psueoscience and deceit.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-13 16:10:00 UTC
DEFINITION: SCIENCE:
“The elimination of imaginary information from our statements of observation.”
Science: via-negativa: the elimination of imagination, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, or deceit.
The rest is ample curiosity, patience, discipline, hard work, and tool-making – whether those tools are cognitive and logical, or physical and measurable.
As the scale of our inquiry decreases to the small, or increases to the large, or peers into the past, or into the future, or into the fast, or into the slow, we must reduce that which we cannot perceive and compare to that which we can perceive and compare.
That process is largely a constituted in the development of logical and physical instrumentation by which we can sense and perceive and compare that which we cannot without the assistance of logical or physical instrumentation.
In other words, Science consists in that discipline under which we struggle to distill the truth from the results of free association within our imaginations (and the imaginations of others).
Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-13 14:06:00 UTC
Aristotle invented what we call science today:” the elimination of imaginary information from our statements of observation.”
It took through the Machiavelli to develop it in social science. It took until Bacon to develop it in general use. It took until darwin and maxwell to remove most of the remaining uses. I’m just removing it from psychology, sociology, group evolutionary strategy, and law. The problem for most thinkers in the past was the conflation of mathematics and platonism, and the conflation of reason and supernaturalism. Once deflated we are left with states, transformations, and the operations required to conduct those transformations: recipes. All else is some version of history, literature, and mythology. The reason we require myth, literature, and history, is because it takes very little cognitive power or knowledge to understand myth (cartoonish hyperbole for the purpose of reducing experience), literature (analogy to experience), and history (reduction of complexity beyond direct experience).
It doesn’t matter what similar errors they made – they were men of their time. it matters that between Augustine, Plato, and Aristotle, we obtained theological, platonic, and scientific traditions, which roughly match the cognitive abilities of our classes. We can easily categorize all thought as deflationary and true, conflationary and analogical, or conflationary and false (deceptive).
What matters is that one cannot argue truthfully only meaningfully across them, and decidability is ALWAYS provided by the scientific.
So, we have decidabile and true on one end, meainginful and allegorical in the middle, and deceitful and supernatural on the opposite end.
Decidable/True — Meaningful/Allegorical — Deceitful/False
deduciblity —————- inference —————– misdirection
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-13 13:22:00 UTC
When you see the universe as nothing but in formation in different states, the whole bundle of frustration with other peoples becomes not one of ill intention, but of lagging genetics and bad information.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-10 15:17:00 UTC
ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE ACADEMIC DISCIPLINES
I take economists seriously in their criticism of social science. I take physicists seriously in their criticism of economics. I take philosophers seriously in their criticism of physics. I take historians seriously in their criticism of philosophy. I take the common law seriously in its criticism of the history of man. For man, in every discipline, the mirror always lies.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law of Sovereign Men
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 07:58:00 UTC
Um… before I say anything, lets remember that I claim no special knowledge of physics. What I claim is to understand the categories of errors man makes that we must circumvent in order to make each generational leap in dimensional knowledge.
It is very hard to believe that E8 is not the map of the full set of forces, given how ‘simple’ that explanation is, the problem of dark (non-reflective) matter, the apparent volume of that matter in the universe, and that the missing particles (forces), in that model would be ‘heavy’ (massive), and that we are still relatively blind or ignorant to the constitution of space time.
My current opinion is that the particles(forces) we do not yet understand, if found, will inform us, and that we have spent the better part of a century now making fairly little progress, because of the limits of visible (reflective) matter, and the vast distraction provided by the chimera of mathematical physics, just as we spent the majority of the 20th century in the vast distraction of the logic of language and sets.
As for the wave function collapse, probability, schrodenger, and multiple worlds, the most simple answer (and the universe keeps telling us it’s simple) is that we do not understand space time. And that all this mathematics is pretty much just “jerking off” for grant money.
We have one present problem in physics that I know of and that is dark matter. Until we solve that problem, or back into the problem with an explanatory theory (E8), everything else is the modern equivalent of contemplating how many angels can dance on a pin.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-26 19:49:00 UTC
@jordanbpeterson Dr Peterson (Harris 10) Science is a juridical discipline: via-negativa. Literature a moral discipline: via-positiva.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-24 17:42:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/823949007437332480
PLATONISM IS JUST FRAUD. PLAIN AND SIMPLE.
There is no matter except as a function of the limits of our actions.
As far as we know existence is constructed of forces.
The relations between those forces exist.
From that set of relations between those forces, some set of operations are possible.
The states of equilibrium that those forces rest within.
Everything is constructed from the operations that are possible between those forces.
Our experience of the universe is limited by the limits of our actions.
The universe is not capable of introspection, planning, or choice.
We can, because we can remember, search, model, and forecast, identify the forces and operations at various scales of the universe starting with human scale and working in both directions large and small.
We can make and test observations and create those theories of observations we call ‘facts’.
We can use operations to attempt to transform that which we observe between states.
We can create stories (narratives) theories to attempt to explain those transformations (we call these stories ‘theories’)
We can create many ‘crutches’ to assist us in memory, recall, comparison, and operation given the limits or our actions (the limits of our perception, memory, categorization, and comparison).
We call these crutches by many names.
But they are must memories.
They exist as memories.
Memories limited by our ability to act (change state).
Fragmentary relations subject to constant revision the construction of which we are unable to analyze through introspection.
The experience of which we cannot analyze through introspection but can analyze through mechanical inspection.
And through that inspection we can easily observe some variation of (overly simplistically stated) a brainstem that operates purely mechanically.
a lower brain that senses change in state and rewards or punishes.
a midbrain that produces wants and incentives.
an upper brain that performs various complex functions of memory and recall.
a forebrain that organizes into the language of negotiation the wants of what operates beneath it.
And our consciousness consists of the experience of what we can judge within a 2-3 second window worth of iterations of stimuli mixed with those memories and fed to different brain regions and the rewards and punishments that our brain gives us as instructions produced through millennia of evolution.
As far as I know the forces in different states, and the opportunities to change state that we call operations, and our memories exist.
Giving other-worldly names to nothing other than the experience of memories and the associations we find by searching those memories, is to conflate the physical changes in state, the results of those changes in state upon our ongoing iteration of perceptions, and the reality that exists whether we imagine it or not.
This conflation, like all forms of conflation, is the origin of deception of the self and others. Conversely, the west is the only civilization to successfully create and retain deflationary truth. We did so because the adults practice law out of necessity, and the warriors pay the price for wishful thinking and pretence. And the priests and the little people including the philosophers are simply malcontents trying to create excuses to circumvent that law and steal.
SUGGESTION
We think by suggestion, we communicate by suggestion, we understand by suggestion, but we truth-test through criticism (due diligence).
And we have a name for those who fail to perform due diligence in order to negotiate on behalf of their wants:
FRAUD.
As far as I know, all platonism is fraud. fraud by learned habit. fraud by convenience. fraud by intent.
BUT ITS JUST FRAUD.
Humans seek to acquire. If you cannot acquire truthfully, then you are acquiring untruthfully.
FRAUD.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-11 14:51:00 UTC
On book research- NASA.
Partial book research – tesla.
Off book research – patents.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-24 13:08:00 UTC